Difference between revisions of "A Portrait of Yishmael/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<category name="">Neutral to Positive | <category name="">Neutral to Positive | ||
<p>Yishmael did not actively sin, and may even have had some merits.</p> | <p>Yishmael did not actively sin, and may even have had some merits.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Jubilees17-1-18" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees17-1-18" data-aht="source">17:6-18</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,<fn>Cf. the LXX 21:9 which renders:  "When Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, who had been born to Abraham, playing with her son Isaac".  Josephus (Antiquities 1:12:3), also makes no mention of any negative action of Yishmael.</fn> <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">R. Simon in Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">53:14</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>,<fn>Other Tannaim and Amoraim in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah45-9" data-aht="source">45:9</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">53:11</a><a href="BereshitRabbah62-5" data-aht="source">62:5</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> present diametrically | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Jubilees17-1-18" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees17-1-18" data-aht="source">17:6-18</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,<fn>Cf. the LXX 21:9 which renders:  "When Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, who had been born to Abraham, playing with her son Isaac".  Josephus (Antiquities 1:12:3), also makes no mention of any negative action of Yishmael.</fn> <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">R. Simon in Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">53:14</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>,<fn>Other Tannaim and Amoraim in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah45-9" data-aht="source">45:9</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">53:11</a><a href="BereshitRabbah62-5" data-aht="source">62:5</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> present very different and even diametrically opposite portraits of Yishmael – see the discussions below of the positions of R. Akiva and R. Shimon b. Yochai.</fn> <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit21-9" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit21-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit21-911172021" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="RadakBereshit17-2025" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17:20,25</a><a href="RadakBereshit21-911172021" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,11,17,20,21</a><a href="RadakBereshit25-912" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:9, 12</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit21-91114" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor</a><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit16-13512" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:1,3,5,12</a><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit21-91114" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,11,14</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Saba</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBereshit21" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit17" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit21" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink></mekorot> |
<point><b>Prophecy to Hagar – "וְהוּא יִהְיֶה פֶּרֶא אָדָם"</b> – These commentators all view the prophecy as either a positive or neutral characterization of the soon to be born Yishmael, but they differ in the details:<br/> | <point><b>Prophecy to Hagar – "וְהוּא יִהְיֶה פֶּרֶא אָדָם"</b> – These commentators all view the prophecy as either a positive or neutral characterization of the soon to be born Yishmael, but they differ in the details:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Free</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is a metaphor for a non-submissive person who is free from the yoke of others.<fn>Such a prophecy would be very encouraging to Hagar who was suffering from her servitude to Sarah.</fn> The angel told Hagar that Yishmael would be a powerful individual, victorious over his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), but simultaneously causing others to fight back ("וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").</li> | <li><b>Free</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is a metaphor for a non-submissive person who is free from the yoke of others.<fn>Such a prophecy would be very encouraging to Hagar who was suffering from her servitude to Sarah.</fn> The angel told Hagar that Yishmael would be a powerful individual, victorious over his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), but simultaneously causing others to fight back ("וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Man of the wilderness</b> – Radak asserts that "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" refers to a man of the wilderness who, due to his nomadic lifestyle, will constantly be battling his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").  