Difference between revisions of "Cursing Canaan/2/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<point><b>What did Canaan do?</b><ul>
 
<point><b>What did Canaan do?</b><ul>
 
<li><b>Revealed Noach's nakedness</b> – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor,<fn>See R. Nehemiah who similarly says that Canaan was the first to "see" Noach's nakedness.</fn> the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was revealed by others.&#160; As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.</li>
 
<li><b>Revealed Noach's nakedness</b> – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor,<fn>See R. Nehemiah who similarly says that Canaan was the first to "see" Noach's nakedness.</fn> the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was revealed by others.&#160; As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.</li>
<li><b>Castrated/sodomized Noach</b> – Rashbam, Ralbag and Seforno<fn>Ibn Ezra and R"Y Kara suffice by stating that he did an act</fn> all suggests that Canaan did a more severe act, and state that he castrated his grandfather.&#160; The Bavli suggests instead that he sodomized him.&#160; All these sources are probably picking up on the language of "&#8206;וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר <b>עָשָׂה</b> לוֹ",&#8206;<fn>Since R"Y Bekhor Shor reads this verse to refer to Shem, he finds the hint to Canaan's deed elsewhere in the story.<br/><br/></fn> and thus look for an active crime that Canaan might have committed.<fn>See also R"Y Kara and Ibn Ezra who similarly see in this verse evidence of Canaan's depraved action, but do not state what it was explicitly.</fn>&#160; Moreover, they must make his deed worse than that of his father to justify his being cursed.</li>
+
<li><b>Castrated/sodomized Noach</b> – The other sources maintain that Canaan did a much more severe act, with Rashbam, Ralbag and Seforno positing that he castrated his grandfather and the Bavli suggesting that he sodomized him.&#160; All these sources are probably picking up on the language of "&#8206;וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר <b>עָשָׂה</b> לוֹ",&#8206;<fn>Since R"Y Bekhor Shor reads this verse to refer to Shem, he finds the hint to Canaan's deed elsewhere in the story.<br/><br/></fn> and thus look for an active crime that Canaan might have committed.<fn>See also R"Y Kara and Ibn Ezra who similarly see in this verse evidence of Canaan's depraved action, but do not state what it was explicitly.</fn>&#160; Moreover, they all assume that his deed was worse than that of his father to justify his being cursed.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן</b><ul>
 
<point><b>וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן</b><ul>

Version as of 10:15, 11 October 2015

Noach's Vineyard

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Canaan Sinned

Noach punished Canaan because Canaan had wronged him the most.

"אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ בְּנוֹ הַקָּטָן" – All these sources agree that the verse cannot be speaking of the action done by Cham, since he was not the youngest of Noach's sons.1  They disagree, though, regarding who is the subject of the phrase:
  • Canaan – Most of these commentators maintain that the term refers to Canaan, the youngest son of Cham.2  Seforno explains that Canaan is called Noach's son, despite his being his grandson, because 'בְּנֵי בָּנִים הֲרֵי הֵם כְּבָנִים', (a person's grandsons are like his sons). R. Yosef Kara, Ibn Ezra, and Ralbag assert, instead, that the "וי"ו" of "בְּנוֹ" refers back to Cham.3
  • Shem – R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggests that the verse refers to Shem whom, he claims, was Noach's youngest son.4  According to him, the verse speaks not of the evil which was done to Noach, but rather the good.  Its purpose is to emphasize that, of the three sons, Shem acted most appropriately and was thus the most blessed.
What did Canaan do?
  • Revealed Noach's nakedness – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor,5 the word "וַיִּתְגַּל" is not a reflexive form, but rather means that Noach was revealed by others.  As such, he suggests that it was Canaan who did so, while Cham simply saw the nakedness.
  • Castrated/sodomized Noach – The other sources maintain that Canaan did a much more severe act, with Rashbam, Ralbag and Seforno positing that he castrated his grandfather and the Bavli suggesting that he sodomized him.  All these sources are probably picking up on the language of "‎וַיֵּדַע אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לוֹ",‎6 and thus look for an active crime that Canaan might have committed.7  Moreover, they all assume that his deed was worse than that of his father to justify his being cursed.
וְחָם הוּא אֲבִי כְנָעַן
  • Introduction – Rashbam and R"Y Bkehor Shor suggest that Cham is introduced as Canaan's father because this is relevant for later in the story.  This way the reader understands who canaan is when he is cursed.
  • "Like father, like son" – According to Ibn Ezra, Ralbag and Seforno, on the other hand, the text comes to identify father and son in their evil ways.
Measure for measure punishment – Ralbag posits that Canaan purposefully prevented Noach from having other children so as to maximize the inheritance and land that he would get.  Since he desired a larger dominion, Hashem

Canaan Born from Cham's Sin

Canaan was cursed as an illegitimate child born of the illicit union between Cham and Noach's wife.

Canaan Cursed for Cham's Sin

Canaan not Cursed

Canaan was never cursed; only Cham was.