Difference between revisions of "Cursing Canaan/2/en"
m (Text replacement - "Seforno" to "Sforno") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<category>Canaan Sinned | <category>Canaan Sinned | ||
<p>Canaan was punished because it was he who committed the offense.</p> | <p>Canaan was punished because it was he who committed the offense.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot>R. Nehemiah in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah36-7" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah,</a><a href="BereshitRabbah36-7" data-aht="source">36:7</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> <multilink><a href="RYosefKaraBereshit9-24" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYosefKaraBereshit9-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:24</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamReconstructedBereshit9-18" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamReconstructedBereshit9-18" data-aht="source">Reconstructed Bereshit 9:18</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="IbnEzraAdditionalCommentaryBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Additional Commentary Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaParashah9" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaParashah9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Beur HaParashah 9</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href=" | + | <mekorot>R. Nehemiah in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah36-7" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah,</a><a href="BereshitRabbah36-7" data-aht="source">36:7</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> <multilink><a href="RYosefKaraBereshit9-24" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYosefKaraBereshit9-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:24</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamReconstructedBereshit9-18" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamReconstructedBereshit9-18" data-aht="source">Reconstructed Bereshit 9:18</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="IbnEzraAdditionalCommentaryBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Additional Commentary Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaParashah9" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaParashah9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Beur HaParashah 9</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="SfornoBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Sforno</a><a href="SfornoBereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 9:18-27</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Sforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Sforno</a></multilink></mekorot> |
<point><b>"אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן"</b> – All of these sources assume that the verse cannot be speaking of the action done by Cham, since he was not the youngest of Noach's sons.<fn>When the three sons are mentioned together (<a href="Bereshit5-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 5:32</a>, <a href="Bereshit6-9-10" data-aht="source">6:10</a>, <a href="Bereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">9:18 </a>and <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">10:1</a>), they are ordered, Shem, Cham, and Yefet, suggesting that Shem was the oldest, followed by Cham, with Yefet being the youngest.</fn>  They disagree, though, regarding the subject of the phrase "בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן":<br/> | <point><b>"אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן"</b> – All of these sources assume that the verse cannot be speaking of the action done by Cham, since he was not the youngest of Noach's sons.<fn>When the three sons are mentioned together (<a href="Bereshit5-32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 5:32</a>, <a href="Bereshit6-9-10" data-aht="source">6:10</a>, <a href="Bereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">9:18 </a>and <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">10:1</a>), they are ordered, Shem, Cham, and Yefet, suggesting that Shem was the oldest, followed by Cham, with Yefet being the youngest.</fn>  They disagree, though, regarding the subject of the phrase "בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן":<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Canaan</b> – Most of these commentators maintain that the term refers to Canaan, the youngest son of Cham,<fn>As evidence that Canaan is Cham's youngest son, they point to the order of sons mentioned in the genealogy list in <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Bereshit 10:6</a>, "וּבְנֵי חָם כּוּשׁ וּמִצְרַיִם וּפוּט וּכְנָעַן".</fn> and that this verse proves that Canaan was the one who sinned.<fn>See below that R"Y Bekhor Shor reads this verse differently, and instead finds a hint in <a href="Bereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">verse 21</a> to support his position that it was Canaan who sinned.</fn>  R"Y Kara and | + | <li><b>Canaan</b> – Most of these commentators maintain that the term refers to Canaan, the youngest son of Cham,<fn>As evidence that Canaan is Cham's youngest son, they point to the order of sons mentioned in the genealogy list in <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Bereshit 10:6</a>, "וּבְנֵי חָם כּוּשׁ וּמִצְרַיִם וּפוּט וּכְנָעַן".