Difference between revisions of "Channah's Prayer/2"
m |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<point><b>"יָדִין אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ"</b> – This is a request that Shemuel merit to judge the people.</point> | <point><b>"יָדִין אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ"</b> – This is a request that Shemuel merit to judge the people.</point> | ||
<point><b>Mention of a king</b> – In mentioning a king, Channah is not necessarily a prophetess but a visionary.<fn>Nonetheless, Ralbag maintains that this was said via prophecy.</fn>  She sees the leadership vacuum and implores Hashem: "וְיִתֶּן עֹז לְמַלְכּוֹ", and that, through her son, He anoint a monarch.</point> | <point><b>Mention of a king</b> – In mentioning a king, Channah is not necessarily a prophetess but a visionary.<fn>Nonetheless, Ralbag maintains that this was said via prophecy.</fn>  She sees the leadership vacuum and implores Hashem: "וְיִתֶּן עֹז לְמַלְכּוֹ", and that, through her son, He anoint a monarch.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The song as introduction to Sefer Shemuel</b> – Channah's prayer is a very apt introduction to the Book of Shemuel which revolves around the theme of discovering the appropriate monarch for Israel. David is chosen because he recognizes the lesson of "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ",  that wars are won not with swords or spears but "בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת".‎<fn>See his words to Golyat: "וַיֹּאמֶר דָּוִד אֶל הַפְּלִשְׁתִּי אַתָּה בָּא אֵלַי בְּחֶרֶב וּבַחֲנִית וּבְכִידוֹן וְאָנֹכִי בָא אֵלֶיךָ בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת אֱלֹהֵי מַעַרְכוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר חֵרַפְתָּ."</fn>  Shaul, in contrast lost his kingship because he let himself be his own guide, rather than obeying Hashem's commands.<fn>Shaul initially loses his kingship because he fails to wait for Shemuel, fearing that he will lose his army (and hence the war) if he waited any longer. In contrast to David, Shaul forgets that victory is not related to human might, but Hashem's backing.  He loses the monarchy a second time when he decides on his own to spare the king and sheep of Amalek rather than totally destroying them as commanded by Hashem.</fn>  R. Silber suggests that Channah's story "stands in the beginning of a book on kingship as a definition of what a king must be, "מַלְכּוֹ", <b>His</b> king".  While David recognized this, Shaul did not.</point> | + | <point><b>The song as introduction to Sefer Shemuel</b> – Channah's prayer is a very apt introduction to the Book of Shemuel which revolves around the theme of discovering the appropriate monarch for Israel. David is chosen because he recognizes the lesson of "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ",  that wars are won not with swords or spears but "בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת".‎<fn>See his words to Golyat: "וַיֹּאמֶר דָּוִד אֶל הַפְּלִשְׁתִּי אַתָּה בָּא אֵלַי בְּחֶרֶב וּבַחֲנִית וּבְכִידוֹן וְאָנֹכִי בָא אֵלֶיךָ בְּשֵׁם י"י צְבָאוֹת אֱלֹהֵי מַעַרְכוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר חֵרַפְתָּ."</fn>  Shaul, in contrast lost his kingship because he let himself be his own guide, rather than obeying Hashem's commands.<fn>Shaul initially loses his kingship because he fails to wait for Shemuel, fearing that he will lose his army (and hence the war) if he waited any longer. In contrast to David, Shaul forgets that victory is not related to human might, but Hashem's backing.  He loses the monarchy a second time when he decides on his own to spare the king and sheep of Amalek rather than totally destroying them as commanded by Hashem.  See <a href="Shaul's Sin in Gilgal" data-aht="page">Shaul's Sin in Gilgal</a> and <a href="Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek" data-aht="page">Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek</a>.</fn>  R. Silber suggests that Channah's story "stands in the beginning of a book on kingship as a definition of what a king must be, "מַלְכּוֹ", <b>His</b> king".  While David recognized this, Shaul did not.</point> |
<point><b>The song and Rosh Hashanah</b> – Channah's prayer is read as the haftarah for Rosh HaShanah.  One of the reasons for the choice might be its focus on the theme of Hashem's dominion and kingship, which is one of the focal points of the day (מלכויות).<fn><multilink><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Rosh HaShanah 11a</a><a href="Bavli Rosh HaShanah" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a></multilink>, in contrast, connects the choice to the theme of זכרונות, remembering, and the fact that Channah was remembered on Rosh Hashanah.  See also <multilink><a href="BavliBerakhot10a" data-aht="source">Bavli Berakhot</a><a href="BavliBerakhot29a" data-aht="source">Berakhot 29a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> which points to the fact that the nine blessings of the Mussaf prayer relate to the nine mentions of Hashem in Channah's prayer.</fn>  In fact, the well known liturgical poem, "ונתנה תוקף", which emphasizes how all is in God's hands, appears to be constructed on the foundations of Channah's song.<fn>Thus the poem's query, "מי יחיה ומי ימות" parallels Channah's words, "י"י מֵמִית וּמְחַיֶּה".  Similarly, Channah's reference to the satiated going hungry is alluded to by the poem's question: "מי ברעב ומי בצמא."  