Difference between revisions of "Commentators:R. Avraham ibn Ezra/0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<category>Background<br/><br/> | <category>Background<br/><br/> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Life | <subcategory>Life | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 75: | Line 74: | ||
<li>According to I.E. man’s rational soul separates a human being from the rest of the animal kingdom. The soul is a tabula rasa when first placed in the body. It is put there in order to be developed. If a human being develops his rational soul, then it acquires eternal life. The commandments of the Torah keep the body and the mind pure, so that  the soul can fulfill its destiny.</li> | <li>According to I.E. man’s rational soul separates a human being from the rest of the animal kingdom. The soul is a tabula rasa when first placed in the body. It is put there in order to be developed. If a human being develops his rational soul, then it acquires eternal life. The commandments of the Torah keep the body and the mind pure, so that  the soul can fulfill its destiny.</li> | ||
<li>"The soul is destined to return to God the glorious who gave her. She was placed in the body to be shown the Lord’s work, to study the works of her Master and to observe His commandments."</li> | <li>"The soul is destined to return to God the glorious who gave her. She was placed in the body to be shown the Lord’s work, to study the works of her Master and to observe His commandments."</li> | ||
− | <li>"Man’s soul is unique. When it is first placed in the body… it is like a tablet set before a scribe. When God’s writing is inscribed upon this tablet…then the soul clings to God both while it is yet in man and later after it leaves the human body."<br/><br/>"It is only when a person knows the sciences and the secret of God’s<br/>Throne and the “Chariot” and knows God, his soul cleaves to<br/>God while he is yet alive and continues clinging to God after | + | <li>"Man’s soul is unique. When it is first placed in the body… it is like a tablet set before a scribe. When God’s writing is inscribed upon this tablet…then the soul clings to God both while it is yet in man and later after it leaves the human body."<br/><br/>"It is only when a person knows the sciences and the secret of God’s<br/>Throne and the “Chariot” and knows God, his soul cleaves to<br/>God while he is yet alive and continues clinging to God after itleaves his body". (See H. Norman Strickman,The Secret of the Torah; A Translation of Ibn Ezra's Yesod Mora Ve-Sod Ha-Torah New Jersey, 1995, p. 148-149. Yesod Mora: 10:2).</li> |
<li>Ibn Ezra was...well versed in the philological, scientific and philosophical studies cultivated by Arabs and Jews in his native land. " (I. Husik, A History of Medieval Jewish Philosophy, New York 1916, p. 187.)</li> | <li>Ibn Ezra was...well versed in the philological, scientific and philosophical studies cultivated by Arabs and Jews in his native land. " (I. Husik, A History of Medieval Jewish Philosophy, New York 1916, p. 187.)</li> | ||
<li>Ibn Ezra was a Neo-Platonists (ibid. p.184).Julius Guttmann referred to him as “the last in the line of Jewish Neoplatonists”.</li> | <li>Ibn Ezra was a Neo-Platonists (ibid. p.184).Julius Guttmann referred to him as “the last in the line of Jewish Neoplatonists”.</li> | ||
Line 101: | Line 100: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li><b>Jewish thought</b> – There are many parallels between the teachings of Ibn Ezra and those of Maimonides (1138–1204). A  strong case can be made that the works of Ibn Ezra  influenced Maimonides.<fn>See:<br/> H. Norman Strickman, Abraham ibn Ezra's Yesod Mora, Vol. 12.pp.159-165.<br/><br/> I. Twersky, Did R. Abraham ibn Ezra Influence Maimonides? In Rabbi. Abraham ibn Ezra: Studies In The Writings Of a Twelfth Century Jewish Polymath. Harvard University Press. 1993</fn> Ibn Ezra also impacted | + | <li><b>Jewish thought</b> – There are many parallels between the teachings of Ibn Ezra and those of Maimonides (1138–1204). A  strong case can be made that the works of Ibn Ezra  influenced Maimonides.<fn>See:<br/> H. Norman Strickman, Abraham ibn Ezra's Yesod Mora, Vol. 12.pp.159-165.<br/><br/> I. Twersky, Did R. Abraham ibn Ezra Influence Maimonides? In Rabbi. Abraham ibn Ezra: Studies In The Writings Of a Twelfth Century Jewish Polymath. Harvard University Press. 1993</fn> Ibn Ezra also impacted  on the Chasidei Ashkenaz.<fn>See  Joseph Dan, Rabbi <i>Judah He-Hasid</i> (Heb), Israel, 2005. pp.122-130; <br/> Joseph Isaac Lifshitz,<i> One God; Many Images :Dialectical Thought In Hasidei</i><br/><i>Ashkenaz</i> (Heb.), Israel, 2015. pp 68-72.  </fn></li> |
<li><b>Misattributed works</b> –  Commentary to Proverbs.</li> | <li><b>Misattributed works</b> –  Commentary to Proverbs.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 109: | Line 108: | ||
<subcategory>Characteristics | <subcategory>Characteristics | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Verse by verse / Topical</b> – Basically a verse by verse commentary. However, there are many exceptions. His commentary contains long essays on philosophical issues, on God's name,<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ex. 3:15.</fn> on the Priestly Garments, on the Ten Commandments, the Golden Calf and other themes. The essays are occasionally introduced with the words Abraham the Authors says, or the Words of Abraham.</li> | + | <li><b>Verse by verse / Topical</b> – Basically a verse by verse commentary. However, there are many exceptions. His commentary contains long essays on philosophical issues, on God's name,<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ex. 3:15.</fn> on the Priestly Garments, on the Ten Commandments, the Golden Calf and other themes. The essays are occasionally introduced with the words Abraham the Authors says, or the Words of Abraham.</li> |
<li><b>Genre</b> – </li> | <li><b>Genre</b> – </li> | ||
<li><b>Structure</b> –</li> | <li><b>Structure</b> –</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Peshat and derash</b> –  Emphasis on Peshat.<fn>However, there are instances where Ibn Ezra strays from the peshat. See ,H. Norman Strickman;. <i>Abraham Ibn Ezra's non-literal interpretations</i>. Hakirah 9 (N. Y. 2010) 281-296.</fn> Rabbinic interpretations  are to be accepted  with regards to halakhic practice even in cases where they do not appear to be in keeping with the literal meaning of the text.<fn>See Ibn Ezra's comment on "be fruitful and multiply" in his notes on Gen. 1:26.. Also see his comments on the obligation to accept Rabbinic interpretations regarding the Halakhah in Chapter 6 of the<i> Yesod Mora.</i> </fn> Aggadic interpretations which are not in keeping with the literal meaning of the text do not have to be taken at face value.<fn>See third method of Biblical interpretation in Ibn Ezra's introduction to his short commentary on the Torah.</fn> Ibn Ezra  employs philosophy,<fn>See Ibn Ezra's comment on Gen. 18:21 and Ps. 1:6. </fn> numerology<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ex. 3:15.</fn> and astrology<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ps. 19: 1-6.</fn> to explain biblical  texts.</li> | + | <li><b>Peshat and derash</b> –  Emphasis on Peshat.<fn><br/>"I  will not show favoritism to anyone when it comes to interpreting the Torah.<br/><br/>"I will, to the utmost of my ability, try to understand every word [in Scripture] and the do my best to explain it.<br/><br/>"I will not make mention of the reasons offered by the masoretes as why certain words are spelled full and at other times defectively because all their reasons are of a Midrashic nature.<br/><br/>However, there are instances where Ibn Ezra strays from the peshat. See ,H. Norman Strickman;. <i>Abraham Ibn Ezra's non-literal interpretations</i>. Hakirah 9 (N. Y. 2010) 281-296.</fn> Rabbinic interpretations  are to be accepted  with regards to halakhic practice even in cases where they do not appear to be in keeping with the literal meaning of the text.<fn>See Ibn Ezra's comment on "be fruitful and multiply" in his notes on Gen. 1:26.. Also see his comments on the obligation to accept Rabbinic interpretations regarding the Halakhah in Chapter 6 of the<i> Yesod Mora.</i> </fn> Aggadic interpretations which are not in keeping with the literal meaning of the text do not have to be taken at face value.<fn>See third method of Biblical interpretation in Ibn Ezra's introduction to his short commentary on the Torah.</fn> Ibn Ezra  employs philosophy,<fn>See Ibn Ezra's comment on Gen. 18:21 and Ps. 1:6. </fn> numerology<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ex. 3:15.</fn> and astrology<fn>See Ibn Ezra on Ps. 19: 1-6.</fn> to explain biblical  texts.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
