Difference between revisions of "Commentators:R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 55: Line 55:
 
<li><b>Dates</b> – c.1085<fn>We do not know the exact date of Rashbam's birth.  The approximation of 1085 is based on the fact that he argued with Rashi (See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit37-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 37:2</a>), might have even ruled Halakha in front of him (Mordekhai Sanhedrin 702), and possibly Rashi learned from his interpretations (R. Chaim Paltiel Bereshit 49:22).  Since Rashi died in 1105, the assumption is that Rashbam must have been born at least 20 years earlier to argue with him.</fn> – c.1174.<fn>The date of Rashbam's death is also unknown.  Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) gives a date of 4935 (1174/75) which would make Rashbam 90 when he died, but the basis for this is unknown.  D. Rosin rejects the date, and says instead that Rashbam died after 1158, since he is hinted to in Ibn Ezra's <multilink><a href="IbnEzraIggeretHaShabbat" data-aht="source">Iggeret HaShabbat</a><a href="IbnEzraIggeretHaShabbat" data-aht="source">Iggeret HaShabbat</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, in the words of "ולא תשא פני איש".  Assuming Ibn Ezra is responding to Rashbam's commentary, then it seems Rashbam was still alive in 1158.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Dates</b> – c.1085<fn>We do not know the exact date of Rashbam's birth.  The approximation of 1085 is based on the fact that he argued with Rashi (See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit37-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 37:2</a>), might have even ruled Halakha in front of him (Mordekhai Sanhedrin 702), and possibly Rashi learned from his interpretations (R. Chaim Paltiel Bereshit 49:22).  Since Rashi died in 1105, the assumption is that Rashbam must have been born at least 20 years earlier to argue with him.</fn> – c.1174.<fn>The date of Rashbam's death is also unknown.  Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) gives a date of 4935 (1174/75) which would make Rashbam 90 when he died, but the basis for this is unknown.  D. Rosin rejects the date, and says instead that Rashbam died after 1158, since he is hinted to in Ibn Ezra's <multilink><a href="IbnEzraIggeretHaShabbat" data-aht="source">Iggeret HaShabbat</a><a href="IbnEzraIggeretHaShabbat" data-aht="source">Iggeret HaShabbat</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, in the words of "ולא תשא פני איש".  Assuming Ibn Ezra is responding to Rashbam's commentary, then it seems Rashbam was still alive in 1158.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Location</b> – Rashbam lived in cities in Northern France including Troyes, Ramerupt, Paris, Caen, and Loudun.<fn>In MS Ginsburg Rashbam writes that in 1130 he was in Ramerupt, and E. Urbach suggest he left Troyes to there after Rashi died. R. Tam in Sefer HaYashar Teshuvot 41 writes that Rashbam is not with him in Ramerupt, rather in Caen. Rashbam himself also mentions that he was asked a question in Loudun (Rashbam Bemidbar 30:2), and in Paris (Rashbam Bemidbar 11:35, Or Zarua 1:476).</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Location</b> – Rashbam lived in cities in Northern France including Troyes, Ramerupt, Paris, Caen, and Loudun.<fn>In MS Ginsburg Rashbam writes that in 1130 he was in Ramerupt, and E. Urbach suggest he left Troyes to there after Rashi died. R. Tam in Sefer HaYashar Teshuvot 41 writes that Rashbam is not with him in Ramerupt, rather in Caen. Rashbam himself also mentions that he was asked a question in Loudun (Rashbam Bemidbar 30:2), and in Paris (Rashbam Bemidbar 11:35, Or Zarua 1:476).</fn></li>
<li><b>Occupation</b> – Rashbam had a flock of ewes, which provided milk and wool.</li>
+
<li><b>Occupation</b> – Rashbam had a flock of ewes, which provided milk and wool.<fn>See Shibbolei HaLeket 2:33: "ראיתי רבנו תם ז"ל שהקפיד על רבנו שמואל זצ"ל, שהיו לו רחלות הנה {צ"ל: הרבה} רחוקות קצת מן העיר ועומדות אצל גוי אחד. והיה שולח שם רבינו שמואל בכל השכמה בתו לראות, ולא היתה מספקת לבוא שם עד שחלבו הגוי כולו או רובו.", and the parallels cited by Urbach in Ba'alei HaTosafot p. 46, n. 13.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Family</b> – Rashbam was the grandson of Rashi<fn>See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit37-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 37:2</a>.</fn> and the son of R. Meir.<fn>See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit25-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:32.</a></fn> His brothers were R. Yitzchak and R. Tam. He had a daughter Marona and perhaps a son Yosef.<fn>See Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) and discussion in E. Urbach, Baalei HaTosafot, (Jerusalem, 1986) pp. 114-115.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Family</b> – Rashbam was the grandson of Rashi<fn>See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit37-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit 37:2</a>.</fn> and the son of R. Meir.<fn>See Rashbam's commentary on <a href="RashbamBereshit25-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 25:32.</a></fn> His brothers were R. Yitzchak and R. Tam. He had a daughter Marona and perhaps a son Yosef.<fn>See Sefer HaYuchsin v.5 (p.218) and discussion in E. Urbach, Baalei HaTosafot, (Jerusalem, 1986) pp. 114-115.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Teachers</b> –&#160;</li>
 
