Avraham/0/en

Avraham – Overview

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

Avraham

Religious Identity

Journey to Belief

Though the Midrash38:13About Bereshit Rabbah shares stories of Avraham destroying his father's idols and being sentenced to death for his beliefs, we know nothing of his religious journey from Sefer Bereshit itself. Rambam and the Kuzari offer two possibilities, each in line with their own philosophical beliefs about attainment of faith:

• Intellectual inquiry – RambamHilkhot Avodah Zarah 1:3About R. Moshe b. Maimon maintains that Avraham's belief was a product of his intellectual quest to understand the ways of the world.¹
• Tradition – R"Y HaLevi1:47About R. Yehuda HaLevi, in contrast, assumes that knowledge of Hashem was passed down through the generations, from Adam to Noach to Shem and finally to Avraham.

Uniqueness?

Was Avraham's monotheism unique? This question depends on how one understands the phrase "וּמַלְכִּי צֶדֶק מֶלֶךְ שָׁלֵם... כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן":

• Not Unique – Malkitzedek was similarly monotheistic.
• The MidrashPirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 8About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, and many sources in its wake, identify Malkitzedek with Shem, whose monotheism predated that of Avraham (and, as mentioned above,  might have himself led Avraham to belief). 
• RadakBereshit 14:18About R. David Kimchi, instead, allows for the possibility that Malkitzedek was an outsider, unrelated to Avraham in any way, who served only one God. Moreover, given that he was a king, it is possible that the entire city of Shalem was similarly monotheistic.
• Unique – ShadalBereshit 14:18About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto, NetzivBereshit 14:18About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin, and Hoil MosheBereshit 14:18About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi, in contrast maintain that being a "כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" simply means serving the highest god in a pantheon of many gods, or that "Elyon" was the name of a Canaanite god. Hoil Moshe emphasizes that Avraham's importance lay in the very fact that he was the sole monotheist, so it is inconceivable that others worshiped similarly.

Avraham & Mitzvot

Did Avraham keep all the mitzvot? The issue has been hotly debated for generations. On one hand, Avraham lived centuries before the Torah was given and many of its laws would be meaningless to him, suggesting that he did not keep them. On the other hand, it seems paradoxical to conceive of the founder of a religion not observing even its most basic commandments. This leads to a variety of approaches to the question: [For a full discussion of the issue, see Avot and Mitzvot – Was Avraham the First Jew.]

• Full Observance – See Mishna KiddushinKiddushin 4:14About the Mishna, Tosefta KiddushinKiddushin 5:14About the Tosefta, Bereshit Rabbah61:1About Bereshit Rabbah, Bavli YomaYoma 28bAbout the BavliBereshit 26:5About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki and RashiBereshit 26:5About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki who suggest that Avraham kept the entire Torah, and according to some, even the Oral Law.
• No Observance – See Tosafot RidRid Bava Batra 120aAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot, R. Avraham b. HaRambamBereshit 35:4About R. Avraham Maimonides, and R. Yosef ibn KaspiTirat Kesef 96About R. Yosef ibn Kaspi who claim that Avraham observed what was specifically commanded to him by Hashem in Sefer Bereshit, but not other laws later given in the Torah. His greatness lay in his monotheistic belief and exemplary moral behavior, but not in ritual observance.
• Partial Observance – RashbamBereshit 26:5About R. Shemuel b. Meir suggests that only rational mitzvot which relate to a moral ethic were observed by Avraham and the other Patriarchs.

Distinct Worship?

How distinct was Avraham's mode of worship from those around him?  This question is an outgrowth of the above. If Avraham was unaware of later commandments, is it possible that, in worshiping Hashem, he borrowed from the practices of the pagans around him?

• Akeidat Yitzchak – See Shadal who suggests that Avraham, like the rest of the world in his era, originally viewed child sacrifice as the highest form of devotion to God. It was only through the story of the Akeidah itself that Hashem taught both him and the monotheistic world at large that the practice was, in fact, immoral and repugnant. For elaboration, see Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak.
• וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל –

Missionary?

