Who was Enslaved in Egypt/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
Who was Enslaved in Egypt?
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators disagree regarding who was enslaved in Egypt and this impacts their understandings of the nature of the bondage as a whole. While the majority of exegetes assume that the entire nation were slaves and view the experience as being extremely oppressive in both scope and intensity, not all agree. R"Y Bekhor Shor asserts that the Israelites worked in shifts. Each worked for Paroh for a period of weeks and then returned home. As such, individual Israelites were not always enslaved and had time for themselves and their families. Ralbag presents a third possibility, that Paroh had instituted a monetary tax and only those who could not pay it labored for Paroh instead. Thus, someone who was wealthy might have never worked for Paroh.
Everyone
The entire Israelite nation was enslaved, including men, women, children and the elderly.
"וַיָּשִׂימוּ עָלָיו שָׂרֵי מִסִּים" – These sources
"וַעָבְדוּ בָהֶם בְּפָרֶךְ" – R. Shemuel b. Nachmani understands "פָרֶךְ" to refer not to back breaking labor but to degradation, claiming that the Egyptians would give the males work suited for females and vice versa.1
Freedom of movement
Did women work as well? This position might suggest that even women were enslaved. See R. Shemuel b. Nachmani in Bavli Sotah who suggests that "עבודת פרך" refers to the switching of male and female labor roles.2 If so, it is not clear how Yocheved was free to nurse Moshe for the daughter of Paroh. This position might suggest that the princess simply took her from a different task to work for her. The fact that she paid her, rather than simply assuming that the work was expected of a slave, might relate to the princess' own personal conscience and not be indicative of how the larger Egyptian populace would have acted.
Own homes and possessions – If the Israelites were slaves to the State rather than to individuals,3 it is possible that they daily returned to their own homes. It is not clear, however, how they would have had time or money to amass and care for individual possessions or cattle. If the enslavement was a gradually worsening process, it is possible that they still owned possessions from the time that they were free or partially free. In addition, it is possible that Paroh's work ended at nightfall, and the Israelites tended to their own after dark.
How was this to accomplish Paroh's goal? With the entire nation in bondage, Paroh hoped that they would be too weak and tired to procreate. In addition, in their physically and emotionally degraded state it would be hard for them to fight against him in case of war.
Relationship to other Egyptians – If the entire nation was enslaved it is likely that the average Egyptian disparaged them. R. Hirsch notes that through the enslavement, "הללו הוכרזו כאינם שייכים לגזע האנושי" (these were announced as not belonging to the human race). Seforno similarly posits that with each degrading action, it became easier to view and treat the Israelites as slaves.
Harshness of the slavery – This position views the slavery as being harsh due to both its all inclusive nature and the cruel conditions.
"רָאֹה רָאִיתִי אֶת עֳנִי עַמִּי אֲשֶׁר בְּמִצְרָיִם וְאֶת צַעֲקָתָם" – This position reads this verse simply to refer to the cries of the entire nation.
Purpose of punishment – This approach might view the punishment as mainly retributive in nature; the country was plagued for the Egyptians' unfair treatment of the Israelites.
"בֵּית עֲבָדִים" – According to this approach, this term is an apt description of Egypt.
Tribal Exemption
The entire nation was enslaved with the exception of the the tribe of Levi.
Why was Levi exempt?
Age / Gender Exemption
Men were enslaved, but women, children and the elderly were exempt.
Economic Exemption
Paorh decreed a monetary tax on the nation. Those who could afford to pay it were not enslaved; everyone else was forced to work in lieu of payment.
"וַיָּשִׂימוּ עָלָיו שָׂרֵי מִסִּים" – These sources understand "מִסִּים" to refer to a monetary tax.5
"וַיִּבֶן עָרֵי מִסְכְּנוֹת לְפַרְעֹה" – This part of the verse refers to those who did not have the finances to pay the monetary tax . They, instead,w ere forced to build store houses for Paroh. Ralbag implies that much of the nation fell into this category, as it was possible that Paroh taxed the people even daily.
Biblical parallels
- The concept that a foreign minority might have to pay a tribute to the controlling majority occurs often when one country subdues another. In Egypt, however, the Israelites had not been conquered by Egypt but rather come to live peacefully.
- The idea that a person without monetary means might substitute work for payment, finds its parallel in the laws of slaves, where a person can sell himself if he finds himself in debt. In Egypt, however, the Israelites had no real control over being in "debt", as the tax stemmed from Paroh as well.
Freedom of movement – According to this position, those who could afford the monetary tax had no responsibilities to Paroh and were free to go where they pleased. This could explain Aharon's ability to meet Moshe out of Egypt.
Own homes and possessions – Ralbag implies that after finishing their daily labor quotas the Israelites would return to their personal homes, suggesting that even those who worked did not live on site.
Relationship to other Egyptians – This position might assert that those Israelites who could afford the monetary tax and were not enslaved were not looked down upon by the neighboring Egyptians. However, since a significant portion were, the nation as a whole held a degraded status.
