Dictionary:Changing Meanings/0

Lexical: Changing Meanings

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Within the Biblical Period

There are many words whose meaning might have changed from one period within Tanakh to another:

• בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל – In most of Sefer Bereshit¹ and the opening verses of Sefer Shemot² the term  refers to the sons of Yaakov, whereas afterwards it refers to the nation of Israel.  The turning point might be Shemot 1:9, which uniquely states "עַם בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל",‎³ perhaps to clarify that the people have become a nation.⁴  There are several cases in which the meaning of the term is ambiguous:
• Bereshit 32:33 "לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת גִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה" – See the debate in Bavli Chulin 100b whether this refers to something Yaakov's sons accepted upon themselves or whether this was a prohibition first commanded to the nation at at Sinai and placed in Sefer Bereshit to provide the reasoning.⁵
• Bereshit 36:30
• שבת
• חדש – In Torah the word refers to a month, while in Neviim it also takes on the meaning of "Rosh Chodesh", the first of the month.⁶
• חתן

Biblical vs. Rabbinic Hebrew

• אמה – In Tanakh, the word אמה means either maidservant (when spelled without a dagesh) or a unit of measure (when spelled with a dagesh). In Rabbinic Hebrew, it may be used to refer also to the forearm itself.
• See the dispute in Bavli SotahSotah 12bAbout the Bavli regarding the meaning of the phrase "וַתִּשְׁלַח אֶת אֲמָתָהּ וַתִּקָּחֶהָ" in Shemot 2:5, where one opinion suggests that the daughter of Paroh extended her arm, rather than sending her servant, to retrieve Moshe.⁷ Ibn Ezra Shemot First Commentary 2:5About R. Avraham ibn Ezrarejects this possibility noting both the missing dagesh⁸ and the fact that this usage is not found in Tanakh: "אמה מדה היא, כי הזרוע לא תקרא אמה".‎⁹ 
• בית – In Tanakh, this root generally refers to either a physical house¹⁰ or receptacle,¹¹ or a family or household.¹² In Rabbinic Hebrew it is also understood more narrowly to refer specifically to a wife.¹³
• See Sifra Vayikra 16:32 and Mishna Yoma 1:1Yoma 1:1About the Mishna who adopt this later meaning to Vayikra 16, explaining, "וְכִפֶּר בַּעֲדוֹ וּבְעַד בֵּיתוֹ" to mean "and he will atone for himself and his wife".
• See also Lekach TovShemot 1:1Esther 4:14About R. Toviah b. Eliezer and ChizkuniShemot 1:1Shemot 22:2About R. Chizkiyah b. Manoach on Shemot 1:1 who understand the phrase  "אִישׁ וּבֵיתוֹ בָּאוּ" to refer to Yaakov's sons and their wives. See, though, Ibn EzraShemot Second Commentary 1:1About R. Avraham ibn Ezra who argues against this reading, noting: "אין בית בכל המקרא אשה".
• גּוֹי – Though the Sages use this word to refer to a non-Jew,¹⁴ in Tanakh it simply means nation, and can even refer to the Nation of Israel.¹⁵ In his Sefer HaShorashim, RadakSefer HaShorashimAbout R. David Kimchi attempts to explain the change in usage, suggesting that when the Sages wanted to identify a person as a non-Israelite but did not know his nationality, they would refer to him as simply "גוי", so as to say that he was from a different nation.
• דָּמִֽים – In Tanakh this word is related to blood or life whereas in Mishnaic Hebrew it also takes the meaning of "money".¹⁶ 
• The later usage might have influenced the interpretation of RashbamShemot 22:1About R. Shemuel b. Meir and ChizkuniShemot 22:2About R. Chizkiyah b. Manoach to Shemot 22:1-2 who understand the phrases "אֵין/יש לוֹ דָּמִים" to mean "תשלומי דמים", perhaps combining the Biblical and Rabbinic usage of the term. 
• Cf. Ibn JanachSefer HaShorashim (דם)Sefer HaShorashimAbout R. Yonah ibn Janach who explains similarly, claiming that the verse in Shemot and the parallel phrase "אֵין לוֹ דָּם" in Bemidbar 35:27 both mean ransom. He further claims that the phrase in Tehillim 72:14, "וְיֵיקַר דָּמָם בְּעֵינָיו" means not life but value or worth.
• ה״א הקריאה – Contrast Ibn EzraBemidbar 15:15Esther Second Commentary 1:2About R. Avraham ibn Ezra on Bemidbar 15:15 who claims that there is no such thing as a "ה״א לקריאה" in Biblical Hebrew¹⁷ with Ibn BalaamBemidbar 15:15About R. Yehuda ibn Balaam who suggests that though rare, it does exist.   As examples, Ibn Balaam points to Bemidbar 15:15, Yirmeyahu 2:31, Mikhah 2:7 and Shir HaShirim 8:13.
  
