Difference between revisions of "A Portrait of Yishmael/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Yishmael after the expulsion</b> – Radak points to Yishmael's achievements as an archer, and lauds him for teaching this skill to his descendants, the Children of Kedar.  He even suggests that this part of the story was written so that all can learn from Yishmael the important lesson of passing on skills to one's children.</point> | <point><b>Yishmael after the expulsion</b> – Radak points to Yishmael's achievements as an archer, and lauds him for teaching this skill to his descendants, the Children of Kedar.  He even suggests that this part of the story was written so that all can learn from Yishmael the important lesson of passing on skills to one's children.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Yishmael and Yitzchak</b> – This position does not posit any active rivalry between the two. | + | <point><b>Yishmael and Yitzchak</b> – This position does not posit any active rivalry between the two. Jubilees presents them as visiting their father together later in life and Abarbanel claims that Avraham died peacefully because he saw " את ישמעאל ויצחק שלמים ומוסכמים באהבה רבה" .</point> |
<point><b>Yishmael's descendants</b><ul> | <point><b>Yishmael's descendants</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Neutral</b>  – Ibn Ezra and Radak identify Yishmael's descendants with Arav and Midyan, both of whom live in the wilderness, and as such fulfill the original prophecy to Hagar.</li> | <li><b>Neutral</b>  – Ibn Ezra and Radak identify Yishmael's descendants with Arav and Midyan, both of whom live in the wilderness, and as such fulfill the original prophecy to Hagar.</li> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
<point><b>Prophecy to Hagar</b> – According to Rashi and Resh Lakish, the angel pointed to the wickedness of Yishmael's character.  Rashi asserts that he was to become a robber ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל") who was to be hated and provoked by all ("יַד כֹּל בּוֹ").‎<fn>Abarbanel questions this approach from the context.  If the angel was trying to encourage Hagar to return home, how would a negative prophecy regarding her son help?  He writes, " איך יגיד העתידות האלה המלאך להגר ובזה אין בשורה מוצאת".</fn>  Resh Lakish goes a step further, asserting that he would rob, not possessions, but lives.<fn>He also makes a play on the words "כֹּל בּוֹ", suggesting that it be read "כלבו", equating him with a dog, both of whom eat carcasses.  See also <multilink><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">HaRekhasim Levik'ah</a><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter (HaRekhasim Levikah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter</a></multilink> who reads the prophecy quite negatively as well. He asserts that the phrase "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is not a description of a type of person (in which case the adjective wold have followed and not preceeded the noun), but rather a description of a פרא, a donkey.  Yishmael is more donkey than man.</fn></point> | <point><b>Prophecy to Hagar</b> – According to Rashi and Resh Lakish, the angel pointed to the wickedness of Yishmael's character.  Rashi asserts that he was to become a robber ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל") who was to be hated and provoked by all ("יַד כֹּל בּוֹ").‎<fn>Abarbanel questions this approach from the context.  If the angel was trying to encourage Hagar to return home, how would a negative prophecy regarding her son help?  He writes, " איך יגיד העתידות האלה המלאך להגר ובזה אין בשורה מוצאת".</fn>  Resh Lakish goes a step further, asserting that he would rob, not possessions, but lives.<fn>He also makes a play on the words "כֹּל בּוֹ", suggesting that it be read "כלבו", equating him with a dog, both of whom eat carcasses.  See also <multilink><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">HaRekhasim Levik'ah</a><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter (HaRekhasim Levikah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter</a></multilink> who reads the prophecy quite negatively as well. He asserts that the phrase "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is not a description of a type of person (in which case the adjective wold have followed and not preceeded the noun), but rather a description of a פרא, a donkey.  Yishmael is more donkey than man.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – Rashi asserts that Avraham was praying for the spiritual well being of Yishmael, that he should live a life that is "before God".</point> | <point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – Rashi asserts that Avraham was praying for the spiritual well being of Yishmael, that he should live a life that is "before God".</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"מְצַחֵק"</b> – These commentators suggest that the word refers either to idolatry,<fn>See Tosefta Sota 5:12, R. Akiva, Targum Pseudo-Jonathon and Rashi.  As evidence that the root "צחק" can be understood in this manner, R. Akiva points to Shemot 32:6, where the nation is "מצחק" before the Golden Calf.</fn> murder<fn>See R. Yishmael in Tosefta Sota and Rashi. Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer speaks not just in general of spilling blood, but has Yishmael attempting to kill Yitzchak himself.  Support for this meaning is brought from Shemuel II 2:14 and the deadly "משחק" set up between the men of Yoav and Avner.</fn> or illicit relations,<fn>See R. Eliezer the son of R. Yose HaGelili who points to the story of Mrs. Potiphar in Bereshit 39:17, where the root "צחק" suggests sexual behavior.</fn> the crimes considered most despicable in Judaism.</point> | + | <point><b>"מְצַחֵק"</b> – These commentators suggest that the word refers either to idolatry,<fn>See Tosefta Sota 5:12, R. Akiva, Targum Pseudo-Jonathon and Rashi. Targum Pseudo Jonathan presents Hagar as also worshipping idols, and explains the phrase "וַתֵּתַע בְּמִדְבַּר" metaphorically to mean that she wandered after idolatry.  As evidence that the root "צחק" can be understood in this manner, R. Akiva points to <a href="Shemot32-6" data-aht="source">Shemot 32:6</a>, where the nation is "מצחק" before the Golden Calf.</fn> murder<fn>See R. Yishmael in Tosefta Sota and Rashi. Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer speaks not just in general of spilling blood, but has Yishmael attempting to kill Yitzchak himself.  Support for this meaning is brought from <a href="ShemuelII2-14" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 2:14</a> and the deadly "משחק" set up between the men of Yoav and Avner.</fn> or illicit relations,<fn>See R. Eliezer the son of R. Yose HaGelili who points to the story of Mrs. Potiphar in <a href="Bereshit39-17" data-aht="source">Bereshit 39:17</a>, where the root "צחק" suggests sexual behavior.</fn> the three crimes considered most despicable in Judaism.</point> |
<point><b>Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?</b> Given such wicked behavior, it is not surprising that Sarah wanted Yishmael banished.</point> | <point><b>Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?</b> Given such wicked behavior, it is not surprising that Sarah wanted Yishmael banished.</point> | ||
− | |||
<point><b>Why is Avraham "upset about his son"?</b> According to Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Rashi, Avraham was upset at his son's actions, not at the request to expel him.</point> | <point><b>Why is Avraham "upset about his son"?</b> According to Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Rashi, Avraham was upset at his son's actions, not at the request to expel him.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Why did Hashem reject Yishmael?</b> Yishmael's actions proved him unworthy and warranted expulsion.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Why is Yishmael made into a great nation?</b> This approach would likely assert that this was a reward to Avraham (not Yishmael) and part of the fulfillment of Hashem's promise to him that he would be fruitful and a father of great nations.  The commentators, though, attempt to belittle the promise. Targum Pseudo Jonathon says that Yishmael is to be come a "nation of robbers" and Rashi asserts that the 12 princes will not last, "כעננים יכלו"‎.<fn>Compare Targum Pseudo Jonathan that asserts that the cows brought by the twelve princes during the Consecration of the Altar were an attempt to merit the destruction of the twelve princes of Yishmael.</fn> </point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Hashem saves Yishmael</b> – According to Targum Pseudo Jonathan, Hashem saved Yishmael only for the sake of Avraham and his merits.<fn>Rashi is somewhat inconsistent in his understanding as he points to the midrash which claims that Hashem saved Yishmael on his own merits, for his present righteous state ("בַּאֲשֶׁר הוּא שָׁם").  Yet, according to Rashi, Yishmael's present spiritual state is one of wickedness.</fn></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Yishmael after the expulsion</b></point> | ||
<point><b>Polemical Motivations?</b></point> | <point><b>Polemical Motivations?</b></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 02:48, 14 November 2014
Yishmael
Exegetical Approaches
Neutral to Positive
Yishmael does not actively sin, and may even have some merits.
Prophecy to Hagar – These commentators all view the prophecy as either a positive or neutral characterization of the soon to be born Yishmael, but they differ in the details:
- Free – According to Ibn Ezra, "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is a metaphor for a non-submissive person who is free from the yoke of others.1 The angel told Hagar that Yishmael would be a powerful individual, victorious over his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), but simultaneously causing others to fight back ("יַד כֹּל בּוֹ").
- Man of the desert – Radak asserts that "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" refers to a man of the desert who, due to his nomadic lifestyle, will constantly be battling his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ"). However, he will not flee from them, but manage to dwell amongst them ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן").2
- Man of civilization – Abarbanel reads the opening words of the angel as a rhetorical question, "Will your son be a man of the desert?"3 The angel is, thus, informing Hagar that Yishmael will live amongst men ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן"), intermingling and socializing with them ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), rather than alone in the wilderness.4
Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ" – According to Abarbanel, Avraham is asking Hashem what will become of Yishmael once Yitzchak is born. He is worried about both Yishmael's physical and spiritual well being,5 questioning whether Yishmael will die young (being replaced by Yitzchak)6 and whether he will be part of Hashem's covenant. The question assumes that, in Avraham's eyes, there was no intrinsic disqualification which would have caused Yishmael to be automatically rejected.
