Difference between revisions of "Avraham/0/en"
m |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<subcategory>Journey to Belief | <subcategory>Journey to Belief | ||
<p>Though the <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">Midrash</a><a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">38:13</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> shares stories of Avraham destroying his father's idols and being sentenced to death for his beliefs, we know nothing of his religious journey from Sefer Bereshit itself. Rambam and the Kuzari offer two possibilities, each in line with their own philosophical beliefs about attainment of faith:</p><ul> | <p>Though the <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">Midrash</a><a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">38:13</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> shares stories of Avraham destroying his father's idols and being sentenced to death for his beliefs, we know nothing of his religious journey from Sefer Bereshit itself. Rambam and the Kuzari offer two possibilities, each in line with their own philosophical beliefs about attainment of faith:</p><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Intellectual inquiry </b>– <multilink><a href="RambamHilkhotAvodahZarah1-3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamHilkhotAvodahZarah1-3" data-aht="source">Hilkhot Avodah Zarah 1:3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Maimon</a></multilink> maintains that Avraham's belief was a product of his intellectual quest to understand the ways of the world.<fn>See <a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 38:13</a> lays out a conversation between Avraham and Nimrod which similarly presents Avraham as having attained belief via intellectual inquiry.</fn></li> | + | <li><b>Intellectual inquiry </b>– <multilink><a href="RambamHilkhotAvodahZarah1-3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamHilkhotAvodahZarah1-3" data-aht="source">Hilkhot Avodah Zarah 1:3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Maimon</a></multilink> maintains that Avraham's belief was a product of his intellectual quest to understand the ways of the world.<fn>See also <a href="BereshitRabbah38-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah 38:13</a> which lays out a conversation between Avraham and Nimrod which similarly presents Avraham as having attained belief via intellectual inquiry.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Tradition </b>– <multilink><a href="Kuzari1-47" data-aht="source">R. Yehuda HaLevi</a><a href="Kuzari1-47" data-aht="source">1:47</a><a href="R. Yehuda HaLevi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda HaLevi</a></multilink>, in contrast, assumes that knowledge of Hashem was passed down through the generations, from Adam to Noach to Shem and finally to Avraham.</li> | <li><b>Tradition </b>– <multilink><a href="Kuzari1-47" data-aht="source">R. Yehuda HaLevi</a><a href="Kuzari1-47" data-aht="source">1:47</a><a href="R. Yehuda HaLevi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda HaLevi</a></multilink>, in contrast, assumes that knowledge of Hashem was passed down through the generations, from Adam to Noach to Shem and finally to Avraham.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<subcategory>Uniqueness? | <subcategory>Uniqueness? | ||
<p><b> Was Avraham's monotheism unique? </b> This question depends on how one understands the phrase "וּמַלְכִּי צֶדֶק מֶלֶךְ שָׁלֵם... כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" (<a href="Bereshit14-13-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a>):</p><ul> | <p><b> Was Avraham's monotheism unique? </b> This question depends on how one understands the phrase "וּמַלְכִּי צֶדֶק מֶלֶךְ שָׁלֵם... כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" (<a href="Bereshit14-13-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a>):</p><ul> | ||
− | <li><b> Not Unique</b> –  | + | <li><b> Not Unique</b> – Malkitzedek was similarly monotheistic.</li> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><multilink><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer8" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer8" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 8</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>, and many other sources, identify  | + | <li><multilink><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer8" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer8" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 8</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>, and many other sources, identify Malkitzedek with Shem, whose monotheism predated that of Avraham (and, who, as mentioned above, might have himself led Avraham to belief). </li> |
− | <li><multilink><a href="RadakBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, instead, allows for the possibility that  | + | <li><multilink><a href="RadakBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, instead, allows for the possibility that Malkitzedek was an outsider, unrelated to Avraham in any way, who served only one God. Moreover, given that he was a king, it is possible that the entire city of Shalem was similarly monotheistic.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Unique</b> – <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="NetzivBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink>, and the <multilink><a href="HoilMosheBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilMosheBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi</a></multilink>, in contrast, maintain that being a "כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" simply means serving the highest god in a pantheon of many gods. Alternatively, "Elyon" was the name of a Canaanite god whom | + | <li><b>Unique</b> – <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="NetzivBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink>, and the <multilink><a href="HoilMosheBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilMosheBereshit14-18" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:18</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi</a></multilink>, in contrast, maintain that being a "כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" simply means serving the highest god in a pantheon of many gods. Alternatively, "Elyon" was the name of a Canaanite god whom Malkitzedek served. Hoil Moshe emphasizes that Avraham's importance lay in the very fact that he was the sole monotheist, so it is inconceivable that others worshiped similarly.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Distinct Worship? | <subcategory>Distinct Worship? | ||
− | <p><b>How distinct was Avraham's mode of worship from those around him? </b> This question is an outgrowth of the above. If Avraham was unaware of later commandments, is it possible that, in worshiping Hashem, he borrowed from the practices of the surrounding pagans?</p> | + | <p><b>How distinct was Avraham's mode of worship from those around him? </b> This question is an outgrowth of the above. If Avraham was unaware of later commandments, is it possible that, in worshiping Hashem, he borrowed from the practices of the surrounding pagans?</p><ul> |
− | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Akeidat Yitzchak</b> – See <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Shadal </a><a href="ShadalBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 22:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>who suggests that Avraham, like the rest of the world in his era, originally viewed child sacrifice as the highest form of devotion to God. It was only through the story of the Akeidah itself that Hashem taught both him and the monotheistic world at large that the practice was, in fact, immoral and repugnant. For elaboration, see <a href="Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak" data-aht="page">Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak</a>.</li> | <li><b>Akeidat Yitzchak</b> – See <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Shadal </a><a href="ShadalBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 22:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>who suggests that Avraham, like the rest of the world in his era, originally viewed child sacrifice as the highest form of devotion to God. It was only through the story of the Akeidah itself that Hashem taught both him and the monotheistic world at large that the practice was, in fact, immoral and repugnant. For elaboration, see <a href="Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak" data-aht="page">Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak</a>.</li> | ||
