Difference between revisions of "Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian/1/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Original Author: Rabbi Hillel Novetsky)
(Original Author: Rabbi Hillel Novetsky)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
<figure class="thumb">
 
<figure class="thumb">
<aht page="Moshe Killing the Egyptian in Art"><img src="Media/2Shemot/02/Moshe - Mitzri - Szyk.gif"/></aht>
+
<a href="Moshe Killing the Egyptian in Art" data-aht="page"><img src="Media/2Shemot/02/Moshe - Mitzri - Szyk.gif"/></a>
<figcaption>(<aht page="Moshe Killing the Egyptian in Art">Click for this topic in art</aht>)</figcaption>
+
<figcaption>(<a href="Moshe Killing the Egyptian in Art" data-aht="page">Click for this topic in art</a>)</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 
<h2>Moshe's Violent Debut</h2>
 
<h2>Moshe's Violent Debut</h2>
Line 17: Line 17:
 
</multilang>
 
</multilang>
  
<p>Since most readers of Tanakh tend to revere Moshe and sympathize with the oppressed Israelites in Egypt, Moshe's killing of the Egyptian taskmaster is usually viewed as demonstrating Moshe's willingness to champion the cause of justice even at great personal risk, and as an initial indicator of Moshe's empathy and leadership potential.<fn>This is how most Jewish commentators have traditionally read the episode.  Many early Christian and Islamic sources painted a more critical portrait - see for e.g. Augustine, Contra Faustum, Book XXII, #70:  "It was wrong for one who had no legal authority to kill the man, even though he was a bad character, besides being the aggressor. But in minds where great virtue is to come, there is often an early crop of vices...."  See <aht subpage="2">Exegetical Approaches</aht> regarding the possible influences of polemics on Jewish interpretation.</fn>  The continuation of the chapter may support this reading, as this story is immediately followed by two others in which Moshe similarly intervenes on behalf of the defenseless party.</p>
+
<p>Since most readers of Tanakh tend to revere Moshe and sympathize with the oppressed Israelites in Egypt, Moshe's killing of the Egyptian taskmaster is usually viewed as demonstrating Moshe's willingness to champion the cause of justice even at great personal risk, and as an initial indicator of Moshe's empathy and leadership potential.<fn>This is how most Jewish commentators have traditionally read the episode.  Many early Christian and Islamic sources painted a more critical portrait - see for e.g. Augustine, Contra Faustum, Book XXII, #70:  "It was wrong for one who had no legal authority to kill the man, even though he was a bad character, besides being the aggressor. But in minds where great virtue is to come, there is often an early crop of vices...."  See <a href="2" data-aht="subpage">Exegetical Approaches</a> regarding the possible influences of polemics on Jewish interpretation.</fn>  The continuation of the chapter may support this reading, as this story is immediately followed by two others in which Moshe similarly intervenes on behalf of the defenseless party.</p>
<p>Upon closer examination, however, Moshe's action raises questions of vigilante justice.  Did the Egyptian taskmaster deserve to die simply for smiting the Hebrew slave under his command?<fn>Cf. the formulation of <multilink><aht source="Wessely">R. Naftali Herz Wessely</aht><aht source="Wessely">Shirei Tiferet Petichah</aht><aht parshan="R. N&quot;H Wessely">About R. Naftali Herz Wessely</aht></multilink> (also cited by <aht source="HaketavShemot2-11">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah Shemot 2:11</aht>).</fn>  And even if he did, by what right did Moshe take the law into his own hands?  Could Moshe, a prince of Egypt, not have stopped the beating without resorting to such an extreme measure?  And if Moshe's deed was justified, why did God not intervene to prevent the resultant decades of Moshe's exile and estrangement from his nation?</p>
+
<p>Upon closer examination, however, Moshe's action raises questions of vigilante justice.  Did the Egyptian taskmaster deserve to die simply for smiting the Hebrew slave under his command?<fn>Cf. the formulation of <multilink><a href="Wessely" data-aht="source">R. Naftali Herz Wessely</a><a href="Wessely" data-aht="source">Shirei Tiferet Petichah</a><a href="R. N&quot;H Wessely" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Herz Wessely</a></multilink> (also cited by <a href="HaketavShemot2-11" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah Shemot 2:11</a>).</fn>  And even if he did, by what right did Moshe take the law into his own hands?  Could Moshe, a prince of Egypt, not have stopped the beating without resorting to such an extreme measure?  And if Moshe's deed was justified, why did God not intervene to prevent the resultant decades of Moshe's exile and estrangement from his nation?</p>
  
 
<h2>Additional Questions</h2>
 
<h2>Additional Questions</h2>
 
<p>The Torah does not explicitly praise or condemn Moshe's action, nor does it overtly punish him for the deed, leaving the commentators to mine the meager details of the story for additional clues.  Some of the issues they consider include:</p>
 