• חותן/חותנת and חם/חמות – Biblical Hebrew distinguishes between a father-in-law on the husband and wife's side, using distinct terms for each.  The wife's father is referred to as a חותן,‎¹⁸ while the husband's father is referred to as a חם.‎¹⁹ Rabbinic Hebrew, in contrast, does not preserve the distinction and uses the terms חם and חמות to refer also to the parents of the wife.²⁰  For further discussion, see חֹתֵן / חֹתֶנֶת.
• כל – In Biblical Hebrew the word "" can mean either all or "most".
• מלאך – In Biblical Hebrew "מַלְאָךְ" refers to any type of messenger,²¹ not specifically an angel. Divine messengers are singled out by the terms "מַלְאַךְ אֱלֹהִים" or "'מַלְאַךְ ה".‎²²  In Rabbinic Hebrew, in contrast, "מַלְאָךְ" takes on the much more specific connotation of "angel".²³ Tanakh's broader definition of the word allows for ambiguity and in several cases, commentators debate what type of messenger is referred to:
• See the discussion in Avraham's Guests – Angels or Men regarding the identity of the "מלאכים" / "אנשים" in Bereshit 18-19.
• See also Ralbag Shofetim 6:11Shofetim 13:16Bereshit Beur HaMilot 16:7Bereshit Beur HaMilot 21:17Bereshit Beur HaMilot 32:2About R. Levi b. Gershomregarding the "מלאך" who appeared to Hagar in both Bereshit 16 and 21, those who meet Yaakov in Bereshit 32:2, and those that appeared to Gidon and to Manoach's wife and many others.  In each case Ralbag suggests that the verse refers to a prophet of Hashem.²⁴
• מס – Hoil MosheShemot 1:11Bemidbar 31:28About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi points out that "מס" in Tanakh refers to a labor tax rather than a monetary one,²⁵ noting that the Biblical term for a monetary tribute is מנחה  or מכס. 
• This relates to a dispute among commentators regarding how to understand the role of the "tax officers" mentioned in Shemot 1:11. Though many assume this refers to those who oversaw the forced labor, RalbagShemot Beur HaMilot 1:11About R. Levi b. Gershom suggests it refers to collection of a fiscal payment (as per the later usage of the word).  Ralbag opines that only those who could not afford the monetary fine were forced to labor for Paroh. See discussion in Who was Enslaved in Egypt.
• מקום – Ibn EzraBereshit First Commentary 28:11Esther First Commentary IntroductionAbout R. Avraham ibn Ezra notes that in Tanakh, the word "מקום" never refers to Hashem and always connotes a location.  It is only the Sages who use the term to refer also to Hashem due to his omnipresence.²⁶
• This leads Ibn EzraBereshit First Commentary 28:11About R. Avraham ibn Ezra to reject the Midrashic interpretation²⁷ that the phrase "וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם" in Bereshit 28:11 means that Yaakov prayed to Hashem.
• Ibn EzraEsther First Commentary IntroductionAbout R. Avraham ibn Ezra similarly objects to those who explain²⁸ that Esther 4:14, "רֶוַח וְהַצָּלָה יַעֲמוֹד לַיְּהוּדִים מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר", refers to Hashem's salvation
• עולם – Ibn EzraKohelet 3:11Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7About R. Avraham ibn Ezra notes that throughout Tanakh the word "עוֹלָם" is a marker of time, connoting a long duration or eternity. It is only in Rabbinic sources that the word takes on the extra meaning of "world".²⁹ [In Tanakh, the word used to describe the world is "תֵּבֵל".]
• As such, he claims that when explaining verses which can sustain both meanings (see Tehillim 66:7, Tehillim 89:3, Mishlei 10:24-25 and Kohelet 3:11),³⁰ the prevalent meaning of "eternity" should be adopted.