</fn> and that this verse proves that Canaan was the one who sinned.<fn>See below that R"Y Bekhor Shor reads this verse differently, and instead finds a hint in <a href="Bereshit9-18-27" data-aht="source">verse 21</a> to support his position that it was Canaan who sinned.</fn>  R"Y Kara and Sforno explain that Canaan is called Noach's son, despite being only his grandson, because "בְּנֵי בָּנִים הֲרֵי הֵם כְּבָנִים", (a person's grandsons are like his sons).  Ibn Ezra and Ralbag<fn>See also R"Y Kara who brings this as a second possibility.</fn> assert, instead, that the possessive letter <i>vav</i> in "בְּנוֹ" refers back to Cham.<fn>In other words, the verse reads "And Noach realized what the youngest son [of Cham] had done to him".</fn></li> |
<li><b>Shem</b> – R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggests that the verse refers to Shem, and that it was Shem who was Noach's youngest son.<fn>As evidence, he points to the genealogy list of <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Chapter 10</a> which first lists the descendants of Yefet, then of Cham, and finally of Shem.  R"Y Bekhor Shor asserts that this list reflects the true birth order, and that Shem is listed first in other cases due to his importance, not his age.  As further support, R"Y Bekhor Shor points to <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Bereshit 10:21</a>, which speaks of Yefet as the "older brother" ("וּלְשֵׁם יֻלַּד גַּם הוּא אֲבִי כׇּל בְּנֵי עֵבֶר אֲחִי יֶפֶת הַגָּדוֹל").  [However, this verse, too, is ambiguous and can be understood to say instead that Shem was the older brother of Yefet.]<br/>Cf. Ralbag who agrees with R"Y Bekhor Shor regarding the birth order of the sons, though he disagrees regarding how to read this specific verse.</fn>  According to him, the verse speaks not of the evil which was done to Noach, but rather the good.<fn>The phrase is  connected to the immediately preceding verse rather than the following one.</fn>  Its purpose is to emphasize that, of the three sons, Shem acted most appropriately and was thus the most blessed.</li> | <li><b>Shem</b> – R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggests that the verse refers to Shem, and that it was Shem who was Noach's youngest son.<fn>As evidence, he points to the genealogy list of <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Chapter 10</a> which first lists the descendants of Yefet, then of Cham, and finally of Shem.  R"Y Bekhor Shor asserts that this list reflects the true birth order, and that Shem is listed first in other cases due to his importance, not his age.  As further support, R"Y Bekhor Shor points to <a href="Bereshit10-1-26-721-22" data-aht="source">Bereshit 10:21</a>, which speaks of Yefet as the "older brother" ("וּלְשֵׁם יֻלַּד גַּם הוּא אֲבִי כׇּל בְּנֵי עֵבֶר אֲחִי יֶפֶת הַגָּדוֹל").  [However, this verse, too, is ambiguous and can be understood to say instead that Shem was the older brother of Yefet.]<br/>Cf. Ralbag who agrees with R"Y Bekhor Shor regarding the birth order of the sons, though he disagrees regarding how to read this specific verse.</fn>  According to him, the verse speaks not of the evil which was done to Noach, but rather the good.<fn>The phrase is  connected to the immediately preceding verse rather than the following one.</fn>  Its purpose is to emphasize that, of the three sons, Shem acted most appropriately and was thus the most blessed.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>What did Canaan do?</b><ul> | <point><b>What did Canaan do?</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Castrated/sodomized Noach</b> – Most of these sources maintain that Canaan did a heinous act, with Rashbam, Ralbag, and | + | <li><b>Castrated/sodomized Noach</b> – Most of these sources maintain that Canaan did a heinous act, with Rashbam, Ralbag, and Sforno positing that he castrated his grandfather, and the Bavli suggesting that he sodomized him.  All of these sources are likely motivated by the language of "אֲשֶׁר <b>עָשָׂה</b> לוֹ",‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="#" data-aht="source">Al-Kirkisani, the Karaite</a></multilink>, who makes this point.</fn> and they thus attempt to identify an active crime that Canaan might have committed.<fn>See also R"Y Kara and Ibn Ezra who similarly see in this verse evidence of Canaan's depraved action, but do not identify it.</fn>  Moreover, in order to justify Canaan being cursed, they need to attribute to him a deed worthy of such a punishment.</li> |
<li><b>Revealed Noach's nakedness</b> – In contrast, R"Y Bekhor Shor finds the hint to Canaan's sin in the phrase "וַיִּתְגַּל בְּתוֹךְ אׇהֳלֹה".‎<fn>Since R"Y Bekhor Shor read the verse, "וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן" to refer to Shem, he is forced to find the hint to Canaan's sin elsewhere.</fn>  He maintains that the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was exposed by others.  As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.<fn>See R. Nehemiah in Bereshit Rabbah who similarly says that Canaan's sin was that he was the first to see Noach's nakedness.</fn></li> | <li><b>Revealed Noach's nakedness</b> – In contrast, R"Y Bekhor Shor finds the hint to Canaan's sin in the phrase "וַיִּתְגַּל בְּתוֹךְ אׇהֳלֹה".‎<fn>Since R"Y Bekhor Shor read the verse, "וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן" to refer to Shem, he is forced to find the hint to Canaan's sin elsewhere.</fn>  He maintains that the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was exposed by others.  As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.<fn>See R. Nehemiah in Bereshit Rabbah who similarly says that Canaan's sin was that he was the first to see Noach's nakedness.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן"</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Introduction</b> – Rashbam and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that Cham is introduced as Canaan's father so that the reader will know who Canaan is when he is later cursed.<fn>Rashbam points out that this is "דרך המקראות" (the way of the text), and explains that often the text introduces a fact to the reader early on so that something later in the narrative will be understood.  For other examples, see <a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">Rashbam</a>.</fn></li> | <li><b>Introduction</b> – Rashbam and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that Cham is introduced as Canaan's father so that the reader will know who Canaan is when he is later cursed.<fn>Rashbam points out that this is "דרך המקראות" (the way of the text), and explains that often the text introduces a fact to the reader early on so that something later in the narrative will be understood.  For other examples, see <a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">Rashbam</a>.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li><b>"Like father, like son"</b> – In contrast, according to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag, and | + | <li><b>"Like father, like son"</b> – In contrast, according to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag, and Sforno, the text comes to show the similar depraved conduct of father and son.<fn>While Ibn Ezra claims that Canaan followed in his father's ways, Sforno suggests that the verse is saying that Cham was like the infamous Canaan.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וַיַּרְא חָם אֲבִי כְנַעַן אֵת עֶרְוַת אָבִיו"</b> – | + | <point><b>"וַיַּרְא חָם אֲבִי כְנַעַן אֵת עֶרְוַת אָבִיו"</b> – Sforno posits that the word "עֶרְוַת" here means shame, pointing to such usage in <a href="Ezra4-14" data-aht="source">Ezra 4:14</a>.  Thus, the verse is saying that, unlike his brothers who covered their father, Cham gawked at his father's castration and disgrace.<fn>Ibn Ezra, R"Y Bekhor Shor, and Ralbag also all emphasize that Cham's sin was one of looking, and not more than that.</fn></point> |
<point><b>Contrast to Shem and Yefet</b> – According to most of these commentators,<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor is the lone exception.</fn> there is a vast divide between Canaan and Shem/Yefet.  While the former committed an egregious sexual crime, the latter were so modest as to not even look at their father.  Canaan therefore merited punishment, while Shem and Yefet received blessings.</point> | <point><b>Contrast to Shem and Yefet</b> – According to most of these commentators,<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor is the lone exception.</fn> there is a vast divide between Canaan and Shem/Yefet.  While the former committed an egregious sexual crime, the latter were so modest as to not even look at their father.  Canaan therefore merited punishment, while Shem and Yefet received blessings.</point> | ||
<point><b>Measure for measure punishment</b> – Ralbag posits that Canaan purposefully prevented Noach from having additional children so as to maximize his inheritance portion.  Noach thus punished him that he would be enslaved to his brothers and receive less.</point> | <point><b>Measure for measure punishment</b> – Ralbag posits that Canaan purposefully prevented Noach from having additional children so as to maximize his inheritance portion.  Noach thus punished him that he would be enslaved to his brothers and receive less.</point> |
Latest revision as of 10:23, 28 January 2023
Cursing Canaan
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators struggle to understand both why Canaan should be cursed for his father's actions and what was so terrible about his deed that it provoked such a severe punishment. R"Y Bekhor Shor and Ralbag assert that while Cham merely looked at Noach, Canaan committed a much more offensive act, either castrating his grandfather, or at least actively revealing his nakedness.
Others disagree, claiming that Cham was the sole offender. Thus, Rashi asserts that although Cham sinned, for technical reasons, the curse fell upon his son rather than himself. The Hoil Moshe, in contrast, assumes that the choice to curse Canaan was much more fundamental. He suggests that Cham slept with Noach's wife, and that Canaan, who was the son born of this union, was naturally considered a cursed offspring, and told that he would never be on equal footing with his half-brothers. Finally, R. Saadia solves the conundrum by maintaining that not only was Cham the only sinner, he was also the only one cursed. When Noach said "אָרוּר כְּנָעַן", this was short for "אֲבִי כְנָעַן", the epithet of Cham.