"מְצַחֵק" – Most of these commentators7 suggest that Yishmael was simply happily dancing,8 playing or laughing9 and that the word carries no derogatory connotation at all.
Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?
- According to Jubilees and Ibn Ezra, Sarah was simply jealous,10 while the Tzeror HaMor asserts that she was insulted as she mistakenly thought that Yishmael was laughing at her.11
- Abarbanel asserts that even before the incident Sarah was planning to expel Yishmael, fearing that otherwise he would claim rights to the inheritance. Seeing Yishmael being the center of attention simply confirmed her suspicions that the longer he stayed, the more difficult disinheriting him would become.
Evaluation of Sarah – According to the Tzeror HaMor, Yishmael's actions did not warrant an expulsion and Sarah sinned in her actions.12 Her descendants were later punished when Yishmael's descendants refused water to the Children of Israel,13 resulting in many deaths. Radak, too, suggests that Sarah was deserving of rebuke, saying that Avraham kept quiet only for the sake of "household peace" (שלום בית).
Why is Avraham "upset about his son"? Avraham's reaction is understandable given that Yishmael did nothing to deserve expulsion. Radak asserts that Avraham loved him, for after all, "בדרך טובה היה הולך".14
Why did Hashem reject Yishmael? Abarbanel explains that Yitzchak alone was to inherit, as Hashem wanted the chosen line to emerge from Avraham and Sarah. Hashem, thus, agreed with Sarah that in order to ensure this and prevent any contesting of the inheritance, Yishmael needed to be expelled from the home.15
Why is Yishmael made into a great nation? Though these commentators do not address the issue directly, they might suggest that Yishmael himself merited such a reward. Alternatively, this is part of Hashem's promise to make Avraham himself into a great nation.
Hashem saves Yishmael
- Deserving – According to Bereshit Rabbah, Hashem listened to Yishmael and saved him on his own merits. The midrash understands the phrase "בַּאֲשֶׁר הוּא שָׁם" to refer to Yishmael's present spiritual status.16 Though his descendants were to oppress Israel, Yishmael himself was righteous and deserving of salvation.
- Punishment to Sarah – Tzeror HaMor suggests that it would have been better had Yishmael died from the lack of water, since then he would never have borne a nation who was to oppress the Israelites. Due to Sarah's actions, though, he was saved so that he could later punish the nation.
Yishmael after the expulsion – Radak points to Yishmael's achievements as an archer, and lauds him for teaching this skill to his descendants, the Children of Kedar. He even suggests that this part of the story was written so that all can learn from Yishmael the important lesson of passing on skills to one's children.
Yishmael and Yitzchak – This position does not posit any active rivalry between the two. Jubilees presents them as visiting their father together later in life and Abarbanel claims that Avraham died peacefully because he saw " את ישמעאל ויצחק שלמים ומוסכמים באהבה רבה" .
Yishmael's descendants
- Neutral – Ibn Ezra and Radak identify Yishmael's descendants with Arav and Midyan, both of whom live in the wilderness, and as such fulfill the original prophecy to Hagar.
- Negative –Ibn Ezra also suggests that the fourth beast of Daniel's vision refers to Yishmael, who will prevail over many but ultimately be vanquished. Tzeror HaMor similarly identifies Yishmael's descendants with Israel's enemies, associating them Arav and Dedan in Yeshayahu 21 who refuse Israel water.17
Polemical Motivations?
Mildly Negative
Yishmael has several negative traits, but he is not completely wicked.
Prophecy to Hagar – Both Ramban and Seforno18 assert that the prophecy pointed to some of Yishmael's negative character traits:
- Militancy – Ramban maintains that Yishmael was to become a "פֶּרֶא אָדָם", a militant personality who spends his days ready to pounce on and devour others.19 He sees in this a punishment to Avraham and Sarah who had sinned in the harsh treatment of Hagar. They were meted a measure for measure punishment, for Yishmael's descendants were to similarly oppress their offspring.
Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ" – According to Ramban, Avraham is literally praying for Yishmael's life. Knowing that Yitzchak is to inherit alone makes him wonder whether Yishmael is destined to die early. Though Yishmael might have faults, Avraham had always viewed him as the heir, and as his father, he was filled with love for him.
