Sifre Zuta Bemidbar
This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Name | Sifre Zuta ספרי זוטא |
---|---|
Dates | |
Place | Eretz Yisrael |
Characteristics | |
Sources | R. Akiva |
Impacted on |
Background1
Names
Date
3rd century
Place
SifZNum was redacted in Eretz Yisrael.
Language
· Mishnaic Hebrew
Text
- SifZNum was known in medieval times, lost for centuries, and partially rediscovered and reconstructed in a gradual process beginning in the 19th century.
- Manuscripts – S. Schechter published two leaves from the Genizah containing SifZNum on Matot and Massei. J.N. Epstein published five leaves on Chukat.4
- Printings – The first attempted critical edition of SifZNum as a whole5 was published by H. Horovitz (Breslau, 1910), based on the fragment published by Schechter and citations in midrashim and Rishonim. Horovitz’s work must be revised based on the fragments published by Epstein, and new manuscripts that have been discovered of certain sources of citations, such as Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol. It has also become clear that Horovitz erroneously included many passages that did not originate in SifZNum.6
- Textual layers –
Content
Genre
- –
Structure
- – It has been inferred from various sources that SifZNum started with an exposition of Bemidbar 5:2,7 skipped 31:25-35:8,8 and generally expounded the same verses as did Sifre Bemidbar.9
SifZNum was divided into several large units (the size and names of which are unknown), which were subdivided into numbered parashiyyot.
Characteristics
- – See Introduction to Midreshei Halakhah.
Sources
Significant Influences
Occasional Usage
Possible Relationship
Impact
Other Midrashim
- – SifZNum is cited extensively in Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol, and is also cited in Bemidbar Rabbah to Naso.
Medieval Exegetes
- –