Commentators:R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)/0

R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.

CAUTION: THIS TOPIC HAS NOT YET UNDERGONE EDITORIAL REVIEW

Rashbam

Name	R. Shemuel b. Meir ר' שמואל בן מאיר, רשב"ם
Dates	1085-1174
Location	France
Influenced by	Rashi, his father R. Meir
Works	Tanakh and Talmud commentaries
Exegetical Characteristics
Impacted on	R. Eliezer of Beaugency, R. Yosef Bekhor Shor

Background

Life

• Name –
  • Hebrew name – R. Shemuel b. Meir (ר' שמואל בן מאיר), of which Rashbam (רשב"ם) is an acronym.
• Dates – c.1085¹ – c.1174.²
• Location – Rashbam lived in cities in Northern France including Troyes, Ramerupt, Paris, Caen, and Loudun.
• Occupation –
• Family – Rashbam was the grandson of Rashi³ and the son of R. Meir.⁴ His brothers were R. Yitzchak and R. Tam. He had a daughter Maruna and perhaps a son Yosef.⁵
• Teachers –
• Contemporaries –
• Students –
• Notable events

Works

• Biblical commentaries – Rashbam most probably wrote a commentary on all of Tanakh. His commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, Breslau 103, that is now lost.⁶ Commentaries of Rashbam on Tehillim, Iyyov, Kohelet, and Shir HaShirim have recently been published, but some dispute his authorship of these works. Citations from Rashbam's commentaries on Neviim and Ketuvim also survived in the Arugat HaBosem of R. Avraham b. Azriel and in some Northern French commentaries.
• Grammar –
• Rabbinics –
  • Talmudic novellae – Rashbam wrote commentaries on the tenth chapter of Pesachim and on Bava Batra 29a through the end⁷ in order to complete missing sections of Rashi's commentary. In addition Rashbam wrote commentaries on Eiruvin,⁸ Gittin,⁹ Bava Kama,¹⁰ other sections of Bava Batra,¹¹ and Niddah¹² which are not extant, but are cited by other commentaries.
  • Halakhic codes –
  • Responses to the works of others –
  • Responsa –
• Jewish thought –
• Commonly misattributed to Rashbam –

Torah Commentary

Textual Issues

• Manuscripts – Rashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, MSS Breslau 103, which was a bit fragmented, and was lost completely during the Holocaust. This manuscript was missing the first three Parashot of Sefer Bereshit, Parashat Pinechas, and Devarim 33:3 through the end.¹³ Rashbam's commentary on Bereshit 1 was discovered by A. Geiger in MSS Munich 5, and it is now incorporated in most printed editions. His commentary to part of Devarim 34 was found by M. Sokolow in 1984 in MSS Oxford 34.
D. Rosin published an annotated edition based on that manuscript in 1882.
• Printings – The commentary was saved due to its printing in a few מקראות גדולות. It was printed for the first time in 1705 in BerlinRashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, which was missing many pages in its beginning and end, and even this manuscrips was lost in the Holocaust. D. Rosin published an annotated edition based on that manuscript in 1882.
• Long and short commentaries – Rashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, which was missing many pages in its beginning and end, and even this manuscrips was lost in the Holocaust. D. Rosin published an annotated edition based on that manuscript in 1882.
• The writing process – Rashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, which was missing many pages in its beginning and end, and even this manuscrips was lost in the Holocaust. D. Rosin published an annotated edition based on that manuscript in 1882.
• Ramban's later updates – Rashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, which was missing many pages in its beginning and end, and even this manuscrips was lost in the Holocaust. D. Rosin published an annotated edition based on that manuscript in 1882.

Characteristics

• Verse by verse / Topical –
• Genre –
• Structure –
• Language –

Methods

• –

Themes

• –

Sources

Significant Influences

• Earlier Sources –
• Teachers –
• Foils –

Occasional Usage

Possible Relationship

Impact

Later exegetes

Supercommentaries

¹ We don't know the exact date of his birth. The approximation of 1085 is based on the fact that he argued with Rashi (See Rashbam's commentary on Bereshit 37:2). Since Rashi died in 1105, the assumption is that Rashbam must have been born at least 20 years earlier.

² The date of Rashbam's death is also unknown. Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) gives a date of of 4935 (1174/75) which would make Rashbam 90 when he died, but the basis for this is unknown. D. Rosin notes that it appears from Ibn Ezra's Iggeret HaShabbatIggeret HaShabbatAbout R. Avraham ibn Ezra, which was writen in 1158, that Rashbam was still living at that time. This assumes that Ibn Ezra is responding to Rashbam's commentary, and that the words "ולא תשא פני איש" indicate that Rashbam was still alive.

³ See Rashbam's commentary on Bereshit 37:2.

⁴ See Rashbam's commentary on Bereshit 25:32.

⁵ See Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) and discussion in E. Urbach, Baalei HaTosafot, (Jerusalem, 1986) pp. 114-115.

⁶

⁷ Two versions of this commentary survived in two different printings, Bomberg and Pisarro.

⁸ See Tosafot MegillahMegillah 18b s.v. קנקנתוםAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot

⁹ See TosafotBava Metziah 19a s.v. וליחושBava Batra 27a s.v. ולכתובAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot

¹⁰ See Tosafot Bava KamaBava Kama 68a s.v. מהAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot

¹¹ See Rashbam on Bava Batra 50b s.v. "רב מרי"

¹² See TosafotYoma 18b s.v. והאמרYevamot 80b s.v. עדAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot

¹³ To compensate, the manuscript contained Parashot Vaetchanan, Eikev, and Reeh twice, with slight changes.