However, he will not flee from them, but manage to dwell amongst them ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן")‎.<fn>Compare R"Y Bekhor Shor who similarly connects Yishmael's future with the wilderness but suggests that Yishmael will be a merchant who travels through the desert, buying and selling his wares ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").  This | + | <li><b>Man of the wilderness</b> – Radak asserts that "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" refers to a man of the wilderness who, due to his nomadic lifestyle, will constantly be battling his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").  However, he will not flee from them, but manage to dwell amongst them ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן")‎.<fn>Compare R"Y Bekhor Shor who similarly connects Yishmael's future with the wilderness, but suggests that Yishmael will be a merchant who travels through the desert, buying and selling his wares ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").  This interpretation is likely rooted in the mention of a Yishmaelite caravan in the sale of Yosef in Bereshit 37.</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Man of civilization</b> – Abarbanel reads the opening words of the angel as a rhetorical question | + | <li><b>Man of civilization</b> – Abarbanel reads the opening words of the angel as a rhetorical question: "Will your son be a man of the wilderness?"<fn>Abarbanel agrees with Radak's understanding of the phrase "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" but, due to his novel punctuation, comes to an opposite conclusion of what the prophecy says about Yishmael's abode.  For other cases where Abarbanel suggests to read a verse as a question ("בתמיה"), see <a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a>.</fn>  The angel is, thus, informing Hagar that Yishmael will live amongst men ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן"), intermingling and socializing with them ‎("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"),‎ rather than alone in the wilderness.<fn>He points out that the context of the prophecy is an attempt to make Hagar return to Avraham. The angel thus tells her that her son's future lies in civilized land, amongst people, and not in the wilderness where she presently finds herself.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – According to Abarbanel, Avraham is asking Hashem what will become of Yishmael once Yitzchak is born.  He is worried about Yishmael's physical and spiritual well-being,<fn>Cf. Rashi and Ramban who each adopt one of these two possibilities.</fn> wondering whether Yishmael will die young (being replaced by Yitzchak)<fn>See Ramban who has Avraham wonder if the reason Yitzchak is to inherit all is because Yishmael is to die before Avraham.</fn> and whether he will be part of Hashem's covenant.  The question assumes that, in Avraham's eyes, there was no intrinsic disqualification which would have caused Yishmael to be automatically rejected.</point> | <point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – According to Abarbanel, Avraham is asking Hashem what will become of Yishmael once Yitzchak is born.  He is worried about Yishmael's physical and spiritual well-being,<fn>Cf. Rashi and Ramban who each adopt one of these two possibilities.</fn> wondering whether Yishmael will die young (being replaced by Yitzchak)<fn>See Ramban who has Avraham wonder if the reason Yitzchak is to inherit all is because Yishmael is to die before Avraham.</fn> and whether he will be part of Hashem's covenant.  The question assumes that, in Avraham's eyes, there was no intrinsic disqualification which would have caused Yishmael to be automatically rejected.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"מְצַחֵק"</b> – Most of these commentators<fn>Radak is the lone exception.  He suggests that Yishmael was laughing at Yitzchak for having been born to such old parents.  Radak apparently does not consider this laughter particularly negative | + | <point><b>"מְצַחֵק"</b> – Most of these commentators<fn>Radak is the lone exception.  He suggests that Yishmael was laughing at Yitzchak for having been born to such old parents.  However, Radak apparently does not consider this laughter particularly negative, as immediately thereafter he says of Yishmael: "ובדרך טובה היה מהלך, כי הוא גדל עמו ולמדהו דרך ה'‏".  Yishmael's laughter, though not laudable, would nonetheless be quite normal in youthful bantering.</fn> suggest that Yishmael was simply happily dancing,<fn>This is the rendering of Jubilees.</fn> playing, or laughing,<fn>See Ibn Ezra, "מצחק כי כן מנהג כל נער".  Abarbanel similarly depicts him happily playing ("שהי' משתעשע בבית") as everyone around tried to please and serve him.</fn> and that the word carries no derogatory connotation at all.</point> |
