Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem/2
Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem?
Exegetical Approaches
Self Interest
Yonah's reluctance to fulfill Hashem's command was motivated by personal reasons. This position subdivides regarding the exact nature of the concern:
Feared being Labeled a False Prophet
Yonah feared that when the people of Nineveh repented, Hashem's decree of destruction would be overturned and he would be viewed as a false prophet.
- He asks why Yonah would care what the people of Nineveh thought of him; after all, he was not even living among them!
- Moreover, he questions how the inhabitants of Nineveh could possibly have concluded that Yonah was a false prophet. They obviously understood that there was a chance that their repentance could overturn the decree, so they apparently thought that the prophet's role was to prompt them to change. As such, when they were spared they would never think to accuse him!
Futile Mission
Yonah was convinced that not all of the people of Nineveh would repent, but Hashem would forgive them regardless, making his efforts futile. Being old and tired, he preferred that Hashem send someone in his stead.
Patriotism
Yonah's decision was rooted in his love of Israel and desire for their preservation.
- Most of these commentators maintain that Yonah was concerned lest the quick repentance of Nineveh cast a bad light on Israel who refused to change its ways despite numerous prophetic rebukes.
- Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that Yonah knew that Assyria was destined to exile the ten tribes and he refused to be the vehicle through which Israel's enemy was saved from destruction.
- Ibn Ezra8 points out that the text uses the phrase "לִבְרֹחַ... מִלִּפְנֵי י"י" rather than "מפני ה'" to indicate that though Yonah knew that he could never hide from Hashem Himself, he believed that he could go outside of Israel where Hashem's providence was weaker and there was no prophetic inspiration.9 He might not be able to escape Hashem, but perhaps he could avoid his destiny.
- R. Yonatan in the Mekhilta10 claims that Yonah was willing to die for Israel' sake, as he says to the sailors, "הֲטִילֻנִי אֶל הַיָּם". Yonah, then, might never have expected to avoid the repercussions of his actions.
Theological Concerns
Yonah's objection stemmed from a fundamental disagreement with Hashem regarding the institution of repentance.
- Repentance does not eradicate punishment – Though Yonah believed that repentance for misdeeds is desirable, he did not think that repentance removes the need for retribution. Justice requires that everyone get their due, and apologizing or regretting one's actions does not change that.
- Repentance from fear insufficient – According to Yonah, repentance that stems from fear of punishment is not sincere, and will never be long lasting as it does not come from a true recognition of right and wrong and desire to change. As soon as the danger ends, a person is likely to return to their old ways.
- No repentance for idolators – According to Abarbanel, Yonah believed that "תשובה" means returning to Hashem; thus even if someone fixes their interpersonal behavior, if they still maintain idolatrous beliefs, their repentance is not complete.14 Returning to God is a prerequisite for all repentance.
- Inferior Repentance – The images of animals in sack cloth and the call for them to fast suggest that the entire scene is but a parody of repentance. If repentance involves regret and change of heart, involving animals is farcical. This might support the idea that the change was prompted only by fear, and as such was superficial.15
- Changed actions not beliefs – Abarbanel claims that though the people repented of their crimes against their fellow men, they did not return to Hashem. Thus, the verse states, "וַיַּרְא הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם", emphasizing their actions but not their beliefs. Though earlier the text shares that "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים", this connotes a recognition of godly authority but not a monotheistic belief in Hashem. Thus, in contrast to the surrounding verses, Hashem is called "אלֹהִים" and not by His proper name, Hashem.16
- Sincere – Alternatively, the repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people felt needed to be expiated.17 Yonah did not have an issue was not the quality of the repentance, but with Hashem's reaction to it.
- Hashem is attempting to teach Yonah that repentance, however short-lived, is not worthless. Though his gourd lived for just a day, Yonah cared deeply about it; while it was there it provided for him. So too, Hashem teaches Yonah, even if the people of Nineveh eventually revert to evil, since at the moment their repentance is sincere, it is accepted.20
- Alternatively, Hashem is simply trying to teach Yonah about fatherly love. Yonah, who did not even invest in the gourd, desired its life, how much more so should Hashem, who fathered his creations, desire their survival! Repentance allows for erasure of destruction not because of justice, but because of love.
Did Not Disobey
Yonah never attempted to flee and disregard Hashem's directive.
- Rereading the word "לִבְרֹחַ" – Yefet reinterprets the word "לִבְרֹחַ" to mean "to hurry",23 and suggests that not only did Yonah not flee from Hashem's word, but he actually hurried to fulfill it. Yonah felt that travel by sea would be the quickest route to Nineveh, and thus heading to Tarshish was means of expediting the mission.24
- Assumed fulfillment – According to R. Saadia Gaon, Yonah actually fulfilled Hashem's first mission, even though it is not mentioned in the verses,25 and these words only reflect his attempt at avoiding being called a second time. Since the first mission entailed only rebuking the people of Nineveh, but contained no prophecy of destruction, Yonah was not worried about the possibility of being called a false prophet, and was willing to do as told.26 Afterwards, however, he fled outside of Israel where there is no prophecy to avoid being called upon to deliver a message of specific doom.