<li><b>"וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל... וַיִּקְרָא שָׁם בְּשֵׁם י"י"</b> – Is it possible that Avraham's planting of a tree in a place of worship is influenced by surrounding Canaanite practices, as attested to by the later prohibition, "לֹא תִטַּע לְךָ אֲשֵׁרָה כׇּל עֵץ אֵצֶל מִזְבַּח ה'‏" (Devarim 16:21)? [See below for sources that suggest, instead, that the tree was meant to invite people to gather, so that Avraham could teach them about Hashem.]</li> | <li><b>"וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל... וַיִּקְרָא שָׁם בְּשֵׁם י"י"</b> – Is it possible that Avraham's planting of a tree in a place of worship is influenced by surrounding Canaanite practices, as attested to by the later prohibition, "לֹא תִטַּע לְךָ אֲשֵׁרָה כׇּל עֵץ אֵצֶל מִזְבַּח ה'‏" (Devarim 16:21)? [See below for sources that suggest, instead, that the tree was meant to invite people to gather, so that Avraham could teach them about Hashem.]</li> | ||
Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Tests of Faith | <subcategory>Tests of Faith | ||
− | <p><multilink><a href="MishnaAvot5-3" data-aht="source">Mishna Avot </a><a href="MishnaAvot5-3" data-aht="source">Avot 5:3</a><a href="Mishna" data-aht="parshan">About the Mishna</a></multilink>states that Avraham was tested with ten trials. Though Avraham's life was clearly filled with various ordeals, only one of these is referred to as a test in Tanakh, the Akeidah ("וְהָאֱלֹהִים נִסָּה אֶת אַבְרָהָם"). </p><p>Various sources attempt to enumerate the ten tests referred to by the Mishna | + | <p><multilink><a href="MishnaAvot5-3" data-aht="source">Mishna Avot </a><a href="MishnaAvot5-3" data-aht="source">Avot 5:3</a><a href="Mishna" data-aht="parshan">About the Mishna</a></multilink>states that Avraham was tested with ten trials. Though Avraham's life was clearly filled with various ordeals, only one of these is referred to as a test in Tanakh, the Akeidah ("וְהָאֱלֹהִים נִסָּה אֶת אַבְרָהָם"). </p><p>Various sources attempt to enumerate the ten tests referred to by the Mishna.  Some include only events mentioned in Tanakh, while others include also events culled from the Midrash. For some examples, see the lists compiled by <multilink><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer26" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDeRabbiEliezer26" data-aht="source">26</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambamCommentaryontheMishnaAvot5" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamCommentaryontheMishnaAvot5" data-aht="source">Commentary on the Mishna Avot 5</a><a href="RambamHilkhotAvodahZarah1-3" data-aht="source">Hilkhot Avodah Zarah 1:3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Maimon</a></multilink>, and <multilink><a href="ROvadyahMiBartenuraAvot5-3" data-aht="source">R. Ovadyah MiBartenura</a><a href="ROvadyahMiBartenuraAvot5-3" data-aht="source">Avot 5:3</a><a href="R. Ovadyah MiBartenura" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah MiBartenura</a></multilink>. For analysis of the various lists and discussion of why Hashem deemed it necessary to try Avraham at all, see the interactive learning module, <a href="https://mg.alhatorah.org/Avraham's_Ten_Trials_Module.html">Avraham's Ten Trials</a>.</p> |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>"תִּתֵּן.. חֶסֶד לְאַבְרָהָם" | <subcategory>"תִּתֵּן.. חֶסֶד לְאַבְרָהָם" | ||
− | <p>Avraham is often portrayed as a paradigm of "חסד", with his hosting of guests being held up as a model to emulate.  How unique, though, was Avraham in this regard?  </p> | + | <p>Avraham is often portrayed as a paradigm of "חסד", with his hosting of guests being held up as a model to emulate.  How unique, though, was Avraham in this regard?  </p><ul> |
− | <ul> | + | <li><b>Comparing Lot and Avraham</b> – Many sources compare the hospitality of the two relatives.  See <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit18-1" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit18-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit18-3" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit18-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:3</a><a href="RambanBereshit19-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 19:8</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="SfornoBereshit19-3" data-aht="source">Sforno</a><a href="SfornoBereshit19-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit 19:3</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Sforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Sforno</a></multilink>, and <multilink><a href="RSRHirschBereshit19-3" data-aht="source">R. S.R. Hirsch</a><a href="RSRHirschBereshit19-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit 19:3</a><a href="R. Samson Raphael Hirsch" data-aht="parshan">About R. Samson Raphael Hirsch</a></multilink>.  See also <a href="A Portrait of Lot" data-aht="page">A Portrait of Lot</a> for further discussion of Lot's character.</li> |
− | <li><b>Comparing Lot and Avraham</b> – Many sources compare the hospitality of the two relatives.  See <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit18-1" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit18-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit18-3" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit18-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:3</a><a href="RambanBereshit19-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 19:8</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href=" | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>"צְדָקָה וּמִשְׁפָּט" | <subcategory>"צְדָקָה וּמִשְׁפָּט" | ||
− | <p>In <a href="Bereshit18-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:19</a>, Hashem shares how He chose Avraham because He knew that Avraham was to teach his children "righteousness and justice". Avraham then proceeds to stand up for this very issue, reproaching Hashem's decision to totally destroy Sedom. Avraham makes two somewhat contradictory arguments, condemning collective punishment, yet simultaneously requesting collective salvation. How do these requests relate to each other?  [See <a href="Avraham's Prayer for Sedom" data-aht="page">Avraham's Prayer for Sedom</a> for elaboration and discussion of the various modes of Divine Justice.]</p> | + | <p>In <a href="Bereshit18-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:19</a>, Hashem shares how He chose Avraham because He knew that Avraham was to teach his children "righteousness and justice". Avraham then proceeds to stand up for this very issue, reproaching Hashem's decision to totally destroy Sedom. Avraham makes two somewhat contradictory arguments, condemning collective punishment, yet simultaneously requesting collective salvation. How do these requests relate to each other?  [See <a href="Avraham's Prayer for Sedom" data-aht="page">Avraham's Prayer for Sedom</a> for elaboration and discussion of the various modes of Divine Justice.]</p><ul> |
− | <ul> | ||
<li><multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit18-24" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit18-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:24</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink> claims that Avraham was indeed praying for both the righteous and wicked, viewing collective salvation as a merciful act that transcends justice.</li> | <li><multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit18-24" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit18-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:24</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink> claims that Avraham was indeed praying for both the righteous and wicked, viewing collective salvation as a merciful act that transcends justice.</li> | ||
