Difference between revisions of "Commentators:Sifre Zuta/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
<page type="Basic">
 
<page type="Basic">
 
+
<h1>Sifre Zuta Bemidbar</h1>
<h1>Sifre Zuta</h1>
+
<stub></stub>
<stub/>
 
 
 
 
<div class="header">
 
<div class="header">
 
<infobox class="Parshan">
 
<infobox class="Parshan">
 
<title>Sifre Zuta</title>
 
<title>Sifre Zuta</title>
<row>
+
<row>
<label>Name</label>
+
<label>Name</label>
<content>
+
<content>
<div>Sifre Zuta</div>
+
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="rtl">ספרי זוטא</div>
+
Sifre Zuta
</content>
+
</div>
</row>
+
<div dir="rtl">
<row>
+
ספרי זוטא
<label>Dates</label>
+
</div>
<content></content>
+
</content>
</row>
+
</row>
<row>
+
<row>
<label>Place</label>
+
<label>Dates</label>
<content>Eretz Yisrael</content>
+
</row>
</row>
+
<row>
<row>
+
<label>Place</label>
<label>Characteristics</label>
+
<content>Eretz Yisrael</content>
<content></content>
+
</row>
</row>
+
<row>
<row>
+
<label>Characteristics</label>
<label>Sources</label>
+
</row>
<content>R. Akiva</content>
+
<row>
</row>
+
<label>Sources</label>
<row>
+
<content>R. Akiva</content>
<label>Impacted on</label>
+
</row>
<content></content>
+
<row>
</row>
+
<label>Impacted on</label>
 +
</row>
 +
 
 
</infobox>
 
</infobox>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
<category>Background<fn>This page incorporates information from M. Kahana, "The Halakhic Midrashim" in The Literature of the Sages Part II, ed. Safrai et al. (Assen, 2006): 3-105 (hereafter: Kahana).</fn>
 
 
<category>Background
 
 
<subcategory>Names
 
<subcategory>Names
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li>Common name – </li>
+
<li>Common name –&#160;ספרי זוטא במדבר<fn>This page will use the abbreviation SifZNum. The Aramaic word zuta means small and comes to distinguish this work from Sifre Bemidbar, which is also referred to as Sifre Rabbati. While the size of SifZNum is not clearly known, from the evidence at hand it does not seem smaller in scale than Sifre Bemidbar. The name may thus indicate simply that SifZNum was not as commonly available.</fn></li>
<li>Other names – </li>
+
<li>Other names –&#160;ספרי, זוטי, ספרי ירושלמי, ספרי של פנים אחרות, מכילתא<fn>For other names see J.N. Epstein, Prolegomena ad Litteras Tannaiticas, ed E.Z. Melamed (Jerusalem-Tel<br/>Aviv 1957): 741.</fn><br/> </li>
</ul>
+
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Date
 
<subcategory>Date
<ul>
+
<p>3rd century</p>
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
+
<subcategory>Place
<subcategory>Place<!--Provenance-->
+
<p>SifZNum was redacted in Eretz Yisrael.</p>
<ul>
 
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Language
 
<subcategory>Language
<ul>
+
<p>·&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; Mishnaic Hebrew</p>
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Text
 
<subcategory>Text
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li>Manuscripts – </li>
+
<li>SifZNum was known in medieval times, lost for centuries, and partially rediscovered and reconstructed in a gradual process beginning in the 19th century.</li>
<li>Printings – </li>
+
<li>Manuscripts –&#160;S. Schechter published two leaves from the Genizah containing SifZNum on Matot and Massei. J.N. Epstein published five leaves on Chukat.<fn>See the new transcriptions of these fragments in M. Kahana., The Genizah Fragments of the Halakhic Midrashim 1 (Jerusalem 2005): 214-226.</fn></li>
<li>Textual layers – </li>
+
<li>Printings –&#160;The first attempted critical edition of SifZNum as a whole<fn>B. Koenigsberger had previously published a reconstruction of SifZNum from the parashah of Bemidbar through Behaalotecha, in two installments (Frankfurt 1894, and Pleschen 1907).</fn> was published by H. Horovitz (Breslau, 1910), based on the fragment published by Schechter and citations in midrashim and Rishonim. Horovitz’s work must be revised based on the fragments published by Epstein, and new manuscripts that have been discovered of certain sources of citations, such as Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol. It has also become clear that Horovitz erroneously included many passages that did not originate in SifZNum.<fn>See Kahana: 93-94 for a summary critique of Horovitz’s edition.</fn></li>
</ul>
+
<li>Textual layers –&#160;</li>
 +
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong></strong></p>
 
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
 
 
<category>Content
 
<category>Content
 
<subcategory>Genre
 
<subcategory>Genre
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li> –&#160;</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Structure
 
