Ancient Near Eastern Index – Parashat Vaera

• See Tanakh and Archaeology (5), by R. Amnon Bazak, for a review of arguments that attempt to deny the historicity of the servitude in Egypt and the Exodus, and discussion of the weaknesses of these claims.  R. Bazak then provides counter-arguments which support the truth of the events. For example, he notes how the Torah possesses extensive knowledge about the details of the period and close familiarity with ancient Egyptian culture and its characteristics¹ which a later writer fabricating the events would not have known.
• See Ramesses and the Question of Dating the Exodus, by Prof. Yoel Elitzur, which discusses claims that Ramses II must be the Paroh of the Exodus due, among other things, to mention of the storage city of the same name. As this identification does not fit with the chronology presented by Tanakh, Prof. Elitzur lays out several arguments against the claim, noting weaknesses in the evidence supplied for the proposed dating.
• See Was There an Exodus?, or watch יציאת מצרים בראי הארכאולוגיה ומשמעות שירת הים, both by Rabbi Dr. Joshua Berman, for analysis of evidence of the Exodus and the meaning of Biblical phrases associated with the Exodus in light of ancient Near Eastern sources. He notes how many details of the exodus story reflect the realities of late-second-millennium Egypt . Among these he includes Torah's "familiarity with Egyptian names, its awareness of settlement patterns in the eastern delta and of the correct way of naming the pharaoh, its cognizance of royal fortifications outside of Egypt and the geography of the Sinai peninsula, the Negev, and Transjordan".
• See Sefer Shemot: Archaeology, by Nachliel Selevan, for discussion of scholarly approaches to the question of when the slavery and Exodus took place in Egyptian history.

• See Exploring Exodus (New York, 1996): 21-25 by Dr. Nahum Sarna for analysis  of the nature of Egyptian slavery. He points to several Egyptian texts which might shed light on the hardships experienced by agricultural workers and brick builders in ancient Egypt. He characterizes Egyptian servitude as “state slavery, the organized imposition of forced labor upon the male population for long and indefinite terms of service under degrading and brutal conditions” without compensation or civil rights, whose lot might have often been worse than that of household salves.  [See also Nature of the Bondage for differing views of the nature of the Egyptian oppression among Biblical commentators.²] 
• See Brick by Brick, by David A. Falk, for a brief analysis of the purpose and type of building that the Israelites likely performed in Egypt and the behavior of the taskmasters.
• See The Global Egyptian Museum’s entry on Mud Bricks for a brief description of the type of bricks the Israelites are described as producing in Shemot 5.
• See Bricks Without Straw? By Charles F. Nims, for a description of ancient brick-making techniques and an exploration (and rejection) of claims of having identified archaeological evidence of bricks made without straw that attest to the narrative in Shemot 5. He notes that Paroh's command that straw will not be given to the nation does not mean that they made bricks without this component, but that now they had to collect straw on their own.

Both Shemot 12:12 and Bemidbar 33:4 explicitly state that the Plague of the Firstborn executed a "judgment against the [Egyptian] gods". Both Midrashim and scholars have suggested that the other plagues as well might have targeted what were believed to be Egyptian deities.

Primary Sources

Articles

• See Egyptian Background and the Exodus Narrative for explanation of the possible Egyptian etymology of the names Moshe, Aharon, and Miriam.  See there also for discussion of the significance of the term "יד חזקה" in light of the fact that Parohs often bragged about their "strong arm" and the term "כבד לב" in light of the Egyptian belied that hearts were weighed to see if they were too heavy to pass into the afterlife.
• See The Egyptian Derivation of the Name Moses, by J. Gwyn Grifiths, for analysis of suggestions about the Egyptian root of the name Moshe and the weaknesses of various theories. 

Dr. Nahum Sarna, in Exploring Exodus (New York, 1996): 66-70, identifies connections between the miracles performed by Moshe and Aharon and parallels in Ancient Near Eastern legend, including the following: 

• The sign of the staff turning into a crocodile can be more fully understood against the context of the Egyptian legend of Khufu, narrated in brief here as Story 2 on the Westcar Papyrus. 
• The Sumerian legend of Inanna and Su-Kale-Tuda, narrated in brief here, tells of a plague of water being turned to blood. 
• The Egyptian text The Prophecies of Neferti describes wild animals overrunning the land as a symbol of destruction and chaos.