• עַם הָאָרֶץ – In Rabbinic Hebrew this term refers to an individual who does not have much Torah knowledge or is not careful in keeping the laws of purity or tithing.³¹  In Tanakh, in contrast, the term does not have a derogatory meaning and refers to a group rather than an individual, speaking of those living in the land. It is debated whether the term refers to the poorer masses or specifically to the higher classes, or if it is more general in nature.³²
• צדקה - Though, in Rabbinic sources, the word צדקה refers to charity and giving of alms, R"Y KaraDevarim 24:13-14About R. Yosef Kara notes that it never takes this meaning in Tanakh, but rather refers to justice or righteousness. [It is, thus, often paired with the word "משפט".]³³
• צדיק – In Rabbinic sources the word צדיק often refers to one who is extraordinarily righteous.  In Tanakh, though, it is possible that the word simply means innocent or just, but not exceptionally so.³⁴ The difference might affect one's understanding of several verses. 
• Was Noach saved because he was extremely virtuous, or was he simply the only upright, innocent individual of the time? See Ramban Bereshit 6:9Bereshit 6:9Bereshit 45:24About R. Moshe b. Nachman.
• Was Avraham asking that Hashem not destroy the righteous of Sedom, or only to not collectively punish the innocent? For discussion, see Avraham's Prayer for Sedom.
• רוב – In contrast to Mishnaic and modern Hebrew where "רוב" means "most" or a "majority",³⁵ in Tanakh the word consistently means abundance or many.³⁶ 
• The change in meaning might have influenced Bavli MegillahMegillah 16bAbout Bavli Megillah's reading of Esther 10:3, "כִּי מׇרְדֳּכַי הַיְּהוּדִי מִשְׁנֶה לַמֶּלֶךְ אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ וְגָדוֹל לַיְּהוּדִים וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו".  The Bavli suggests that the verse is highlighting that only most were pleased with Mordechai, while others were not. Contrast Hoil MosheShemot 1:11Bemidbar 31:28Esther 10:3About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi who explains the verse to mean: "ורצוי לאחיו הרבים". See Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו for more.
• שאול – Tanakh never speaks of distinct after-worlds for the righteous and wicked, and instead uses one term, "שאול", to refer to the place to which all the dead go,³⁷ being synonymous with either death itself, a grave, or perhaps the "underworld".³⁸  By Mishnaic times, a distinction between an afterworld for the righteous (גן עדן) and wicked (גיהנום) already exists and the term "שאול" comes to refer to the latter.‎³⁹
• See Ibn EzraBereshit First Commentary 37:35About R. Avraham ibn Ezra on Bereshit 37:35 who argues on these grounds against the Vulgate's translation of this verse which defines "שאול" as "hell".
• תורה – In Rabbinic Hebrew the word "תורה" refers to the Five Books of Chumash or a Torah scroll. In Tanakh, the term is more general, referring to a set of instructions, teaching or law. The difference in meaning might affect how commentators understand the several places in which there is a command to write or read " דִּבְרֵי / הַתּוֹרָה הַזֹּאת":
• Ceremony at Mt. Eval – Commentaors dispute what was written on the stones, the entire Torah, only the laws, the Decalogue, or the blessings and curses mentioned in the unit.
• Writing / reading of the "Torah" in Devarim 31 – Here, too, exegetes dispute both what Moshe wrote and what the king is obligated read during hakhel: the enitre Torah, Sefer Devarim or specific teachings therein.
• תשובה – Though in Tanakh one can "return to Hashem"⁴⁰ or "turn away from Hashem"⁴¹ the noun form "תשובה" is never used in this context. It, instead, refers to either a physical return from one place to another,⁴² a reply,⁴³ or the turn of the year.⁴⁴ In Rabbinic Hebrew, in contrast, the noun form is often used to refer to a spiritual return⁴⁵ (repentance) and phrases like "לַעֲשׁוֹת תְּשׁוּבָה", "בעל תשובה" or "לחזור בתשובה" appear.

