Difference between revisions of "Biblical Parallels Index – Devarim 4/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Topic Manager created an empty topic subpage)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<aht-xml>
 +
 +
<page type="Basic">
 
<h1>Biblical Parallels Index – Devarim 4</h1>
 
<h1>Biblical Parallels Index – Devarim 4</h1>
 
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div>
 
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div>
 +
<div class="overview">
 +
<h2>Overview</h2>
 +
This index is meant to help the reader explore Biblical parallels, be they two accounts of the same event, stories with similar motifs and themes, or units of text which are linguistically similar and perhaps alluding one to the other. The page includes links to tools that aid in comparison, primary sources that touch upon the parallels, and summaries of and links to articles which analyze them in depth</div>
 +
<category>“You Shall Not Add”
 +
The prohibition of adding to the commandments of the Torah is stated in Devarim 4:2 and Devarim 13:1, with slight variations in wording and in different halakhic contexts (in Devarim 4, the prohibition appears in the context of the sin of idolatry, and in Devarim 13 it follows laws regarding prohibited sacrifices). This parallel leads one to ask why the commandment is stated twice and whether there is significance to the differences in wording and in halakhic context of the two sections.
 +
<subcategory>Tools
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Use the <a href="https://mg.alhatorah.org/TanakhLab?c1=Devarim:4:2-4:2&amp;c2=Devarim:13:1-13:1&amp;f=bc">Tanakh Lab </a>to compare the wording of the prohibition in the two chapters.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</subcategory>
 +
<subcategory>Articles
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>See <a href="Adding and Subtracting from Torah" data-aht="page">Adding and Subtracting from Torah</a> which questions the scope of the prohibition against adding or subtracting from Torah. It looks at a variety of approaches brought by commentators. Some limit the law to the realm of religious worship, others suggest that it is aimed at the masses but not learned, spiritual leaders, and others maintain that it includes both adding to existing laws and creating new ones.Several of the commentators support their position by comparing the wording and context of the prohibition in both this chapter and chapter 13.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</subcategory>
 +
</category>
 +
 +
</page>
 +
</aht-xml>

Version as of 07:35, 27 June 2024

Biblical Parallels Index – Devarim 4

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

This index is meant to help the reader explore Biblical parallels, be they two accounts of the same event, stories with similar motifs and themes, or units of text which are linguistically similar and perhaps alluding one to the other. The page includes links to tools that aid in comparison, primary sources that touch upon the parallels, and summaries of and links to articles which analyze them in depth

“You Shall Not Add” The prohibition of adding to the commandments of the Torah is stated in Devarim 4:2 and Devarim 13:1, with slight variations in wording and in different halakhic contexts (in Devarim 4, the prohibition appears in the context of the sin of idolatry, and in Devarim 13 it follows laws regarding prohibited sacrifices). This parallel leads one to ask why the commandment is stated twice and whether there is significance to the differences in wording and in halakhic context of the two sections.

Tools

  • Use the Tanakh Lab to compare the wording of the prohibition in the two chapters.

Articles

  • See Adding and Subtracting from Torah which questions the scope of the prohibition against adding or subtracting from Torah. It looks at a variety of approaches brought by commentators. Some limit the law to the realm of religious worship, others suggest that it is aimed at the masses but not learned, spiritual leaders, and others maintain that it includes both adding to existing laws and creating new ones.Several of the commentators support their position by comparing the wording and context of the prohibition in both this chapter and chapter 13.