How was this to accomplish Paroh's goal? According to Ralbag, Paroh allowed his officers to force the people to work beyond the limits of the law and gave them back-breaking types of labor which required much effort because this would ruin the people's health, lessening their seed. Thus, even though some Israelites were exempt and did not physically suffer, Paroh hoped that the significant portion of Israelites who worked would be weakened and propagate less.
Harshness of the slavery – While Ralbag focuses on the physical burdens the Israelites were forced to bear, HaKetav VeHaKabbalah points to emotional pain as well. He understands the root "פרך" to mean "stop"6 and explains that the Egyptians would constantly stop the Israelites mid-project to work on another one. This moving from job to job without ever seeing their labor come to fruition was just as painful to the soul as the hard toil was to their bodies.
"רָאֹה רָאִיתִי אֶת עֳנִי עַמִּי אֲשֶׁר בְּמִצְרָיִם וְאֶת צַעֲקָתָם" – Ralbag would explain that the verse speaks of the nation as a whole because even if some were not enslaved, the majority were worked beyond their endurance daily.
Rotation
The Israelites worked for Paroh in a rotation. Each labored for several weeks or months at a time and then was free to go home until the next shift.
וַיָּשִׂימוּ עָלָיו שָׂרֵי מִסִּים – These commentators understand this to refer to a labor tax rather than a monetary one.7
Biblical parallels – R"Y Bekhor Shor compares this labor tax to that of Shelomo when building the Beit HaMikdash where the people would work for one month and then return home for two,8 while Ramban instead compares it to Shelomo's taxing of the foreigners in his land.9 According to both, Paroh's actions were not all that different from that of other monarchs who forced certain segments of the population to work for them for set periods of time.
Were the Israelites the only ones taxed? R"Y Bekhor Shor asserts that the rest of the Egyptians also paid a tax to Paroh, giving a fifth of their crops to the king.10 Precisely because the Children of Israel were exempt from this, they were instead forced to build the storehouses for this wheat.11 Even R"Y Bekhor Shor agrees, however, that the forced labor later intensified and extended to other types of work including sowing and irrigation.
Own homes and possessions – R"Y Bekhor Shor explains that since the Israelites were not always working for Paroh, they had their own homes and possessions12 and the time to support their own families as well.13 In fact, Hashem's command that the Israelites request vessels "מִגָּרַת בֵּיתָהּ", suggests that they might even have had Egyptian tenants.14
Freedom of movement – This position could explain that Aharon had the freedom to meet Moshe in the desert because he was not working at the time. Aharon would not have been unique; many others at any given time might also have been able to leave the country for a short period.
"לְכוּ לְסִבְלֹתֵיכֶם" – After Moshe and Aharon request leave for a three day holiday, Paroh refuses and then tells then "לְכוּ לְסִבְלֹתֵיכֶם", suggesting that even Moshe and Aharon were among those who were enslaved. Ramban explains that when Moshe and Aharon had come to Paroh, they were accompanied by some of the laboring Israelites, and it was them that Paroh was telling to return to work.
Did women and children work as well? Though these sources do not address the question, they would likely posit that the building was limited to men as in other cases of conscripted labor. This would explain how Yocheved and Miriam15 appear not to be enslaved in Shemot 2.
Payment to Yocheved – According to this position, many Israelites might have had other employment during the periods when they were not working for Paroh. Thus, Paroh's daughter's offering compensation to Yocheved for nursing was simply a normal transaction made between free citizens.
Relations with other Egyptians – If the bondage was a labor tax rather than slavery, it is possible that the Israelites were not necessarily viewed as particularly degraded members of society16 and that some lay Egyptians and Israelites might have even been on neighborly terms.17
Harshness of the enslavement – R"Y Bekhor Shor and Ramban learn from the phrase, "וַיַּעֲבִדוּ מִצְרַיִם אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּפָרֶךְ" that the conditions during the periods of forced labor were unusually harsh and that the slaves were given no time to rest. Ramban also posits that in a second stage of the bondage, Paroh allowed individual Egyptians to enslave Israelites to work for them personally when desired.
How did rotating laborers accomplish Paroh's goal? R"Y Bekhor Shor claims that Paroh hoped to tire out the people so they would not have the energy at night to have relations and reproduce.18 This, however, is difficult, considering that they could do so during the months that they were free from work totally. One might explain instead that Paroh was not mainly concerned about the size of the Israelite population, but about the potential that they would fight against him in periods of war. Having a significant portion of the nation enslaved at any one time reduced this concern.
Purpose of punishment
- This depiction of the slavery raises the possibility that Paroh was not being punished for extremely cruel treatment of the Israelites but rather for not recognizing Hashem and granting the Israelites leave to worship Him.
- Ramban might suggest that it was not the State sponsored slavery that was being punished but the expanding of the bondage to individuals.
"בֵּית עֲבָדִים" – The description of Egypt as a "house of bondage" is somewhat difficult for this approach, especially if one posits that such labor taxes were common elsewhere. These sources might respond that Egypt was unique in enforcing the tax for hundreds of years and for the unusually harsh conditions during the periods of labor.