Biblical vs. Modern Hebrew

• בירה – Though today, "בירה" is used to refer to a capital city, in Biblical Hebrew the word generally means simply palace or fortress,⁴⁶ related to the Akkadian "birtu".
• The later usage of the term has influenced many to understand the phrase "שושן הבירה" throughout Megillat Esther to mean "Shushan, the capital city".⁴⁷ See, though, Ibn EzraEsther First Commentary 1:2Esther Second Commentary 1:2About R. Avraham ibn Ezra (and R. Bachya Kad HaKemachAbout R. Bachya b. Asherin his wake) who point out that a distinction should be made between "שושן" or "העיר שושן", which do refer to a city, home to many Jews, and "שושן הבירה" which refers to the fortified castle. ⁴⁸

• דוד – Though today this can refer to an uncle on either the mother or father's side, see RashiYirmeyahu 32:12About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki⁴⁹ who notes that in Tanakh, the term is reserved for a father's brother.⁵⁰  [It also takes the meaning of beloved, as in Shir HaShirim]. 
• See Yirmeyahu 32:12 where Rashi attempts to explain how Chanamel can be  referred to as both Yirmeyahu's cousin and uncle,⁵¹ rejecting the possibility raised by some that he was Yirmeyahu's cousin on his father side and his uncle on his mother's side, claiming, "לא מצינו בכל המקרא אח האם קרוי דוד".‎⁵²  
• See also RadakAmos 6:10About R. David Kimchi⁵³ on Amos 6:10, who raises the possibility that the hapax legomenon "מסרף" in the phrase "דּוֹדוֹ וּמְסָרְפוֹ" might refer to an uncle on the mother's side (suggesting that the words דוד and מסרף are a pair).⁵⁴
• להתחתן – In Tanakh, in contrast to modern Hebrew, the parties who are "מתחתן" are the חֹתֵן (father⁵⁵ of the bride) and the חָתָן (son-in-law)⁵⁶ or the חֹתֵן (father of the bride) and the father of the groom,⁵⁷ not the husband and wife. The verb "להתחתן" is not used to describe the forming of the marital relationship between the bride and groom⁵⁸ as it was the father of the bride and not the bride herself who was the active party in the marital contract. This betrays the nature of marriage in Tanakh as the formation of an alliance⁵⁹ rather than a bonding of love.
• ירא א-להים – Today, this phrase is used to refer to a person who is a believing, God-fearing Jew, and focuses on the person's relationship to Hashem.  In Tanakh, though, it might also be used in the context of interpersonal relations, referring to someone's moral or ethical conduct.⁶⁰ ShadalShemot 1:15About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto suggests that the term might refer to anyone who fears even a false god, for someone who fears such a higher authority will have some sense of morality.  The difference in meaning might affect how one reads several stories:
• The Midwives – As the midwives are said to have "feared God" (Shemot 1:17), whether one understand the phrase to refer to having belief in Hashem or having a sense of morality will influence whether one suggests that they were Egyptian or Hebrew. See Who are the Midwives.
• Amalek - In speaking of Amalek's attack, Devarim 25:18 states, "וְאַתָּה עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ וְלֹא יָרֵא אֱלֹהִים".  Commentators debate whether the description "יָרֵא אֱלֹהִים" refers to Amalek or Israel, and, if the former, whether it describes the Amalekites' lack of ethics or disregard for God. See Annihilating Amalek.
•  מדבר – In modern Hebrew a "מדבר" is defined as an area with a hot, dry climate and less than 250 mm of precipitation a year. RadakYehoshua 8:15Yirmeyahu 12:12About R. David Kimchi⁶¹ points out that in Tanakh, in contrast, the term refers to grazing land, unfit for agriculture but well suited for shepherding.  He suggests that the word "מדבר" might relate to the root "דבר" meaning to lead (or shepherd).
• The difference in meaning affects how one thinks about the forty years in the wilderness.  Did the nation trek through barren, arid land, with intense heat and almost no water,⁶² or were the conditions considerably better, with pasture for their livestock?⁶³  See Life in the Wilderness.
• נִין וָנֶכֶד‎‎⁶⁴‎‎‎‎‎ – This pair of words appears three times in Tanakh,⁶⁵ always in this order.  As such, in context, the terms would appear to mean child and grandchild respectively,⁶⁶ or perhaps refer more generally to descendants (with no differentiation between the terms).⁶⁷ In modern Hebrew, in contrast, נין and נכד no longer take on the general connotation of "descendant", and the chronological order is reversed and moved down a generation, with נכד referring to a grandson and נין referring to a great-grandson.⁶⁸
• נצל - The הפעיל form of this verb (הציל) has maintained the meaning of to save or deliver until today, but the meaning of the פיעל and התפעל forms might have changed over time:
• The פיעל form appears in four places in Tanakh, but its meaning is ambiguous.  Based on the context, in three cases (Shemot 3:22, Shemot 12:35-36, and Divrei HaYamim II 20:25) the word appears to mean to strip or despoil,⁶⁹ while in a fourth case it appears to mean to "save".  Both possibilities stand in contrast to the modern usage of "to exploit". See Reparations and Despoiling Egypt for how the different understandings might affect how one reads the command to borrow / ask for vessels from the Egyptians.
• The התפעל form of "נצל" appears only once, in Shemot 33:6 where it appears to mean remove from one's self.⁷⁰ Today, in contrast, the word means to apologize.  Yaakov Etzion⁷¹ notes that the connotation of the verb has changed over the years. In medieval times it was used in the context of defending one's self against others' arguments (rather than acknowledging guilt),⁷² and it meant to save one's self or cast off blame (thus, somewhat in keeping with the biblical usge of the term). Only in modern times does it refer to the taking responsibility for one's actions and expressing regret for them.
• רגז – Today, this root relates to anger. See, though, RashbamBereshit 45:24Shemot 22:1Vayikra 16:10About R. Shemuel b. Meir who notes that in Tanakh it takes the meaning of "tremble" or "agitate",⁷³ and is paired with fear⁷⁴ rather than anger.⁷⁵
• Bereshit 45:24– The difference in usage might lie at the core of the debate between commentators over the meaning of Yosef's words to the brothers, "אַל תִּרְגְּזוּ בַּדָּרֶךְ".  While RashiBereshit 45:24About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki and Ibn EzraBereshit First Commentary 45:24Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7Esther Second Commentary 1:2About R. Avraham ibn Ezra suggest that Yosef is warning the brothers not to be angry with one another, RashbamBereshit 45:24About R. Shemuel b. Meir and RambanBereshit 45:24About R. Moshe b. Nachman claim that Yosef is telling the brothers not to fear robbers en route home.  See ShadalBereshit 45:24About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto who attempts to defend both readings, suggesting that the root "רגז" simply means tremble, and can thus take on the secondary meaning of any strong emotion.
• שופט – In modern Hebrew, a "שופט" serves solely in a judicial capacity.  In Biblical Hebrew, however, the verb "לשפט" might also refer to the execution of judgement, and the noun form has the broader connotation of "governor" or "savior" as well.
• The difference in meaning might influence how one perceives the various "שופטים" of Sefer Shofetim. Were they religious leaders or simply warriors who took vengeance on Israel's enemies?  See Hoil Moshe on Shofetim 10:4

