Difference between revisions of "Cursing Canaan/2/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
m |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<li><b>"Like father, like son"</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag and Seforno, on the other hand, the text comes to identify father and son in their evil ways.</li> | <li><b>"Like father, like son"</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag and Seforno, on the other hand, the text comes to identify father and son in their evil ways.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Measure for | + | <point><b>Measure for measure punishment</b> – Ralbag posits that Canaan purposefully prevented Noach from having other children so as to maximize the inheritance and land that he would get.  Since he desired a larger dominion, Hashem</point> |
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Canaan Born from Cham's Sin | <category>Canaan Born from Cham's Sin |
Version as of 09:11, 11 October 2015
Noach's Vineyard
Exegetical Approaches
Canaan Sinned
Noach punished Canaan because Canaan had wronged him the most.
Sources:opinion in Bavli Sanhedrin, R. Nehemiah in Bereshit Rabbah, R. Yosef Kara, Rashbam, Ibn Ezra, R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, Ralbag, Seforno
"אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן" – All these sources agree that the verse cannot be speaking of the action done by Cham, since he was not the youngest of Noach's sons.1 They disagree, though, regarding who is the subject of the phrase:
- Canaan – Most of these commentators maintain that the term refers to Canaan, the youngest son of Cham.2 Seforno explains that Canaan is called Noach's son, despite his being his grandson, because 'בְּנֵי בָּנִים הֲרֵי הֵם כְּבָנִים', (a person's grandsons are like his sons). R. Yosef Kara, Ibn Ezra, and Ralbag assert, instead, that the "וי"ו" of "בְּנוֹ" refers back to Cham.3
- Shem – R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggests that the verse refers to Shem whom, he claims, was Noach's youngest son.4 According to him, the verse speaks not of the evil which was done to Noach, but rather the good. Its purpose is to emphasize that, of the three sons, Shem acted most appropriately and was thus the most blessed.
What did Canaan do?
- Revealed Noach's nakedness – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor,5 the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was revealed by others. As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.
- Castrated/sodomized Noach – Rashbam, Ralbag and Seforno6 all suggests that Canaan did a more severe act, and state that he castrated his grandfather. The Bavli suggests instead that he sodomized him. All these sources are probably picking up on the language of "וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ",7 and thus look for an active crime that Canaan might have committed.8 Moreover, they must make his deed worse than that of his father to justify his being cursed.
וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן
- Introduction – Rashbam and R"Y Bkehor Shor suggest that Cham is introduced as Canaan's father because this is relevant for later in the story. This way the reader understands who canaan is when he is cursed.
- "Like father, like son" – According to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag and Seforno, on the other hand, the text comes to identify father and son in their evil ways.
Measure for measure punishment – Ralbag posits that Canaan purposefully prevented Noach from having other children so as to maximize the inheritance and land that he would get. Since he desired a larger dominion, Hashem
Canaan Born from Cham's Sin
Canaan was cursed as an illegitimate child born of the illicit union between Cham and Noach's wife.
Sources:Hoil Moshe, I. Elizur
Canaan Cursed for Cham's Sin
Josephus, opinion in Bavli Sanhedrin, opinions in Bereshit Rabbah, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Ramban, Shadal
Sources:Despite the fact that it was Cham who acted wrongly, for technical reasons Canaan was cursed instead.
Canaan not Cursed
Canaan was never cursed; only Cham was.
Sources:R. Saadia Gaon