<li><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot17" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot17" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem Ma'asei Avot 17</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink> vehemently disagrees, viewing the saving of unrepentant sinners as an injustice.  He claims that Avraham was instead asking that the land of the righteous be saved (while the guilty were still to be punished).<fn>His words, "הַאַף תִּסְפֶּה וְלֹא תִשָּׂא לַמָּקוֹם" refer not to saving the people of the place, but the place itself.</fn></li> | <li><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot17" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot17" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem Ma'asei Avot 17</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink> vehemently disagrees, viewing the saving of unrepentant sinners as an injustice.  He claims that Avraham was instead asking that the land of the righteous be saved (while the guilty were still to be punished).<fn>His words, "הַאַף תִּסְפֶּה וְלֹא תִשָּׂא לַמָּקוֹם" refer not to saving the people of the place, but the place itself.</fn></li> | ||
Line 69: | Line 66: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Conduct in Battle | <subcategory>Conduct in Battle | ||
− | <p><a href="Bereshit14" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14</a> describes the Battle of the Kings and Avraham's military intervention so as to save his nephew Lot from captivity. Many suggest that the story was included in Tanakh since Avraham's conduct in war was worthy of emulation: [See <a href="Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story" data-aht="page">Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story</a> for elaboration.]</p> | + | <p><a href="Bereshit14" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14</a> describes the Battle of the Kings and Avraham's military intervention so as to save his nephew Lot from captivity. Many suggest that the story was included in Tanakh since Avraham's conduct in war was worthy of emulation: [See <a href="Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story" data-aht="page">Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story</a> for elaboration.]</p><ul> |
− | <ul> | ||
<li>According to <multilink><a href="RBachyaBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">R. Bachya</a><a href="RBachyaBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:1</a><a href="R. Bachya b. Asher" data-aht="parshan">About R. Bachya b. Asher</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:1</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, the story teaches us about Avraham's bravery and his capabilities as a <b>military strategist</b> and warrior.</li> | <li>According to <multilink><a href="RBachyaBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">R. Bachya</a><a href="RBachyaBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:1</a><a href="R. Bachya b. Asher" data-aht="parshan">About R. Bachya b. Asher</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit14-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14:1</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, the story teaches us about Avraham's bravery and his capabilities as a <b>military strategist</b> and warrior.</li> | ||
<li><multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit14Introduction" data-aht="source">R. D"Z Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit14Introduction" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14 Introduction</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink> claims that this alone could not possibly be the story's purpose, as the Torah does not come to glorify its heroes as mighty warriors.<fn>He writes, "גיבורי התנ"ך 'גיבורי כח עושי דברו' הם, ולא גיבורי מלאכת המלחמה".</fn> Instead, he suggests that Avraham's refusal to benefit from the spoils of battle reveals both his <b>generosity and recognition that all belongs to Hashem</b>.<fn>Avraham's conduct stands out particularly in light of the norms of the Ancient Near East in which the victor took the spoils of battle.</fn></li> | <li><multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit14Introduction" data-aht="source">R. D"Z Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit14Introduction" data-aht="source">Bereshit 14 Introduction</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink> claims that this alone could not possibly be the story's purpose, as the Torah does not come to glorify its heroes as mighty warriors.<fn>He writes, "גיבורי התנ"ך 'גיבורי כח עושי דברו' הם, ולא גיבורי מלאכת המלחמה".</fn> Instead, he suggests that Avraham's refusal to benefit from the spoils of battle reveals both his <b>generosity and recognition that all belongs to Hashem</b>.<fn>Avraham's conduct stands out particularly in light of the norms of the Ancient Near East in which the victor took the spoils of battle.</fn></li> | ||
Line 79: | Line 75: | ||
<category>Possible Sins | <category>Possible Sins | ||
<subcategory>Avraham in Egypt | <subcategory>Avraham in Egypt | ||
− | <p><a href="Bereshit12-10-20" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12</a> describes Avraham's descent to Egypt due to famine. Commentators debate the propriety of his conduct throughout the episode. [For a full discussion of the various issues, see <a href="Endangering Sarai in Egypt" data-aht="page">Endangering Sarai in Egypt</a>.]</p> | + | <p><a href="Bereshit12-10-20" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12</a> describes Avraham's descent to Egypt due to famine. Commentators debate the propriety of his conduct throughout the episode. [For a full discussion of the various issues, see <a href="Endangering Sarai in Egypt" data-aht="page">Endangering Sarai in Egypt</a>.]</p><p><b>Leaving Israel</b> – Was Avraham justified in leaving the land promised to him by Hashem, or should he have trusted that Hashem would care for him during the famine and stayed put?</p><ul> |
− | <p><b>Leaving Israel</b> – Was Avraham justified in leaving the land promised to him by Hashem, or should he have trusted that Hashem would care for him during the famine and stayed put?</p> | ||
− | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Justified</b> – <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 12:10-13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> claims that, in times of famine, a person must do what they can to provide for themselves, as one cannot rely on miracles.</li> | <li><b>Justified</b> – <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 12:10-13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> claims that, in times of famine, a person must do what they can to provide for themselves, as one cannot rely on miracles.</li> | ||
<li><b>Not Justified</b> – <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:10</a><a href="RambanBereshit16-6" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:6</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, in contrast, claims that Avraham should have had faith that Hashem would save him from famine.</li> | <li><b>Not Justified</b> – <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:10</a><a href="RambanBereshit16-6" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:6</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, in contrast, claims that Avraham should have had faith that Hashem would save him from famine.</li> | ||
− | </ul> | + | </ul><p><b>Endangering Sarah</b> – Should Avraham have risked Sarah's honor to save his own life? After all, by posing as Avraham's sister, Sarah presented herself as available, making it much more likely that the Egyptians would take her!</p><ul> |