¹ See Bereshit 42:5, 45:2 and 46:5. In several other verses () the meaning of the term is ambiguous.  See discussion below.

² The phrase "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" in Shemot 1:1 clearly refers to the sons of Yaakov but verse 7 is ambiguous and could refer either to Yaakov's sons or to the entire Israelite nation. This depends on whether the verse is still part of the opening summary of Sefer Bereshit (cf. Bereshit 47:27) or is referring to events after the brothers' death.

³ This is the only place in Tanakh in which this exact term is used and there are only two other places in Tanakh (Shemot 3:10, 7:4) where Hashem uses a similar term, "עַמִּי בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל".

⁴ See R. Hirsch on Shemot 1:1 and 9 who implies this.

⁵ Compare also R"Y Bekhor Shor, Radak and Ralbag's reading of the verse.

⁶ See, for instance, Shemuel I 20:5, Melakhim II 4:23, Yeshayahu 1:13, Yeshayahu 66:23, Yechezkel 45:17, Amos 8:5, and Tehillim 81:4.  The phrase "יוֹם הַחֹדֶשׁ" also refers to Rosh Chodesh and appears 4 times in Tanakh, once in Shemot 40:2, where it is accompanied by the clarification, "בְּאֶחָד לַחֹדֶשׁ", and in Shemuel I 20:34, Yechezkel 46:1 and 46:6.

⁷ The different possibilities relate to the question of how many people were aware of Moshe's true identity. If Paroh's daughter alone retrieved the baby, perhaps even the maidservants were unaware of his Israelite origins.

⁸ Others, such as RashiShemot 2:5About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki and R"Y Bekhor ShorShemot 2:5About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, note this as well.

⁹ ShadalShemot 2:5About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto makes the same point, but suggests one possible exception, the description of the size of Og's bed in Devarim 3:11, "עַרְשׂוֹ עֶרֶשׂ בַּרְזֶל הֲלֹה הִוא בְּרַבַּת בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן תֵּשַׁע אַמּוֹת אׇרְכָּהּ וְאַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת רׇחְבָּהּ בְּאַמַּת אִישׁ". He notes, though, that even in this verse the phrase "אַמַּת אִישׁ" might refer to the measurement rather than an actual arm.

¹⁰ See, for example, Bereshit 12:15, Bereshit 19:2, Bereshit 24:23 or Bereshit 33:17.

¹¹ See, for instance, Shemot 25:27, Shemot 26:29, Melakhim I 18:32, and Nechemyah 2:3.

¹² See, for example, Bereshit 7:1, Bereshit 35:2 or Bereshit 36:6.

¹³ See, for example, Bavli Shabbat 118bShabbat 118bAbout the Bavli.

