Difference between revisions of "Commentators:R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz (Keli Yekar)/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Import script)
(Import script)
 
Line 47: Line 47:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Name</b> – ר' שלמה אפרים בן אהרן מלונטשיץ&#8206;<fn>R. Shelomo Ephraim writes at the end of his <a href="KeliYekarIntroduction" data-aht="source">Introduction to the Keli Yekar</a> that his name Shelomo was added in 1601 during a serious illness. For most of his life, he was known as R. Ephraim of Luntschitz, and nowadays he is often simply referred to by the name of his most famous work, the "Keli Yekar".</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Name</b> – ר' שלמה אפרים בן אהרן מלונטשיץ&#8206;<fn>R. Shelomo Ephraim writes at the end of his <a href="KeliYekarIntroduction" data-aht="source">Introduction to the Keli Yekar</a> that his name Shelomo was added in 1601 during a serious illness. For most of his life, he was known as R. Ephraim of Luntschitz, and nowadays he is often simply referred to by the name of his most famous work, the "Keli Yekar".</fn></li>
<li><b>Dates</b> – c. 1550<fn>This approximation is derived from the combination of the Keli Yekar's two statements that he wrote the Ir Gibborim (published in 1580) in his youth (see his Introduction to that work) and that he had reached old age by the time the Ammudei Shesh was published in 1617 (see his note preceding the Introduction there).</fn> – 1619<fn>R. Yechiel Halperin in Seder HaDorot (p.251) records the date of his death as the night of 7 Iyyar 5779, citing the "פנקס חבורה דק"ק פראג" (which also offers other details concerning the dispute which arose when the Keli Yekar's students wanted to personally tend to his corpse).  [A later restoration of his tombstone apparently misinterpreted the original inscription, and mistakenly engraved 7 Adar Sheni – see the discussion of A. Stern, מליצי אש על חדשי ניסן אייר&#8206; (Galanta, 1930): 208-209.]</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Dates</b> – c. 1550<fn>This approximation is derived from the combination of the Keli Yekar's two statements that he wrote the Ir Gibborim (published in 1580) in his youth (see his Introduction to that work) and that he had reached old age by the time the Ammudei Shesh was published in 1617 (see his note preceding the Introduction there).</fn> – 1619<fn>R. Yechiel Halperin in Seder HaDorot (p.251), citing the "פנקס חבורה דק״ק פראג", records the date of the Keli Yekar's death as the night of 7 Iyyar 5379. The Keli Yekar's <a href="\5#Tombstone" data-aht="page">refurbished tombstone inscription</a>, however, reads that he died on 7 Adar 5379. [A. Stern, מליצי אש על חדשי ניסן אייר&#8206; (Galanta, 1930): 208-209, claims that the later restoration of the tombstone misinterpreted the original inscription. However, Stern's main argument assumes that the tombstone reads "ז׳ אדר שני שע״ט" instead of "ז׳ אדר שנת שע״ט".]</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Locations</b> – Born in Leczyca (Luntschitz),<fn>Luntschitz was the Jewish name for the Polish town of Leczyca.</fn> studied in Lublin, lived in Jaroslaw and Lemberg, and served as Rabbi in Prague.</li>
 
<li><b>Locations</b> – Born in Leczyca (Luntschitz),<fn>Luntschitz was the Jewish name for the Polish town of Leczyca.</fn> studied in Lublin, lived in Jaroslaw and Lemberg, and served as Rabbi in Prague.</li>
<li><b>Occupation</b> – R. Shelomo Ephraim gained his reputation as an itinerant preacher,<fn>Traveling through Lublin, Jaroslaw, Lemberg and other towns.</fn> and was considered to be the preeminent <i>darshan</i> of his era in Poland.<fn>In his introductions to Siftei Daat and Ammudei Shesh, he describes how he was asked to deliver sermons at large public gatherings (even before he became Rabbi of Prague).</fn>  In 1604, he was called to Prague to serve as head of the yeshivah and rabbinical court,<fn>In the introduction to his Ammudei Shesh, R. Shelomo Ephraim dates his being summoned to Prague to Adar 5364.  There he describes the difficult burden which he assumed, and how it minimized his continued literary output.  He proceeds to explain that it was only the plague that forced him to temporarily flee Prague in 1606 which afforded him the respite to produce the Ammudei Shesh.  [Anyone who could fled Prague in the fall of 1606, including the famed Johannes Kepler.]  Similar themes are found in his earlier introduction to Siftei Daat.  There he writes that after three years of serving as the head of the rabbinical court in Prague, the community relieved him of these responsibilities and instead allowed him to devote more time to delivering sermons.</fn> later becoming the chief rabbi of Prague upon the death of the Maharal in 1609.</li>
+
<li><b>Occupation</b> – R. Shelomo Ephraim gained his reputation as an itinerant preacher,<fn>Traveling through Lublin, Jaroslaw, Lemberg and other towns.</fn> and was considered to be the preeminent <i>darshan</i> of his era in Poland.<fn>In his introductions to Siftei Daat and Ammudei Shesh, he describes how he was asked to deliver sermons at large public gatherings (even before he became Rabbi of Prague).</fn>  In 1604, he was called to Prague to serve as head of the yeshivah and rabbinical court,<fn>In the introduction to his Ammudei Shesh, R. Shelomo Ephraim dates his being summoned to Prague to Adar 5364.  There he describes the difficult burden which he assumed, and how it minimized his continued literary output.  He proceeds to explain that it was only the plague that forced him to temporarily flee Prague in 1606 which afforded him the respite to produce the Ammudei Shesh.  [Anyone who could, fled Prague in the fall of 1606, including the famed Johannes Kepler.]  Similar themes are found in his earlier introduction to Siftei Daat.  There he writes that after three years of serving as the head of the rabbinical court in Prague, the community relieved him of these responsibilities and instead allowed him to devote more time to delivering sermons.</fn> later becoming the chief rabbi of Prague upon the death of the Maharal in 1609.</li>
 