− | <p><b>Endangering Sarah</b> – Should Avraham have risked Sarah's honor to save his own life? After all, by posing as Avraham's sister, Sarah presented herself as available, making it much more likely that the Egyptians would take her!</p> | + | <li><b>Justified</b> – Most commentators attempt to defend Avraham's actions. Thus, <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 12:10-13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> claims that preserving human life is more important than preventing forced sexual activity in a case where relations are not a Torah offense.  <multilink><a href="RanBereshit12-11" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="RanBereshit12-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:11</a><a href="R. Nissim Gerondi (Ran)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Nissim Gerondi</a></multilink>, in contrast, suggests that Avraham was hoping to protect not only himself but also Sarah.  He planned to act as her guardian, in charge of her nuptials, and to ask for such a high dowry that no one would be able to pay it.<fn>See also <multilink><a href="SfornoBereshit12-13-16" data-aht="source">Sforno</a><a href="SfornoBereshit12-13-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:13-16</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Sforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Sforno</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:13</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> who follow his reading.  See also <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah40-5" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah40-5" data-aht="source">40:5</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit12-10-14" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit12-10-14" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:10-14</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who suggest that Avram was hoping to hide Sarah during their stay.</fn></li> |
− | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Justified</b> – Most commentators attempt to defend Avraham's actions. Thus, <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot12-10-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 12:10-13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> claims that preserving human life is more important than preventing forced sexual activity in a case where relations are not a Torah offense.  <multilink><a href="RanBereshit12-11" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="RanBereshit12-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:11</a><a href="R. Nissim Gerondi (Ran)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Nissim Gerondi</a></multilink>, in contrast, suggests that Avraham was hoping to protect not only himself but also Sarah.  He planned to act as her guardian, in charge of her nuptials, and to ask for such a high dowry that no one would be able to pay it.<fn>See also <multilink><a href=" | ||
<li><b>Not Justified</b> - <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:10</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="UCassutoBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Cassuto</a><a href="UCassutoBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:13</a><a href="Prof. Umberto Cassuto" data-aht="parshan">About Prof. Umberto Cassuto</a></multilink> assert that Avraham erred.  His actions betrayed a lack of faith in Hashem, and endangered Sarah unnecessarily.</li> | <li><b>Not Justified</b> - <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit12-10" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:10</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="UCassutoBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Cassuto</a><a href="UCassutoBereshit12-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 12:13</a><a href="Prof. Umberto Cassuto" data-aht="parshan">About Prof. Umberto Cassuto</a></multilink> assert that Avraham erred.  His actions betrayed a lack of faith in Hashem, and endangered Sarah unnecessarily.</li> | ||
− | </ul> | + | </ul><p><b>Lying</b> – Was lying justified under the circumstances?</p><ul> |
− | <p><b>Lying</b> – Was lying justified under the circumstances?</p> | ||
− | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Avraham lied</b> – Most sources assume that in cases of danger to life, one is allowed to lie. </li> | <li><b>Avraham lied</b> – Most sources assume that in cases of danger to life, one is allowed to lie. </li> | ||
<li><b>Avraham did not lie</b> – <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit20" data-aht="source">R. Saadia</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit20" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 20</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink> adds that Avraham did not actively lie, but rather used a word with a dual meaning ("sister" can refer to either a sister or any relative).</li> | <li><b>Avraham did not lie</b> – <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit20" data-aht="source">R. Saadia</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit20" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 20</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink> adds that Avraham did not actively lie, but rather used a word with a dual meaning ("sister" can refer to either a sister or any relative).</li> | ||
Line 97: | Line 87: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>"בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה" | <subcategory>"בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה" | ||
− | <p>After Hashem promises Avraham the Land of Israel in <a href="Bereshit15-7-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15</a>, Avraham questions, "בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה".  Is this an expression of lack of belief in Hashem?</p> | + | <p>After Hashem promises Avraham the Land of Israel in <a href="Bereshit15-7-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15</a>, Avraham questions, "בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה".  Is this an expression of lack of belief in Hashem?</p><ul> |
− | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Sin</b> – Shemuel in <multilink><a href="BavliNedarim32a" data-aht="source">Bavli Nedarim</a><a href="BavliNedarim32a" data-aht="source">Nedarim 32a</a><a href="Bavli Nedarim" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Nedarim</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="VayikraRabbah11-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra Rabbah</a><a href="VayikraRabbah11-5" data-aht="source">11:5</a><a href="Vayikra Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Vayikra Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="TanchumaKedoshim13" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaKedoshim13" data-aht="source">Kedoshim 13</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> all maintain that Avraham displayed a lack of faith in Hashem when he asked for a sign that he would inherit the land.  Moreover, they claim that he was punished severely for it; the decree of bondage in Egypt was a direct result of this speech. [See <a href="Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage" data-aht="page">Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage</a> for further discussion.]</li> | <li><b>Sin</b> – Shemuel in <multilink><a href="BavliNedarim32a" data-aht="source">Bavli Nedarim</a><a href="BavliNedarim32a" data-aht="source">Nedarim 32a</a><a href="Bavli Nedarim" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Nedarim</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="VayikraRabbah11-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra Rabbah</a><a href="VayikraRabbah11-5" data-aht="source">11:5</a><a href="Vayikra Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Vayikra Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan)</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="TanchumaKedoshim13" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaKedoshim13" data-aht="source">Kedoshim 13</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> all maintain that Avraham displayed a lack of faith in Hashem when he asked for a sign that he would inherit the land.  Moreover, they claim that he was punished severely for it; the decree of bondage in Egypt was a direct result of this speech. [See <a href="Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage" data-aht="page">Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage</a> for further discussion.]</li> | ||
