Difference between revisions of "Chronological and Thematic Order/0"
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<h1>Chronological and Thematic Order</h1> | <h1>Chronological and Thematic Order</h1> | ||
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | <div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | ||
| − | <h2></h2> | + | <h2>Introduction</h2> |
| − | When writing a historical narrative, an author must balance the competing elements of chronology and thematic order.  Should events be told in the order that they occurred or based on their relationship to one another?  When should one component outweigh the other?< | + | <p>When writing a historical narrative, an author must balance the competing elements of chronology and thematic order.  Should events be told in the order that they occurred or based on their relationship to one another?  When should one component outweigh the other?</p> |
| + | <p>The Biblical text sets chronological order as the norm, but in many places it is sacrificed for literary reasons. At times, two narratives completely swap places with one another, appearing in reverse order.  In other cases, several elements of different stories might chronologically overlap.  Instead of switching off between the two, Torah will usually complete one narrative unit before moving to the other.  This might take the form of a short epilogue that is brought forward to provide closure to the unit, or several verses which are pushed off to serve as an introduction to a later story.  The misplaced piece can be one verse long, or several chapters in length.</p> | ||
| + | <p>In several places in Torah, the achronology is explicit in the text.  Time markers such as people's ages, the passage of years, or more rarely, definitive dates, clue the reader into the phenomenon.  More often, though, scenes are ambiguous and for textual or conceptual reasons a case might be made for achronology, but no proof can be found in the text.</p> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> | ||
Version as of 06:27, 27 January 2016
Chronological and Thematic Order
Introduction
When writing a historical narrative, an author must balance the competing elements of chronology and thematic order. Should events be told in the order that they occurred or based on their relationship to one another? When should one component outweigh the other?
The Biblical text sets chronological order as the norm, but in many places it is sacrificed for literary reasons. At times, two narratives completely swap places with one another, appearing in reverse order. In other cases, several elements of different stories might chronologically overlap. Instead of switching off between the two, Torah will usually complete one narrative unit before moving to the other. This might take the form of a short epilogue that is brought forward to provide closure to the unit, or several verses which are pushed off to serve as an introduction to a later story. The misplaced piece can be one verse long, or several chapters in length.
In several places in Torah, the achronology is explicit in the text. Time markers such as people's ages, the passage of years, or more rarely, definitive dates, clue the reader into the phenomenon. More often, though, scenes are ambiguous and for textual or conceptual reasons a case might be made for achronology, but no proof can be found in the text.
