Difference between revisions of "Chronological and Thematic Order/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category name="Thematic"> | <category name="Thematic"> | ||
− | Thematic | + | Thematic Arrangement |
− | <p>Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline.  When components of two independent stories overlap in time, | + | <p>Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline.  When components of two independent stories overlap in time, Tanakh will tend to focus on each story individually rather than constantly switching back and forth between the two.  Thus the same overall time period might be discussed from different vantage points, with material grouped by varying protagonists, perspectives, literary genre or other factors.  </p> |
<opinion>Figures | <opinion>Figures | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
− | <opinion>Personal vs. National | + | <opinion>Personal vs. National Perspective |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Homiletical Reasons | <category>Homiletical Reasons | ||
+ | <p>Homiletical</p> | ||
<opinion>Defense of Avot | <opinion>Defense of Avot | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> |
Version as of 08:27, 18 November 2019
Chronological and Thematic Order
Exegetical Approaches
Technical Displacement of Secondary Points
At times, achronology in the text is a result of technical literary issues. In many cases, the majority and core of a given story is recorded in its proper chronological place and it is just one or two secondary components which are displaced. The displaced unit might be moved from elsewhere to join and thereby complete the central story ("להשלים את הענין") or it might be separated from the main narrative so as not to interrupt the story line ("לא להפסיק את הענין").
Introductions and Epilogues: "להשלים את הענין"
A subordinate component of a story might be moved from its proper chronological place so as to complete the central narrative. It can take the form of a prelude before the main story or an epilogue at the end.
Introduction
An event which occurred earlier is displaced to serve as an introduction and provide necessary background to a later story.
Epilogue
A component of a story which is only to occur later is moved earlier to provide closure to the main unit.
posits that this was first commanded in the fortieth year (by which point it was known that Yehoshua alone was to head the conquest and the "book," the Sefer Torah, was extant).7 In order to finish the story, however, the command is recorded here.
Summary
An episode which occurred and was explicitly mentioned earlier in Tanakh is repeated in order to serve as a summary to a unit.
Headings
An event which is soon to be discussed in the text is mentioned already in the heading of the unit, letting the reader know what is to come. This might take the form of a "כלל ופרט", a general formulation followed by details.
Prologues and Appendices: "לא להפסיק את הענין"
Secondary narrative components might be moved to form a prologue at the very beginning of a unit or an appendix at the end because placing them in their proper chronological place in the middle of the central unit would otherwise break the flow of the main narrative . The episode or topic which is displaced is either irrelevant to the main theme or message of the unit, of lesser import, or of a different literary character.
Prologues
An event is moved from its correct chronological place later in the text and placed at the very beginning of the unit where it will not disrupt the main topic.
Appendices
An episode is moved from its correct chronological place earlier in the narrative and placed at the very end of the unit where it will not disrupt the main topic.
Miscellaneous
Resumptive Repetition
Thematic Arrangement
Tanakh will often prefer thematic ordering over strict chronology, juxtaposing related material even if this means not adhering to a historical timeline. When components of two independent stories overlap in time, Tanakh will tend to focus on each story individually rather than constantly switching back and forth between the two. Thus the same overall time period might be discussed from different vantage points, with material grouped by varying protagonists, perspectives, literary genre or other factors.
Figures
Personal vs. National Perspective
Homiletical Reasons
Homiletical