<li><b>No sin</b> – Many medieval and modern commentators (see, for example, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary15-8" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 15:8</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RSRHirschBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">R. S.R. Hirsch</a><a href="RSRHirschBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Samson Raphael Hirsch" data-aht="parshan">About R. Samson Raphael Hirsch</a></multilink> ) reject the possibility that Avraham doubted Hashem. R"Y Bekhor Shor suggests that Avraham was simply asking a factual question, when and how he will inherit. Ibn Ezra, instead, suggests that Avraham was asking that Hashem turn the promise of inheritance into an unconditional covenant.</li> | <li><b>No sin</b> – Many medieval and modern commentators (see, for example, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary15-8" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 15:8</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RSRHirschBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">R. S.R. Hirsch</a><a href="RSRHirschBereshit15-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:8</a><a href="R. Samson Raphael Hirsch" data-aht="parshan">About R. Samson Raphael Hirsch</a></multilink> ) reject the possibility that Avraham doubted Hashem. R"Y Bekhor Shor suggests that Avraham was simply asking a factual question, when and how he will inherit. Ibn Ezra, instead, suggests that Avraham was asking that Hashem turn the promise of inheritance into an unconditional covenant.</li> | ||
Line 112: | Line 101: | ||
<subcategory>Covenant with Philistines | <subcategory>Covenant with Philistines | ||
<p>Though most sources do not view Avraham's covenant with Avimelekh in <a href="Bereshit21-22-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21</a> as problematic, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 22:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> uniquely faults Avraham for making the treaty.  He asserts that the Philistine land was included in Hashem's promise to Avraham, and thus the prohibition "לֹא תְחַיֶּה כׇּל נְשָׁמָה" applied to them as well. According to Rashbam, the command to sacrifice Yitzchak was meant to distress Avraham and punish him for this deed.<fn>Hagi Ben-Artzi, in <a href="http://www.biu.ac.il/JH/Parasha/netzabim/BenArzi.pdf">מבט חדש על העקידה</a>, elaborates on Rashbam's approach and suggests that in making an oath and covenant with Avimelekh, Avraham had nullified the covenants of "land" and "seed" promised him by Hashem. As such, Hashem demanded that he return the "seed" that was given him, Yitzchak. See also R"Y Medan, "כי קרוב אליך" (Tel Aviv, 2014): 139-140, who explains similarly.</fn>  See <a href="Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak" data-aht="page">Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak</a> for elaboration.</p> | <p>Though most sources do not view Avraham's covenant with Avimelekh in <a href="Bereshit21-22-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21</a> as problematic, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit22-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 22:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> uniquely faults Avraham for making the treaty.  He asserts that the Philistine land was included in Hashem's promise to Avraham, and thus the prohibition "לֹא תְחַיֶּה כׇּל נְשָׁמָה" applied to them as well. According to Rashbam, the command to sacrifice Yitzchak was meant to distress Avraham and punish him for this deed.<fn>Hagi Ben-Artzi, in <a href="http://www.biu.ac.il/JH/Parasha/netzabim/BenArzi.pdf">מבט חדש על העקידה</a>, elaborates on Rashbam's approach and suggests that in making an oath and covenant with Avimelekh, Avraham had nullified the covenants of "land" and "seed" promised him by Hashem. As such, Hashem demanded that he return the "seed" that was given him, Yitzchak. See also R"Y Medan, "כי קרוב אליך" (Tel Aviv, 2014): 139-140, who explains similarly.</fn>  See <a href="Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak" data-aht="page">Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak</a> for elaboration.</p> | ||
+ | </subcategory> | ||
+ | <subcategory>Extra Marriages | ||
+ | <p>Commentators differ in their evaluation of Avraham's marriages to Hagar and Keturah:</p><ul> | ||
+ | <li><b>Neutral / Positive</b> – The vast majority of exegetes do not fault Avraham for either marriage, and even view these as a fulfillment of Hashem's promise that he become the father of many nations.<fn>See Radak, Abarbanel and Shadal.</fn> R. Yaacov Medan further explains that by sending his sons from Ketura "eastward", Avraham was trying to ensure that the Land of Israel would be buffered by friendly neighbors, his other progeny.<fn>R. Medan points to two sets of boundaries given in the Torah for the Promised Land: the larger borders given to the forefathers, from נהר מצרים to נהר פרת, and the smaller borders given to those who left Egypt, from נחל מצרים to לבוא חמת. He explains that these were meant to be concentric circles. The inner circle of the Land of Israel proper was to be populated solely by the Children of Israel. In contrast, the outer circle was to be settled by the Israelites' relatives, i.e. Avraham's other offspring. See <a href="https://www.etzion.org.il/he/tanakh/torah/sefer-bereishit/parashat-chayei-sara/%D7%97%D7%99%D7%99-%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A7%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94">his VBM article</a> for elaboration.</fn></li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Problematic</b> – <multilink><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit16-1" data-aht="source">R. Avraham Saba</a><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit16-1" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor Bereshit 16:1</a><a href="TzerorHaMorBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)</a></multilink>, in contrast, finds both marriages problematic. He notes that once Hashem had promised Avraham progeny, he should not have doubted God or taken matters into his own hands. Moreover, once Hashem said that his line was to continue through Sarah specifically, he should not have prayed for Yishmael's success or taken more wives.<fn>He might understand the promise "וְהָיִיתָ לְאַב הֲמוֹן גּוֹיִם" to refer not to the literal siring of many nations, but that Avraham would lead or guide many nations.</fn> He was duly punished through the birth of sons (Yishmael, Midyan, and the others) who would become enemies of Israel and serve as stumbling blocks throughout history.<fn>In contrast to R. Medan who presents Avraham as trying to ensure friendly neighbors, R. Saba has Avraham being responsible for Israel being surrounded by enemy neighbors.</fn></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 127: | Line 122: | ||
<subcategory name="Keturah"> | <subcategory name="Keturah"> | ||
Keturah | Keturah | ||
− | <p><a href="Bereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25</a> speaks of Avraham's marriage to Keturah.  Who is this woman?  Based on the simple chronology of the chapters, Avraham is at least 140 when marrying her; why does he feel a need to remarry at such an advanced age? Finally, what is the Torah trying to teach us by recounting this episode? See <a href="Avraham's Many Wives" data-aht="page">Avraham's Many Wives</a> for discussion of these issues.</p><ul> | + | <p><a href="Bereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25</a> speaks of Avraham's marriage to Keturah.  Who is this woman?  Based on the simple chronology of the chapters, Avraham is at least 140 when marrying her; why does he feel a need to remarry at such an advanced age? Finally, what is the Torah trying to teach us by recounting this episode? See <a href="Avraham's Many Wives" data-aht="page">Avraham's Many Wives</a> for discussion of these issues, and see above regarding different evaluations of the marriage..</p><ul> |
