Difference between revisions of "Aharon/0"
< Aharon
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
In several  instances in Torah, a simple reading of the story implies that Aharon might have sinned: | In several  instances in Torah, a simple reading of the story implies that Aharon might have sinned: | ||
<subcategory>Sin of the Golden Calf | <subcategory>Sin of the Golden Calf | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>One of the most troubling aspects of the Sin of the Golden Calf is the lead role that  Aharon appears to play  in the events  Is it possible that Aharon was involved in an idolatrous rite, or is it blasphemous to even ponder such a possibility? Though commentators universally attempt to defend Aharon and agree that he did not worship the calf as an alternative deity, they differ in how they understand and mitigate his wrongdoing:  [For a full discussion of the episode, see <a href="Sin of the Golden Calf" data-aht="page">Sin of the Golden Calf</a>.] </p> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li><b>Inappropriate worship of Hashem</b> | + | <li><b>Delay tactics</b> / <b>test </b>–  According to Pirkei de Rabbi Eliezer and Rashi, though the people themselves viewed the calf as alternative god, Aharon himself did not.  All of his actions were aimed simply at delaying the people, hoping that Moshe would arrive before they sinned. R. Saadia, instead, defends Aharon by  comparing him to Yehu,<fn>See Melakhim II 10:18-28.</fn> who similarly pretended to promote idolatry, but only in order to discover and eliminate those who were guilty of Baal worship.</li> |
| − | <li><b>Replacing Moshe</b> – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor, the calf was not connected to idolatry at all. Bereft of Moshe's leadership and his connection to the Divine, the people searched for an alternative to guide them in the wilderness.  Aharon tried to placate them by providing a powerless leader whom they would abandon as soon as Moshe returned. Hashem's anger was aimed at avenging Moshe's honor, not His own | + | <li><b>Inappropriate worship of Hashem</b> – The Kuzari portrays Aharon as having positive, albeit misguided, intentions. The nation desired not an alternative god, but a tangible object which could represent Hashem and to whom they could direct their worship. Aharon erred only in not recognizing that all graven images are prohibited, even of Hashem Himself.</li> |
| − | + | <li><b>Replacing of Moshe</b> – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor, the calf was not connected to idolatry at all. Bereft of Moshe's leadership and his connection to the Divine, the people searched for an alternative to guide them in the wilderness.  Aharon tried to placate them by providing a powerless leader whom they would abandon as soon as Moshe returned. Hashem's anger was aimed at avenging Moshe's honor, not His own.</li> | |
| − | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Slandering Moshe | <subcategory>Slandering Moshe | ||
<p>Bemidbar 12 describes Miryam and Aharon's criticizing of Moshe's marriage to the Cushite woman, and Miryam's ensuing punishment.  What led Miryam and Aharon to criticize their brother and how we to evaluate their infraction? Was this malicious slander, idle chatter or simply poor judgment?  [For elaboration, see <a href="Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage" data-aht="page">Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage</a>.]</p> | <p>Bemidbar 12 describes Miryam and Aharon's criticizing of Moshe's marriage to the Cushite woman, and Miryam's ensuing punishment.  What led Miryam and Aharon to criticize their brother and how we to evaluate their infraction? Was this malicious slander, idle chatter or simply poor judgment?  [For elaboration, see <a href="Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage" data-aht="page">Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage</a>.]</p> | ||
| − | <li></li> | + | <ul> |
| + | <li><b>An attempt to help</b> - The Sifre is perhaps the most extreme in its defense of Miryam and Aahron, viewing the siblings as simply trying to encourage the resumption of normal marital life between Moshe and Zipporah and having no spiteful intent whatsoever.</li> | ||
| + | <li>Objection to perceived wrongdoing – </li> | ||
| + | <li>Challenge to authority</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Sin at Mei Merivah | <subcategory>Sin at Mei Merivah | ||
Version as of 14:16, 12 October 2019
Aharon
Aharon's Roles
Spokesman
Political Leader
Priest
Unique Traits
Possible Sins In several instances in Torah, a simple reading of the story implies that Aharon might have sinned:
Sin of the Golden Calf
One of the most troubling aspects of the Sin of the Golden Calf is the lead role that Aharon appears to play in the events Is it possible that Aharon was involved in an idolatrous rite, or is it blasphemous to even ponder such a possibility? Though commentators universally attempt to defend Aharon and agree that he did not worship the calf as an alternative deity, they differ in how they understand and mitigate his wrongdoing: [For a full discussion of the episode, see Sin of the Golden Calf.]
- Delay tactics / test – According to Pirkei de Rabbi Eliezer and Rashi, though the people themselves viewed the calf as alternative god, Aharon himself did not. All of his actions were aimed simply at delaying the people, hoping that Moshe would arrive before they sinned. R. Saadia, instead, defends Aharon by comparing him to Yehu,1 who similarly pretended to promote idolatry, but only in order to discover and eliminate those who were guilty of Baal worship.
- Inappropriate worship of Hashem – The Kuzari portrays Aharon as having positive, albeit misguided, intentions. The nation desired not an alternative god, but a tangible object which could represent Hashem and to whom they could direct their worship. Aharon erred only in not recognizing that all graven images are prohibited, even of Hashem Himself.
- Replacing of Moshe – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor, the calf was not connected to idolatry at all. Bereft of Moshe's leadership and his connection to the Divine, the people searched for an alternative to guide them in the wilderness. Aharon tried to placate them by providing a powerless leader whom they would abandon as soon as Moshe returned. Hashem's anger was aimed at avenging Moshe's honor, not His own.
Slandering Moshe
Bemidbar 12 describes Miryam and Aharon's criticizing of Moshe's marriage to the Cushite woman, and Miryam's ensuing punishment. What led Miryam and Aharon to criticize their brother and how we to evaluate their infraction? Was this malicious slander, idle chatter or simply poor judgment? [For elaboration, see Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage.]
- An attempt to help - The Sifre is perhaps the most extreme in its defense of Miryam and Aahron, viewing the siblings as simply trying to encourage the resumption of normal marital life between Moshe and Zipporah and having no spiteful intent whatsoever.
- Objection to perceived wrongdoing –
- Challenge to authority