¹⁴ See Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot 12:43, Mishna Avodah Zarah 2:6Avodah Zarah 2:6Avodah Zarah 4:8About the Mishna and 4:8Avodah Zarah 2:6Avodah Zarah 4:8About the Mishna, Tosefta Berakhot 6:18Berakhot 6:18About the Tosefta.

¹⁵ See, for instance, Bereshit 18:18, Bereshit 46:3, Devarim 26:5 or Yehoshua 4:1.  See also the debate in Sifre Devarim 32:28 regarding Devarim 32:28.  ShadalDevarim 32:43About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto goes further to suggest that even the plural form "גויים" in Devarim 32:43 might refer to the Nation of Israel.

¹⁶ See, for instance,  Mishna Maaser Sheni 1:5, Mishna Bava Metzia 5:3 and 5:9, and Mishna Bava Batra 2:7.

¹⁷ He writes, "כי לא ימצא בלשון הקדש, כי אם בלשון חכמים."

¹⁸ See, for example, Shofetim 19:4-9  It is possible that the term might refer also to a brother-in-law (or even another relative) as the term relates to the individual who contracts the marriage. [See Ibn Janach.] This bears on the identity of "חֹתֵן מֹשֶׁה" who is mentioned in many verses, but with reference to different individuals. See Yitro – Names and חֹתֵן / חֹתֶנֶת for elaboration.

¹⁹ See, for instance, see Bereshit 38:13, Bereshit 38:25 and Shemuel I 4:19-21.

²⁰ See, for example, see Mishna Demai 3:6Demai 2:2Demai 3:6About the Mishna, Pesachim 3:7Pesachim 3:7About the Mishna, Yevamot 1:1Yevamot 1:1About the Mishna, and Ketubot 1:5Ketubot 1:5About the Mishna.

²¹ See, for example, Bemidbar 20:14, Bemidbar 21:21,Devarim 2:26, or Yehoshua 6:25.

²² However, even in such cases, there ןעיא נק ambiguity as to whether an angel or human messenger  is referred to.

²³ It is possible that the change is usage is related to the increasing prevalence of the word "שליח" in Mishnaic times. This synonym never appears in Tanakh, but by Mishnaic times it is widespread, becoming the preferred word to express a human messenger, allowing for a narrower definition of "מלאך".

²⁴ Ralbag's reading is motivated by philosophical concerns, as he rejects the possibility that angels might be corporeal.  See R. Levi b. Gershom for more examples.

²⁵ The context of many verses would support this.  See, for instance, Shemot 1:11, Devarim 20:11, Yehoshua 16:10, Melakhim I 5:27, and Melakhim I 9:16 which all explicitly speak of a labor force. See also Shofetim 1:28-35 or Yeshayahu 31:8 which speak of people being taken as "מס".  One possible exception to this usage is Esther 10:1.

²⁶ See, for example, Mishna Taanit 1:7, Bavli Shabbat 12bShabbat 12bAbout the Bavli, Bavli Kiddushin 31bKiddushin 31bAbout the Bavli, or the many places which speak of "מצוות בין אדם למקום" such as Sifra Vayikra 16:30, Mishna Yoma 8:9Yoma 8:8-9About the Mishna, and Bavli Rosh HaShanah 17b.

²⁷ See Bavli BerakhotBerakhot 26bAbout the Bavli, and more explicitly, Bereshit Rabbah68:9About Bereshit Rabbah and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer35About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer.  This understanding is found already in PhiloOn Dreams That They are God-Sent I 63-71About Philo as well. Others understand "וַיִּפְגַּע" to mean "pray" while still maintaining the definition "place" for the word "בַּמָּקוֹם", translating the verse as "And Yaakov prayed in the place".

²⁸ See, for instance, Lekach TovShemot 1:1Esther 4:14About R. Toviah b. Eliezer.

²⁹ See, for instance, Mishna Berakhot 9:2Berakhot 9:2About the Mishna, Mishna Rosh HaShanah 1:2Rosh HaShanah 1:2About the Mishna, and Mishna Chagigah 2:1Chagigah 2:1About the Mishna.

³⁰ In each of these cases some commentators explain the word to mean "world" and others to mean "of long duration"

³¹ See, for example, Mishna Demai 2:2, Mishna Horayot 3:8 or Mishna Tahorot 7:1.

³² See S. Talmon, "תולדות עם הארץ בממלכת יהודה", Beit Mikra 12:3 (1967): 27-55 and A. Brawer, "עם הארץ כפשוטו במקרא", Beit Mikra 15:2 (1970): 202-206.

³³ Thus, though there is a commandment to give a tithe to the poor, to "open one's hand" to lend to the poor and forgive their debts (Devarim 15:1-8), and to support those who have become poor (Vayikra 25:35), no where is this referred to as "giving tzedakah".

