Difference between revisions of "Dictionary:Changing Meanings/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 36: Line 36:
 
<li>וַיַּעֲמֹד שָׂטָן עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיָּסֶת אֶת דָּוִיד (<a href="DivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 21:1</a>)&#160; – &#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary109-6" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary109-6" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 109:6</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakDivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakDivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 21:1</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> have the same dispute regarding this verse.<fn>In this case the meaning of the word is further clouded by the fact that in the parallel verse in <a href="ShemuelII24-1" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 24:1</a>, the incitement of David is attributed to Hashem and not to a "שטן" at all.</fn></li>
 
<li>וַיַּעֲמֹד שָׂטָן עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיָּסֶת אֶת דָּוִיד (<a href="DivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 21:1</a>)&#160; – &#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary109-6" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary109-6" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 109:6</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakDivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakDivreiHaYamimI21-1" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 21:1</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> have the same dispute regarding this verse.<fn>In this case the meaning of the word is further clouded by the fact that in the parallel verse in <a href="ShemuelII24-1" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 24:1</a>, the incitement of David is attributed to Hashem and not to a "שטן" at all.</fn></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
<li><b>רֹאֶה, נָבִיא,&#160;חֹזֵה</b> – Tanakh itself attests to the changing terms used to describe a prophet.&#160; See <a href="ShemuelI9-9" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 9:9</a>, " כִּי לַנָּבִיא הַיּוֹם יִקָּרֵא לְפָנִים הָרֹאֶה". The different terms might reflect varying conceptions of the prophet's main role.&#160; Was he primarily a "seer", foreteller of the future, or&#160; a spokesman,<fn>See Shemot 7:1, "רְאֵה נְתַתִּיךָ אֱלֹהִים לְפַרְעֹה וְאַהֲרֹן אָחִיךָ יִהְיֶה נְבִיאֶךָ", which from context would appear to mean that Aharon is to be the spokesperson.</fn> someone whose job it was to relay the word of Hashem?</li>
+
<li><b>רֹאֶה, נָבִיא,&#160;חֹזֵה</b> – Tanakh itself attests to the changing terms used to describe a prophet.&#160; See <a href="ShemuelI9-9" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 9:9</a>, " כִּי לַנָּבִיא הַיּוֹם יִקָּרֵא לְפָנִים הָרֹאֶה". The different terms might reflect varying conceptions of the prophet's main role.&#160; Was he primarily a "seer", foreteller of the future, or&#160; a spokesman,<fn>See Shemot 7:1, "רְאֵה נְתַתִּיךָ אֱלֹהִים לְפַרְעֹה וְאַהֲרֹן אָחִיךָ יִהְיֶה נְבִיאֶךָ", which from context would appear to mean that Aharon is to be the spokesperson.</fn> someone whose job it was to relay the word of Hashem or rebuke the people?</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</category>
 
</category>
Line 121: Line 121:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<li>&#160;<b>שֵׁכָר</b>&#160;– See&#160;<multilink><a href="HoilMosheBemidbar28-7" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe </a><a href="HoilMosheBemidbar28-7" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 28:7</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi</a></multilink>on Bemidbar 28:7 who suggests that the word "שכר" in Tanakh refers to a strong wine rather than an alcoholic beverage made of wheat (as per its later usage).<fn>For discussion of how the word has been used over time, see A. Shemesh, <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwj73syqrsHsAhUtsKQKHT3NC-EQFjAAegQIAhAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.herzog.ac.il%2Fvtc%2Ftvunot%2Fmega42_shemesh.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw2j8pFkv3pa5HyMcXU_7UiQ">"יין ושכר אל תשת: המונח 'שֵׁכָר' במקרא ובפרשנות הבתר-מקראית"</a>, Megadim 42 (2005): 15-25.</fn></li>
 
