Difference between revisions of "Chronological and Thematic Order/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<point><b>Marriage of Amram and Yocheved (Shemot 2:1)</b> – <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot2-1" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot2-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink> maintains that Amram and Yocheved had married before the decree of Paroh discussed in Shemot 1. Their marriage is mentioned later so as to properly open the story of Moshe's birth and its aftermath.</point> | <point><b>Marriage of Amram and Yocheved (Shemot 2:1)</b> – <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot2-1" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot2-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink> maintains that Amram and Yocheved had married before the decree of Paroh discussed in Shemot 1. Their marriage is mentioned later so as to properly open the story of Moshe's birth and its aftermath.</point> | ||
<point><b>Pesach (Bemidbar 9:1)</b> – <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar9" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar9" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 9</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> suggests that the story of the impure who could not participate in the Pesach of the first year is mentioned in the beginning of Bemidbar 9, not because it occurred there, but only to serve as a prelude to the main story of the unit, Pesach Sheni. Without the background of the events of the first month, the request of the impure would not make sense to the reader.</point> | <point><b>Pesach (Bemidbar 9:1)</b> – <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar9" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar9" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 9</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> suggests that the story of the impure who could not participate in the Pesach of the first year is mentioned in the beginning of Bemidbar 9, not because it occurred there, but only to serve as a prelude to the main story of the unit, Pesach Sheni. Without the background of the events of the first month, the request of the impure would not make sense to the reader.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Shemuel's death (Shemuel II 28:1)</b> – The death of Shemuel is mentioned in the beginning of the story of the Ba'alat Ha'Ov even though it occurred back in Shemuel I 25 as it provides important background to understand the story's continuation and revival of the prophet.</point> | + | <point><b>Shemuel's death (Shemuel II 28:1)</b> – The death of Shemuel is mentioned in the beginning of the story of the Ba'alat Ha'Ov even though it occurred back in <a href="ShemuelI25-1-2" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 25</a>, as it provides important background to understand the story's continuation and revival of the prophet.</point> |
</subopinion> | </subopinion> | ||
<subopinion>Epilogue | <subopinion>Epilogue | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<point><b>Death notices</b> – The deaths of the various characters in Sefer Bereshit are recorded already when they fade from the scene,<fn>For examples, see the mention of the death of Noach in <a href="Bereshit9-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:29</a>, Terach in <a href="Bereshit11-31-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:31-32</a>, Avraham in <a href="Bereshit25-1-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:8</a>, and Yitzchak in <a href="Bereshit35-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit 35:29</a>.</fn> rather then in the middle of later narratives when they chronologically occurred.<fn>undefined</fn>  The achronology is motivated by a desire to provide closure to each protagonist's individual story.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-3" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-3" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 6:3</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit11-31" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 11:31</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitSecondCommentary9-29" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitSecondCommentary9-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit Second Commentary 9:29</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitAdditionalCommentary11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit Additional Commentary 11:32</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:32</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>.</fn></point> | <point><b>Death notices</b> – The deaths of the various characters in Sefer Bereshit are recorded already when they fade from the scene,<fn>For examples, see the mention of the death of Noach in <a href="Bereshit9-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:29</a>, Terach in <a href="Bereshit11-31-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:31-32</a>, Avraham in <a href="Bereshit25-1-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:8</a>, and Yitzchak in <a href="Bereshit35-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit 35:29</a>.</fn> rather then in the middle of later narratives when they chronologically occurred.<fn>undefined</fn>  The achronology is motivated by a desire to provide closure to each protagonist's individual story.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-3" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-3" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 6:3</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit11-31" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 11:31</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitSecondCommentary9-29" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitSecondCommentary9-29" data-aht="source">Bereshit Second Commentary 9:29</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitAdditionalCommentary11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit Additional Commentary 11:32</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:32</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>The manna (Shemot 16:32-35)</b> – Shemot 16 tells the story of the manna's initial arrival in the first year in the Wilderness, but it also mentions its later preservation near the Ark<fn>The verse's statement, "וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת" suggests that Aharon placed the manna near the Ark, an act which could have only occurred in the second year, after the ark was built.</fn> and its being eaten throughout the forty years of wandering. Despite the fact that these added details occur only later, they are placed here to close the unit.