Canaan Sinned
Canaan was punished because it was he who committed the offense.
- Canaan – Most of these commentators maintain that the term refers to Canaan, the youngest son of Cham,2 and that this verse proves that Canaan was the one who sinned.3 R"Y Kara and Sforno explain that Canaan is called Noach's son, despite being only his grandson, because "בְּנֵי בָּנִים הֲרֵי הֵם כְּבָנִים", (a person's grandsons are like his sons). Ibn Ezra and Ralbag4 assert, instead, that the possessive letter vav in "בְּנוֹ" refers back to Cham.5
- Shem – R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggests that the verse refers to Shem, and that it was Shem who was Noach's youngest son.6 According to him, the verse speaks not of the evil which was done to Noach, but rather the good.7 Its purpose is to emphasize that, of the three sons, Shem acted most appropriately and was thus the most blessed.
- Castrated/sodomized Noach – Most of these sources maintain that Canaan did a heinous act, with Rashbam, Ralbag, and Sforno positing that he castrated his grandfather, and the Bavli suggesting that he sodomized him. All of these sources are likely motivated by the language of "אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ",8 and they thus attempt to identify an active crime that Canaan might have committed.9 Moreover, in order to justify Canaan being cursed, they need to attribute to him a deed worthy of such a punishment.
- Revealed Noach's nakedness – In contrast, R"Y Bekhor Shor finds the hint to Canaan's sin in the phrase "וַיִּתְגַּל בְּתוֹךְ אׇהֳלֹה".10 He maintains that the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was exposed by others. As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.11
- Introduction – Rashbam and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that Cham is introduced as Canaan's father so that the reader will know who Canaan is when he is later cursed.12
- "Like father, like son" – In contrast, according to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag, and Sforno, the text comes to show the similar depraved conduct of father and son.13
Canaan Born from Cham's Sin
Canaan was the cursed offspring, born from the illicit relations between Cham and Noach's wife.
Canaan Cursed for Cham's Sin
Despite the fact that it was Cham who sinned, due to technical reasons, it was Canaan who received the punishment.
- Youngest – Ramban asserts that despite the fact that Cham is named in the middle of the progeny lists, he was in fact Noach's youngest child. He points to Bereshit 10:21 as evidence that Yefet was the oldest, and to our verse that Cham was the youngest.24 Shem, the middle child, is consistently listed first only due to his loftier stature.25
- Lowly stature – Bereshit Rabbah, Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan), and Rashi, in contrast, suggest that Cham is not the smallest in age, but in stature. He is referred to as the "smallest" because of his behavior.
- Saw Noach's nakedness – Ramban reads the verse literally and asserts that Cham was disrespectful in looking at his father's nakedness.
- Castrated or sodomized Noach – The Bavli, Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan), and Rashi, in contrast, understand the term "גילוי ערוה" to have a sexual connotation and assume that Cham must have performed an actual act, either castration or sodomizing. This is supported by the language of "אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ" in verse 24 which suggests that Cham did more than merely look.
- Introduction – Rashi asserts that the verse is simply an introduction so that the reader can understand who Canaan is when he is cursed.
- Canaan the oldest - According to Ramban, the verse teaches that at the time of the story, Canaan was the only son of Cham.26 As such, Cham was known as "the father of Canaan".
- Curses don't fall on the blessed – R. Yehuda in Bereshit Rabbah asserts that since Hashem had already blessed Noach's sons, cursing Cham would have been ineffective, and so Noach cursed his son instead. It is not clear, though, why Canaan, and not Cham's other children, was cursed.
- Measure for measure – The Bavli suggests that this was a "measure for measure" punishment of Cham.27 Since Cham had prevented Noach from having a fourth child, Noach decided to curse Cham's fourth son.
- Cham too close to Noach – According to Josephus, Noach did not want to curse Cham as he was his son, and thus he moved the curse onto Cham's progeny.
- Not enough to punish Cham – In contrast to Josephus, Ramban asserts that Noach felt that cursing Cham would not be enough; his progeny needed to suffer as well.28 Since Canaan was the only son who was alive at the time, he was the one cursed.29
Canaan Not Cursed
It was really Cham who was cursed, not Canaan.