Difference between revisions of "Abuse of Monarchical Power: David and Achav/0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
m |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | <div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | ||
<h2>Introduction</h2> | <h2>Introduction</h2> | ||
− | People in position of power often tend to abuse that power.  Biblical characters are no exception, and the stories of David's sin with Batsheva (<a href="ShemuelII11" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 11</a> and <a href="ShemuelII12-1-14" data-aht="source">12</a>) and Achav's acquisition of Navot's vineyard (<a href="MelakhimI21" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 21</a>) are two cases in point.  Despite the vastly contrasting reputations of the two kings, the two stories follow surprisingly similar plot lines. In each, a king, who lacks nothing, nonetheless desires a layperson's beloved property. With the aid of others, | + | People in position of power often tend to abuse that power.  Biblical characters are no exception, and the stories of David's sin with Batsheva (<a href="ShemuelII11" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 11</a> and <a href="ShemuelII12-1-14" data-aht="source">12</a>) and Achav's acquisition of Navot's vineyard (<a href="MelakhimI21" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 21</a>) are two cases in point.  Despite the vastly contrasting reputations of the two kings, the two stories follow surprisingly similar plot lines. In each, a king, who lacks nothing, nonetheless desires a layperson's beloved property. With the aid of others, a plot is orchestrated to bring about the owner's death, so that he can take the item for himself. In the end, the king is rebuked by the prophet, but repentance serves to mitigate the punishment. |
<h2>Content Parallels</h2> | <h2>Content Parallels</h2> |
Version as of 12:11, 2 May 2018
Abuse of Monarchical Power: David and Achav
Introduction
People in position of power often tend to abuse that power. Biblical characters are no exception, and the stories of David's sin with Batsheva (Shemuel II 11 and 12) and Achav's acquisition of Navot's vineyard (Melakhim I 21) are two cases in point. Despite the vastly contrasting reputations of the two kings, the two stories follow surprisingly similar plot lines. In each, a king, who lacks nothing, nonetheless desires a layperson's beloved property. With the aid of others, a plot is orchestrated to bring about the owner's death, so that he can take the item for himself. In the end, the king is rebuked by the prophet, but repentance serves to mitigate the punishment.
Content Parallels
- The kings – Both David and Achav were powerful kings who had more than their share of wealth and property, but nonetheless wanted more. Hashem tells David, "וָאֶתְּנָה לְךָ אֶת בֵּית אֲדֹנֶיךָ וְאֶת נְשֵׁי אֲדֹנֶיךָ בְּחֵיקֶךָ וָאֶתְּנָה לְךָ אֶת בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל וִיהוּדָה" (Shemuel II 12:8), clearly emphasizing that since David had been given so much, it was unjust that he should look to take the wife of another. Likewise, though Achav apparently had a palace not only in Shomron, but also in Yizrael, and despite owning vineyards that were more valuable than Navot's,1 he nonetheless wanted more.
- The desired "property" – In each story the king's desire something which is especially significant to the owner. Natan's parable emphasizes that Batsheva was beloved by Uriah, who, in contrast to David, had but one wife. Similarly, the vineyard of Navot is a "נחלת אבות," and therefore land from which he is not willing to part.
- King removed from the murder – The deaths of Uriah and Navot are set up in such a manner as to leave the public unaware of the king's role and believe him innocent. Navot is killed via a staged trial in which he is accused of blasphemy and treason, while Uriah is killed in battle.
- Shared plot components – Both plots involve the "sending of letters" (Izevel to the elders to frame Navot, and David to Yoav to isolate Uriah on the battlefield), an abuse of power by royal institutions (the army and judicial system), and the cooperation of officials whom the victim would have trusted (the townsmen of Navot and Uriah's fellow soldiers and general-in-chief). In each case, after the plot succeeds word is sent back to the king.
- Partners in crime – In neither story does the king act alone. David involves Yoav, who achieves David's goal, but does so through his own means rather than those suggested by the king. Navot shares his distress with his wife, Izevel, who takes matters totally into her own hands, independently coming up with the plan to kill Navot.
- The victims – Each of Uriah and Navot take a moral stance when refusing a request of the king. Uriah questions how he can sleep in his own bed when the nation is camping on the battlefield, while Navot implies that selling his vineyard would be against Hashem's will.
- Fast/ refusal to eat bread – When David is faced with the imminent death of his son, he fasts and refuses bread as part of his prayers to save him. Achav similarly refuses to eat, first as a sullen reaction to not getting what he wanted from Navot, and later in the story as part of his repentance.2
- Prophetic rebuke – Both kings are essentially told "הֲרָצַחְתָּ וְגַם יָרָשְׁתָּ"3 and punished measure for measure for their sins.4 The punishments are aimed not only at them, but their descendants/house as well.
- Repentance – david's cry of "חָטָאתִי לַי"י" earns him
Literary Allusions
Analysis
- Degree of similarity –
- Distinctive phrases –