− | <li><b>A third wife</b> – <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit25Introduction" data-aht="source">R. D"Z Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit25Introduction" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25 Introduction</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink> think Keturah is a new wife, taken after Sarah's death.  In contrast,<multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit25-1" data-aht="source"> Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> suggests that Avraham married her while Sarah was still alive.</li> | + | <li><b>A third wife</b> – <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit25Introduction" data-aht="source">R. D"Z Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannBereshit25Introduction" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25 Introduction</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink> think Keturah is a new wife, taken after Sarah's death.  In contrast,<multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit25-1" data-aht="source"> Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> suggests that Avraham married her while Sarah was still alive.  The marriage might have been an attempt to fulfill Hashem's promise that he become the father of many nations.</li> |
<li><b>Hagar</b> – Rav in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah61-4" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah61-4" data-aht="source">61:4</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaChayyeiSarah" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaChayyeiSarah" data-aht="source">Chayyei Sarah</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> all claim that Keturah is simply another name for Hagar, and that Avraham remarried her after Sarah's death.</li> | <li><b>Hagar</b> – Rav in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah61-4" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah61-4" data-aht="source">61:4</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaChayyeiSarah" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaChayyeiSarah" data-aht="source">Chayyei Sarah</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit25-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:1</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> all claim that Keturah is simply another name for Hagar, and that Avraham remarried her after Sarah's death.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Latest revision as of 23:12, 5 July 2023
Avraham – Overview
Overview
Avraham, the first of our forefathers, is a trailblazer in both belief and deed. He leaves his home and family to follow Hashem to an unknown land. Though his life is filled with tests and trials, including famine, his wife's bareness, family strife, and political struggles, he maintains faith in Hashem's promises and perseveres. He is a man of both "חסד" and "אמת". He is strong enough to reproach Hashem when he thinks justice is not being served, yet humble enough to surrender himself before Him when asked to sacrifice his son.
Commentators discuss each of the Avraham stories, exploring Avraham's religious journey, leadership, and family life. They emphasize the lessons to be learned from his various deeds, highlight character traits to be emulated, but also, at times, question his decisions and actions. The page below offers a glimpse at their differing understandings of some of the most pivotal episodes in Avraham's life and their varying portraits of his character and legacy.
Religious Identity
Journey to Belief
Though the Midrash shares stories of Avraham destroying his father's idols and being sentenced to death for his beliefs, we know nothing of his religious journey from Sefer Bereshit itself. Rambam and the Kuzari offer two possibilities, each in line with their own philosophical beliefs about attainment of faith:
- Intellectual inquiry – Rambam maintains that Avraham's belief was a product of his intellectual quest to understand the ways of the world.1
- Tradition – R. Yehuda HaLevi, in contrast, assumes that knowledge of Hashem was passed down through the generations, from Adam to Noach to Shem and finally to Avraham.
Uniqueness?
Was Avraham's monotheism unique? This question depends on how one understands the phrase "וּמַלְכִּי צֶדֶק מֶלֶךְ שָׁלֵם... כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" (Bereshit 14:18):
- Not Unique – Malkitzedek was similarly monotheistic.
- Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, and many other sources, identify Malkitzedek with Shem, whose monotheism predated that of Avraham (and, who, as mentioned above, might have himself led Avraham to belief).
- Radak, instead, allows for the possibility that Malkitzedek was an outsider, unrelated to Avraham in any way, who served only one God. Moreover, given that he was a king, it is possible that the entire city of Shalem was similarly monotheistic.
- Unique – Shadal, Netziv, and the Hoil Moshe, in contrast, maintain that being a "כֹהֵן לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן" simply means serving the highest god in a pantheon of many gods. Alternatively, "Elyon" was the name of a Canaanite god whom Malkitzedek served. Hoil Moshe emphasizes that Avraham's importance lay in the very fact that he was the sole monotheist, so it is inconceivable that others worshiped similarly.
Avraham's Observance of Mitzvot
Did Avraham keep all the mitzvot? The issue has been hotly debated for generations. On one hand, Avraham lived centuries before the Torah was given and many of its laws would be meaningless to him, suggesting that he did not keep them. On the other hand, it seems paradoxical to conceive of the founder of a religion not observing even its most basic commandments. This leads to a variety of approaches to the question: [For a full discussion of the issue, see Avot and Mitzvot – Was Avraham the First Jew.]
- Full Observance – See Mishna Kiddushin, Tosefta Kiddushin, Bereshit Rabbah, and Rashi who suggest that Avraham kept the entire Torah, and according to some, even the Oral Law.
- No Observance – See Tosafot Rid, R. Avraham b. HaRambam, and R. Yosef ibn Kaspi who claim that Avraham observed what was specifically commanded to him by Hashem in Sefer Bereshit, but not other laws later given in the Torah. His greatness lay in his monotheistic belief and exemplary moral behavior, but not in ritual observance.
- Partial Observance – Rashbam suggests that only rational mitzvot which relate to a moral ethic were observed by Avraham and the other Patriarchs.
Distinct Worship?
How distinct was Avraham's mode of worship from those around him? This question is an outgrowth of the above. If Avraham was unaware of later commandments, is it possible that, in worshiping Hashem, he borrowed from the practices of the surrounding pagans?
- Akeidat Yitzchak – See Shadal who suggests that Avraham, like the rest of the world in his era, originally viewed child sacrifice as the highest form of devotion to God. It was only through the story of the Akeidah itself that Hashem taught both him and the monotheistic world at large that the practice was, in fact, immoral and repugnant. For elaboration, see Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak.
- "וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל... וַיִּקְרָא שָׁם בְּשֵׁם י"י" – Is it possible that Avraham's planting of a tree in a place of worship is influenced by surrounding Canaanite practices, as attested to by the later prohibition, "לֹא תִטַּע לְךָ אֲשֵׁרָה כׇּל עֵץ אֵצֶל מִזְבַּח ה'" (Devarim 16:21)? [See below for sources that suggest, instead, that the tree was meant to invite people to gather, so that Avraham could teach them about Hashem.]
