Difference between revisions of "Calling for Peace in the Conquest of Canaan/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
<p>It is prohibited to call for peace to the Seven Nations and any overtures for peace on their part are rejected.</p>
 
<p>It is prohibited to call for peace to the Seven Nations and any overtures for peace on their part are rejected.</p>
 
<mekorot>Perhaps <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim20" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim</a><a href="SifreDevarim20" data-aht="source">20</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink>,<fn>Sifre 199 states that the verses in Devarim which speak of negotiating for peace relate only to "optional wars".&#160; Nonetheless, on Devarim 20:8, the Sifre says that if the Canaanites repent they are not killed. It is possible that the Midrash is speaking only of individuals who repent and assumes that the nation as a whole is not given that option. Ramban, however, attempts to explain that the Sifre really thinks that there is a call to peace in all wars, and is only saying that in cases where an enemy decides to fight, it is only in "optional wars" that the women and children are left alive.</fn> <multilink><a href="PesiktaDeRavKahana13-5" data-aht="source">Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a><a href="PesiktaDeRavKahana13-5" data-aht="source">13:5</a><a href="Pesikta DeRav Kahana" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiSotah35b" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBemidbar21-22" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:22</a><a href="RashiDevarim20-10-18" data-aht="source">Devarim 20:10-18</a><a href="RashiSotah35b" data-aht="source">Sotah 35b</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>,<fn>This is Rashi's opinion in his comments on Bavli Sotah 35b. However, in his commentary to Devarim 20:18 he says that Canaanites who repent and convert will be accepted.&#160; It is possible that there he is speaking about individuals which might be exempted and only in cases where they not only reject idolatry but accept all of the Torah's laws..</fn>&#160; <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim20-16" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim20-16" data-aht="source">Devarim 20:16</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, perhaps <multilink><a href="RambamSeferHaMitzvotPositiveCommandments190" data-aht="source">Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambamSeferHaMitzvotPositiveCommandments190" data-aht="source">Positive Commandments 190</a><a href="Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot</a></multilink>,<fn>In his Sefer HaMitzvot,</fn></mekorot>
 
<mekorot>Perhaps <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim20" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim</a><a href="SifreDevarim20" data-aht="source">20</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink>,<fn>Sifre 199 states that the verses in Devarim which speak of negotiating for peace relate only to "optional wars".&#160; Nonetheless, on Devarim 20:8, the Sifre says that if the Canaanites repent they are not killed. It is possible that the Midrash is speaking only of individuals who repent and assumes that the nation as a whole is not given that option. Ramban, however, attempts to explain that the Sifre really thinks that there is a call to peace in all wars, and is only saying that in cases where an enemy decides to fight, it is only in "optional wars" that the women and children are left alive.</fn> <multilink><a href="PesiktaDeRavKahana13-5" data-aht="source">Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a><a href="PesiktaDeRavKahana13-5" data-aht="source">13:5</a><a href="Pesikta DeRav Kahana" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiSotah35b" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBemidbar21-22" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:22</a><a href="RashiDevarim20-10-18" data-aht="source">Devarim 20:10-18</a><a href="RashiSotah35b" data-aht="source">Sotah 35b</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>,<fn>This is Rashi's opinion in his comments on Bavli Sotah 35b. However, in his commentary to Devarim 20:18 he says that Canaanites who repent and convert will be accepted.&#160; It is possible that there he is speaking about individuals which might be exempted and only in cases where they not only reject idolatry but accept all of the Torah's laws..</fn>&#160; <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim20-16" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim20-16" data-aht="source">Devarim 20:16</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, perhaps <multilink><a href="RambamSeferHaMitzvotPositiveCommandments190" data-aht="source">Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambamSeferHaMitzvotPositiveCommandments190" data-aht="source">Positive Commandments 190</a><a href="Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot</a></multilink>,<fn>In his Sefer HaMitzvot,</fn></mekorot>
<point><b>"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – According to these sources, the word "רק" (only) in this phrase serve to contrast verses Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).<fn>Cf. the opinion below which assumes that they serve as a contrast only to the immediately preceding verses (12-14) and relate only to whether or not women and children must be killed if peace is rejected.</fn>&#160; As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.<fn>While it is mandatory to seek peace before engaging in war with distant cities, this is prohibited with regards to the Canaanite cities.&#160; In addition, if the peace offer is not accepted, only males of distant cities are to be killed while their women and children are to be saved.&#160; In contrast, all members of Canaanite cities are to be destroyed.</fn></point>
+
<point><b>"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – According to these sources, this phrase serves to contrast Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).<fn>Cf. the opinion below which assumes that they serve as a contrast only to the immediately preceding verses (12-14) and relate only to whether or not women and children must be killed if peace is rejected.</fn>&#160; As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.<fn>While it is mandatory to seek peace before engaging in war with distant cities, this is prohibited with regards to the Canaanite cities.&#160; In addition, if the peace offer is not accepted, only males of distant cities are to be killed while their women and children are to be saved.&#160; In contrast, all members of Canaanite cities are to be destroyed.</fn></point>
<point><b>"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם"</b> – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah<fn>See, for instance <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32-33</a>, <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:11-16</a>, <a href="Bemidbar33-51-56" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:51-53</a>,&#160; and <a href="Devarim7-1-6" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:1-2</a>.</fn> which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations aand do not mention any alternative option for peace.</point>
+
<point><b>"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם"</b> – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah<fn>See, for instance <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32-33</a>, <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:11-16</a>, <a href="Bemidbar33-51-56" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:51-53</a>,&#160; and <a href="Devarim7-1-6" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:1-2</a>.</fn> which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations and do not mention any alternative peace option.</point>
<point><b>"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם "</b></point>
+
<point><b>"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם"</b> – The prohibition in Devarim 7<fn>See also&#160; <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32</a> and <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:12</a>.</fn> against making a treaty with or marrying Canaanites seems to presuppose that some Canaanites will not be killed.&#160; These sources could respond that Hashem is simply saying that there is a need to destroy all so that no treaty or marriages will be made, as such connections wikll ""</point>
 