<li><b>Family</b> – The occupation of the Keli Yekar's father is the subject of debate.<fn>See Ben-Sasson, Wealth, who suggests that he was not a rabbi and that this made the Keli Yekar one of the few East European scholars of the day who had no close relation in a position of communal or rabbinical leadership (see below for Keli Yekar's critique of the societal elite).  R. Shelomo Ephraim, however, refers to his father using rabbinic terms of reverence, and see sources cited by Levin, Seeing: 48-49.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Family</b> – The occupation of the Keli Yekar's father is the subject of debate.<fn>See Ben-Sasson, Wealth, who suggests that he was not a rabbi and that this made the Keli Yekar one of the few East European scholars of the day who had no close relation in a position of communal or rabbinical leadership (see below for Keli Yekar's critique of the societal elite).  R. Shelomo Ephraim, however, refers to his father using rabbinic terms of reverence, and see sources cited by Levin, Seeing: 48-49.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Teachers</b> – R. Shelomo Luria,<fn>The Keli Yekar refers to him as his teacher in Ir Gibborim, Parashat Metzora.</fn> Maharal<fn>The Keli Yekar came into contact with Maharal very late in life, but nevertheless, Maharal's views seem to have influenced him. See, on this topic, J. Elbaum's review of A. Neher's פרק בתרבות יהודי אשכנז במאה השש-עשרה, in Tarbiz 55 (1986): 145-159. Neher claims that Keli Yekar is saturated with the Maharal's ideas, despite no explicit mention of him. While Elbaum agrees that his educational views (e.g. his opposition to pilpul – see S. Assaf, מקורות לתולדות החינוך בישראל, Vol. 1 (Tel Aviv, 1954): 45-52) were influenced by Maharal, he argues that Neher overstates Maharal's influence.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Teachers</b> – R. Shelomo Luria,<fn>The Keli Yekar refers to him as his teacher in Ir Gibborim, Parashat Metzora.</fn> Maharal<fn>The Keli Yekar came into contact with Maharal very late in life, but nevertheless, Maharal's views seem to have influenced him. See, on this topic, J. Elbaum's review of A. Neher's פרק בתרבות יהודי אשכנז במאה השש-עשרה, in Tarbiz 55 (1986): 145-159. Neher claims that Keli Yekar is saturated with the Maharal's ideas, despite no explicit mention of him. While Elbaum agrees that his educational views (e.g. his opposition to pilpul – see S. Assaf, מקורות לתולדות החינוך בישראל, Vol. 1 (Tel Aviv, 1954): 45-52) were influenced by Maharal, he argues that Neher overstates Maharal's influence.</fn></li>
<li><b>Contemporaries</b> – R. Mordechai Yafeh,<fn>R. Mordechai (also known as the Levush) was older than the Keli Yekar, but they served together on the Council of the Four Lands.</fn> R. David Gans,<fn>R. David Gans was an important rabbinical scholar, historian, mathematician, geographer, and astronomer. See next note.</fn> R. Yom Tov Lipmann Heller,<fn>In 1612, the Keli Yekar, along with R. Yom Tov Lipmann Heller, provided an approbation to a work of astronomy published in Prague by R. David Gans. See A. Neher, "חומר חדש על דוד גנז כתוכן", Tarbiz 45 (1976): 141.  Toward the end of R. Shelomo Ephraim's Ammudei Shesh (Prague ed., 38b), he recommends studying Mishna with R. Heller's newly published commentary, the Tosefot Yom Tov.</fn> R. Avraham Horowitz<fn>R. Avraham was the father of the "Shelah", R. Yeshayah Horowitz.  The Shelah was the Keli Yekar's assistant in Prague and ultimately succeeded him as the Rabbi of Prague.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Contemporaries</b> – R. Mordechai Yafeh,<fn>R. Mordechai (also known as the Levush) was older than the Keli Yekar, but they served together on the Council of the Four Lands.</fn> R. David Gans,<fn>R. David Gans was an important rabbinical scholar, historian, mathematician, geographer, and astronomer. See next note.</fn> R. Yom Tov Lipmann Heller,<fn>In 1612, the Keli Yekar, along with R. Yom Tov Lipmann Heller, provided an approbation to a work of astronomy published in Prague by R. David Gans. See A. Neher, "חומר חדש על דוד גנז כתוכן", Tarbiz 45 (1976): 141.  Toward the end of R. Shelomo Ephraim's Ammudei Shesh (Prague ed., 38b), he recommends studying Mishna with R. Heller's newly published commentary, the Tosefot Yom Tov.</fn> R. Avraham Horowitz<fn>R. Avraham was the father of the "Shelah", R. Yeshayah Horowitz.  The Shelah was the Keli Yekar's assistant in Prague and ultimately succeeded him as the Rabbi of Prague.  They are co-signed on an approbation affixed to the <a href="http://www.hebrewbooks.org/11724">1616-1618 Prague edition</a> of the Yam Shel Shelomo.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Students</b> – R. Shabtai Horowitz<fn>He was the son of the Shelah and the author of ווי העמודים (see note below regarding its introduction).</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Students</b> – R. Shabtai Horowitz<fn>He was the son of the Shelah and the author of ווי העמודים (see note below regarding its introduction).</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Time period</b> – R. Shelomo Ephraim lived at a time of relative prosperity and wealth for the Jews of Poland. A new class emerged of very wealthy Jewish estate owners,<fn>They actually held their land through lease.</fn> as well as an affluent class of Jews working for them. The new financial elite assumed important leadership roles throughout Polish Jewish communities, and much of the Keli Yekar's preaching was devoted to the flaws of this class, and to the problems of social stratification in general.<fn>See Ben-Sasson, Wealth.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Time period</b> – R. Shelomo Ephraim lived at a time of relative prosperity and wealth for the Jews of Poland. A new class emerged of very wealthy Jewish estate owners,<fn>They actually held their land through lease.</fn> as well as an affluent class of Jews working for them. The new financial elite assumed important leadership roles throughout Polish Jewish communities, and much of the Keli Yekar's preaching was devoted to the flaws of this class, and to the problems of social stratification in general.<fn>See Ben-Sasson, Wealth.</fn></li>