<li>&#160;<b>שֵׁכָר</b>&#160;– See&#160;<multilink><a href="HoilMosheBemidbar28-7" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe </a><a href="HoilMosheBemidbar28-7" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 28:7</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi</a></multilink>on Bemidbar 28:7 who suggests that the word "שכר" in Tanakh refers to a strong wine rather than an alcoholic beverage made of wheat (as per its later usage).<fn>For discussion of how the word has been used over time, see A. Shemesh, <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwj73syqrsHsAhUtsKQKHT3NC-EQFjAAegQIAhAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.herzog.ac.il%2Fvtc%2Ftvunot%2Fmega42_shemesh.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw2j8pFkv3pa5HyMcXU_7UiQ">"יין ושכר אל תשת: המונח 'שֵׁכָר' במקרא ובפרשנות הבתר-מקראית"</a>, Megadim 42 (2005): 15-25.</fn></li>
<li><b>שקע </b>– This word did not undergo a change in meaning form Biblical to Mishnaic times, but one of context. In both eras it means to sink, but only in the later period does it refer to the setting of the sun.&#160; Tanakh, instead, consistently uses the phrase "בָא הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ" and never "שקיעת החמה". Y. Etsion suggests that the difference relates to changing conceptions of sunrise/sunset&#160; - does one think of the sun as coming in and out or as rising and falling?</li>
+
<li><b>שקע </b>– This word did not undergo a change in meaning form Biblical to Mishnaic times, but one of context. In both eras it means to sink, but only in the later period does it refer to the setting of the sun.&#160; Tanakh, instead, consistently uses the phrase "בָא הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ" and never "שקיעת החמה". Y. Etsion suggests that the difference relates to changing conceptions of sunrise/sunset&#160; - does one think of the sun as coming in and out of its abode, or as rising and sinking into the sea (as it might appear from the perspective of one vieiwng it on earth)?</li>
 
<li><b>תּוֹרָה&#160; </b>– In Rabbinic Hebrew the word "תּוֹרָה" refers to the Five Books of Chumash or a Torah scroll. In Tanakh, the term is more general, referring to a set of instructions, teaching, or law.<fn>See, for example, its usage in <a href="Shemot12-49" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:49</a>,&#160;<a href="Shemot16-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 16:28</a> or <a href="Vayikra6-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 6:2</a>.</fn> The difference in meaning might affect how commentators interpret several verses:</li>
 
<li><b>תּוֹרָה&#160; </b>– In Rabbinic Hebrew the word "תּוֹרָה" refers to the Five Books of Chumash or a Torah scroll. In Tanakh, the term is more general, referring to a set of instructions, teaching, or law.<fn>See, for example, its usage in <a href="Shemot12-49" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:49</a>,&#160;<a href="Shemot16-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 16:28</a> or <a href="Vayikra6-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 6:2</a>.</fn> The difference in meaning might affect how commentators interpret several verses:</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 131: Line 131:
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Biblical vs. Modern Hebrew
 
<category>Biblical vs. Modern Hebrew
<p>Many modern Hebrew words might take on different meanings than their Biblical counterparts:</p><ul>
+
<p>Many modern Hebrew words might take on different meanings than their Biblical counterparts:</p>
 +
<ul>
 
<li><b>אָחֻז&#160;</b>– The meaning of this word has become narrower with time (and has shifted from verbal to noun form). In Tanakh it refers to taking a part from a whole, but not necessarily one from one hundred.<fn>See <a href="Bemidbar31-30" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 31:30</a>, where it speaks of taking one out of fifty, and&#160;<a href="DivreiHaYamimI24-6" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 24:6</a> where the word refers to taking an undefined portion.</fn> It is first in modern times that it comes to mean percent specifically.</li>
 
<li><b>אָחֻז&#160;</b>– The meaning of this word has become narrower with time (and has shifted from verbal to noun form). In Tanakh it refers to taking a part from a whole, but not necessarily one from one hundred.<fn>See <a href="Bemidbar31-30" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 31:30</a>, where it speaks of taking one out of fifty, and&#160;<a href="DivreiHaYamimI24-6" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim I 24:6</a> where the word refers to taking an undefined portion.</fn> It is first in modern times that it comes to mean percent specifically.</li>
 
