Difference between revisions of "Biblical Parallels Index – Shemot 17/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<subcategory>Tools
 
<subcategory>Tools
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>See Makbilot BaMIkra for links to passages from tanakh which speak of teh war against Amalek and directive to obliterate them including Shemot 17, Devarim 25:17-19 and Shemuel I 15:2-3.&#160;</li>
+
<li>See&#160;<a href="https://mg.alhatorah.org/Dual/Biblical_Parallels/Shemot/17.6#m5e1n6">Makbilot BaMikra</a> for links to passages from Tanakh which speak of the war against Amalek and the directive to obliterate them, including: Shemot 17:8-16, Devarim 25:17-19 and Shemuel I 15:2-3.&#160;</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>

Version as of 11:33, 14 November 2023

Biblical Parallels Index – Shemot 17

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

War with Amalek The war with Amalek is mention both in Shemot 17 and Devarim 25:17-19.  When one compares the passages, one notices that there are significant differences between the two.  Chief among these is that only in Devarim does the Torah emphasize Amalek’s cruelty. 

Tools

  • See Makbilot BaMikra for links to passages from Tanakh which speak of the war against Amalek and the directive to obliterate them, including: Shemot 17:8-16, Devarim 25:17-19 and Shemuel I 15:2-3. 

Articles

  • See Shaul’s War Against Amalek, by R. Amnon Bazak, for comparison and contrast of the accounts of the war against Amalek in Shemot and Devarim, and the aftermath of these encounters in Sefer Shemuel.  He notes that in Shemot the war is described as an affront against God; other nations were awed by God's feats in Egypt and Amalek alone dared to attack. Devarim, in contrast, highlights the human dimension of the war, focusing on how it was an immoral attack against innocents.
  • See Zakhor: The Evil of Amalek, by R. Alex Israel, for a composite picture of the unique immorality of Amalek based on details gleaned from the various Biblical accounts of conflicts between Israel and Amalek.
  • See Amalek: The Moral Argument, by R. Yaakov Medan, who discusses both the differences between the two accounts and the moral question raised by the obligation to wipe out Amalek. R. Medan notes that one may assume that the two accounts of the war represent two stages, an initial defeat (Devarim), and the ultimate victory (Shemot). He, though, suggests that they represent two distinct wars, with Devarim speaking of Amalek's attack on the "מעפילים".  This, he posits, precipitated a series of persistent, continuous attacks on Israel's weak throughout the forty years in the wilderness.
  • See The Legal Blend in Biblical Narrative, by Rabbi Dr. Joshua Berman, for analysis of cases in which distinct aspects of two sources from the Torah, both dealing with the same issue in different ways, are blended in a narrative found in the Prophets or Writings. Dr. Berman suggests that the narrative of Shaul and Amalek blends motifs found in the passages about Amalek in Shemot and Devarim.
  • See The Punishment of Amalek in the Jewish Tradition: Coping with the Moral Problem, by Dr. Avi Sagi, for analysis and categorization of commentators’ interpretations of the Biblical narratives and halakhic passages relating to Amalek.  Through this discussion, Dr. Sagi explores the interaction in Jewish tradition between morality, religion, and canonical text.