Difference between revisions of "Channah's Prayer/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<li>R"A Bazak<fn>See his article, <a href="http://etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A7-%D7%91-%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%94">"תפילת חנה"</a>.</fn> alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.<fn>This would be analogous to someone today reciting a psalm when in distress, even if not all the details of the psalm are applicable.  One might question, however, if such a corpus of prayers existed already in the time of Channah.</fn>   As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.<fn>A difficulty with this approach relates to the mention of a king in the last verse of the prayer, as the original composer of the prayer would also not have been living during the monarchic era. This leads R"A Bazak to suggest that this line might have been added to the song afterwards.  As support for such a possibility, he points to an opinion brought by <multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Tehillim First Commentary 51:20</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>to explain Psalm 51. The opening of the psalm suggests that it was composed by David after his sin with Batsheva, but the ending alludes to a Jerusalem which needs rebuilding.  Ibn Ezra cites a possibility that the concluding line was a later interpolation.<br/>R. Bazak must nonetheless explain why the prophet decided to include the later addition, if Channah had never said it. He suggests a structural reason. The Book of Shemuel ends with David's song to Hashem, which closes with the words "מִגְדּוֹל יְשׁוּעוֹת מַלְכּוֹ וְעֹשֶׂה חֶסֶד לִמְשִׁיחוֹ". As such, the two songs, each with mentions of a king/anointed one, form bookends for Sefer Shemuel as a whole.  For a discussion of other parallels between the two songs, see <a href="Channah's Prayer and David's Song" data-aht="page">Channah's Prayer and David's Song</a>.</fn></li> | <li>R"A Bazak<fn>See his article, <a href="http://etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A7-%D7%91-%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%AA-%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%94">"תפילת חנה"</a>.</fn> alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.<fn>This would be analogous to someone today reciting a psalm when in distress, even if not all the details of the psalm are applicable.  One might question, however, if such a corpus of prayers existed already in the time of Channah.</fn>   As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.<fn>A difficulty with this approach relates to the mention of a king in the last verse of the prayer, as the original composer of the prayer would also not have been living during the monarchic era. This leads R"A Bazak to suggest that this line might have been added to the song afterwards.  As support for such a possibility, he points to an opinion brought by <multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimFirstCommentary51-20" data-aht="source">Tehillim First Commentary 51:20</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>to explain Psalm 51. The opening of the psalm suggests that it was composed by David after his sin with Batsheva, but the ending alludes to a Jerusalem which needs rebuilding.  Ibn Ezra cites a possibility that the concluding line was a later interpolation.<br/>R. Bazak must nonetheless explain why the prophet decided to include the later addition, if Channah had never said it. He suggests a structural reason. The Book of Shemuel ends with David's song to Hashem, which closes with the words "מִגְדּוֹל יְשׁוּעוֹת מַלְכּוֹ וְעֹשֶׂה חֶסֶד לִמְשִׁיחוֹ". As such, the two songs, each with mentions of a king/anointed one, form bookends for Sefer Shemuel as a whole.  For a discussion of other parallels between the two songs, see <a href="Channah's Prayer and David's Song" data-aht="page">Channah's Prayer and David's Song</a>.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"רָחַב פִּי"</b> – <a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1 | + | <point><b>"רָחַב פִּי"</b> – <a href="AbarbanelShemuelI2-1" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a> explains the choice of language "and my mouth has widened" as a contrast to Channah's quiet ways when she was distressed. He points out that those who are full of sorrow tend to speak quietly, without their voices being heard. Thus, too, Channah had previously prayed in silence ("שְׂפָתֶיהָ נָּעוֹת וְקוֹלָהּ לֹא יִשָּׁמֵעַ"). Now, though, she opened her mouth wide to rejoice in Hashem's aid.</point> |
<point><b>"שָׂמַחְתִּי בִּישׁוּעָתֶךָ"</b> – At first glance, the word salvation is not the expected choice to describe being granted a child.  Nonetheless, in this story, where infertility is accompanied by taunts from a rival wife, Channah might be referring to deliverance from humiliation.</point> | <point><b>"שָׂמַחְתִּי בִּישׁוּעָתֶךָ"</b> – At first glance, the word salvation is not the expected choice to describe being granted a child.  Nonetheless, in this story, where infertility is accompanied by taunts from a rival wife, Channah might be referring to deliverance from humiliation.</point> | ||
<point><b>"וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְאֵין צוּר כֵּאלֹהֵינוּ"</b><ul> |
Version as of 01:38, 29 September 2016
Channah's Prayer
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators struggle to determine whether Channah's prayer is personal in nature or relates to the nation as a whole and if it is one of praise or petition. Rashi opts to read the entire song as a thanksgiving prayer relating to Channah's individual circumstances and the birth of her son. This requires reinterpreting some of the imagery, but has the advantage of the song fitting in nicely with its context.
Targum Yonatan, in contrast, attempts to read the prayer as related to the fate of the nation, suggesting that Channah was prophesying about Israel's future victories over its foes. Though this nicely explains the many references to war, it is not clear why Channah would be sharing such news in the aftermath of her son's birth and weaning.
A third approach suggests that the mixture of personal and national in the song is intentional. Channah rejoices in the birth of her son, but simultaneously requests from Hashem that her son grow to provide the nation with much needed leadership and salvation from their enemies.
Personal Thanksgiving
Channah's prayer is a personal song of thanksgiving to Hashem for granting her request for a child. It revolves around both her earlier travails as a barren woman and her present happiness in the birth of her son.
- According to these sources, the enemy mentioned refers to Peninah (and others like her), who would regularly mock Channah over her barren state.3
- R"A Bazak4 alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.5 As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.6
- Rashi and R. Yosef Kara, following Bavli Berakhot,7 take this verse out of its simple meaning and read "צוּר" as "צייר". Channah is saying that there is no artist like Hashem who can form a living soul, alluding to the birth of Shemuel.
- Radak more simply reads the word "צוּר" as a metaphor for strength, saying that Channah is praising Hashem's ability to reverse nature and make one who was barren fruitful.
- Prophetic – According to R. Yosef Kara and Radak, mention of the future king was prophetic. Channah saw that her son was to later anoint the first king of Israel and ended her prayer with a wish that Hashem give him strength. It is not clear, however, why she would mention this right now.
- Personal – The Hoil Moshe, in contrast, claims that the king and anointed one of verse 10 do not refer to a monarch, but rather to Shemuel himself. The words reflect Channah's hopes that her son grow to be a leader and prophet, strengthened and exalted by Hashem.10
National Prophecy
Channah's song contains prophetic material relating to the nation as a whole. It speaks of events throughout the nation's history from the defeat of the Philistines by the hand of Shemuel until the coming of the Mashiach.
Personal Thanks and National Petition
Channah's prayer relates to both her personal life and to the fate of the nation. She simultaneously thanks Hashem for a son, and requests that her child grow up to usher in a new era of leadership for Israel.
- External – According to Ralbag, the enemies refer to the Philistines whom Shemuel is to defeat. Since there is a spark of prophecy in Channah's words, she can speak as if the salvation has already occurred.
- Internal – R. Silber, in contrast, claims that Channah is speaking of the corrupt leaders of Israel whom Shemuel is to replace. He could maintain that Channah speaks in the past tense despite this being a request, in the manner of many psalmists who do the same, thereby expressing confidence that the desired outcome will come to fruition.