<li><b>אֶמֶת </b>– In modern Hebrew אמת stands in contrast to שקר and means truth.&#160; In Biblical Hebrew, however, the meaning of the word is broader and includes also the connotation of being steadfast or faithful,<fn>See, for instance, <a href="Bereshit24-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 24:27</a>, 24:48-49 (and&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit24-48" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit24-48" data-aht="source">Bereshit 24:48</a><a href="RashbamEsther1-2" data-aht="source">Esther 1:2</a><a href="RashbamEsther3-8" data-aht="source">Esther 3:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBemidbar15-15" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 15:15</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 24:49</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentaryIntroduction" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary Introduction</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary 1:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary1-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-2" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary19-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 19:1</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary66-7" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherSecondCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther Second Commentary 1:2</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> there), <a href="Bereshit32-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:11</a>, <a href="Yehoshua2-12" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 2:12</a>, <a href="Yeshayahu16-5" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 16:5</a>,&#160;<a href="Tehillim91-3-4" data-aht="source">Tehillim 91:3-4</a> or <a href="Tehillim132-11" data-aht="source">Tehillim 132:11</a>.&#160; The context of many of these verses is the keeping of promises.&#160; In many, too, the word "אמת" is paired with "חסד" and might refer to Hashem's steadfast kindness.</fn> with "אֶמֶת" being synonymous with "נאמנות".&#8206;<fn>See the discussion and examples brought by S. Melzer, "משמעויות מקראיות מקוריות", Beit Mikra 18:3 (1973): 303-305.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> even suggests that the original root of the word is "אמן" where the nun was dropped.<fn>See&#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 24:49</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentaryIntroduction" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary Introduction</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary 1:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary1-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-2" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary19-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 19:1</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary66-7" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherSecondCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther Second Commentary 1:2</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> similarly, "והמלה מגזרת: אמונה, והתי״ו לשון נקבה".</fn></li>
 
<li><b>אֶמֶת </b>– In modern Hebrew אמת stands in contrast to שקר and means truth.&#160; In Biblical Hebrew, however, the meaning of the word is broader and includes also the connotation of being steadfast or faithful,<fn>See, for instance, <a href="Bereshit24-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 24:27</a>, 24:48-49 (and&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit24-48" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit24-48" data-aht="source">Bereshit 24:48</a><a href="RashbamEsther1-2" data-aht="source">Esther 1:2</a><a href="RashbamEsther3-8" data-aht="source">Esther 3:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBemidbar15-15" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 15:15</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 24:49</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentaryIntroduction" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary Introduction</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary 1:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary1-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-2" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary19-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 19:1</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary66-7" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherSecondCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther Second Commentary 1:2</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> there), <a href="Bereshit32-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:11</a>, <a href="Yehoshua2-12" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 2:12</a>, <a href="Yeshayahu16-5" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 16:5</a>,&#160;<a href="Tehillim91-3-4" data-aht="source">Tehillim 91:3-4</a> or <a href="Tehillim132-11" data-aht="source">Tehillim 132:11</a>.&#160; The context of many of these verses is the keeping of promises.&#160; In many, too, the word "אמת" is paired with "חסד" and might refer to Hashem's steadfast kindness.</fn> with "אֶמֶת" being synonymous with "נאמנות".&#8206;<fn>See the discussion and examples brought by S. Melzer, "משמעויות מקראיות מקוריות", Beit Mikra 18:3 (1973): 303-305.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> even suggests that the original root of the word is "אמן" where the nun was dropped.<fn>See&#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshitFirstCommentary24-49" data-aht="source">Bereshit First Commentary 24:49</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentaryIntroduction" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary Introduction</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherFirstCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther First Commentary 1:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary1-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary12-2" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 12:2</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary19-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 19:1</a><a href="IbnEzraTehillimSecondCommentary66-7" data-aht="source">Tehillim Second Commentary 66:7</a><a href="IbnEzraEstherSecondCommentary1-2" data-aht="source">Esther Second Commentary 1:2</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> similarly, "והמלה מגזרת: אמונה, והתי״ו לשון נקבה".</fn></li>
Line 148: Line 149:
 
</ul></fn></li>
 
</ul></fn></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
</ul><ul>
+
</ul>
 +
<ul>
 