<subcategory>Structure
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li>–&#160;It has been inferred from various sources that SifZNum started with an exposition of Bemidbar 5:2,<fn>This is also where Sifre Bemidbar starts.</fn> skipped 31:25-35:8,<fn>This is indicated in one of the Genizah fragments. Sifre Bemidbar also skips this section.</fn> and generally expounded the same verses as did Sifre Bemidbar.<fn>As can be observed in citations in Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol.</fn><br/> SifZNum was divided into several large units (the size and names of which are unknown), which were subdivided into numbered parashiyyot.</li>
</ul>
+
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Characteristics
 
<subcategory>Characteristics
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li>– See Introduction to Midreshei Halakhah.</li>
</ul>
+
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
 
 
<category>Sources
 
<category>Sources
 
<subcategory>Significant Influences
 
<subcategory>Significant Influences
<ul>
 
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Occasional Usage
 
<subcategory>Occasional Usage
<ul>
 
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Possible Relationship
 
<subcategory>Possible Relationship
<ul>
+
<ul>
 
<li></li>
 
<li></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
 
 
<category>Impact
 
<category>Impact
 
<subcategory>Other Midrashim
 
<subcategory>Other Midrashim
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li>–&#160;SifZNum is cited extensively in Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol, and is also cited in Bemidbar Rabbah to Naso.</li>
</ul>
+
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Medieval Exegetes
 
<subcategory>Medieval Exegetes
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li> –&#160;</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
<subcategory>Supercommentaries
 
<subcategory>Supercommentaries
<ul>
+
<ul>
<li> – </li>
+
<li>–&#160;R. J. Jaskowicz, ספרי זוטא על ספר במדבר<fn>Lodz 1929.</fn><br/> R. E. Garbus, ספרי זוטא על במדמר עם פרוש ספירי אפרים<fn>Jerusalem, 1949.</fn><br/> In addition, academic studies of SifZNum have been published by J.N. Epstein<fn>“Sifrei Zuttah Parashat Parah”, Tarbiz 1 (1930) 46-78, reprinted in J.N. Epstein, Studies in Talmudic Literature and Semitic languages, ed E.Z. Melamed (Jerusalem 1983-1988) 2,1, 141-173.</fn> and S. Lieberman.<fn>Siphre Zutta: The Midrash of Lydda (New York 1968).</fn></li>
</ul>
+
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 17:06, 27 June 2015

Sifre Zuta Bemidbar

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Sifre Zuta
Name
Sifre Zuta
ספרי זוטא
Dates
PlaceEretz Yisrael
Characteristics
SourcesR. Akiva
Impacted on

Background1

Names

  • Common name – ספרי זוטא במדבר2
  • Other names – ספרי, זוטי, ספרי ירושלמי, ספרי של פנים אחרות, מכילתא3

Date

3rd century

Place

SifZNum was redacted in Eretz Yisrael.

Language

·         Mishnaic Hebrew

Text

  • SifZNum was known in medieval times, lost for centuries, and partially rediscovered and reconstructed in a gradual process beginning in the 19th century.
  • Manuscripts – S. Schechter published two leaves from the Genizah containing SifZNum on Matot and Massei. J.N. Epstein published five leaves on Chukat.4
  • Printings – The first attempted critical edition of SifZNum as a whole5 was published by H. Horovitz (Breslau, 1910), based on the fragment published by Schechter and citations in midrashim and Rishonim. Horovitz’s work must be revised based on the fragments published by Epstein, and new manuscripts that have been discovered of certain sources of citations, such as Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol. It has also become clear that Horovitz erroneously included many passages that did not originate in SifZNum.6
  • Textual layers – 

Content

Genre

  • – 

Structure

  • – It has been inferred from various sources that SifZNum started with an exposition of Bemidbar 5:2,7 skipped 31:25-35:8,8 and generally expounded the same verses as did Sifre Bemidbar.9
    SifZNum was divided into several large units (the size and names of which are unknown), which were subdivided into numbered parashiyyot.

Characteristics

  • – See Introduction to Midreshei Halakhah.

Sources

Significant Influences

Occasional Usage

Possible Relationship

Impact

Other Midrashim

  • – SifZNum is cited extensively in Yalkut Shimoni and Midrash Hagadol, and is also cited in Bemidbar Rabbah to Naso.

Medieval Exegetes

  • – 

Supercommentaries

  • – R. J. Jaskowicz, ספרי זוטא על ספר במדבר10
    R. E. Garbus, ספרי זוטא על במדמר עם פרוש ספירי אפרים11
    In addition, academic studies of SifZNum have been published by J.N. Epstein12 and S. Lieberman.13