³⁴ In several verses the word cannot easily be translated as an especially righteous figure.  See, for example, Avimelekh's words "הֲגוֹי גַּם צַדִּיק תַּהֲרֹג" in Bereshit 20:4, Devarim 25:1's warning to judges, "וְהִצְדִּיקוּ אֶת הַצַּדִּיק וְהִרְשִׁיעוּ אֶת הָרָשָׁע" and David's statement regarding Ishboshet, "אַף כִּי אֲנָשִׁים רְשָׁעִים הָרְגוּ אֶת אִישׁ צַדִּיק בְּבֵיתוֹ" (Shemuel II 4:11).

³⁵ See, for instance: Mishna Yevamot 12:2Yevamot 1:1Yevamot 12:2About the Mishna, "בגדול שהוא יכול להלוך בו או בקטן שהוא חופה את רוב רגלו חליצתה כשרה" and Mishna Ketubot 1:10Ketubot 1:10About the Mishna, "אם רוב אנשי העיר משיאין לכהונה הרי זו תנשא לכהונה".

³⁶ For some of many examples, see Yeshayahu 1:11: "לָמָּה לִּי רֹב זִבְחֵיכֶם יֹאמַר י"י", Yirmeyahu 30:14: "מַכַּת אוֹיֵב הִכִּיתִיךְ מוּסַר אַכְזָרִי עַל רֹב עֲוֺנֵךְ עָצְמוּ חַטֹּאתָיִךְ", and in Esther 5:11: "וַיְסַפֵּר לָהֶם הָמָן אֶת כְּבוֹד עׇשְׁרוֹ וְרֹב בָּנָיו".

³⁷ Several verses speak of even the righteous heading to "שְׁאוֹל", implying that it was not understood to refer to hell. See Yaakov's lament in Bereshit 37:35, "אֵרֵד אֶל בְּנִי אָבֵל שְׁאֹלָה", David's prayer in Shemuel II 22:6, "חֶבְלֵי שְׁאוֹל סַבֻּנִי קִדְּמֻנִי מֹקְשֵׁי מָוֶת", Chizkiyahu's prayer in Yeshayahu 38:10, "אֲנִי אָמַרְתִּי בִּדְמִי יָמַי אֵלֵכָה בְּשַׁעֲרֵי שְׁאוֹל פֻּקַּדְתִּי יֶתֶר שְׁנוֹתָי" and Yonah's cry, "וַיַּעֲנֵנִי מִבֶּטֶן שְׁאוֹל" in Yonah 2:3.

³⁸ Sheol is consistently described as a place to which one is lowered.  See, for example, "ה' מֵמִית וּמְחַיֶּה מוֹרִיד שְׁאוֹל וַיָּעַל" ,"גַּם הֵם אִתּוֹ יָרְדוּ שְׁאוֹלָה" or "הַעְמֵק שְׁאָלָה אוֹ הַגְבֵּהַּ לְמָעְלָה".

³⁹ See, for example,  Mishna Sanhedrin 10:3Sanhedrin 10:3About the Mishna, Tosefta Sanhedrin 13:1Sanhedrin 13:1About the Tosefta and Bavli Eiruvin 19aEiruvin 19aAbout the Bavli.

⁴⁰ For a few examples, see Devarim 4:30, Devarim 30:2 or Yirmeyahu 24:7.

⁴¹ See, for instance, Bemidbar 14:43 or Yehoshua 22:16.

⁴² See, for example, Shemuel I 7:17

⁴³ See Iyyov 21:34.

⁴⁴ See Shemuel II 11:1 or Melakhim I 20:22.

⁴⁵ For a few of many examples, see Mishna Yoma 8:9, Mishna Avot 4:11, or Tosefta Kiddushin 1:11.

⁴⁶ See Nechemyah 2:8, Divrei HaYamim I 29:1, and Divrei HaYamim I 29:19.

⁴⁷ See, for example, RashbamEsther 1:2About R. Shemuel b. Meir and R"Y NachmiasEsther 1:2About R. Yosef Nachmias on Esther 1:2.

⁴⁸

This distinction might impact one's understanding of several verses in the Megillah:

• Esther 1:5 – The second seven day party might have been only for those in the castle.  If so, in contrast to what is suggested by Esther Rabbah, there were likely very few, if any, Jews in attendance.
• Esther 2:5 – This verse might teach not that Mordechai lived in the city of Shushan, but that he had a position (and perhaps lived) in the palace even before Esther was taken.
• Esther 9:6 – This verse might refer to the killing of 500 supporters of Haman in the castle complex itself.

