Chronological and Thematic Order/2
Chronological and Thematic Order
Exegetical Approaches
Literary Concerns
Tanakh often sacrifices chronological order for literary reasons, preferring thematic order over strict chronology. Rather than switching off between two stories just so as to adhere to a historical timeline, Tanakh will often prefer to finish one narrative unit before moving to another. At times, the displaced unit is secondary to the main narrative, while at other times both the chronological and achronological components might be of equal import.
Secondary to Main Unit
In many cases, the majority and main crux of a given story is recorded in its proper chronological place and it is just one or two secondary components of the story which are displaced. The displaced unit might be moved to join and thereby complete the focal story ("להשלים את הענין") or it might be separated from it so as not to interrupt the main storyline ("לא להפסיק את הענין").
Introductions and Epilogues: "להשלים את הענין"
A subordinate component of a story might be moved either forward or backwards to complete the main narartive. This might take the form of an introduction, summation or epilogue.
Introductions – An event which occurred earlier is displaced in order to serve as an introduction and provide necessary background to a later story or law
Prologues and Appendices: "לא להפסיק את הענין"
In several instances, earlier events are moved to form an appendix at the end of a unit or a prologue at the beginning because placing the story in its proper chronological place would otherwise break the flow of the main narrative . The episode or topic which is displaced is irrelevant to the main theme or message of the unit, of lesser import, or of a different literary character: