Difference between revisions of "Commentators:R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)/0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Original Author: Rabbi Jonathan Rabinowitz) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<page type="Basic"> | <page type="Basic"> | ||
− | |||
<h1>R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)</h1> | <h1>R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)</h1> | ||
− | <stub/> | + | <stub></stub> |
− | |||
<div class="header"> | <div class="header"> | ||
<infobox class="Parshan"> | <infobox class="Parshan"> | ||
<title>Shadal</title> | <title>Shadal</title> | ||
− | + | <img style="max-width:50%;" src="/Media/Parshanim/Shadal/Picture.jpg" alt="Shadal from an 1865 engraving" title="Shadal from an 1865 engraving"/> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Name</label> | |
− | + | <content> | |
− | + | <div dir="ltr"> | |
− | + | R. Samuel David Luzzatto, Shadal | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <div dir="rtl"> | |
− | + | ר' שמואל דוד לוצאטו, שד"ל | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | </content> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Dates</label> | |
− | + | <content>1800 – 1865</content> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Location</label> | |
− | + | <content>Italy</content> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Works</label> | |
− | + | <content>Biblical commentaries, Mechkarei HaYahadut, Mavo LeMachzor Benei Roma</content> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Exegetical Characteristics</label> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Influenced by</label> | |
− | + | </row> | |
− | + | <row> | |
− | + | <label>Impacted on</label> | |
+ | <content>Hoil Moshe</content> | ||
+ | </row> | ||
+ | |||
</infobox> | </infobox> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
<category>Background<fn>This section incorporates information from S. Vargon, שמואל דוד לוצאטו – ביקורתיות מתונה בפירוש המקרא (Ramat Gan, 2013, hereafter: Vargon, Shadal), the Encyclopedia Judaica entry "Luzzato, Samuel David", and the <a href="http://www.magnes.org/collections/archives/global-jewish-diaspora/luzzatto-samuel-david-and-isaia-papers">"Luzzatto (Samuel David and Isaia) papers"</a>.</fn> | <category>Background<fn>This section incorporates information from S. Vargon, שמואל דוד לוצאטו – ביקורתיות מתונה בפירוש המקרא (Ramat Gan, 2013, hereafter: Vargon, Shadal), the Encyclopedia Judaica entry "Luzzato, Samuel David", and the <a href="http://www.magnes.org/collections/archives/global-jewish-diaspora/luzzatto-samuel-david-and-isaia-papers">"Luzzatto (Samuel David and Isaia) papers"</a>.</fn> | ||
− | <p | + | <p><strong></strong></p> |
<subcategory>Life | <subcategory>Life | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
<li><b>Name</b> | <li><b>Name</b> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Works<fn>Shadal was an incredibly prolific writer, and this is not a complete account of all his publications (in particular this page does not include his Italian publications). For a more complete account and chronology of Shadal's publications, see Vargon, Shadal: 39-51.</fn> | <subcategory>Works<fn>Shadal was an incredibly prolific writer, and this is not a complete account of all his publications (in particular this page does not include his Italian publications). For a more complete account and chronology of Shadal's publications, see Vargon, Shadal: 39-51.</fn> | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
<li><b>Biblical commentaries</b> | <li><b>Biblical commentaries</b> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 82: | Line 81: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
</category> | </category> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<category>Torah Commentary | <category>Torah Commentary | ||
<subcategory>Characteristics | <subcategory>Characteristics | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | + | <li><b>Verse by verse / Topical</b> – </li> | |
− | + | <li><b>Genre</b> – </li> | |
− | + | <li><b>Structure</b> – </li> | |
− | + | <li><b>Language</b> – </li> | |
− | + | <li><b>Peshat and Derash</b> – Shadal uses a number of different methods to reconcile cases in which the halakhah does not seem to be the simple peshat of the verse:</li> | |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>אסמכתא – Shadal says that in some cases Chazal do not think that they are expressing the real peshat of the verse rather they are just trying to find a hook in Torah for a halakhah which is not explicitly told in Torah – Shemot 22:2, 23:2.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Shadal holds according to the lone opinion in Chazal – Shemot 21:2, 21:23, Devarim 22:17.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Torah uses extreme formulation – Shadal on Shemot 21:17 says explicitly that in many cases the Torah writes laws in an extreme and threatening formulation (דרך גיזום ואיום) and really we are suppose to be lenient in cases when one implements them – Shemot 21:12, 21:16, 21:17, 21:29, 21:34-36, 22:6.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Chazal changed the simple meaning of the text in order to fit their time period:</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Chazal changed the simple meaning in order to fit the halakhah in the time of בית שני – Shemot 12:6, Vayikra 6:13, 6:19, Bemidbar 6:18, Devarim 18:6.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Chazal made special enactments – Shadal on Vayikra 7:18 explains that in many cases where Chazal do not explain like the simple understanding of the verse it is because there was a need in their generation to make new enactments (תקנה שתיקנו לפי צורך הדורות) – Shemot 12:43, 21:3, Vayikra 7:18, Devarim 25:5, 26:12.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Methods | <subcategory>Methods | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | + | <li>– </li> | |
− | + | </ul> | |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Themes | <subcategory>Themes | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li> – </li> | + | <li> – </li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Textual Issues | <subcategory>Textual Issues | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li><b>Manuscripts</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Manuscripts</b> – </li> |
− | <li><b>Printings</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Printings</b> – </li> |
− | <li><b>Textual layers</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Textual layers</b> – </li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
</category> | </category> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<category>Sources | <category>Sources | ||
<subcategory>Significant Influences | <subcategory>Significant Influences | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li><b>Earlier Sources</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Earlier Sources</b> – </li> |
− | <li><b>Teachers</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Teachers</b> – </li> |
− | <li><b>Foils</b> – </li> | + | <li><b>Foils</b> – </li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Occasional Usage | <subcategory>Occasional Usage | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li></li> | + | <li> –</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
<subcategory>Possible Relationship | <subcategory>Possible Relationship | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li></li> | + | <li> –</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<category>Impact | <category>Impact | ||
<subcategory>Later exegetes | <subcategory>Later exegetes | ||
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <li></li> | + | <li> –</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | |||
</category> | </category> | ||
− | |||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Version as of 06:54, 5 February 2016
R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)
This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Name | R. Samuel David Luzzatto, Shadal ר' שמואל דוד לוצאטו, שד"ל |
---|---|
Dates | 1800 – 1865 |
Location | Italy |
Works | Biblical commentaries, Mechkarei HaYahadut, Mavo LeMachzor Benei Roma |
Exegetical Characteristics | |
Influenced by | |
Impacted on | Hoil Moshe |
Background1
Life
- Name
- Hebrew name – ר' שמואל דוד בן ר' חזקיה לוצאטו (known by the acronym שד"ל)
- Italian name – Samuele Davide Luzzatto
- Dates – 1800 – 1865
- Location – Shadal was born and raised in Trieste, Italy, and lived most of his adult life in Padua.
- Education – Shadal was educated in an Italian Jewish community that was open to general education alongside a Jewish one. His elementary education included Bible, Mishnah, mathematics, geography, history, Italian, French, and German, and in his teens, he intensively studied Latin.2 Shadal's research and literary activities began in his early teens,3 and he completed studying the entire Talmud at age 17.
- Occupation – At age 20, Shadal began working as a private tutor, and at 29, he was appointed professor at the rabbinical college in Padua, where he taught for the rest of his life.4 His extensive educational and literary work spanned the fields of philology, Semitics, poetry, philosophy, and biblical exegesis, and included correspondence with many of the leading Jewish scholars and rabbis of his day. Through his teaching and written works, Shadal defended traditional Judaism against modern critical movements, while also forging his own brand of Modern Orthodoxy. He is considered one of the founders of the Hebrew "Chokhmat Yisrael" literature and school of thought.5
- Family – Shadal had a tragic personal life, his mother dying when he was just fourteen, and his father Hezekiah dying ten years later. His first wife, Bilhah Bat-Sheva Segre, died after a long illness, and he later married her sister, Leah. His children from his first wife included Isaia (who died at 14 months), a second son named Isaia (a lawyer), Filosseno (Philoxenus),6 a promising young scholar who died at the age of 24, and a daughter Milcah, who died at 18. With his second wife, he had four children: Miriam, Baruch Iyyov (died at age 7), Yosef, and Binyamin (a physician).
- Teachers – Shadal studied Hebrew language and Talmud with his father, Talmud under R. Abraham Eliezer Halevi,7 and ancient and modern languages and science under R. Mordechai de Cologna, Leon Vita Saraval, and R. Raphael Baruch Segre.8
- Contemporaries – Among those Shadal corresponded with were Isaac Samuel Reggio, Abraham Geiger, and Leopold Zunz. He also had close ties with R. Solomon Judah Löb Rapoport, and R. Nachman Krochmal, who together with Shadal founded the Hebrew "Chokhmat Yisrael" school of thought.
- Students – Many, including R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (author of Torah commentary Hoil Moshe)
- Time period – Shadal lived at a time when world Jewry was undergoing massive change and upheaval in a rapidly modernizing world. His lifetime saw the development and ascendancy of Reform Judaism in large swaths of the Jewish world and modern critical approaches to Judaism and Jewish sources.
Works9
- Biblical commentaries
- Jewish thought and Rabbinics – Ohev Ger,15 Vikuach Al Chokhmat HaKabbalah VeAl Kadmut Sefer HaZohar,16 Mevo LeMachzor KeMinhag Benei Roma,17 Yad Yosef, Yesodei HaTorah,18 דרך ארץ או אטיציזמוס: שירת שד"ל לדורו,19 Seder Tannaim VaAmoraim,20 Torah Nidreshet,21 Iggerot Shedal,22 Peninei Shedal.23
- Edited works – Hafla'ah ShebaArakhin,24 Cherev HaMithappekhet,25 Diwan of R. Yehuda Halevi,26 Betulat Bat Yehudah,27 Commentary to Half of the Book of Mikhah.28
- Other works – Kinnor Na'im,29 Ḳinah,30 Avnei Zikkaron,31 Beit HaOtzar,32 A Catalogue of the Library of Joseph Almanzi,33 Ma'amar BeYesodei Hadiḳduḳ,34 Naḥalat Shadal,35 Ṭal Orot.36
Torah Commentary
Characteristics
- Verse by verse / Topical –
- Genre –
- Structure –
- Language –
- Peshat and Derash – Shadal uses a number of different methods to reconcile cases in which the halakhah does not seem to be the simple peshat of the verse:
- אסמכתא – Shadal says that in some cases Chazal do not think that they are expressing the real peshat of the verse rather they are just trying to find a hook in Torah for a halakhah which is not explicitly told in Torah – Shemot 22:2, 23:2.
- Shadal holds according to the lone opinion in Chazal – Shemot 21:2, 21:23, Devarim 22:17.
- Torah uses extreme formulation – Shadal on Shemot 21:17 says explicitly that in many cases the Torah writes laws in an extreme and threatening formulation (דרך גיזום ואיום) and really we are suppose to be lenient in cases when one implements them – Shemot 21:12, 21:16, 21:17, 21:29, 21:34-36, 22:6.
- Chazal changed the simple meaning of the text in order to fit their time period:
- Chazal changed the simple meaning in order to fit the halakhah in the time of בית שני – Shemot 12:6, Vayikra 6:13, 6:19, Bemidbar 6:18, Devarim 18:6.
- Chazal made special enactments – Shadal on Vayikra 7:18 explains that in many cases where Chazal do not explain like the simple understanding of the verse it is because there was a need in their generation to make new enactments (תקנה שתיקנו לפי צורך הדורות) – Shemot 12:43, 21:3, Vayikra 7:18, Devarim 25:5, 26:12.
Methods
- –
Themes
- –
Textual Issues
- Manuscripts –
- Printings –
- Textual layers –
Sources
Significant Influences
- Earlier Sources –
- Teachers –
- Foils –
Occasional Usage
- –
Possible Relationship
- –
Impact
Later exegetes
- –