Difference between revisions of "Dictionary:רְכוּשׁ/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Original Author: Neima Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky)
 
(Original Author: Neima Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><aht source="Bereshit13-5">Bereshit 13:5-6</aht> and <aht source="Bereshit36-6">36:6</aht> – Both of these cases describe an overcrowding due to an abundance of רְכוּשׁ, presumably referring to livestock.</li>
 
<li><aht source="Bereshit13-5">Bereshit 13:5-6</aht> and <aht source="Bereshit36-6">36:6</aht> – Both of these cases describe an overcrowding due to an abundance of רְכוּשׁ, presumably referring to livestock.</li>
<li><aht source="Bereshit15-14">Bereshit 15:14</aht> –  Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo (Pischa 14) reads this as referring to gold and silver.  Cf. Abarbanel Shemot 3 and R. Hirsch Shemot 11:2 who connect the fulfillment of this promise with the gold and silver articles taken from the Egyptians before leaving Egypt.  Alternatively, it refers to livestock, as Shemot 12:38 emphasizes the "צֹאן וּבָקָר מִקְנֶה כָּבֵד מְאֹד" which left Egypt with them.  [Surprisingly, though, the Mekhilta reads that very verse as also referring to gold and silver.]  <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> mentions both possibilities but prefers the first.  For further discussion, see <aht page="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</aht>.</li>
+
<li><aht source="Bereshit15-14">Bereshit 15:14</aht> –  Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo (Pischa 14) reads this as referring to gold and silver.  Cf. Abarbanel Shemot 3 and R. Hirsch Shemot 11:2 who connect the fulfillment of this promise with the gold and silver articles taken from the Egyptians before leaving Egypt.  Alternatively, it refers to livestock, as Shemot 12:38 emphasizes the "צֹאן וּבָקָר מִקְנֶה כָּבֵד מְאֹד" which left Egypt with them.  [Surprisingly, though, the Mekhilta reads that very verse as also referring to gold and silver.]  <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> mentions both possibilities but prefers the first.  For further discussion, see <aht page="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</aht>.</li>
 
<li><aht source="Bemidbar16-32">Bemidbar 16:32</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII21-17">Divrei HaYamim II 21:17</aht> – In each of these cases, the רְכוּשׁ is connected to a destroyed or plundered house.  <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink>, assuming that animals would not have lived in the house, attempts to prove from here that the word must refer to inanimate possessions.  However, even accepting Ibn Janach's debatable assumption that animals were kept in separate premises, it is not clear from either of these verses that the רְכוּשׁ was located in the house.</li>
 
<li><aht source="Bemidbar16-32">Bemidbar 16:32</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII21-17">Divrei HaYamim II 21:17</aht> – In each of these cases, the רְכוּשׁ is connected to a destroyed or plundered house.  <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink>, assuming that animals would not have lived in the house, attempts to prove from here that the word must refer to inanimate possessions.  However, even accepting Ibn Janach's debatable assumption that animals were kept in separate premises, it is not clear from either of these verses that the רְכוּשׁ was located in the house.</li>
<li><aht source="Bemidbar35-3">Bemidbar 35:3</aht> – This is the one case where <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> thinks רְכוּשׁ means some type of livestock, as it appears in between "לִבְהֶמְתָּם" and "וּלְכֹל חַיָּתָם".  Cf. Seforno who distinguishes between three categories of animals.  However, see Bavli Nedarim 81a and Rashi Bemidbar who interpret differently.</li>
+
<li><aht source="Bemidbar35-3">Bemidbar 35:3</aht> – This is the one case where <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> thinks רְכוּשׁ means some type of livestock, as it appears in between "לִבְהֶמְתָּם" and "וּלְכֹל חַיָּתָם".  Cf. Seforno who distinguishes between three categories of animals.  However, see Bavli Nedarim 81a and Rashi Bemidbar who interpret differently.</li>
 
<li><aht source="DivreiHaYamimI27-25">Divrei HaYamim I 27:25-32</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII32-27">Divrei HaYamim II 32:27-29</aht> – In both of these cases, the word רְכוּשׁ appears in the context of a summary statement following a list of royal possessions.  In each case, the list includes all types of assets but concludes with various categories of livestock, leaving doubt as to whether רְכוּשׁ refers to the entire list or just to the animals at the end.  Here, too, <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> argues for the first option.</li>
 