Line 139: | Line 138: | ||
<subcategory>Significant Influences | <subcategory>Significant Influences | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Earlier Sources</b> – R. Saadiah Gaon (892-942 C.E.) R. Judah ibn Chayyuj; R. Jonah ibn Janach; R Menahchem ben Saruk; Dunash ben Labrat (920-990 C.E.)</li> | + | <li><b>Earlier Sources</b> – R. Saadiah Gaon (892-942 C.E.) R. Judah ibn Chayyuj; R. Jonah ibn Janach; R Menahchem ben Saruk; Dunash ben Labrat (920-990 C.E.), R. Moshe, Ha-Kohen ibn Giqatilah; R. Solomon ibn Gabirol.(1020-1070 C.E.)</li> |
<li><b>Teachers</b> – </li> | <li><b>Teachers</b> – </li> | ||
<li><b>Foils</b> – </li> | <li><b>Foils</b> – </li> |
Version as of 01:34, 28 March 2016
Ibn Ezra – Intellectual Profile
This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Name | R. Avraham ben Meir Ibn Ezra ר' אברהם בן מאיר אבן עזרא, ראב"ע |
---|---|
Dates | 1092 – 1167 |
Location | Andalusia / Italy / Provence / France / England |
Works | Commentaries on Torah and part of Nakh, math, science, and grammar works. |
Exegetical Characteristics | |
Influenced by | R. Saadia Gaon, R. Yonah ibn Janach, R. Yehudah Hayuj |
Impacted on | Most Jewish Bible commentators. His though great impact on Chasidei Ashkenzaz |
Background
Life
- Name –
- Hebrew name – Avraham ben Meir ibn Ezra1
- _ name –
- Dates – 1092-11672
- Location – Spain, Italy,France, Provence, England. Some maintain that Ibn Ezra visited Egypt, Israel, Babylonia and India. However, there is no real evidence to back up these assertions.
- Education – Bible, Talmud3, Midrash, Grammar, Philosophy, Mathematics, Astronomy, Astrology,4 and Poetry.
- Occupation – Poet,5 teacher, and Bible commentator
- Family – Son Isaac – Isaac was a poet of note who spent most of his life in the Near East; Isaac is reported to have converted to Islam while in Babylonia.6 He later returned to Judaism. A heartrending lament by Ibn Ezra7 reveals that Isaac predeceased his father.8
- Teachers –
- Contemporaries – R. Yehuda Ha-Levi,9 Rabbi Moshe ibn Ezra,10 Rabbi Joseph ibn Tzadik,11 Rashbam,12 R. Tam.13
- Students –
- Time period – Almohades invasion of Moslem Spain ( 1147).
- The Alomohades gave the Jews the choice of conversion to Islam, emigration or death.
- Ibn Ezra wrote an elegy lamenting the destruction of the Jewish communities in Spain by the Almohades. It is a unique poem, for it is the only “clear cut example of a poetical Jewish reaction to an outbreak of Islamic persecution.”14
"O woe! Misfortune from heaven has fallen upon Sefarad [Spain];
My eyes, my eyes flow with tears.
...................................................
"The Exile dwelt there blamelessly in safety
Without interruption for a thousand and seventy years.
But the day came when her people were banished and she became like a widow. " 15... - In addition, the first (1095) and second crusades.(1150) took place during his lifetime........................................................................................................
- –
- World outlook –
- According to I.E. man’s rational soul separates a human being from the rest of the animal kingdom. The soul is a tabula rasa when first placed in the body. It is put there in order to be developed. If a human being develops his rational soul, then it acquires eternal life. The commandments of the Torah keep the body and the mind pure, so that the soul can fulfill its destiny.
- "The soul is destined to return to God the glorious who gave her. She was placed in the body to be shown the Lord’s work, to study the works of her Master and to observe His commandments."