<fn>See <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:50</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>and <multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1_2" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1_2" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> who both point to this as the classic example and prototype of the many cases in Torah where it appends information which happened only significantly later so as to complete a story.</fn>  [For a spectrum of opinions regarding the specific timing of the events mentioned in the epilogue, see <a href="Epilogue to the Manna Story" data-aht="page">Epilogue to the Manna Story</a>.]</point> | <point><b>The manna (Shemot 16:32-35)</b> – Shemot 16 tells the story of the manna's initial arrival in the first year in the Wilderness, but it also mentions its later preservation near the Ark<fn>The verse's statement, "וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת" suggests that Aharon placed the manna near the Ark, an act which could have only occurred in the second year, after the ark was built.</fn> and its being eaten throughout the forty years of wandering. Despite the fact that these added details occur only later, they are placed here to close the unit.<fn>See <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:50</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>and <multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1_2" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1_2" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> who both point to this as the classic example and prototype of the many cases in Torah where it appends information which happened only significantly later so as to complete a story.</fn>  [For a spectrum of opinions regarding the specific timing of the events mentioned in the epilogue, see <a href="Epilogue to the Manna Story" data-aht="page">Epilogue to the Manna Story</a>.]</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Recording the battle of Amalek (Shemot 17:14)</b> – After the battle of Amalek, Hashem tells Moshe to record the event for posterity in "the book" and to speak to Yehoshua about wiping out Amalek. <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary17-14" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary17-14" data-aht="source">Shemot Short Commentary 17:14</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink | + | <point><b>Recording the battle of Amalek (Shemot 17:14)</b> – After the battle of Amalek, Hashem tells Moshe to record the event for posterity in "the book" and to speak to Yehoshua about wiping out Amalek. <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary17-14" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotShortCommentary17-14" data-aht="source">Shemot Short Commentary 17:14</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> posits that this was first commanded in the fortieth year (by which point it was known that Yehoshua alone was to head the conquest and the "book," the Sefer Torah, was extant).<fn>Cf. Rashi who disagrees and maintains chronological order, asserting that Hashem already here hinted to Moshe that he was not to enter the land and Yehoshua was to lead after him. Alternatively, Yehoshua is mentioned due to the role he played in the present battle, and not because of his future position of leadership.</fn>  In order to finish the story, however, the command is recorded here.</point> |
<point><b>Yitro's departure (Shemot 18:27)</b> – <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:32</a><a href="ShadalBemidbar8-7" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 8:7</a><a href="ShadalBemidbar20-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink><fn>This is Shadal's first possible reading of the story.</fn> posits that the story of Yitro's arrival, advice, and its implementation all occurred where found, in Shemot 18 before the Revelation at Sinai, but that Yitro's departure took place only later. Though Yitro first left in the second year, the fact is recorded already in Shemot to "complete the story". [See <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a> for elaboration and for those who maintain that other parts of the story, too, might only be mentioned here to "finish the narrative".]</point> | <point><b>Yitro's departure (Shemot 18:27)</b> – <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit11-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 11:32</a><a href="ShadalBemidbar8-7" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 8:7</a><a href="ShadalBemidbar20-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink><fn>This is Shadal's first possible reading of the story.</fn> posits that the story of Yitro's arrival, advice, and its implementation all occurred where found, in Shemot 18 before the Revelation at Sinai, but that Yitro's departure took place only later. Though Yitro first left in the second year, the fact is recorded already in Shemot to "complete the story". [See <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a> for elaboration and for those who maintain that other parts of the story, too, might only be mentioned here to "finish the narrative".]</point> | ||
<point><b>Incense altar  (Shemot 30:1-10)</b> – It is possible that the directive to build the Mishkan preceded the Sin of the Golden Calf, but that the Incense Altar was commanded only in its aftermath.<fn>See R"M Speigelman's article, "<a href="https://www.etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%AA-%D7%95%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%94%D7%9C-%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%9B%D7%9F-%D7%9C%D7%90%D7%97%D7%A8-%D7%97%D7%98%D7%90-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%92%D7%9C">פרשת ויקהל (שקלים) - המשכן לאחר חטא העגל"</a>  and the discussion in <a href="Purpose and Placement of the Incense Altar" data-aht="page">Purpose and Placement of the Incense Altar</a>.</fn>  If so, its proper placement should be after the sin in Shemot 34, but it is mentioned earlier to close the unit on the vessels of the Mishkan.<fn>However, to highlight that it was not part of the original command, it appears after the unit's concluding verses.</fn></point> | <point><b>Incense altar  (Shemot 30:1-10)</b> – It is possible that the directive to build the Mishkan preceded the Sin of the Golden Calf, but that the Incense Altar was commanded only in its aftermath.<fn>See R"M Speigelman's article, "<a href="https://www.etzion.org.il/he/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%AA-%D7%95%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%94%D7%9C-%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%9B%D7%9F-%D7%9C%D7%90%D7%97%D7%A8-%D7%97%D7%98%D7%90-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%92%D7%9C">פרשת ויקהל (שקלים) - המשכן לאחר חטא העגל"</a>  and the discussion in <a href="Purpose and Placement of the Incense Altar" data-aht="page">Purpose and Placement of the Incense Altar</a>.</fn>  If so, its proper placement should be after the sin in Shemot 34, but it is mentioned earlier to close the unit on the vessels of the Mishkan.<fn>However, to highlight that it was not part of the original command, it appears after the unit's concluding verses.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Erecting the Tabernacle (Shemot 40)</b> – According to those who maintain that the Days of Consecration of the Mishkan (described in Vayikra 8-9) began on the 23rd of Adar, the description of the erection of the Mishkan on the first of Nissan (described in Shemot 40) is out of place. They might | + | <point><b>Erecting the Tabernacle (Shemot 40)</b> – According to those who maintain that the Days of Consecration of the Mishkan (described in Vayikra 8-9) began on the 23rd of Adar, the description of the erection of the Mishkan on the first of Nissan (described in Shemot 40) is out of place. They might suggest that it is mentioned here only to serve as an epilogue to the unit of chapters discussing the building of the Mishkan.</point> |
− | <point><b>Clouds on the Mishkan (Shemot 40:36-38)</b> – After discussing the erection of the Tabernacle in Shemot 40, the final verses of the chapter speak of the role to be played by the cloud as an indicator of when to travel, | + | <point><b>Clouds on the Mishkan (Shemot 40:36-38)</b> – After discussing the erection of the Tabernacle in Shemot 40, the final verses of the chapter speak of the role to be played by the cloud as an indicator of when to travel, adding out that this was a constant throughout their journeys in the Wilderness . Though this refers to what is to occur in the future, it is mentioned here as a conclusion to the discussion of the cloud of glory which descended on the Mishkan when it was constructed.</point> |
− | <point><b>Conquest of Canaanite cities (Bemidbar 21:3)</b> – <multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> suggests that the conquest of the Canaanite cities mentioned here occurred first in Shofetim 1:16-17.  It is mentioned already here, though, to complete the story, telling the reader how the nation's vow was fulfilled..</point> | + | <point><b>Conquest of Canaanite cities (Bemidbar 21:3)</b> – <multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> suggests that the conquest of the Canaanite cities mentioned here occurred first in <a href="Shofetim1-16-17" data-aht="source">Shofetim 1:16-17</a>.  It is mentioned already here, though, to complete the story, telling the reader how the nation's vow was fulfilled..</point> |
</subopinion> | </subopinion> | ||
<subopinion>Summary | <subopinion>Summary | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
<p>Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline.  This is perhaps most evident when components of two independent stories overlap in time. Tanakh will focus on each story individually rather than constantly switching back and forth between the two. As such, the same overall time period might be discussed from different vantage points, with material grouped by varying protagonists, perspectives, literary genre or other factors.</p> | <p>Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline.  This is perhaps most evident when components of two independent stories overlap in time. Tanakh will focus on each story individually rather than constantly switching back and forth between the two. As such, the same overall time period might be discussed from different vantage points, with material grouped by varying protagonists, perspectives, literary genre or other factors.</p> | ||
<opinion>Figures | <opinion>Figures | ||
+ | <point><b>Yehuda vs. Yosef</b></point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion>Personal vs. National Perspective | <opinion>Personal vs. National Perspective |
Version as of 23:32, 19 November 2019
Chronological and Thematic Order
Exegetical Approaches
Technical Displacement: Minor Details
At times, achronology in the text is a result of technical literary issues. In many cases, the majority and core of a given story is recorded in its proper chronological place and it is just one or two secondary components which are displaced. The displaced unit might be moved from elsewhere to join and thereby complete the central story ("להשלים את הענין") or it might be separated from the main narrative so as not to interrupt the story line ("לא להפסיק את הענין").
Introductions and Epilogues: "להשלים את הענין"
A subordinate component of a story might be moved from its proper chronological place so as to complete a central narrative. It can take the form of a prelude before the main story or an epilogue at the end.
Introduction
An event which occurred earlier is displaced to serve as an introduction and provide necessary background to a later story.
Epilogue
A component of a story which is only to occur later is moved earlier to provide closure to the main unit.
Summary
An episode which occurred and was explicitly mentioned earlier in Tanakh is repeated in order to serve as a summary to a unit.
Headings
An event which is soon to be discussed in the text is mentioned already in the heading of the unit, letting the reader know what is to come. This might take the form of a "כלל ופרט", a general formulation followed by details.
Prologues and Appendices: "לא להפסיק את הענין"
Secondary narrative components might be moved to form a prologue at the very beginning of a unit or an appendix at the end because placing them in their proper chronological place in the middle of the central unit would otherwise break the flow of the main narrative . The episode or topic which is displaced is either irrelevant to the main theme or message of the unit, of lesser import, or of a different literary character.
Prologues
An event is moved from its correct chronological place later in the text and placed at the very beginning of the unit where it will not disrupt the main topic.
Appendices
An episode is moved from its correct chronological place earlier in the narrative and placed at the very end of the unit where it will not disrupt the main topic.
Miscellaneous
Thematic Arrangement: Parallel Units
Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline. This is perhaps most evident when components of two independent stories overlap in time. Tanakh will focus on each story individually rather than constantly switching back and forth between the two. As such, the same overall time period might be discussed from different vantage points, with material grouped by varying protagonists, perspectives, literary genre or other factors.