<li><b>Teachers</b> –&#160;</li>

Version as of 04:58, 7 November 2018

R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
CAUTION: THIS TOPIC HAS NOT YET UNDERGONE EDITORIAL REVIEW
Rashbam
Name
R. Shemuel b. Meir
ר' שמואל בן מאיר, רשב"ם
Dates1085-1174
LocationFrance
WorksTanakh and Talmud commentaries
Exegetical Characteristics
Influenced byRashi, his father R. Meir
Impacted onR. Eliezer of Beaugency, R. Yosef Bekhor Shor

Background

Life

  • Name – 
    • Hebrew name – R. Shemuel b. Meir (ר' שמואל בן מאיר), of which Rashbam (רשב"ם) is an acronym.
  • Dates – c.10851 – c.1174.2
  • Location – Rashbam lived in cities in Northern France including Troyes, Ramerupt, Paris, Caen, and Loudun.3
  • Occupation – Rashbam had a flock of ewes, which provided milk and wool.4
  • Family – Rashbam was the grandson of Rashi5 and the son of R. Meir.6 His brothers were R. Yitzchak and R. Tam. He had a daughter Marona and perhaps a son Yosef.7
  • Teachers – 
  • Contemporaries – 
  • Students – 
  • Time period

Works

  • Biblical commentaries – Rashbam wrote a commentary on most or all of Tanakh. See below regarding his Torah commentary.8 Commentaries of Rashbam on Tehillim, Iyyov, Kohelet, and Shir HaShirim have recently been published, but his authorship of these works is disputed. Citations from Rashbam's commentaries on Neviim and Ketuvim also survived in the Arugat HaBosem of R. Avraham b. Azriel and in some Northern French commentaries.
  • Grammar – 
  • Rabbinics – 
    • Talmudic novellae – Rashbam wrote commentaries on the tenth chapter of Pesachim and on Bava Batra 29a through the end9 in order to complete missing sections of Rashi's commentary. In addition Rashbam wrote commentaries on Eiruvin,10 Gittin,11 Bava Kama,12 other sections of Bava Batra,13 and Niddah14 which are not extant, but are cited by other commentaries.
    • Halakhic codes – 
    • Responses to the works of others – 
    • Responsa – 
  • Jewish thought – 
  • Commonly misattributed to Rashbam – 

Torah Commentary

Textual Issues

  • Manuscripts – Rashbam's commentary on Torah survived only in one manuscript, MS Breslau 103, and even this manuscript was lost during the Holocaust. This manuscript was missing the first three Parashot of Sefer Bereshit, Parashat Pinechas, and Devarim 33:3 through the end.15 Rashbam's commentary on Bereshit 1 was discovered by A. Geiger in MS Munich 5, and it is now incorporated in most printed editions. In 1882, D. Rosin published a critical edition based on MSS Breslau 103 and Munich 5. Rashbam's commentary on part of Devarim 34 was published by M. Sokolow in 1984 from MS Oxford 34.  Regarding the reconstruction of the missing portions of Rashbam's commentary, see Rashbam's Torah Commentary.
  • Printings – The commentary was printed for the first time in 1705 in Berlin.
  • Long and short commentaries – 
  • The writing process – 
  • Ramban's later updates – 

Characteristics

  • Verse by verse / Topical – 
  • Genre – 
  • Structure – 
  • Language – 

Methods

  • – 

Themes

  • – 

Sources

Significant Influences

  • Earlier Sources – 
  • Teachers – 
  • Foils – 

Occasional Usage

Possible Relationship

Impact

Later exegetes

Supercommentaries