- "Man’s soul is unique. When it is first placed in the body… it is like a tablet set before a scribe. When God’s writing is inscribed upon this tablet…then the soul clings to God both while it is yet in man and later after it leaves the human body."
"It is only when a person knows the sciences and the secret of God’s
Throne and the “Chariot” and knows God, his soul cleaves to
God while he is yet alive and continues clinging to God after itleaves his body". (See H. Norman Strickman,The Secret of the Torah; A Translation of Ibn Ezra's Yesod Mora Ve-Sod Ha-Torah New Jersey, 1995, p. 148-149. Yesod Mora: 10:2). - Ibn Ezra was...well versed in the philological, scientific and philosophical studies cultivated by Arabs and Jews in his native land. " (I. Husik, A History of Medieval Jewish Philosophy, New York 1916, p. 187.)
- Ibn Ezra was a Neo-Platonists (ibid. p.184).Julius Guttmann referred to him as “the last in the line of Jewish Neoplatonists”.
Works
- Biblical commentaries – Commentary on the Pentateuch, Short Commentary; Long commentary on Exodus, Edited by Asher Weiser. Mosad Ha-Rav Kook 1976.
- Commentary on the Pentateuch, Torat Chaim. Mosad Ha-Rav Kook, 1986
- Commentary on the Pentateuch; Chumash Mechokekei Yehudah, R. Yehudah Leib ben R. Yitzchak Krinsky, reprint, N.Y. 1975.
- Commentary on Isaiah. Mikra'ot Gedolot; Ibn Ezra on Isaiah, Ed. and translated by Michael Friedlander.
- The Minor Prophets, Mikra'ot Gedolot
- Job, Mikraot Gedolot.
- Song of Songs. Mikra'ot Gedolot.
- Ecclesiastes. Mikra'ot Gedolot.
- Daniel. Mikra'ot Gedollot
Psalms.Mikra'ot Gedolot. - . The Five Scrolls. Mikra’ot Gedollot
- Rabbinics –
- Talmudic novellae – No such works.
- Halakhic codes – No such works
- Responses to the works of others – No such works.
- Responsa – No such work.
- Jewish thought – There are many parallels between the teachings of Ibn Ezra and those of Maimonides (1138–1204). A strong case can be made that the works of Ibn Ezra influenced Maimonides.16 Ibn Ezra also impacted on the Chasidei Ashkenaz.17
- Misattributed works – Commentary to Proverbs.
Torah Commentary
Characteristics
- Verse by verse / Topical – Basically a verse by verse commentary. However, there are many exceptions. His commentary contains long essays on philosophical issues, on God's name,18 on the Priestly Garments, on the Ten Commandments, the Golden Calf and other themes. The essays are occasionally introduced with the words Abraham the Authors says, or the Words of Abraham.
- Genre –
- Structure –
- Peshat and derash – Emphasis on Peshat.19 Rabbinic interpretations are to be accepted with regards to halakhic practice even in cases where they do not appear to be in keeping with the literal meaning of the text.20 Aggadic interpretations which are not in keeping with the literal meaning of the text do not have to be taken at face value.21 Ibn Ezra employs philosophy,22 numerology23 and astrology24 to explain biblical texts.
Methods
- –
Themes
- God is incorporeal.
- God is the All.
- Purpose of man is to know God, obey His laws, and cling to God.
- Defend Rabbinic Judaism from attacks by Karaites.
Textual Issues
- Manuscripts –
- Printings –
- Textual layers –
Sources
Significant Influences
- Earlier Sources – R. Saadiah Gaon (892-942 C.E.) R. Judah ibn Chayyuj; R. Jonah ibn Janach; R Menahchem ben Saruk; Dunash ben Labrat (920-990 C.E.), R. Moshe, Ha-Kohen ibn Giqatilah; R. Solomon ibn Gabirol.(1020-1070 C.E.)
- Teachers –
- Foils –
Occasional Usage
- –
Possible Relationship.
- According to Ezra Fleischer, evidence from the Cairo Geneza reveals that Ibn Ezra's son Isaac, married Judah Ha-Levi's daughter.25 However, it should be noted that in all his references to Judah Ha-levi in his commentaries, Ibn Ezra never mentions this.
Impact
Later exegetes
- –
Supercommentaries
- –