<point><b>Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?</b><ul> | <point><b>Why did Sarah want Yishmael expelled?</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>According to Jubilees and Ibn Ezra, Sarah was simply jealous,<fn>The <multilink><a href="BiurBereshit21-8" data-aht="source">Biur</a><a href="BiurBereshit21-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:8</a><a href="Biur" data-aht="parshan">About Netivot HaShalom</a></multilink> questions this read, finding it inconceivable that the righteous Sarah | + | <li>According to Jubilees and Ibn Ezra, Sarah was simply jealous,<fn>The <multilink><a href="BiurBereshit21-8" data-aht="source">Biur</a><a href="BiurBereshit21-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:8</a><a href="Biur" data-aht="parshan">About Netivot HaShalom</a></multilink> questions this read, finding it inconceivable that the righteous Sarah would possibly banish Hagar and Yishmael and place their lives in danger simply out of petty jealousy.  See, though, below, that Tzeror HaMor asserts that this was indeed considered a sin and that Sarah was punished for her actions.</fn> while the Tzeror HaMor asserts that she was insulted as she mistakenly thought that Yishmael was laughing at her.<fn>He suggests that the elderly in general are very sensitive to people's laughter, assuming that they might be the subject.  Thus, too, Sarah, in her old age, concluded that Yishmael was making fun of her.</fn>  </li> |
<li>Abarbanel contends that even before the incident Sarah was planning to expel Yishmael, fearing that otherwise he would claim rights to the inheritance.  Seeing Yishmael being the center of attention simply confirmed her suspicions that the longer he stayed, the more difficult disinheriting him would become.</li> | <li>Abarbanel contends that even before the incident Sarah was planning to expel Yishmael, fearing that otherwise he would claim rights to the inheritance.  Seeing Yishmael being the center of attention simply confirmed her suspicions that the longer he stayed, the more difficult disinheriting him would become.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Evaluation of Sarah</b> – According to the Tzeror HaMor, Yishmael's actions did not warrant an expulsion and Sarah sinned in her actions.<fn>He assumes that the original harsh treatment of Hagar in chapter 16 was similarly sinful, and blames both Avraham and Sarah for their part.  Avraham should never have agreed to take Hagar as a wife in the first place nor allow Sarah's treatment of her afterwards.  Yishmael's birth itself served as a punishment, for his descendants were to bring destruction to Israel. | + | <point><b>Evaluation of Sarah</b> – According to the Tzeror HaMor, Yishmael's actions did not warrant an expulsion and Sarah sinned in her actions.<fn>He assumes that the original harsh treatment of Hagar in chapter 16 was similarly sinful, and blames both Avraham and Sarah for their part.  Avraham should never have agreed to take Hagar as a wife in the first place nor allow Sarah's treatment of her afterwards.  Yishmael's birth itself served as a punishment, for his descendants were to bring destruction to Israel.<br/>Tzeror HaMor's reading is likely influenced by Ramban who similarly views Sarah's conduct in Chapter 16 as sinful.  Ramban differs, though, in that he justifies the banishment of Yishmael in Chapter 21 (as it was done with Divine consent).</fn>  Her descendants were later punished when Yishmael's progeny refused water to the Children of Israel,<fn>See <a href="ישעיהוכא-יג-יז" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 21:13-18</a> and the <a href="TanchumaYitro5" data-aht="source">Tanchuma's</a> understanding of these verses.</fn> resulting in many deaths.  Radak, too, suggests that Sarah was deserving of rebuke, saying that Avraham kept quiet only for the sake of "household peace" (שלום בית).</point> |
− | <point><b>Why is Avraham "upset about his son"?</b> Jubilees and Radak interpret that Avraham is upset about the notion of banishing | + | <point><b>Why is Avraham "upset about his son"?</b> Jubilees and Radak interpret that Avraham is upset about the notion of banishing a beloved son.<fn>Cf. Bereshit Rabbah 53:12.</fn>  This reaction is completely understandable given that Yishmael did nothing to deserve expulsion.  In addition, Radak asserts that Avraham loved him both because he was his firstborn and because "בדרך טובה היה הולך, כי הוא גדל עמו ולמדהו דרך ה'‏"‎.<fn>See above that, according to Radak, Avraham would have rebuked Sarah for her request had it not been that he wanted to preserve household peace.</fn>  He claims that if Avraham taught outsiders to follow in the path of Hashem, it is inconceivable that he did not do the same for his own child, Yishmael.</point> |