"מְצַחֵק" – All these commentators understand the word to refer to scornful laughter or mockery:
- Related to the inheritance – R. Shimon B. Yochai portrays Yishmael laughing at the concept of Yitzchak inheriting22 while Seforno has him suggest that Yitzchak was born of Avimelekh (which would thereby disqualify him).
- Degrading Yitzchak – R. Saadia suggests that Yishmael was scornfully speaking of Yitzchak's death while Ramban presents him as more simply poking fun at Yitzchak and the party.
- Foolish play – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, Yishmael was acting foolishly, laughing and speaking in an unbecoming manner.
Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?
- Protect Yitzchak's character– According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, Sarah wanted to prevent Yitzchak from learning from the bad example set by Yishmael.23 Sarah was not worried about his sharing in a monetary inheritance, but about the two brothers inheriting together, in the sense of growing up together.24
- Prevent Yishmael's inheritance – Seforno asserts that since Hagar was trying to ensure, through her son's libel, that Yishmael inherit all, Sarah banished them so that they would not inherit at all.
- Punishment – Ramban maintains that Sarah viewed Yishmael's actions as a forgetting of his rightful place as servant. Though this normally would deserve death or corporeal punishment, Sarah instead decided to expel Hagar and Yishmael.
Why is Avraham "upset about his son"? Ramban suggests that Avraham's natural love for his son made it painful for him to banish him. Though Yishmael's actions were wrong, and Avraham might have even understood Sarah's desire for the expulsion, they were not so terrible to prevent his anguish at the action. Seforno further suggests that Avraham was oblivious to the true nature of his son, favoring him since he was the first born.25
Why did Hashem reject Yishmael? This approach might suggest that Yishmael was rejected due to both his maternal parentage and his lesser character. Seforno adds that Hashem agreed with Sarah that Yishmael was to be a negative influence, further justifying the banishment.
Why is Yishmael made into a great nation? Seforno asserts that this promise was a reward to Avraham.26 Yishmael himself was not worthy of such grandeur.
Hashem saves Yishmael – This position would probably suggest that, though the expulsion might have been justified, Yishmael's negative actions did not warrant a death sentence.27
Yishmael after the expulsion – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yishmael's becoming an archer, or a man of war, confirmed Sarah's evaluation of his negative character and her worries how this might affect Yitzchak.28
Yishmael's descendants – R. Avraham b. HaRambam claims that the promise that Yishmael will become a great nation is fulfilled with the establishment of Islam. He points out how this is a second monotheist religion, but one which uprooted the Torah. The seeds of this religion lay already in Yishmael, who believed in Hashem having grown up in Avraham's household, but who was never on the path of Torah observance nor on the spiritual level of his brother.
Polemical Motivations?
Extremely Negative
The character of Yishmael is evil, and he commits the most heinous of crimes, including the threesome of idolatry, murder and illicit relations.
Prophecy to Hagar – According to Rashi and Resh Lakish, the angel pointed to the wickedness of Yishmael's character. Rashi asserts that he was to become a robber ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל") who was to be hated and provoked by all ("יַד כֹּל בּוֹ").29 Resh Lakish goes a step further, asserting that he would rob, not possessions, but lives.30
Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ" – Rashi asserts that Avraham was praying for the spiritual well being of Yishmael, that he should live a life that is "before God".
"מְצַחֵק" – These commentators suggest that the word refers either to idolatry,31 murder32 or illicit relations,33 the three crimes considered most despicable in Judaism.
Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled? Given such wicked behavior, it is not surprising that Sarah wanted Yishmael banished.
Why is Avraham "upset about his son"? According to Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Rashi, Avraham was upset at his son's actions, not at the request to expel him.
Why did Hashem reject Yishmael? Yishmael's actions proved him unworthy and warranted expulsion.
Why is Yishmael made into a great nation? This approach would likely assert that this was a reward to Avraham (not Yishmael) and part of the fulfillment of Hashem's promise to him that he would be fruitful and a father of great nations. The commentators, though, attempt to belittle the promise. Targum Pseudo Jonathon says that Yishmael is to be come a "nation of robbers" and Rashi asserts that the 12 princes will not last, "כעננים יכלו".34
Hashem saves Yishmael – According to Targum Pseudo Jonathan, Hashem saved Yishmael only for the sake of Avraham and his merits.35
Yishmael after the expulsion
Polemical Motivations?