<li><b>בטח&#160;</b>– Y. Etsion<fn>See the discussion in his article, "<a href="https://www.safa-ivrit.org/writers/etsion/bitahon.php">מה בין ביטחון לאבטיח</a>".</fn> suggests that though today this root is associated with stability and means to trust and rely upon another, it is possible that originally in Tanakh, like in Arabic today, it meant to fall (and only from there also to lean upon or to trust).<fn>See <a href="MelakhimII18-21" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 18:21</a>, "הִנֵּה בָטַחְתָּ לְּךָ עַל-מִשְׁעֶנֶת הַקָּנֶה הָרָצוּץ הַזֶּה, עַל-מִצְרַיִם אֲשֶׁר יִסָּמֵךְ אִישׁ עָלָיו, וּבָא בְכַפּוֹ וּנְקָבָהּ", where the root is associated with the terms "מִשְׁעֶנֶת" and "יִסָּמֵךְ".</fn>&#160; There are several verses in which the traditional understanding of "trust" is difficult, yet the definition of "fall" is appropriate:</li>
 
<li><b>בטח&#160;</b>– Y. Etsion<fn>See the discussion in his article, "<a href="https://www.safa-ivrit.org/writers/etsion/bitahon.php">מה בין ביטחון לאבטיח</a>".</fn> suggests that though today this root is associated with stability and means to trust and rely upon another, it is possible that originally in Tanakh, like in Arabic today, it meant to fall (and only from there also to lean upon or to trust).<fn>See <a href="MelakhimII18-21" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 18:21</a>, "הִנֵּה בָטַחְתָּ לְּךָ עַל-מִשְׁעֶנֶת הַקָּנֶה הָרָצוּץ הַזֶּה, עַל-מִצְרַיִם אֲשֶׁר יִסָּמֵךְ אִישׁ עָלָיו, וּבָא בְכַפּוֹ וּנְקָבָהּ", where the root is associated with the terms "מִשְׁעֶנֶת" and "יִסָּמֵךְ".</fn>&#160; There are several verses in which the traditional understanding of "trust" is difficult, yet the definition of "fall" is appropriate:</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 179: Line 181:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<li><b>מַחֲמָאָה</b> – This word appears only once in Tanakh, in <a href="Tehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a>.&#160; It is likely the source of the modern "מחמאה", meaning compliment, though the Biblical usage of the word might be somewhat different.&#160; In the verse, the phrase "חָלְקוּ מַחְמָאֹת פִּיו" is parallel to "רַכּוּ דְבָרָיו מִשֶּׁמֶן", leading&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, אמן</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, גוי</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashimחמה" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, חמה</a><a href="RadakBereshit32-33" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:33</a><a href="RadakYehoshua8-15" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 8:15</a><a href="RadakTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> and the commentary&#160;<multilink><a href="AttributedtoRashbamTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">attributed to Rashbam</a><a href="AttributedtoRashbamTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a><a href="Attributed to Rashbam" data-aht="parshan">About Attributed to Rashbam</a></multilink> to suggest that "מַחְמָאֹת" relates to חמאה, meaning butter or cream. The verse is saying that the person's speech was "smoother than cream".&#8206;<fn>According to this reading, the <i>mem</i> is not part of the noun itself, but instead means "more than" (as if written with a <i>tzereh)</i>. Others do raise the possibility that the <i>mem</i> is part of the noun, in which case "מַחְמָאֹת" is unrelated to "חמאה" and simply means flattery. If so, the shift in meaning is small and relates only to whether the word has a negative or positive connotation.&#160; For discussion, see E. Segal-Halevi, "<a href="http://tora.us.fm/tnk1/ktuv/thlim/th-55-22.html">מחמאה - מילה שנוצרה בטעות</a>".</fn>&#160; It speaks of false flattery rather than sincere compliments.<b><br/></b></li>
 