Did Avraham attempt to convert others to belief in Hashem? Though Sefer Bereshit never explicitly presents Avraham as actively doing so, commentators point to several verses which might bear on the question:

• הַנֶּפֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ בְחָרָן" – Sifre Devarim6:5About Sifre Devarim, Bavli SanhedrinSanhedrin 99bAbout the Bavli, and R. Elazar in Bereshit Rabbah39:1484:4About Bereshit Rabbah all suggest that this verse speaks of converting those in Charan. Most of the non-midrashic sources, in contrast, assume the "souls" simply refer to Avraham's slaves and maidservants.
• וַיִּבֶן שָׁם מִזְבֵּחַ לַי"י וַיִּקְרָא בְּשֵׁם י"י – While OnkelosBereshit 12:8About Targum Onkelos, RashiBereshit 12:8About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki, and R"Y Bekhor ShorBereshit 13:4Bereshit 21:33About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor² assume that this refers to personal prayer, Bereshit Rabbah39:16About Bereshit Rabbah and Ramban Bereshit 12:8About R. Moshe b. Nachmanmaintain that it refers to Avraham calling to others to worship Hashem. According to Ramban, it is possible that the altar was not meant for sacrifices but instead served as a monument to announce the unity of Hashem.
• וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל... וַיִּקְרָא שָׁם בְּשֵׁם י"י – According to Resh Lakish in SotahSotah 10a-10bAbout the Bavli, Targum Pseudo JonathonBereshit 21:33About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and R. SaadiaCommentary Bereshit 21:33About R. Saadia Gaon, the planting of the Eshel was meant to encourage people to gather around Avraham so he could teach them about Hashem. R"Y Bekhor ShorBereshit 13:4Bereshit 21:33About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and RadakBereshit 21:33About R. David Kimchi, in contrast, suggest that it related to the covenant with the Philistines and that the verse does not speak of missionary activities..

Tests of Faith

Unique Traits

Belief in Hashem

"תתן חסד לאברהם" Avraham is often regarded as a model of "chessed".

"צְדָקָה וּמִשְׁפָּט"

Conduct in Battle

Bereshit 14 describes the Battle of the Kings and Avraham's military intervention so as to save his nephew Lot form captivity. Many suggest that the story was included in Tanakh since Avraham's conduct in war was worthy of emulation:

• According to R. Bachya and Abarbanel, the story teaches the reader about Avraham's bravery and his capabilities as a military strategist and warrior.
• R. D. claims that this alone could not possibly be the story's purpose, as the Torah does not come to glorify its heroes as mighty warriors.³ Instead, he suggests that Avraham's refusal to benefit from the spoils of battle reveals both his generosity and recognition that all belongs to Hashem.⁴
• Alternatively, Radak and Ralbag assert that the story teaches the importance of enduring loyalty to one's family. Avraham was willing to risk his own life in order to rescue his nephew, even though Lot had taken up company with evil people.

Possible Sins

Avraham in Egypt

Bereshit 12 describes Avraham's descent to Egypt due to famine. Commentators debate the propriety of his conduct throughout the episode. [For a full discussion of the various issues, see Endangering Sarai in Egypt.]

• Leaving Israel – Was Avraham justified in leaving the land promised to him by Hashem, or should he have trusted that Hashem would care for him during the famine and stayed put?
• Justified – Ralbag claims that, in times of famine, a person must do what they can to provide for themselves.  We don't rely on miracles.
• Not Justified – Ramban, in contrast, claims that Avraham should have had faith that Hashem would save him from famine.
• Endangering Sarah – Should Avraham have risked Sarah's honor to save his own life? After all, by posing as Avraham's sister, Sarah presented herself as available, making it much more likely that the Egyptians would take her!
• Justified – Most commentators attempt to defend Avraham's actions. Thus, Ralbag claims that preserving human life is more important than preventing forced sexual activity in a case where relations are not a Torah offense. The Ran, in contrast, suggests that Avraham was hoping to protect not only himself but also Sarah.  He planned to act as her guardian, in charge of her nuptials, and to ask such a high dowry that no one would be able to meet it.⁵
• Not Justified - Ramban and Cassuto assert that Avraham erred.  His actions betrayed a lack of faith in Hashem, and endangered Sarah unnecessarily.
• Lying – Was lying justified under the circumstances?
• Avraham lied – Most sources assume that in cases of danger to life, one is allowed to lie. 
• Avraham did not lie – R. Saadia adds that Avraham did not actively lie, but rather used a word with a dual meaning ("sister" can refer to either a sister or any relative).

Afflicting Hagar

In Bereshit 16, Sarah gives Hagar to Avraham in marriage, hoping that she will bear him a son.  After conceiving, Hagar begins to belittle her mistress, acting with disrespect ("וַתֵּקַל גְּבִרְתָּהּ בְּעֵינֶיהָ").  When Sarah complains, Avraham tells her, "הִנֵּה שִׁפְחָתֵךְ בְּיָדֵךְ עֲשִׂי לָהּ הַטּוֹב בְּעֵינָיִךְ" leading Sarah to afflict the maidservant ("וַתְּעַנֶּהָ שָׂרַי") and Hagar to flee. How should both Sarah and Avraham's actions be viewed?  Was Sarah being overly harsh? Even if so, should Avraham be held accountable?

• Both Sarah and Avraham acted properly – R. Chananel Bereshit 16About R. Chananel b. Chushielclaims that "וַתְּעַנֶּהָ" means that Sarah re-enslaved rather than afflicted Hagar.  The angel's command "שׁוּבִי אֶל גְּבִרְתֵּךְ וְהִתְעַנִּי תַּחַת יָדֶיהָ" proves that Sarah did no wrong.
• Only Sarah acted improperly – Radak Bereshit 16:6About R. David Kimchiblames Sarah, but excuses Avraham who acted only out of a desire to keep peace in the home.
• Both Sarah and Avraham acted improperly – RambanBereshit 16:6About R. Moshe b. Nachman and Tzeror HaMorTzeror HaMor Bereshit 16:1About R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)  fault both parties.  Avraham should not have given his wife free reign to do as she pleased.

"בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה"

After Hashem promises Avraham the Land of Israel in Bereshit 15, Avraham questions, " בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה".  Is this an expression of lack of belief in Hashem?

• Sin – Shemuel in Bavli Nedarim, Vayikra Rabbah,Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and Tanchuma all maintain that Avraham displayed a lack of faith in Hashem when he asked for a sign that he would inherit the land.  Moreover, they claim that  he was punished severely for it; the decree of bondage in Egypt was a direct result of this speech.⁶
• No Sin –

Covenant with Philistines

Though most sources do not view Avraham's covenant with Avimelekh in Bereshit 21:22-32 as problematic, RashbamBereshit 22:1About R. Shemuel b. Meir uniquely faults Avraham for making the treaty.  He asserts that the Philistine land was included in Hashem's promise to Avraham, and thus the prohibition "לֹא תְחַיֶּה כׇּל נְשָׁמָה" applied to them as well. According to Rashbam, the command to sacrifice Yitzchak was meant to distress Avraham and punish him for this deed.⁷  See Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak for elaboration.

Family Life

Marriage When

Sons

Comparison to Other Figures

Setting up foils is often a useful method to highlight the unique aspects of a character a story.  What can be learned about Avraham from the following comparisons?

• Avraham and Yitzchak
• Avraham and Yaakov
• Avraham and Iyyov

In the Arts

¹ See the similar intellectual discussion that Avraham holds with Nimrod in Bereshit Rabbah 38:13.

² His comments are on Bereshit 13:4 rather than Bereshit 12:8.

³ He writes, "גיבורי התנ"ך 'גיבורי כח עושי דברו' הם, ולא גיבורי מלאכת המלחמה".

⁴ Avraham's conduct stands out, particularly in light of the norms of the Ancient Near East in which the victor took the spoils of battle.

⁵ See Abarbanel, Seforno and Shadal who follow his reading.  See also Bereshit Rabbah, Tanchuma, and Rashi, wo suggest that Avram was hoping to hide Sarah during their stay.

⁶ See Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage for further discussion.

⁷ Hagi Ben-Artzi, in מבט חדש על העקידה, elaborates on Rashbam's approach and suggests that in making an oath and covenant with Avimelekh, Avraham had nullified the covenants of "land" and "seed" promised him by Hashem. As such, Hashem demanded that he return the "seed" that was given him, Yitzchak. See also R"Y Medan, "כי קרוב אליך" (Tel Aviv, 2014): 139-140, who explains similarly.