<point><b>Why did Hashem side with Sarah?</b> Abarbanel explains that Yitzchak alone was to inherit, as Hashem wanted the chosen line to emerge from Avraham and Sarah.  Hashem, thus, agreed with Sarah that in order to ensure this and prevent any contesting of the inheritance, Yishmael needed to be expelled from the home.<fn>The expulsion, thus, had nothing to do with the specific actions of Yishmael.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why did Hashem side with Sarah?</b> Abarbanel explains that Yitzchak alone was to inherit, as Hashem wanted the chosen line to emerge from Avraham and Sarah.  Hashem, thus, agreed with Sarah that in order to ensure this and prevent any contesting of the inheritance, Yishmael needed to be expelled from the home.<fn>The expulsion, thus, had nothing to do with the specific actions of Yishmael.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Why is Yishmael made into a great nation?</b> Although these commentators do not address the issue directly, they might suggest that Yishmael himself merited such a reward. Alternatively, this is part of Hashem's promise to make Avraham himself into a great nation.</point> | <point><b>Why is Yishmael made into a great nation?</b> Although these commentators do not address the issue directly, they might suggest that Yishmael himself merited such a reward. Alternatively, this is part of Hashem's promise to make Avraham himself into a great nation.</point> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
<category name="">Extremely Negative | <category name="">Extremely Negative | ||
<p>Yishmael was evil, and he committed the most heinous of crimes, including the threesome of idolatry, murder, and illicit relations.</p> | <p>Yishmael was evil, and he committed the most heinous of crimes, including the threesome of idolatry, murder, and illicit relations.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="ToseftaSota6-6" data-aht="source">R. Akiva and other Sages</a><a href="ToseftaSota5-12" data-aht="source">Tosefta Sotah 5:12</a><a href="ToseftaSota6-6" data-aht="source">Tosefta Sotah 6:6</a><a href="SifreDevarim31" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim 31</a><a href="BereshitRabbah45-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 45:9</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 53:11</a><a href="Tosefta" data-aht="parshan">About the Tosefta</a><a href="Sifre" data-aht="parshan">About the Sifre</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit21-91115-16" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit21-91115-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,11,15-16</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit25-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:8</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBemidbar7-87" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 7:87</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezerHigger29" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezerHigger29" data-aht="source">(Higger) 29</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit21-910111720" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit16-1216" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12,16</a><a href="RashiBereshit17-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17:18</a><a href="RashiBereshit21-910111720" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,10,11,14,17,20</a><a href="RashiBereshit25-917" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:9,17</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink><fn>This appears to be Rashi's dominant position.  However, Rashi (21:17) does cite the opinion of R. Simon in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">53:14</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> that Yishmael was righteous.  Rashi's supercommentaries note the contradiction | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="ToseftaSota6-6" data-aht="source">R. Akiva and other Sages</a><a href="ToseftaSota5-12" data-aht="source">Tosefta Sotah 5:12</a><a href="ToseftaSota6-6" data-aht="source">Tosefta Sotah 6:6</a><a href="SifreDevarim31" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim 31</a><a href="BereshitRabbah45-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 45:9</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 53:11</a><a href="Tosefta" data-aht="parshan">About the Tosefta</a><a href="Sifre" data-aht="parshan">About the Sifre</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit21-91115-16" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit21-91115-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,11,15-16</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit25-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:8</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBemidbar7-87" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 7:87</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezerHigger29" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezerHigger29" data-aht="source">(Higger) 29</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit21-910111720" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit16-1216" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12,16</a><a href="RashiBereshit17-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17:18</a><a href="RashiBereshit21-910111720" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:9,10,11,14,17,20</a><a href="RashiBereshit25-917" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:9,17</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink><fn>This appears to be Rashi's dominant position.  However, Rashi (21:17) does cite the opinion of R. Simon in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah53-14" data-aht="source">53:14</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> that Yishmael was righteous.  Rashi's supercommentaries note the contradiction in Rashi.</fn></mekorot> |