Finally, the line "מי יעני ומי יעשר, מי ישפל ומי ירום" matches Channah's "י"י מוֹרִישׁ וּמַעֲשִׁיר מַשְׁפִּיל אַף מְרוֹמֵם".</fn></point> | <point><b>The song and Rosh Hashanah</b> – Channah's prayer is read as the haftarah for Rosh HaShanah.  One of the reasons for the choice might be its focus on the theme of Hashem's dominion and kingship, which is one of the focal points of the day (מלכויות).<fn><multilink><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a><a href="BavliRoshHaShanah11a" data-aht="source">Rosh HaShanah 11a</a><a href="Bavli Rosh HaShanah" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Rosh HaShanah</a></multilink>, in contrast, connects the choice to the theme of זכרונות, remembering, and the fact that Channah was remembered on Rosh Hashanah.  See also <multilink><a href="BavliBerakhot10a" data-aht="source">Bavli Berakhot</a><a href="BavliBerakhot29a" data-aht="source">Berakhot 29a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> which points to the fact that the nine blessings of the Mussaf prayer relate to the nine mentions of Hashem in Channah's prayer.</fn>  In fact, the well known liturgical poem, "ונתנה תוקף", which emphasizes how all is in God's hands, appears to be constructed on the foundations of Channah's song.<fn>Thus the poem's query, "מי יחיה ומי ימות" parallels Channah's words, "י"י מֵמִית וּמְחַיֶּה".  Similarly, Channah's reference to the satiated going hungry is alluded to by the poem's question: "מי ברעב ומי בצמא."  Finally, the line "מי יעני ומי יעשר, מי ישפל ומי ירום" matches Channah's "י"י מוֹרִישׁ וּמַעֲשִׁיר מַשְׁפִּיל אַף מְרוֹמֵם".</fn></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Latest revision as of 22:57, 5 September 2017
Channah's Prayer
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators struggle to determine whether Channah's prayer is personal in nature or relates to the nation as a whole and if it is one of praise or petition. Rashi opts to read the entire song as a thanksgiving prayer relating to Channah's individual circumstances and the birth of her son. This requires reinterpreting some of the imagery, but has the advantage of the song fitting in nicely with its context.
Targum Yonatan, in contrast, attempts to read the prayer as related to the fate of the nation, suggesting that Channah was prophesying about Israel's future victories over its foes. Though this nicely explains the many references to war, it is not clear why Channah would be sharing such news in the aftermath of her son's birth and weaning.
A third approach suggests that the mixture of personal and national in the song is intentional. Channah rejoices in the birth of her son, but simultaneously requests from Hashem that her son grow to provide the nation with much needed leadership and salvation from their enemies.
Personal Thanksgiving
Channah's prayer is a personal song of thanksgiving to Hashem for granting her request for a child. It revolves around both her earlier travails as a barren woman and her present happiness in the birth of her son.
- According to these sources, the enemy mentioned refers to Peninah (and others like her), who would regularly mock Channah over her barren state.3
- R"A Bazak4 alternatively suggests that this line of the song is not directly related to Channah's circumstances. He posits that Channah did not compose her own prayer but only utilized a preexisting template of thanksgiving since it had a passing reference to her specific situation.5 As such, certain aspects of the song actually have little to do with Channah's personal story.6
- Rashi and R. Yosef Kara, following Bavli Berakhot,7 take this verse out of its simple meaning and read "צוּר" as "צייר". Channah is saying that there is no artist like Hashem who can form a living soul, alluding to the birth of Shemuel.
- Radak more simply reads the word "צוּר" as a metaphor for strength, saying that Channah is praising Hashem's ability to reverse nature and make one who was barren fruitful.
- Prophetic – According to R. Yosef Kara and Radak, mention of the future king was prophetic. Channah saw that her son was to later anoint the first king of Israel and ended her prayer with a wish that Hashem give him strength. It is not clear, however, why she would mention this right now.
- Personal – The Hoil Moshe, in contrast, claims that the king and anointed one of verse 10 do not refer to a monarch, but rather to Shemuel himself. The words reflect Channah's hopes that her son grow to be a leader and prophet, strengthened and exalted by Hashem.10
National Prophecy
Channah's song contains prophetic material relating to the nation as a whole. It speaks of events throughout the nation's history from the defeat of the Philistines by the hand of Shemuel until the coming of the Mashiach.
Personal Thanks and National Petition
Channah's prayer relates to both her personal life and to the fate of the nation. She simultaneously thanks Hashem for a son, and requests that her child grow up to usher in a new era of leadership for Israel.
- External – According to Ralbag, the enemies refer to the Philistines whom Shemuel is to defeat. Since there is a spark of prophecy in Channah's words, she can speak as if the salvation has already occurred.
- Internal – R. Silber, in contrast, claims that Channah is speaking of the corrupt leaders of Israel whom Shemuel is to replace. He could maintain that Channah speaks in the past tense despite this being a request, in the manner of many psalmists who do the same, thereby expressing confidence that the desired outcome will come to fruition.