Missionary?
Did Avraham attempt to convert others to belief in Hashem? Though Sefer Bereshit never explicitly presents Avraham as actively doing so, commentators point to several verses which might bear on the question:
- "הַנֶּפֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ בְחָרָן" – Sifre Devarim, Bavli Sanhedrin, and R. Elazar in Bereshit Rabbah all suggest that this verse speaks of converting those in Charan. Most of the non-midrashic sources, in contrast, assume the "souls" simply refer to Avraham's slaves and maidservants.
- "וַיִּבֶן שָׁם מִזְבֵּחַ לַי"י וַיִּקְרָא בְּשֵׁם י"י" – While Onkelos, Rashi, and R"Y Bekhor Shor2 assume that Avraham's crying out in the name of God refers to personal prayer, Bereshit Rabbah and Ramban maintain that it refers to Avraham calling to others to worship Hashem. According to Ramban, it is possible that the altar was not even meant for sacrifices, but instead served as a monument to announce the unity of Hashem.
- "וַיִּטַּע אֶשֶׁל... וַיִּקְרָא שָׁם בְּשֵׁם י"י" – According to Resh Lakish in Sotah, Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan), and R. Saadia, the planting of the tree was meant to encourage people to gather around Avraham so he could teach them about Hashem. R"Y Bekhor Shor and Radak, in contrast, suggest that it related to the covenant with the Philistines and that the verse does not speak of missionary activities..
Tests of Faith
Mishna Avot states that Avraham was tested with ten trials. Though Avraham's life was clearly filled with various ordeals, only one of these is referred to as a test in Tanakh, the Akeidah ("וְהָאֱלֹהִים נִסָּה אֶת אַבְרָהָם").
Various sources attempt to enumerate the ten tests referred to by the Mishna. Some include only events mentioned in Tanakh, while others include also events culled from the Midrash. For some examples, see the lists compiled by Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, Rambam, and R. Ovadyah MiBartenura. For analysis of the various lists and discussion of why Hashem deemed it necessary to try Avraham at all, see the interactive learning module, Avraham's Ten Trials.
Unique Traits
Belief in Hashem
See discussion above.
"תִּתֵּן.. חֶסֶד לְאַבְרָהָם"
Avraham is often portrayed as a paradigm of "חסד", with his hosting of guests being held up as a model to emulate. How unique, though, was Avraham in this regard?
- Comparing Lot and Avraham – Many sources compare the hospitality of the two relatives. See Rashbam, Ramban, Sforno, and R. S.R. Hirsch. See also A Portrait of Lot for further discussion of Lot's character.
"צְדָקָה וּמִשְׁפָּט"
In Bereshit 18:19, Hashem shares how He chose Avraham because He knew that Avraham was to teach his children "righteousness and justice". Avraham then proceeds to stand up for this very issue, reproaching Hashem's decision to totally destroy Sedom. Avraham makes two somewhat contradictory arguments, condemning collective punishment, yet simultaneously requesting collective salvation. How do these requests relate to each other? [See Avraham's Prayer for Sedom for elaboration and discussion of the various modes of Divine Justice.]
- R. Yosef Bekhor Shor claims that Avraham was indeed praying for both the righteous and wicked, viewing collective salvation as a merciful act that transcends justice.
- R. Eliezer Ashkenazi vehemently disagrees, viewing the saving of unrepentant sinners as an injustice. He claims that Avraham was instead asking that the land of the righteous be saved (while the guilty were still to be punished).3
Conduct in Battle
Bereshit 14 describes the Battle of the Kings and Avraham's military intervention so as to save his nephew Lot from captivity. Many suggest that the story was included in Tanakh since Avraham's conduct in war was worthy of emulation: [See Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story for elaboration.]
- According to R. Bachya and Abarbanel, the story teaches us about Avraham's bravery and his capabilities as a military strategist and warrior.
- R. D"Z Hoffmann claims that this alone could not possibly be the story's purpose, as the Torah does not come to glorify its heroes as mighty warriors.4 Instead, he suggests that Avraham's refusal to benefit from the spoils of battle reveals both his generosity and recognition that all belongs to Hashem.5
- Alternatively, Radak and Ralbag assert that the story teaches the importance of enduring loyalty to one's family. Avraham was willing to risk his own life in order to rescue his nephew, even though Lot had taken up company with evil people.
Possible Sins
Avraham in Egypt
Bereshit 12 describes Avraham's descent to Egypt due to famine. Commentators debate the propriety of his conduct throughout the episode. [For a full discussion of the various issues, see Endangering Sarai in Egypt.]
Leaving Israel – Was Avraham justified in leaving the land promised to him by Hashem, or should he have trusted that Hashem would care for him during the famine and stayed put?
- Justified – Ralbag claims that, in times of famine, a person must do what they can to provide for themselves, as one cannot rely on miracles.
- Not Justified – Ramban, in contrast, claims that Avraham should have had faith that Hashem would save him from famine.
Endangering Sarah – Should Avraham have risked Sarah's honor to save his own life? After all, by posing as Avraham's sister, Sarah presented herself as available, making it much more likely that the Egyptians would take her!
- Justified – Most commentators attempt to defend Avraham's actions. Thus, Ralbag claims that preserving human life is more important than preventing forced sexual activity in a case where relations are not a Torah offense. Ran, in contrast, suggests that Avraham was hoping to protect not only himself but also Sarah. He planned to act as her guardian, in charge of her nuptials, and to ask for such a high dowry that no one would be able to pay it.6
- Not Justified - Ramban and Cassuto assert that Avraham erred. His actions betrayed a lack of faith in Hashem, and endangered Sarah unnecessarily.
Lying – Was lying justified under the circumstances?
- Avraham lied – Most sources assume that in cases of danger to life, one is allowed to lie.
- Avraham did not lie – R. Saadia adds that Avraham did not actively lie, but rather used a word with a dual meaning ("sister" can refer to either a sister or any relative).
"בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה"
After Hashem promises Avraham the Land of Israel in Bereshit 15, Avraham questions, "בַּמָּה אֵדַע כִּי אִירָשֶׁנָּה". Is this an expression of lack of belief in Hashem?
- Sin – Shemuel in Bavli Nedarim, Vayikra Rabbah, Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) and Tanchuma all maintain that Avraham displayed a lack of faith in Hashem when he asked for a sign that he would inherit the land. Moreover, they claim that he was punished severely for it; the decree of bondage in Egypt was a direct result of this speech. [See Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage for further discussion.]
- No sin – Many medieval and modern commentators (see, for example, Ibn Ezra, R"Y Bekhor Shor, HaKetav VeHaKabbalah, Shadal and R. S.R. Hirsch ) reject the possibility that Avraham doubted Hashem. R"Y Bekhor Shor suggests that Avraham was simply asking a factual question, when and how he will inherit. Ibn Ezra, instead, suggests that Avraham was asking that Hashem turn the promise of inheritance into an unconditional covenant.
Afflicting Hagar
In Bereshit 16, Sarah gives Hagar to Avraham in marriage, hoping that she will bear him a son. After conceiving, Hagar begins to belittle her mistress, acting with disrespect ("וַתֵּקַל גְּבִרְתָּהּ בְּעֵינֶיהָ"). When Sarah complains, Avraham tells her, "הִנֵּה שִׁפְחָתֵךְ בְּיָדֵךְ עֲשִׂי לָהּ הַטּוֹב בְּעֵינָיִךְ," leading Sarah to afflict the maidservant ("וַתְּעַנֶּהָ שָׂרַי") and Hagar to flee. How should both Sarah and Avraham's actions be viewed? Was Sarah being overly harsh? Even if so, should Avraham be held accountable?
- Both Sarah and Avraham acted properly – R. Chananel claims that "וַתְּעַנֶּהָ" means that Sarah re-enslaved rather than afflicted Hagar. The angel's command "שׁוּבִי אֶל גְּבִרְתֵּךְ וְהִתְעַנִּי תַּחַת יָדֶיהָ" proves that Sarah did no wrong.
- Only Sarah acted improperly – Radak blames Sarah, but excuses Avraham who acted only out of a desire to keep peace in the home.
- Both Sarah and Avraham acted improperly – Ramban and Tzeror HaMor fault both parties. Avraham should not have given his wife free reign to do as she pleased.
Covenant with Philistines
Though most sources do not view Avraham's covenant with Avimelekh in Bereshit 21 as problematic, Rashbam uniquely faults Avraham for making the treaty. He asserts that the Philistine land was included in Hashem's promise to Avraham, and thus the prohibition "לֹא תְחַיֶּה כׇּל נְשָׁמָה" applied to them as well. According to Rashbam, the command to sacrifice Yitzchak was meant to distress Avraham and punish him for this deed.7 See Purpose of Akeidat Yitzchak for elaboration.
Extra Marriages
Commentators differ in their evaluation of Avraham's marriages to Hagar and Keturah:
- Neutral / Positive – The vast majority of exegetes do not fault Avraham for either marriage, and even view these as a fulfillment of Hashem's promise that he become the father of many nations.8 R. Yaacov Medan further explains that by sending his sons from Ketura "eastward", Avraham was trying to ensure that the Land of Israel would be buffered by friendly neighbors, his other progeny.9
- Problematic – R. Avraham Saba, in contrast, finds both marriages problematic. He notes that once Hashem had promised Avraham progeny, he should not have doubted God or taken matters into his own hands. Moreover, once Hashem said that his line was to continue through Sarah specifically, he should not have prayed for Yishmael's success or taken more wives.10 He was duly punished through the birth of sons (Yishmael, Midyan, and the others) who would become enemies of Israel and serve as stumbling blocks throughout history.11
Family Life
Sarah
Sarah's Status – When did Avraham and Sarah realize that Sarah was to be the mother of the chosen heir?
- Knew from the beginning – Most assume that the couple knew from the very beginning that Avraham's line and legacy was to continue through the son born from Sarah.
- Knew only in Chapter 17 – It is only in Chapter 17, though, that Hashem makes this explicit, leading to the possibility that until then Sarah's status was in doubt. This could explain Sarah's overly harsh reaction to Hagar's belittling of her in Bereshit 16.12 It also suggests that the first few Avraham stories might be aimed at presenting the rejected possibilities – Lot, Avraham's servant Eliezer, and Yishmael.
Endangering Sarah – See sources and discussion above, and see Endangering Sarai in Egypt for more.
Hagar & Yishmael
See discussion about the affliction of Hagar above, and see Banishment of Hagar and Yishmael for discussion of their expulsion.
Keturah
Bereshit 25 speaks of Avraham's marriage to Keturah. Who is this woman? Based on the simple chronology of the chapters, Avraham is at least 140 when marrying her; why does he feel a need to remarry at such an advanced age? Finally, what is the Torah trying to teach us by recounting this episode? See Avraham's Many Wives for discussion of these issues, and see above regarding different evaluations of the marriage..
- A third wife – Radak and R. D"Z Hoffmann think Keturah is a new wife, taken after Sarah's death. In contrast, Shadal suggests that Avraham married her while Sarah was still alive. The marriage might have been an attempt to fulfill Hashem's promise that he become the father of many nations.
- Hagar – Rav in Bereshit Rabbah, Tanchuma, and Rashi all claim that Keturah is simply another name for Hagar, and that Avraham remarried her after Sarah's death.
A Wife for Yitzchak
Before his death, Avraham entrusts his servant with the mission of finding a wife for Yitzchak. What was Avraham's main criterion in looking for a spouse for his son? Was lineage, beliefs or character most important? Commentators debate the issue:
- See A Wife for Yitzchak for details.
Comparison to Other Figures
Setting up foils is often a useful method to highlight the unique aspects of a character or story. What can be learned about Avraham from the following comparisons?
In the Arts
The sacrifice of Yitzchak is considered by many to be the pinnacle of Avraham's career. To compare how the story has been interpreted by artist and commentator alike, see Akeidat Yitzchak in Art.