<point><b>Prophecy to Hagar – "וְהוּא יִהְיֶה פֶּרֶא אָדָם"</b> – According to Resh Lakish in Bereshit Rabbah and Rashi, the angel's words pointed to the wickedness of Yishmael's character.  Rashi asserts that he was to become a robber ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל") who was to be hated and provoked by all ("וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").‎<fn>Abarbanel questions this approach from the context.  If the angel was trying to encourage Hagar to return home, how would a negative prophecy regarding her son help?  He writes:  "איך יגיד העתידות האלה המלאך להגר ובזה אין בשורה מוצאת".</fn>  Resh Lakish goes a step further, asserting that he would rob, not possessions, but lives.<fn>He also makes a play on the words "כֹּל בּוֹ", suggesting that it be read "כלבו", equating him with a dog, both of whom eat carcasses.  See also <multilink><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">HaRekhasim Levik'ah</a><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter (HaRekhasim Levikah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter</a></multilink> who reads the prophecy quite negatively as well. He asserts that the phrase "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is not a description of a type of person (in which case the adjective would have followed and not preceded the noun), but rather a description of a פרא, a donkey.  Yishmael is more donkey than man.</fn></point> | <point><b>Prophecy to Hagar – "וְהוּא יִהְיֶה פֶּרֶא אָדָם"</b> – According to Resh Lakish in Bereshit Rabbah and Rashi, the angel's words pointed to the wickedness of Yishmael's character.  Rashi asserts that he was to become a robber ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל") who was to be hated and provoked by all ("וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").‎<fn>Abarbanel questions this approach from the context.  If the angel was trying to encourage Hagar to return home, how would a negative prophecy regarding her son help?  He writes:  "איך יגיד העתידות האלה המלאך להגר ובזה אין בשורה מוצאת".</fn>  Resh Lakish goes a step further, asserting that he would rob, not possessions, but lives.<fn>He also makes a play on the words "כֹּל בּוֹ", suggesting that it be read "כלבו", equating him with a dog, both of whom eat carcasses.  See also <multilink><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">HaRekhasim Levik'ah</a><a href="HaRekhasimLevikahBereshit16-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:12</a><a href="R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter (HaRekhasim Levikah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda Leib Frankfurter</a></multilink> who reads the prophecy quite negatively as well. He asserts that the phrase "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is not a description of a type of person (in which case the adjective would have followed and not preceded the noun), but rather a description of a פרא, a donkey.  Yishmael is more donkey than man.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – Rashi asserts that Avraham was praying for the spiritual well being of Yishmael, that he should live a life that is "before God".</point> | <point><b>Avraham's plea: "לוּ יִשְׁמָעֵאל יִחְיֶה לְפָנֶיךָ"</b> – Rashi asserts that Avraham was praying for the spiritual well being of Yishmael, that he should live a life that is "before God".</point> |
Version as of 11:33, 19 November 2014
Yishmael
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
The scarcity of information about Yishmael leads commentators to evaluate his character based on clues from those who interact with him, specifically Avraham and Sarah. In so doing, though, exegetes find themselves in a catch-22. On one hand, it seems inconceivable that Sarah would expel Yishmael had he been an innocent, righteous youth. On the other hand, it is equally troubling to suggest that Avraham could have raised a son that would commit terrible crimes.
As a result, the commentators' characterizations of Yishmael run the gamut from innocent to evil. Some exegetes, like Radak, posit that Yishmael was a wholesome youth, and Tzeror HaMor even faults Sarah for banishing him. Rashi, following numerous Midrashim, goes to the opposite extreme, painting an utterly wicked Yishmael and interpreting the various stories in which he appears to match this image. Ramban adopts a middle of the road approach, depicting a negative, but not villainous Yishmael.
Neutral to Positive
Yishmael did not actively sin, and may even have had some merits.
- Free – According to Ibn Ezra, "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" is a metaphor for a non-submissive person who is free from the yoke of others.3 The angel told Hagar that Yishmael would be a powerful individual, victorious over his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), but simultaneously causing others to fight back ("וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ").