<li><aht source="DivreiHaYamimI27-25">Divrei HaYamim I 27:25-32</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII32-27">Divrei HaYamim II 32:27-29</aht> – In both of these cases, the word רְכוּשׁ appears in the context of a summary statement following a list of royal possessions.  In each case, the list includes all types of assets but concludes with various categories of livestock, leaving doubt as to whether רְכוּשׁ refers to the entire list or just to the animals at the end.  Here, too, <multilink><aht source="IbnJanach">R. Yonah ibn Janach</aht><aht source="IbnJanach">Sefer HaShorashim s.v. רכש</aht><aht parshan="R. Yonah ibn Janach">About Ibn Janach</aht></multilink> argues for the first option.</li>
 
<li><aht source="DivreiHaYamimII31-3">Divrei HaYamim II 31:3</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII35-7">35:7</aht> – These verses describe kings giving sacrifices from their רְכוּשׁ, presumably their animal possessions.</li>
 
<li><aht source="DivreiHaYamimII31-3">Divrei HaYamim II 31:3</aht> and <aht source="DivreiHaYamimII35-7">35:7</aht> – These verses describe kings giving sacrifices from their רְכוּשׁ, presumably their animal possessions.</li>

Version as of 15:59, 12 May 2014

רְכוּשׁ

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
רְכוּשׁ
Part of SpeechNoun
Occurrences28
Possible Meanings
  1. General Possessions
  2. Livestock
Related Wordsרֶכֶשׁ, רכש

Possible Meanings

The word appears 28 times in Tanakh, and in many of the cases it is difficult to determine whether it connotes general monetary possessions or specifically animal possessions. As livestock was a very significant component of a person's wealth in Biblical times, it is possible that רְכוּשׁ was initially a term for livestock (and related to רֶכֶשׁ), and later its semantic field expanded to include all property.1 See also the verb רכש.

  • Bereshit 13:5-6 and 36:6 – Both of these cases describe an overcrowding due to an abundance of רְכוּשׁ, presumably referring to livestock.
  • Bereshit 15:14 – Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo (Pischa 14) reads this as referring to gold and silver. Cf. Abarbanel Shemot 3 and R. Hirsch Shemot 11:2 who connect the fulfillment of this promise with the gold and silver articles taken from the Egyptians before leaving Egypt. Alternatively, it refers to livestock, as Shemot 12:38 emphasizes the "צֹאן וּבָקָר מִקְנֶה כָּבֵד מְאֹד" which left Egypt with them. [Surprisingly, though, the Mekhilta reads that very verse as also referring to gold and silver.] R. Yonah ibn JanachSefer HaShorashim s.v. רכשAbout Ibn Janach mentions both possibilities but prefers the first. For further discussion, see Reparations and Despoiling Egypt.
  • Bemidbar 16:32 and Divrei HaYamim II 21:17 – In each of these cases, the רְכוּשׁ is connected to a destroyed or plundered house. R. Yonah ibn JanachSefer HaShorashim s.v. רכשAbout Ibn Janach, assuming that animals would not have lived in the house, attempts to prove from here that the word must refer to inanimate possessions. However, even accepting Ibn Janach's debatable assumption that animals were kept in separate premises, it is not clear from either of these verses that the רְכוּשׁ was located in the house.
  • Bemidbar 35:3 – This is the one case where R. Yonah ibn JanachSefer HaShorashim s.v. רכשAbout Ibn Janach thinks רְכוּשׁ means some type of livestock, as it appears in between "לִבְהֶמְתָּם" and "וּלְכֹל חַיָּתָם". Cf. Seforno who distinguishes between three categories of animals. However, see Bavli Nedarim 81a and Rashi Bemidbar who interpret differently.
  • Divrei HaYamim I 27:25-32 and Divrei HaYamim II 32:27-29 – In both of these cases, the word רְכוּשׁ appears in the context of a summary statement following a list of royal possessions. In each case, the list includes all types of assets but concludes with various categories of livestock, leaving doubt as to whether רְכוּשׁ refers to the entire list or just to the animals at the end. Here, too, R. Yonah ibn JanachSefer HaShorashim s.v. רכשAbout Ibn Janach argues for the first option.
  • Divrei HaYamim II 31:3 and 35:7 – These verses describe kings giving sacrifices from their רְכוּשׁ, presumably their animal possessions.

1. General Possessions

  • Biblical verses –
  • Additional data –

2. Livestock

  • Biblical verses –
  • Additional data –

Disputed Cases

Idioms

Relationship to Synonyms

Semantic Evolution

Intra-Biblical

Rabbinic Hebrew

Modern Hebrew

In Modern Hebrew, רְכוּשׁ is used to refer to property in general, as very little wealth is concentrated in animal holdings.