<p>The Torah does not explicitly praise or condemn Moshe's action, nor does it overtly punish him for the deed, leaving the commentators to mine the meager details of the story for additional clues.  Some of the issues they consider include:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>What exactly was the Egyptian doing to the Hebrew slave?  Was he simply following orders?<fn>See <multilink><aht source="RYBSShemot2-11">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</aht><aht source="RYBSShemot2-11">Shemot 2:14-15</aht><aht parshan="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" /></multilink>.</fn></li>
+
<li>What exactly was the Egyptian doing to the Hebrew slave?  Was he simply following orders?<fn>See <multilink><a href="RYBSShemot2-11" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYBSShemot2-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:14-15</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>.</fn></li>
 
<li>Does the root הכה have the same connotation in both verses of "מַכֶּה אִישׁ עִבְרִי" and "וַיַּךְ אֶת הַמִּצְרִי"?  Did the Egyptian hit the Hebrew with intent to kill?  Did Moshe smite the Egyptian with intent to kill?</li>
 
<li>Does the root הכה have the same connotation in both verses of "מַכֶּה אִישׁ עִבְרִי" and "וַיַּךְ אֶת הַמִּצְרִי"?  Did the Egyptian hit the Hebrew with intent to kill?  Did Moshe smite the Egyptian with intent to kill?</li>
 
<li>How old was Moshe when the incident took place?  Did Moshe know he was an Israelite?  Is he identifying with his people or standing up for the cause of justice?</li>
 
<li>How old was Moshe when the incident took place?  Did Moshe know he was an Israelite?  Is he identifying with his people or standing up for the cause of justice?</li>

Version as of 18:39, 11 August 2014

Was Moshe a Murderer?

Introduction

(Click for this topic in art)

Moshe's Violent Debut

Shemot 2 provides only scant and selected details of Moshe's early life. Somewhat surprisingly, his first recorded initiative is to kill an Egyptian who was hitting a Hebrew man. His second action is to conceal the crime by burying the body:

EN/HEע/E

(יא) וַיְהִי בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם וַיִּגְדַּל מֹשֶׁה וַיֵּצֵא אֶל אֶחָיו וַיַּרְא בְּסִבְלֹתָם וַיַּרְא אִישׁ מִצְרִי מַכֶּה אִישׁ עִבְרִי מֵאֶחָיו.
(יב) וַיִּפֶן כֹּה וָכֹה וַיַּרְא כִּי אֵין אִישׁ וַיַּךְ אֶת הַמִּצְרִי וַיִּטְמְנֵהוּ בַּחוֹל. (שמות ב':י"א-י"ב)

(11) It happened in those days: Moshe grew up, went out to his brothers, saw their burdens, and saw an Egyptian man striking a Hebrew man, from his brethren. (12) And he looked this way and that way and saw that there was no man, and he killed the Egyptian and hid him in the sand. (Shemot 2:11-12)

Since most readers of Tanakh tend to revere Moshe and sympathize with the oppressed Israelites in Egypt, Moshe's killing of the Egyptian taskmaster is usually viewed as demonstrating Moshe's willingness to champion the cause of justice even at great personal risk, and as an initial indicator of Moshe's empathy and leadership potential.1 The continuation of the chapter may support this reading, as this story is immediately followed by two others in which Moshe similarly intervenes on behalf of the defenseless party.

Upon closer examination, however, Moshe's action raises questions of vigilante justice. Did the Egyptian taskmaster deserve to die simply for smiting the Hebrew slave under his command?2 And even if he did, by what right did Moshe take the law into his own hands? Could Moshe, a prince of Egypt, not have stopped the beating without resorting to such an extreme measure? And if Moshe's deed was justified, why did God not intervene to prevent the resultant decades of Moshe's exile and estrangement from his nation?

Additional Questions

The Torah does not explicitly praise or condemn Moshe's action, nor does it overtly punish him for the deed, leaving the commentators to mine the meager details of the story for additional clues. Some of the issues they consider include:

  • What exactly was the Egyptian doing to the Hebrew slave? Was he simply following orders?3
  • Does the root הכה have the same connotation in both verses of "מַכֶּה אִישׁ עִבְרִי" and "וַיַּךְ אֶת הַמִּצְרִי"? Did the Egyptian hit the Hebrew with intent to kill? Did Moshe smite the Egyptian with intent to kill?
  • How old was Moshe when the incident took place? Did Moshe know he was an Israelite? Is he identifying with his people or standing up for the cause of justice?
  • What do "וַיִּפֶן כֹּה וָכֹה" and "וַיַּרְא כִּי אֵין אִישׁ" mean, and did they play a critical role in Moshe's decision to act? If people had been around, would Moshe not have dared to act? And if there were no witnesses, how did the Israelites and Paroh find out?