⁴⁹ See also Sefer HaShorashim of both Ibn Janach and Radak.

⁵⁰ See also OnkelosBereshit 21:23Vayikra 10:4Vayikra 20:20Vayikra 25:49Bemidbar 36:11About Targum Onkelos who consistently translates "דוד" as אַחְבּוּהִי and דֹדֵיהֶן as אֲחֵי אֲבוּהוֹן.

⁵¹ See Yirmeyahu 32:7,9 and 12.

⁵² Cf. ShadalShemot 1:15Shemot 2:5Shemot 3:1Devarim 32:43Yirmeyahu 32:12About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto brings an opinion that the word "דוד" in the verse should be understood as "ידיד". This understanding might relate to the usage of "דוד" to refer to a beloved.

⁵³ Ibn EzraBemidbar 15:15Kohelet 3:11Bereshit First Commentary 28:11Bereshit First Commentary 37:35Shemot First Commentary 2:5Amos First Commentary 6:10Esther First Commentary IntroductionEsther First Commentary 1:2Shemot Second Commentary 1:1Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7Esther Second Commentary 1:2About R. Avraham ibn Ezra brings this possibility in the name of R. Yehuda ibn Kuraish, but rejects it. See also Sefer HaShorashim of Ibn Janach.

⁵⁴ Others suggest that the word is a variant of "משרף" and refers to one who comes to burn a corpse so it does not rot.

⁵⁵ See the discussion above that this term might also refer to the brother of the bride, if he is the one contracting the marriage.

⁵⁶ See Bereshit 34:9, Shemuel I 18:22-27, Melakhim I 3:1.

⁵⁷ See Devarim 7:3 and Divrei HaYamim II 18:1.

⁵⁸ To describe the groom's taking of a wife, the verbs נשא or לקח are used instead.

⁵⁹ See, for instance, Shelomo's many marriages.

⁶⁰ For examples where this usage might be implied, see Bereshit 20:10-11, Shemot 1:17,Vayikra 19:14, 32, Devarim 25:18, and Iyyov 1:1. See N. Leibowitz, Iyyunim Chadashim BeSefer Shemot (Jerusalem, 1970): 32-33 and N. Sarna, Exploring Exodus (New York, 1986): 25-26, 120-121 who elaborate on this point

⁶¹ See also RashbamVayikra 16:10About R. Shemuel b. Meir and ShadalShemot 3:1About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto. Cf. R"Y Bekhor Shor Shemot 3:1About R. Yosef Bekhor Shorwho claims the opposite.  On Shemot 3:2, he explains that Moshe went specifically "אחר המדבר" to shepherd, "שבמדבר לא היה מרעה".

⁶² This fits the descriptions of desolation in Devarim 32:10 and Yirmeyahu 2:6.

⁶³ See Bemidbar 20:4-11 which suggests that the nation had livestock throughout the 40 years.

⁶⁴ For a comprehensive discussion of the evolution of the terms, see Sh. Sharvit,  "הנין יהנכד - מן המקרא ללשון ימינו" in 'עיוני מקרא ופרשנות ח (Ramat Gan, 2008): 165-174.

⁶⁵ see Bereshit 21:23, Yeshayahu 14:22 and Iyyov 18:19.

⁶⁶ See, for instance, the translation of Onkelos Bereshit 21:23About Targum Onkelosor Targum YonatanYeshayahu 14:22About Targum Yonatan (Neviim).

⁶⁷ See, for example, the SeptuagintBereshit 21:23About the Septuagint and R"Y Ibn Janach.

⁶⁸ In Tanakh, grandchildren and great-grandchildren are referred to as "שלש" and "רבע" (the third and fourth generations).‎ See Bereshit 50:23, Shemot 20:4, Shemot 34:7, and Devarim 5:8

⁶⁹ In Divrei HaYamaim the word is surrounded on both sides by the verb "בזז".

⁷⁰ Cf. "הוֹרֵד עֶדְיְךָ" in the previous verse

⁷¹ See his article, ‏"ארבע לשונות סליחה", מעמקים 31, תש"ע.

⁷² See Ramban

⁷³ See, for example, Yoel 2:10, Tehillim 18:8, Tehillim 77:19, and Iyyov 9:6.

⁷⁴ See, for example, Shemot 15:14, Devarim 2:25, Shemuel I 14:15, and Yirmeyahu 33:9.

⁷⁵ In Biblical Hebrew anger is expressed via the terms, "חרון אף", "קצף", or "חמה".