- Man of the wilderness – Radak asserts that "פֶּרֶא אָדָם" refers to a man of the wilderness who, due to his nomadic lifestyle, will constantly be battling his neighbors ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ"). However, he will not flee from them, but manage to dwell amongst them ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן").4
- Man of civilization – Abarbanel reads the opening words of the angel as a rhetorical question: "Will your son be a man of the wilderness?"5 The angel is, thus, informing Hagar that Yishmael will live amongst men ("עַל פְּנֵי כָל אֶחָיו יִשְׁכֹּן"), intermingling and socializing with them ("יָדוֹ בַכֹּל"), rather than alone in the wilderness.6
- According to Jubilees and Ibn Ezra, Sarah was simply jealous,12 while the Tzeror HaMor asserts that she was insulted as she mistakenly thought that Yishmael was laughing at her.13
- Abarbanel contends that even before the incident Sarah was planning to expel Yishmael, fearing that otherwise he would claim rights to the inheritance. Seeing Yishmael being the center of attention simply confirmed her suspicions that the longer he stayed, the more difficult disinheriting him would become.
- Deserving – According to R. Simon in Bereshit Rabbah, Hashem listened to Yishmael and saved him on his own merits. R. Simon understands the phrase "בַּאֲשֶׁר הוּא שָׁם" to refer to Yishmael's present spiritual status.19 Though his descendants were to oppress Israel, Yishmael himself was righteous and deserving of salvation.
- Punishment to Sarah – Tzeror HaMor suggests that it would have been better had Yishmael died from the lack of water, since then he would never have borne a nation who was to oppress the Israelites. Due to Sarah's actions, though, he was saved so that he could later punish Israel.
- Neutral – Ibn Ezra and Radak identify Yishmael's descendants with Arav and Midyan, both of whom live in the wilderness, and as such fulfill the original prophecy to Hagar.
- Negative – Ibn Ezra also suggests that the fourth beast of Daniel's vision refers to Yishmael, who will prevail over many but ultimately be vanquished. Tzeror HaMor similarly identifies Yishmael's descendants with Israel's enemies, associating them with the people of Arav in Yeshayahu 21 who refuse Israel water.20
Mildly Negative
Yishmael had several negative traits, but he was not completely wicked.
- Militancy – Ramban maintains that Yishmael was to become a "פֶּרֶא אָדָם", a militant person always ready to pounce on and devour others.22 He sees in this a punishment to Avraham and Sarah who had sinned in their harsh treatment of Hagar. They were meted a measure for measure punishment, as Yishmael's descendants were to similarly oppress their offspring.
- Inheritance related – R. Shimon B. Yochai portrays Yishmael laughing at the concept of Yitzchak inheriting25 while Seforno has him suggest that Yitzchak was born of Avimelekh, which would thereby disqualify him from inheriting.
- Degrading Yitzchak – R. Saadia suggests that Yishmael was scornfully saying that Yitzchak would not survive to adulthood, while Ramban presents him as more simply poking fun at Yitzchak and the party made in his honor.
- Foolish play – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, Yishmael was acting foolishly, laughing and speaking in an unbecoming manner.
- Protect Yitzchak's character– According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, Sarah wanted to prevent Yitzchak from learning from the bad example set by Yishmael.26 Sarah was not worried about his sharing in a monetary inheritance, but about the two brothers inheriting together, in the sense of growing up together.27
- Prevent Yishmael's inheritance – Seforno asserts that since Hagar was trying to ensure through her son's libel that Yishmael inherit all, Sarah banished them so that they would not inherit at all.
- Punishment – Ramban maintains that Sarah viewed Yishmael's actions as a forgetting of his rightful place as servant. Though this normally would deserve death or corporal punishment, Sarah instead decided to expel Hagar and Yishmael.
Extremely Negative
Yishmael was evil, and he committed the most heinous of crimes, including the threesome of idolatry, murder, and illicit relations.