<point><b>Trickery of Givonim</b> – Both the trickery of the Givonim and the nation's anger on hearing that they were tricked are totally understandable.&#160; The Givonites correctly understood that their only chance for survival was to convince the Israelites that they were from a distant city, since the Israelite were obligated to destroy any from the Seven Nations and would not allow them to surrender and make peace. The Isarelites, for their part, were upset as they had unknowingly violated Hashem's commandments against making covenanats and opeace</point>
 
<point><b>Trickery of Givonim</b> – Both the trickery of the Givonim and the nation's anger on hearing that they were tricked are totally understandable.&#160; The Givonites correctly understood that their only chance for survival was to convince the Israelites that they were from a distant city, since the Israelite were obligated to destroy any from the Seven Nations and would not allow them to surrender and make peace. The Isarelites, for their part, were upset as they had unknowingly violated Hashem's commandments against making covenanats and opeace</point>
 
</category>
 
</category>

Version as of 06:34, 14 July 2016

Calling for Peace in the Conquest of Canaan

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Prohibited

It is prohibited to call for peace to the Seven Nations and any overtures for peace on their part are rejected.

"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה" – According to these sources, this phrase serves to contrast Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).4  As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.5
"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם" – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah6 which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations and do not mention any alternative peace option.
"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם" – The prohibition in Devarim 77 against making a treaty with or marrying Canaanites seems to presuppose that some Canaanites will not be killed.  These sources could respond that Hashem is simply saying that there is a need to destroy all so that no treaty or marriages will be made, as such connections wikll ""
Trickery of Givonim – Both the trickery of the Givonim and the nation's anger on hearing that they were tricked are totally understandable.  The Givonites correctly understood that their only chance for survival was to convince the Israelites that they were from a distant city, since the Israelite were obligated to destroy any from the Seven Nations and would not allow them to surrender and make peace. The Isarelites, for their part, were upset as they had unknowingly violated Hashem's commandments against making covenanats and opeace

Obligated

There is an obligation to offer peace terms before waging war against the Seven Nations, similar to the obligation before fighting an "optional war" against other enemies.  This position subdivides regarding the extent of the call and ensuing peace:

Accepted

Although the Israelites are not commanded to seek out peace, if, before hostilities commence, the Canaanites take the initiative to submit themselves to Israel, their surrender is accepted.