Difference between revisions of "Advice and Implementation/1"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Original Author: Ariella Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
<page type="Introduction">
 
<page type="Introduction">
<h1>Advice and Implementation</h1>
+
<h1>Advice and Implementation</h1>
 
 
 
 
<h2>Questions</h2>
 
<h2>Questions</h2>
<p>In <aht source="Shemot18-21">Shemot 18:24</aht>, the Torah tells us that Moshe listened to Yitro and implemented all of his advice:</p>
+
<p>In <a href="Shemot18-21" data-aht="source">Shemot 18:24</a>, the Torah tells us that Moshe listened to Yitro and implemented all of his advice:</p>
 
<q>So Moshe listened to the voice of his father-in-law, and did all that he had said.</q>
 
<q>So Moshe listened to the voice of his father-in-law, and did all that he had said.</q>
<p>And, in fact, Moshe appoints rulers of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens, exactly as Yitro had recommended. However, with regard to the qualifications of the appointees, Moshe appears to veer from Yitro's advice. While Yitro proposed (<aht source="Shemot18-21">18:21</aht>) that Moshe choose judges who were "capable men, God fearing, men of truth, who hate unjust gain" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל יִרְאֵי אֱלֹהִים אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע), the Torah (<aht source="Shemot18-21">18:25</aht>) tells us only that Moshe's selections were "capable men" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל), without mentioning any of the other attributes – see <aht subpage="Table">Table</aht>. Why are these other job qualifications omitted?<fn>There are also a number of smaller variations between the advice and implementation – see the discussion of Cassuto's position in <aht page="Advice and Implementation/2#Included">Exegetical Approaches</aht>.</fn></p>
+
<p>And, in fact, Moshe appoints rulers of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens, exactly as Yitro had recommended. However, with regard to the qualifications of the appointees, Moshe appears to veer from Yitro's advice. While Yitro proposed (<a href="Shemot18-21" data-aht="source">18:21</a>) that Moshe choose judges who were "capable men, God fearing, men of truth, who hate unjust gain" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל יִרְאֵי אֱ-לֹהִים אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע), the Torah (<a href="Shemot18-21" data-aht="source">18:25</a>) tells us only that Moshe's selections were "capable men" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל), without mentioning any of the other attributes – see <a href="Table" data-aht="subpage">Table</a>. Why are these other job qualifications omitted?<fn>There are also a number of smaller variations between the advice and implementation – see the discussion of Cassuto's position in <a href="Advice and Implementation/2#Included" data-aht="page">Exegetical Approaches</a>.</fn></p>
<p>Similarly, in <aht source="Devarim1-13">Devarim 1:13</aht>,<fn>According to most exegetes, Devarim 1 tells of the same event as Shemot 18 – see <aht page="Appointing Moshe's Assistants">Appointing Moshe's Assistants</aht>.</fn> Moshe asks the nation to find men who are חֲכָמִים וּנְבֹנִים וִידֻעִים ("wise, understanding, and well known"<fn>ידעים may be alternatively rendered as "knowledgeable." See LXX, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, and RD"Z Hoffmann (and the parallel he cites from Kohelet 9:11). See also E. Qimron, "מילון המקרא בראי המגילות", Tarbiz 58:3-4 (1989):303-304.</fn>). In the continuation, however, men who are only חֲכָמִים וִידֻעִים ("wise and well known") are selected while the trait of "understanding" is absent – see <aht subpage="Table">Table</aht>. Why, here too, is there a difference between the criteria being sought and those that were actually found?</p>
+
<p>Similarly, in <a href="Devarim1-13" data-aht="source">Devarim 1:13</a>,<fn>According to most exegetes, Devarim 1 tells of the same event as Shemot 18 – see <a href="Appointing Moshe's Assistants" data-aht="page">Appointing Moshe's Assistants</a>.</fn> Moshe asks the nation to find men who are חֲכָמִים וּנְבֹנִים וִידֻעִים ("wise, understanding, and well known"<fn>ידעים may be alternatively rendered as "knowledgeable." See LXX, Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan), and RD"Z Hoffmann (and the parallel he cites from Kohelet 9:11). See also E. Qimron, "מילון המקרא בראי המגילות", Tarbiz 58:3-4 (1989):303-304.</fn>). In the continuation, however, men who are only חֲכָמִים וִידֻעִים ("wise and well known") are selected while the trait of "understanding" is absent – see <a href="Table" data-aht="subpage">Table</a>. Why, here too, is there a difference between the criteria being sought and those that were actually found?</p>
 
 
  
</page>
+
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Latest revision as of 14:23, 24 July 2019

Advice and Implementation

Introduction

Questions

In Shemot 18:24, the Torah tells us that Moshe listened to Yitro and implemented all of his advice:

So Moshe listened to the voice of his father-in-law, and did all that he had said.

And, in fact, Moshe appoints rulers of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens, exactly as Yitro had recommended. However, with regard to the qualifications of the appointees, Moshe appears to veer from Yitro's advice. While Yitro proposed (18:21) that Moshe choose judges who were "capable men, God fearing, men of truth, who hate unjust gain" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל יִרְאֵי אֱ-לֹהִים אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע), the Torah (18:25) tells us only that Moshe's selections were "capable men" (אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל), without mentioning any of the other attributes – see Table. Why are these other job qualifications omitted?1

Similarly, in Devarim 1:13,2 Moshe asks the nation to find men who are חֲכָמִים וּנְבֹנִים וִידֻעִים ("wise, understanding, and well known"3). In the continuation, however, men who are only חֲכָמִים וִידֻעִים ("wise and well known") are selected while the trait of "understanding" is absent – see Table. Why, here too, is there a difference between the criteria being sought and those that were actually found?