Latest revision as of 06:33, 4 December 2014

R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz (Keli Yekar)

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Keli Yekar
Name
R. Shelomo Ephraim b. Aharon Luntschitz, Keli Yekar
ר' שלמה אפרים בן אהרן מלונטשיץ, כלי יקר
Datesc. 1550 – 1619
LocationPoland
WorksCommentary on Torah, collections of Derashot
Exegetical Characteristics
Influenced byMaharshal, Maharal
Impacted on

Background1

Life

  • Name – ר' שלמה אפרים בן אהרן מלונטשיץ‎2
  • Dates – c. 15503 – 16194
  • Locations – Born in Leczyca (Luntschitz),5 studied in Lublin, lived in Jaroslaw and Lemberg, and served as Rabbi in Prague.
  • Occupation – R. Shelomo Ephraim gained his reputation as an itinerant preacher,6 and was considered to be the preeminent darshan of his era in Poland.7 In 1604, he was called to Prague to serve as head of the yeshivah and rabbinical court,8 later becoming the chief rabbi of Prague upon the death of the Maharal in 1609.
  • Family – The occupation of the Keli Yekar's father is the subject of debate.9
  • Teachers – R. Shelomo Luria,10 Maharal11
  • Contemporaries – R. Mordechai Yafeh,12 R. David Gans,13 R. Yom Tov Lipmann Heller,14 R. Avraham Horowitz15
  • Students – R. Shabtai Horowitz16
  • Time period – R. Shelomo Ephraim lived at a time of relative prosperity and wealth for the Jews of Poland. A new class emerged of very wealthy Jewish estate owners,17 as well as an affluent class of Jews working for them. The new financial elite assumed important leadership roles throughout Polish Jewish communities, and much of the Keli Yekar's preaching was devoted to the flaws of this class, and to the problems of social stratification in general.18

Works

Torah Commentary

Characteristics

  • Verse by verse / Topical
  • Genre
  • Structure
  • Language

Methods

Themes

  • – The commentary incorporates the emphasis on ethics and morals and critique of the societal elite which characterized his preaching.

Textual Issues

  • Manuscripts
  • Printings
  • Textual layers

Sources

Significant Influences

  • Earlier Sources
  • Teachers
  • Foils

Occasional Usage

Possible Relationship

Impact

Later exegetes

Supercommentaries