Difference between revisions of "Biblical Parallels Index – Shemot 19/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
<subcategory>Articles
 
<subcategory>Articles
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>See <a href="Ma'amad Har Sinai in Shemot and Devarim" data-aht="page">Ma'amad Har Sinai in Shemot and Devarim</a> for a table comparing the two accounts and analysis of the differences.&#160; The articles suggests that on the eve of the people's entry into the land, Moshe had two fundamental concerns regarding the nation. He feared that with foreign influences, they would stop believing in Hashem and turn to other gods, and additionally, that even if they retained belief, they would question the authority of the laws transmitted via Moshe and be lax in their observance.&#160; This agenda might account for the unique features of Moshe's retelling of the episode in Devarim 4-5</li>
+
<li>See <a href="Ma'amad Har Sinai in Shemot and Devarim" data-aht="page">Ma'amad Har Sinai in Shemot and Devarim</a> for a table comparing the two accounts and analysis of the differences.&#160; The articles suggests that on the eve of the people's entry into the land, Moshe had two fundamental concerns regarding the nation. He feared that with foreign influences, they would stop believing in Hashem and turn to other gods, and additionally, that even if they retained belief, they would question the authority of the laws transmitted via Moshe and be lax in their observance.&#160; This agenda might account for the unique features of Moshe's retelling of the episode in Devarim 4-5.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<p>Several articles focus more specifically on Moshe's role as an intermediary during revelation. In Sefer Shemot this role is emphasized, while in Devarim, in contrast, several verses highlight how Ma'amad Har Sinai a direct encounter with the Divine.<br/>See The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe?</p>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>See&#160;<a href="The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe" data-aht="page">The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe?</a> for an overview of commentators’ approaches to this issue, ranging from those who believe that all of the Aseret Hadibrot were given through Moshe as an intermediary to those who believe that all of them were revealed directly to the nation.</li>
 +
<li>See <a href="https://etzion.org.il/en/tanakh/torah/sefer-shemot/parashat-yitro/yitro-four-stages-maamad-har-sinai">The Four Stages of Ma’amad Har Sinai</a>, by R. Menachem Leibtag, for analysis of the approaches of Rashi, Ramban, and Ibn Ezra to reconciling the various verses and a theory about how the ambiguity of this narrative reflects the fundamental tension within man’s encounter with Hashem. On one hand, man strives for a&#160; direct "face to face encounter", yet in reality fear often dominates and he cannot handle it.</li>
 +
<li>See&#160;<a href="https://www.hatanakh.com/sites/default/files/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%AA%20%D7%A9%D7%91%D7%95https://www.hatanakh.com/sites/default/files/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%AA%20%D7%A9%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A2_194.pdf%D7%A2_194.pdf">זכרון מעמד הר סיני בנאותו של משה רבנו,</a> by R. Tamir Granot, which compares and contrasts the ways that the Torah describes the experience of revelation in Shemot and Devarim, noting that in the former there is an emphasis on Moshe's mediating role and in Devarim revelation is framed as a "face to face" encounter. He explains that in Shemot, right after witnessing the miracles of the Exodus, the people did not need further proof of Hashem's existence, but rather proof of Moshe's status as prophet. In the fortieth year, in contrast, Moshe's role was obvious, but on the eve of entry into Israel, they needed to boost their belief in Hashem for the future. The differences further reflect two paths toward the development of faith. In Shemot, belief is presented as stemming from an objective, external experience of Hashem's revelation, while in Devarim it comes from an internal experience, a memory of the event as transmitted by the prophet and felt by each individual.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
 
<category>Wings of Eagles
 
<category>Wings of Eagles
 
<p>The Torah uses the image of Hashem carrying Israel on eagles’ wings in both Shemot 19 and Devarim 32. Does the image convey the same message in both cases? What is the metaphor meant to invoke? How does each verse bear on the other?</p>
 
<p>The Torah uses the image of Hashem carrying Israel on eagles’ wings in both Shemot 19 and Devarim 32. Does the image convey the same message in both cases? What is the metaphor meant to invoke? How does each verse bear on the other?</p>
Line 30: Line 35:
 
<subcategory>Primary Sources
 
<subcategory>Primary Sources
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Ibn Ezra equates the two metaphors and in his comments on Devarim 32:11, he explains that the imagery reflects the majesty and speed with which they left Egypt.</li>
+
<li>Ibn Ezra equates the two metaphors and in his comments on Devarim 32:11, explaining that the imagery reflects the majesty and speed with which they left Egypt.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>

Latest revision as of 20:55, 27 June 2024

Biblical Parallels Index – Shemot 19

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

This index is meant to help the reader explore Biblical parallels, be they two accounts of the same event, stories with similar motifs and themes, or units of text which are linguistically similar and perhaps alluding one to the other. The page includes links to tools that aid in comparison, primary sources that touch upon the parallels, and summaries of and links to articles which analyze them in depth.

