Difference between revisions of "Calling for Peace in the Conquest of Canaan/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
m |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<point><b>"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – According to these sources, this phrase serves to contrast Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).<fn>Cf. the opinion below which assumes that they serve as a contrast only to the immediately preceding verses (12-14) and relate only to whether or not women and children must be killed if peace is rejected.</fn>  As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.<fn>While it is mandatory to seek peace before engaging in war with distant cities, this is prohibited with regards to the Canaanite cities.  In addition, if the peace offer is not accepted, only males of distant cities are to be killed while their women and children are to be saved.  In contrast, all members of Canaanite cities are to be destroyed.</fn></point> | <point><b>"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – According to these sources, this phrase serves to contrast Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).<fn>Cf. the opinion below which assumes that they serve as a contrast only to the immediately preceding verses (12-14) and relate only to whether or not women and children must be killed if peace is rejected.</fn>  As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.<fn>While it is mandatory to seek peace before engaging in war with distant cities, this is prohibited with regards to the Canaanite cities.  In addition, if the peace offer is not accepted, only males of distant cities are to be killed while their women and children are to be saved.  In contrast, all members of Canaanite cities are to be destroyed.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם"</b> – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah<fn>See, for instance <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32-33</a>, <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:11-16</a>, <a href="Bemidbar33-51-56" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:51-53</a>,  and <a href="Devarim7-1-6" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:1-2</a>.</fn> which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations and do not mention any alternative peace option.</point> | <point><b>"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם"</b> – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah<fn>See, for instance <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32-33</a>, <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:11-16</a>, <a href="Bemidbar33-51-56" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:51-53</a>,  and <a href="Devarim7-1-6" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:1-2</a>.</fn> which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations and do not mention any alternative peace option.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם"</b> – The prohibition in Devarim 7<fn>See also  <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32</a> and <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:12</a>.</fn> against making a treaty with or marrying Canaanites seems to presuppose that some Canaanites | + | <point><b>"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם"</b> – The prohibition in Devarim 7<fn>See also  <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:32</a> and <a href="Shemot34-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:12</a>.</fn> against making a treaty with or marrying Canaanites seems to presuppose that some Canaanites are not be killed.  These sources could respond in either of the following ways:<br/> |
− | <point><b>Trickery of | + | <ul> |
+ | <li>Hashem is simply saying that there is a need to destroy everyone so that no treaty or marriages will be made.<fn>In other words, these are not distinct prohibitions but a series of actions that need to be prevented.</fn> Sine such connections will inevitably lead to idolatry, they need to be prevented.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Alternatively, as<multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary23-32" data-aht="source"> Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary23-32" data-aht="source">Shemot Short Commentary 23:32</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> explains, the prohibitions against making alliances were needed for the period of the conquest itself, as Hashem had promised that the nations would not be destroyed at once, but rather over a long period.<fn>See <a href="Shemot23-23-33" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:29-30</a>.</fn></li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Trickery of Gibeonites</b> – The trickery of the Gibeonites is totally understandable.  They correctly understood that their only chance for survival was to convince the Israelites that they were from a distant city, since the Israelite were obligated to destroy any from the Seven Nations and would not allow them to surrender and make peace. <fn></fn></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Why did the Israelites override their vow?</b></point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Obligated | <category>Obligated |
Version as of 07:14, 14 July 2016
Calling for Peace in the Conquest of Canaan
Exegetical Approaches
Prohibited
It is prohibited to call for peace to the Seven Nations and any overtures for peace on their part are rejected.
Sources:Perhaps Sifre Devarim,1 Pesikta DeRav Kahana, Rashi,2 R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, perhaps Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot,3
"רַק מֵעָרֵי הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה" – According to these sources, this phrase serves to contrast Devarim 20:16-18 with the entire preceding unit (verses 10-15).4 As such, the verses teach that Canaanite cities ("הָעַמִּים הָאֵלֶּה") differ from "distant cities" on two points, both with regards to whether there is an obligation to call for peace and what to do if that peace is rejected.5
"הַחֲרֵם תַּחֲרִים אֹתָם" – This position is supported by the many verses throughout Torah6 which speak of annihilating the Seven Nations and do not mention any alternative peace option.
"לֹא תִכְרֹת לָהֶם בְּרִית... וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם" – The prohibition in Devarim 77 against making a treaty with or marrying Canaanites seems to presuppose that some Canaanites are not be killed. These sources could respond in either of the following ways:
- Hashem is simply saying that there is a need to destroy everyone so that no treaty or marriages will be made.8 Sine such connections will inevitably lead to idolatry, they need to be prevented.
- Alternatively, as Ibn Ezra explains, the prohibitions against making alliances were needed for the period of the conquest itself, as Hashem had promised that the nations would not be destroyed at once, but rather over a long period.9
Trickery of Gibeonites – The trickery of the Gibeonites is totally understandable. They correctly understood that their only chance for survival was to convince the Israelites that they were from a distant city, since the Israelite were obligated to destroy any from the Seven Nations and would not allow them to surrender and make peace. 10
Why did the Israelites override their vow?
Obligated
There is an obligation to offer peace terms before waging war against the Seven Nations, similar to the obligation before fighting an "optional war" against other enemies. This position subdivides regarding the extent of the call and ensuing peace: