Difference between revisions of "Channah's Prayer/2"
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<li>R"A Bazak<fn>See his article, <a href="http://etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A7-%D7%91-%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%94">"תפילת חנה"</a>.</fn> alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.<fn>This would be analogous to someone today reciting a psalm when in distress, even if not all the details of the psalm are applicable.  One might question, however, if such a corpus of prayers existed already in the time of Channah.</fn>   As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.<fn>A difficulty with this approach relates to the mention of a king in the last verse of the prayer, as the original composer of the prayer would also not have been living during the monarchic era. This leads R"A Bazak to suggest that this line might have been added to the song afterwards.  As support for such a possibility, he points to an opinion brought by <multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Tehillim First Commentary 51:20</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>to explain Psalm 51. The opening of the psalm suggests that it was composed by David after his sin with Batsheva, but the ending alludes to a Jerusalem which needs rebuilding.  Ibn Ezra cites a possibility that the concluding line was a later interpolation.<br/>R. Bazak must nonetheless explain why the prophet decided to include the later addition, if Channah had never said it. He suggests a structural reason. The Book of Shemuel ends with David's song to Hashem, which closes with the words "מִגְדּוֹל יְשׁוּעוֹת מַלְכּוֹ וְעֹשֶׂה חֶסֶד לִמְשִׁיחוֹ". As such, the two songs, each with mentions of a king/anointed one, form bookends for Sefer Shemuel as a whole.  For a discussion of other parallels between the two songs, see <a href="Channah's Prayer and David's Song" data-aht="page">Channah's Prayer and David's Song</a>.</fn></li> | <li>R"A Bazak<fn>See his article, <a href="http://etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A7-%D7%91-%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%94">"תפילת חנה"</a>.</fn> alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.<fn>This would be analogous to someone today reciting a psalm when in distress, even if not all the details of the psalm are applicable.  One might question, however, if such a corpus of prayers existed already in the time of Channah.</fn>   As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.<fn>A difficulty with this approach relates to the mention of a king in the last verse of the prayer, as the original composer of the prayer would also not have been living during the monarchic era. This leads R"A Bazak to suggest that this line might have been added to the song afterwards.  As support for such a possibility, he points to an opinion brought by <multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Tehillim First Commentary 51:20</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>to explain Psalm 51. The opening of the psalm suggests that it was composed by David after his sin with Batsheva, but the ending alludes to a Jerusalem which needs rebuilding.  Ibn Ezra cites a possibility that the concluding line was a later interpolation.<br/>R. Bazak must nonetheless explain why the prophet decided to include the later addition, if Channah had never said it. He suggests a structural reason. The Book of Shemuel ends with David's song to Hashem, which closes with the words "מִגְדּוֹל יְשׁוּעוֹת מַלְכּוֹ וְעֹשֶׂה חֶסֶד לִמְשִׁיחוֹ". As such, the two songs, each with mentions of a king/anointed one, form bookends for Sefer Shemuel as a whole.  For a discussion of other parallels between the two songs, see <a href="Channah's Prayer and David's Song" data-aht="page">Channah's Prayer and David's Song</a>.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"רָחַב פִּי"</b> – <a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1 | + | <point><b>"רָחַב פִּי"</b> – <a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a> explains the choice of language "and my mouth has widened" as a contrast to Channah's quiet ways when she was distressed. He points out that those who are full of sorrow tend to speak quietly, without their voices being heard. Thus, too, Channah had previously prayed in silence ("שְׂפָתֶיהָ נָּעוֹת וְקוֹלָהּ לֹא יִשָּׁמֵעַ"). Now, though, she opened her mouth wide to rejoice in Hashem's aid.</point> |
<point><b>"שָׂמַחְתִּי בִּישׁוּעָתֶךָ"</b> – At first glance, the word salvation is not the expected choice to describe being granted a child.  Nonetheless, in this story, where infertility is accompanied by taunts from a rival wife, Channah might be referring to deliverance from humiliation.</point> | <point><b>"שָׂמַחְתִּי בִּישׁוּעָתֶךָ"</b> – At first glance, the word salvation is not the expected choice to describe being granted a child.  Nonetheless, in this story, where infertility is accompanied by taunts from a rival wife, Channah might be referring to deliverance from humiliation.</point> | ||
<point><b>"וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ"</b><ul> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
<category>Personal Thanks and National Petition | <category>Personal Thanks and National Petition | ||
<p>Channah's prayer relates to both her personal life and to the fate of the nation. She simultaneously thanks Hashem for a son, and requests that her child grow up to usher in a new era of leadership for Israel.</p> | <p>Channah's prayer relates to both her personal life and to the fate of the nation. She simultaneously thanks Hashem for a son, and requests that her child grow up to usher in a new era of leadership for Israel.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RalbagShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:1-10</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:1</a><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:10</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, R"D Silber<fn>See R. David Silber, "Kingship, Samuel, and the Story of Hanna," Tradition 23:2 (1988): 64-75.  The various commentators listed here each | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RalbagShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:1-10</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:1</a><a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1-10" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:10</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, R"D Silber<fn>See R. David Silber, "Kingship, Samuel, and the Story of Hanna," Tradition 23:2 (1988): 64-75.  The various commentators listed here each propose different balances regarding how much and which sections of the prayer are personal and which relate to the nation.</fn></mekorot> |
+ | <point><b>"וַתִּתְפַּלֵּל חַנָּה"</b> – Abarbanel assumes that the verb "התפלל" refers to petitionary prayer.  He maintains that Channah's request appears only in the last verse of the prayer and that the rest of the song simply serves as an introduction, in which Channah first praises Hashem before presenting her request.<fn>Abarbanel cites Bavli Berakhot 32a, "לעולם יסדר אדם שבחו של הקדוש ברוך הוא ואחר כך יתפלל".</fn>  The other commentators interpret as requests even some of the earlier verses.</point> | ||
<point><b>Historical background</b> – Channah stands at a period of transition in the leadership of Israel.  Sefer Shofetim ends with a picture of a nation in anarchy.  The last few chapters describe the mockery of the idol of Michah<fn>See Shofetim Chapters 17-18 which depict a society which is so lost that its members enlist Levites as Priests to worship idolatry and assume this will be pleasing in the eyes of Hashem.</fn> and the atrocities of the concubine of Giv'ah, revealing how low the nation had sunk, both in their relation to Hashem and to their fellow man.  The refrain of these chapters "בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם אֵין <b>מֶלֶךְ</b> בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל אִישׁ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו יַעֲשֶׂה"‎<fn>"In those days there was no <b>king</b> in Israel, each as was right in his eyes did he do."</fn> proclaims the need for a new form of leadership.</point> | <point><b>Historical background</b> – Channah stands at a period of transition in the leadership of Israel.  Sefer Shofetim ends with a picture of a nation in anarchy.  The last few chapters describe the mockery of the idol of Michah<fn>See Shofetim Chapters 17-18 which depict a society which is so lost that its members enlist Levites as Priests to worship idolatry and assume this will be pleasing in the eyes of Hashem.</fn> and the atrocities of the concubine of Giv'ah, revealing how low the nation had sunk, both in their relation to Hashem and to their fellow man.  The refrain of these chapters "בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם אֵין <b>מֶלֶךְ</b> בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל אִישׁ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו יַעֲשֶׂה"‎<fn>"In those days there was no <b>king</b> in Israel, each as was right in his eyes did he do."</fn> proclaims the need for a new form of leadership.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Channah's request for son</b> – When Channah requested a child, it was not only for herself but for Israel as a whole.<fn>Channah's personal situation and barrenness can even be seen as representative of the nation as a whole, bereft not of | + | <point><b>Channah's request for son</b> – When Channah requested a child, it was not only for herself but for Israel as a whole.<fn>Channah's personal situation and barrenness can even be seen as representative of the nation as a whole, bereft not of children but of leadership.</fn> As such, she vowed to immediately return him to Hashem. Shemuel was to be raised in the Mikdash, training to become a leader while surrounded by holiness.</point> |
<point><b>Opening lines of praise</b> – According to Abarbanel, the opening verses of praise refer to Channah's rejoicing over the birth of her son. Ralbag, in contrast, suggests that her happiness relates to what she hopes her son will accomplish as a future leader: vanquishing Israel's enemies and returning the nation to the worship of Hashem.</point> | <point><b>Opening lines of praise</b> – According to Abarbanel, the opening verses of praise refer to Channah's rejoicing over the birth of her son. Ralbag, in contrast, suggests that her happiness relates to what she hopes her son will accomplish as a future leader: vanquishing Israel's enemies and returning the nation to the worship of Hashem.</point> | ||
<point><b>Reference to enemies</b><ul> | <point><b>Reference to enemies</b><ul> | ||
Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
<li><b> Internal</b> – R. Silber, in contrast, claims that Channah is speaking of the corrupt leaders of Israel whom Shemuel is to replace.  He could maintain that Channah speaks in the past tense despite this being a request, in the manner of many psalmists who do the same, thereby expressing confidence that the desired outcome will come to fruition.</li> | <li><b> Internal</b> – R. Silber, in contrast, claims that Channah is speaking of the corrupt leaders of Israel whom Shemuel is to replace.  He could maintain that Channah speaks in the past tense despite this being a request, in the manner of many psalmists who do the same, thereby expressing confidence that the desired outcome will come to fruition.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Changing fortunes</b> – The many examples of reversals in man's plight highlight the main theme of Channah's song, Hashem's dominion in the world.  Channah emphasizes how Hashem can change life's trajectory overnight, a lesson she has experienced in her personal life, and one that is essential for Israel's future leaders to recognize.  As <a href="Devarim17-14-20" data-aht="source">Devarim 17</a> warns, one of the dangers of monarchy is that power goes to the ruler's head and he begins to trust in himself, leading him to forget the true King, Hashem.<fn>See <multilink><a href="ShadalDevarim17-14" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalDevarim17-14" data-aht="source">Devarim 17:14</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> who elaborates on this idea when explaining the need for the special | + | <point><b>Changing fortunes</b> – The many examples of reversals in man's plight highlight the main theme of Channah's song, Hashem's dominion in the world.  Channah emphasizes how Hashem can change life's trajectory overnight, a lesson she has experienced in her personal life, and one that is essential for Israel's future leaders to recognize.  As <a href="Devarim17-14-20" data-aht="source">Devarim 17</a> warns, one of the dangers of monarchy is that power goes to the ruler's head and he begins to trust in himself, leading him to forget the true King, Hashem.<fn>See <multilink><a href="ShadalDevarim17-14" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalDevarim17-14" data-aht="source">Devarim 17:14</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> who elaborates on this idea when explaining the need for the special commandments incumbent upon a king.</fn> Thus, throughout her song, as she prays for leadership, Channah emphasizes that "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ"; it is Hashem who is the true King.</point> |
− | <point><b>"י"י יֵחַתּוּ מְרִיבָיו עָלָיו בַּשָּׁמַיִם יַרְעֵם"</b> – According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, these words are a request that Hashem pulverize Shemuel's enemies, the Philistines,<fn>While others read the phrase "י"י יֵחַתּוּ מְרִיבָיו" to mean that Hashem's enemies shall be broken, Abarbanel assumes that Hashem is simply the address of the request.</fn> and thunder upon them from on high.<fn>They | + | <point><b>"י"י יֵחַתּוּ מְרִיבָיו עָלָיו בַּשָּׁמַיִם יַרְעֵם"</b> – According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, these words are a request that Hashem pulverize Shemuel's enemies, the Philistines,<fn>While others read the phrase "י"י יֵחַתּוּ מְרִיבָיו" to mean that Hashem's enemies shall be broken, Abarbanel assumes that Hashem is simply the address of the request.</fn> and thunder upon them from on high.<fn>They claim that this request is granted when Shemuel is victorious over the Philistines, as the verse states, "וַיַּרְעֵם י"י בְּקוֹל גָּדוֹל בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא עַל פְּלִשְׁתִּים" (Shemuel I 7:10). Abarbanel also raises the possibility that the request refers to Chapter 12, when Shemuel has Hashem rain and thunder on the people in the dry season as a warning sign regarding their request for a king.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"יָדִין אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ"</b> – This is a request that Shemuel merit to judge the people.</point> | <point><b>"יָדִין אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ"</b> – This is a request that Shemuel merit to judge the people.</point> | ||
<point><b>Mention of a king</b> – In mentioning a king, Channah is not necessarily a prophetess but a visionary.<fn>Nonetheless, Ralbag maintains that this was said via prophecy.</fn>  She sees the leadership vacuum and implores Hashem: "וְיִתֶּן עֹז לְמַלְכּוֹ", and that, through her son, He anoint a monarch.</point> | <point><b>Mention of a king</b> – In mentioning a king, Channah is not necessarily a prophetess but a visionary.<fn>Nonetheless, Ralbag maintains that this was said via prophecy.</fn>  She sees the leadership vacuum and implores Hashem: "וְיִתֶּן עֹז לְמַלְכּוֹ", and that, through her son, He anoint a monarch.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The song as introduction to Sefer Shemuel</b> – Channah's prayer is a very apt introduction to the Book of Shemuel which revolves around the theme of discovering the appropriate monarch for Israel. David is chosen because he recognizes the lesson of "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ",  that wars are won not with swords or spears but "בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת".‎<fn>See his words to Golyat: "וַיֹּאמֶר דָּוִד אֶל הַפְּלִשְׁתִּי אַתָּה בָּא אֵלַי בְּחֶרֶב וּבַחֲנִית וּבְכִידוֹן וְאָנֹכִי בָא אֵלֶיךָ בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת אֱלֹהֵי מַעַרְכוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר חֵרַפְתָּ."</fn>  Shaul, in contrast lost his kingship because he let himself be his own guide, rather than obeying Hashem's commands.<fn>Shaul initially loses his kingship because he fails to wait for Shemuel, fearing that he will lose his army (and hence the war) if he waited any longer. In contrast to David, Shaul forgets that victory is not related to human might, but Hashem's backing.  He loses the monarchy a second time when he decides on his own to spare the king and sheep of Amalek rather than totally destroying them as commanded by Hashem.</fn>  R. Silber suggests that Channah's story "stands in the beginning of a book on kingship as a definition of what a king must be, "מַלְכּוֹ", <b>His</b> king".  While David recognized this, Shaul did not.</point> | + | <point><b>The song as introduction to Sefer Shemuel</b> – Channah's prayer is a very apt introduction to the Book of Shemuel which revolves around the theme of discovering the appropriate monarch for Israel. David is chosen because he recognizes the lesson of "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ",  that wars are won not with swords or spears but "בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת".‎<fn>See his words to Golyat: "וַיֹּאמֶר דָּוִד אֶל הַפְּלִשְׁתִּי אַתָּה בָּא אֵלַי בְּחֶרֶב וּבַחֲנִית וּבְכִידוֹן וְאָנֹכִי בָא אֵלֶיךָ בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת אֱלֹהֵי מַעַרְכוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר חֵרַפְתָּ."</fn>  Shaul, in contrast lost his kingship because he let himself be his own guide, rather than obeying Hashem's commands.<fn>Shaul initially loses his kingship because he fails to wait for Shemuel, fearing that he will lose his army (and hence the war) if he waited any longer. In contrast to David, Shaul forgets that victory is not related to human might, but Hashem's backing.  He loses the monarchy a second time when he decides on his own to spare the king and sheep of Amalek rather than totally destroying them as commanded by Hashem.  See <a href="Shaul's Sin in Gilgal" data-aht="page">Shaul's Sin in Gilgal</a> and <a href="Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek" data-aht="page">Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek</a>.</fn>  R. Silber suggests that Channah's story "stands in the beginning of a book on kingship as a definition of what a king must be, "מַלְכּוֹ", <b>His</b> king".  While David recognized this, Shaul did not.</point> |
− | <point><b>The song and Rosh Hashanah</b> – Channah's prayer is read as the haftarah for Rosh HaShanah.  One of the reasons for the choice might be its focus on the theme of Hashem's dominion and kingship, which is one of the focal points of the day (מלכויות).<fn><multilink><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Rosh HaShanah 11a</a><a href="Bavli Rosh HaShanah" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a></multilink>, in contrast, connects the choice to the theme of זכרונות, remembering, and the fact that Channah was remembered on Rosh Hashanah. <multilink><a href="BavliBerakhot10a" data-aht="source">Bavli Berakhot </a><a href="BavliBerakhot29a" data-aht="source">Berakhot 29a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>points to the fact that the nine blessings of the Mussaf prayer relate to the nine mentions of Hashem in Channah's prayer.</fn>  In fact, the well known liturgical poem, "ונתנה תוקף", which emphasizes how all is in God's hands, appears to be constructed on the foundations of Channah's song.<fn>Thus the | + | <point><b>The song and Rosh Hashanah</b> – Channah's prayer is read as the haftarah for Rosh HaShanah.  One of the reasons for the choice might be its focus on the theme of Hashem's dominion and kingship, which is one of the focal points of the day (מלכויות).<fn><multilink><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Rosh HaShanah 11a</a><a href="Bavli Rosh HaShanah" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a></multilink>, in contrast, connects the choice to the theme of זכרונות, remembering, and the fact that Channah was remembered on Rosh Hashanah.  See also <multilink><a href="BavliBerakhot10a" data-aht="source">Bavli Berakhot</a><a href="BavliBerakhot29a" data-aht="source">Berakhot 29a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> which points to the fact that the nine blessings of the Mussaf prayer relate to the nine mentions of Hashem in Channah's prayer.</fn>  In fact, the well known liturgical poem, "ונתנה תוקף", which emphasizes how all is in God's hands, appears to be constructed on the foundations of Channah's song.<fn>Thus the poem's query, "מי יחיה ומי ימות" parallels Channah's words, "י"י מֵמִית וּמְחַיֶּה".  Similarly, Channah's reference to the satiated going hungry is alluded to by the poem's question: "מי ברעב ומי בצמא."  Finally, the line "מי יעני ומי יעשר, מי ישפל ומי ירום" matches Channah's "י"י מוֹרִישׁ וּמַעֲשִׁיר מַשְׁפִּיל אַף מְרוֹמֵם".</fn></point> |
</category> | </category> | ||
</approaches> | </approaches> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Latest revision as of 22:57, 5 September 2017
Channah's Prayer
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators struggle to determine whether Channah's prayer is personal in nature or relates to the nation as a whole and if it is one of praise or petition. Rashi opts to read the entire song as a thanksgiving prayer relating to Channah's individual circumstances and the birth of her son. This requires reinterpreting some of the imagery, but has the advantage of the song fitting in nicely with its context.
Targum Yonatan, in contrast, attempts to read the prayer as related to the fate of the nation, suggesting that Channah was prophesying about Israel's future victories over its foes. Though this nicely explains the many references to war, it is not clear why Channah would be sharing such news in the aftermath of her son's birth and weaning.
A third approach suggests that the mixture of personal and national in the song is intentional. Channah rejoices in the birth of her son, but simultaneously requests from Hashem that her son grow to provide the nation with much needed leadership and salvation from their enemies.
Personal Thanksgiving
Channah's prayer is a personal song of thanksgiving to Hashem for granting her request for a child. It revolves around both her earlier travails as a barren woman and her present happiness in the birth of her son.
- According to these sources, the enemy mentioned refers to Peninah (and others like her), who would regularly mock Channah over her barren state.3
- R"A Bazak4 alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.5 As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.6
- Rashi and R. Yosef Kara, following Bavli Berakhot,7 take this verse out of its simple meaning and read "צוּר" as "צייר". Channah is saying that there is no artist like Hashem who can form a living soul, alluding to the birth of Shemuel.
- Radak more simply reads the word "צוּר" as a metaphor for strength, saying that Channah is praising Hashem's ability to reverse nature and make one who was barren fruitful.
- Prophetic – According to R. Yosef Kara and Radak, mention of the future king was prophetic. Channah saw that her son was to later anoint the first king of Israel and ended her prayer with a wish that Hashem give him strength. It is not clear, however, why she would mention this right now.
- Personal – The Hoil Moshe, in contrast, claims that the king and anointed one of verse 10 do not refer to a monarch, but rather to Shemuel himself. The words reflect Channah's hopes that her son grow to be a leader and prophet, strengthened and exalted by Hashem.10
National Prophecy
Channah's song contains prophetic material relating to the nation as a whole. It speaks of events throughout the nation's history from the defeat of the Philistines by the hand of Shemuel until the coming of the Mashiach.
Personal Thanks and National Petition
Channah's prayer relates to both her personal life and to the fate of the nation. She simultaneously thanks Hashem for a son, and requests that her child grow up to usher in a new era of leadership for Israel.
- External – According to Ralbag, the enemies refer to the Philistines whom Shemuel is to defeat. Since there is a spark of prophecy in Channah's words, she can speak as if the salvation has already occurred.
- Internal – R. Silber, in contrast, claims that Channah is speaking of the corrupt leaders of Israel whom Shemuel is to replace. He could maintain that Channah speaks in the past tense despite this being a request, in the manner of many psalmists who do the same, thereby expressing confidence that the desired outcome will come to fruition.