Revelation

Hashem's revelation at Sinai is described at length in Shemot 19-20 and then recounted by Moshe to the nation in Devarim 4-5.

Tools

  • Use the Tanakh Lab to compare the two sets of chapters from a linguistic perspective. Some of the differences between the accounts relate to the stated goal of the experience, the role of Moshe as intermediary and as lawgiver, and the emphasis (or lack thereof) on hearing but not seeing God.

Articles

  • See Ma'amad Har Sinai in Shemot and Devarim for a table comparing the two accounts and analysis of the differences.  The articles suggests that on the eve of the people's entry into the land, Moshe had two fundamental concerns regarding the nation. He feared that with foreign influences, they would stop believing in Hashem and turn to other gods, and additionally, that even if they retained belief, they would question the authority of the laws transmitted via Moshe and be lax in their observance.  This agenda might account for the unique features of Moshe's retelling of the episode in Devarim 4-5.

Several articles focus more specifically on Moshe's role as an intermediary during revelation. In Sefer Shemot this role is emphasized, while in Devarim, in contrast, several verses highlight how Ma'amad Har Sinai a direct encounter with the Divine.
See The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe?

  • See The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe? for an overview of commentators’ approaches to this issue, ranging from those who believe that all of the Aseret Hadibrot were given through Moshe as an intermediary to those who believe that all of them were revealed directly to the nation.
  • See The Four Stages of Ma’amad Har Sinai, by R. Menachem Leibtag, for analysis of the approaches of Rashi, Ramban, and Ibn Ezra to reconciling the various verses and a theory about how the ambiguity of this narrative reflects the fundamental tension within man’s encounter with Hashem. On one hand, man strives for a  direct "face to face encounter", yet in reality fear often dominates and he cannot handle it.
  • See זכרון מעמד הר סיני בנאותו של משה רבנו, by R. Tamir Granot, which compares and contrasts the ways that the Torah describes the experience of revelation in Shemot and Devarim, noting that in the former there is an emphasis on Moshe's mediating role and in Devarim revelation is framed as a "face to face" encounter. He explains that in Shemot, right after witnessing the miracles of the Exodus, the people did not need further proof of Hashem's existence, but rather proof of Moshe's status as prophet. In the fortieth year, in contrast, Moshe's role was obvious, but on the eve of entry into Israel, they needed to boost their belief in Hashem for the future. The differences further reflect two paths toward the development of faith. In Shemot, belief is presented as stemming from an objective, external experience of Hashem's revelation, while in Devarim it comes from an internal experience, a memory of the event as transmitted by the prophet and felt by each individual.

Wings of Eagles

The Torah uses the image of Hashem carrying Israel on eagles’ wings in both Shemot 19 and Devarim 32. Does the image convey the same message in both cases? What is the metaphor meant to invoke? How does each verse bear on the other?

Tools

  • Concordance – A concordance search reveals that the word נשר appears just a handful of times in Torah, but is used twice as a metaphor for Hashem's interactions with the nation.  In both Shemot 19:4 and Devarim 32:11, the nation is depicted as being carried on eagle's wings. Devarim 32, though, elaborates on the metaphor also speaking of the eagle hovering over its nest.

Primary Sources

  • Ibn Ezra equates the two metaphors and in his comments on Devarim 32:11, explaining that the imagery reflects the majesty and speed with which they left Egypt.

Articles

Fire

In this chapter Hashem reveals himself to the nation amidst fire and smoke.  This is a recurring motif in Tanakh, where fire often serves as a vehicle or symbol of Divine revelation.

Tools

  • Concordance – Use the concordance to find where "fire" appears in Tanakh and what roles it plays. Previously fire has appeared in the context of the covenant between the pieces, the destruction of Sedom, the plagues, and the pillar of cloud and fire that led the Israelites in the desert. Subsequently in the Torah it appears many times as well, often in the context of divine wrath and destruction.

Articles

  • See The Eternal Flame, by R. David Silverberg, for an analysis of consuming fire as a symbol of divine punishment and non-destructive fire as a symbol of Hashem’s presence.
  • See קול אלקים מדבר מתוך האש, by R. Amnon Bazak, for analysis of how Torah’s descriptions of the fire of Sinai in Shemot and Devarim are meant to impart three fundamental religious beliefs: God’s incorporeality, the prohibition of idolatry, and the truth of Moshe’s prophecy.