<li><b>מַחֲמָאָה</b> – This word appears only once in Tanakh, in <a href="Tehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a>.&#160; It is likely the source of the modern "מחמאה", meaning compliment, though the Biblical usage of the word might be somewhat different.&#160; In the verse, the phrase "חָלְקוּ מַחְמָאֹת פִּיו" is parallel to "רַכּוּ דְבָרָיו מִשֶּׁמֶן", leading&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim_2" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, אמן</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashim" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, גוי</a><a href="RadakSeferHaShorashimחמה" data-aht="source">Sefer HaShorashim, חמה</a><a href="RadakBereshit32-33" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:33</a><a href="RadakYehoshua8-15" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 8:15</a><a href="RadakTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> and the commentary&#160;<multilink><a href="AttributedtoRashbamTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">attributed to Rashbam</a><a href="AttributedtoRashbamTehillim55-22" data-aht="source">Tehillim 55:22</a><a href="Attributed to Rashbam" data-aht="parshan">About Attributed to Rashbam</a></multilink> to suggest that "מַחְמָאֹת" relates to חמאה, meaning butter or cream. The verse is saying that the person's speech was "smoother than cream".&#8206;<fn>According to this reading, the <i>mem</i> is not part of the noun itself, but instead means "more than" (as if written with a <i>tzereh)</i>. Others do raise the possibility that the <i>mem</i> is part of the noun, in which case "מַחְמָאֹת" is unrelated to "חמאה" and simply means flattery. If so, the shift in meaning is small and relates only to whether the word has a negative or positive connotation.&#160; For discussion, see E. Segal-Halevi, "<a href="http://tora.us.fm/tnk1/ktuv/thlim/th-55-22.html">מחמאה - מילה שנוצרה בטעות</a>".</fn>&#160; It speaks of false flattery rather than sincere compliments.<b><br/></b></li>
<li><b>משק&#8206;</b><fn>For discussion, see Y. Etsion, &#8207;."בן המשק הראשון", מעמקים 36, תשע"א</fn>– Today this word refers to running a farm, household or even to the economy as a whole, which leads many to naturally assume that the phrase "וּבֶן מֶשֶׁק בֵּיתִי הוּא דַּמֶּשֶׂק אֱלִיעֶזֶר" in Bereshit 15:2 refers to one who was in charge of administering Avraham's household. The word "", though, is a hapax legomenon and its original meaning is unclear.</li>
+
<li><b>משק&#8206;</b><fn>For discussion, see Y. Etsion, &#8207;."בן המשק הראשון", מעמקים 36, תשע"א</fn>– Today this word refers to running a farm, household or even to the economy as a whole, which leads many to naturally assume that the phrase "וּבֶן מֶשֶׁק בֵּיתִי הוּא דַּמֶּשֶׂק אֱלִיעֶזֶר" in Bereshit 15:2 refers to one who was in charge of administering Avraham's household. The word "מֶשֶׁק", though, is a hapax legomenon and its original meaning is unclear.</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>The modern understanding stems from Onkelos and Rashi's explanation of the verse which connects "משק" with the root "נשק", as in Bereshit 41:40's: "אַתָּה תִּהְיֶה <b>עַל בֵּיתִי</b> וְעַל פִּיךָ<b> יִשַּׁק</b> כׇּל עַמִּי".&#8206;<fn>Shadal basically comes to the same conclusion, but thinks the word stems fro the root "שקק", meaning to go to and fro.</fn> R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, suggests that "משק" is related to "משך" and refers to one who acquires, an inheritor.<fn>According to him, then, verses 2 and 3 are parallel.</fn> He compares the verse to Zephanyah 2:9, "מִמְשַׁ֥ק חָר֛וּל", which he understands to mean the acquisition of the "חרול".</li>
+
<li>The modern understanding stems from Onkelos and Rashi's explanation of the verse which connects "משק" with the root "נשק", as in Bereshit 41:40's: "אַתָּה תִּהְיֶה <b>עַל בֵּיתִי</b> וְעַל פִּיךָ<b> יִשַּׁק</b> כׇּל עַמִּי".&#8206;<fn>Shadal basically comes to the same conclusion, but thinks the word stems from the root "שקק", meaning to go to and fro.</fn> R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, suggests that "משק" is related to "משך" and refers to one who acquires, referring to an inheritor.<fn>According to him, then, verses 2 and 3 are parallel.</fn> He compares the verse to Zephanyah 2:9, "מִמְשַׁ֥ק חָר֛וּל", which he understands to mean the acquisition of the "חרול". A third possibility is raised (and rejected) by Shadal in the name of the scholar Quatremère&#160; who associates the word with "משקה", suggesting that Eliezer was a "שר המשקים", or butler.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<li><b>נִין וָנֶכֶד</b>&#8206;&#8206;<fn>For a comprehensive discussion of the evolution of the terms, see S. Sharvit,&#160; "הנין יהנכד - מן המקרא ללשון ימינו" in 'עיוני מקרא ופרשנות ח (Ramat Gan, 2008): 165-174.</fn>&#8206;&#8206;&#8206;&#8206;&#8206; – This pair of words appears three times in Tanakh,<fn>See <a href="Bereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a>,&#160;<a href="Yeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 14:22</a> and <a href="Iyyov18-19" data-aht="source">Iyyov 18:19</a>.</fn> always in this order.&#160; As such, in context, the terms would appear to mean child and grandchild respectively,<fn>See, for instance, the translation of <multilink><a href="TargumOnkelosBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Onkelos </a><a href="TargumOnkelosBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a><a href="Targum Onkelos" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Onkelos</a></multilink>or <multilink><a href="TargumYonatanYeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Targum Yonatan</a><a href="TargumYonatanYeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 14:22</a><a href="Targum Yonatan (Neviim)" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Yonatan (Neviim)</a></multilink>.</fn> or perhaps refer more generally to descendants (with no differentiation between the terms).<fn>See, for example, the&#160;<multilink><a href="SeptuagintBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Septuagint</a><a href="SeptuagintBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a><a href="Septuagint" data-aht="parshan">About the Septuagint</a></multilink> and R"Y Ibn Janach.</fn> In modern Hebrew, in contrast, נין and נכד no longer take on the general connotation of "descendant", and the chronological order is reversed and moved down a generation, with נכד referring to a grandson and נין referring to a great-grandson.<fn>In Tanakh, grandchildren and great-grandchildren are referred to as "שלש" and "רבע" (the third and fourth generations).&#8206; See <a href="Bereshit50-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 50:23</a>, <a href="Shemot20-4" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:4</a>, <a href="Shemot34-7" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:7</a>, and <a href="Devarim5-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:8</a></fn></li>
 
<li><b>נִין וָנֶכֶד</b>&#8206;&#8206;<fn>For a comprehensive discussion of the evolution of the terms, see S. Sharvit,&#160; "הנין יהנכד - מן המקרא ללשון ימינו" in 'עיוני מקרא ופרשנות ח (Ramat Gan, 2008): 165-174.</fn>&#8206;&#8206;&#8206;&#8206;&#8206; – This pair of words appears three times in Tanakh,<fn>See <a href="Bereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a>,&#160;<a href="Yeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 14:22</a> and <a href="Iyyov18-19" data-aht="source">Iyyov 18:19</a>.</fn> always in this order.&#160; As such, in context, the terms would appear to mean child and grandchild respectively,<fn>See, for instance, the translation of <multilink><a href="TargumOnkelosBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Onkelos </a><a href="TargumOnkelosBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a><a href="Targum Onkelos" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Onkelos</a></multilink>or <multilink><a href="TargumYonatanYeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Targum Yonatan</a><a href="TargumYonatanYeshayahu14-22" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 14:22</a><a href="Targum Yonatan (Neviim)" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Yonatan (Neviim)</a></multilink>.</fn> or perhaps refer more generally to descendants (with no differentiation between the terms).<fn>See, for example, the&#160;<multilink><a href="SeptuagintBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Septuagint</a><a href="SeptuagintBereshit21-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 21:23</a><a href="Septuagint" data-aht="parshan">About the Septuagint</a></multilink> and R"Y Ibn Janach.</fn> In modern Hebrew, in contrast, נין and נכד no longer take on the general connotation of "descendant", and the chronological order is reversed and moved down a generation, with נכד referring to a grandson and נין referring to a great-grandson.<fn>In Tanakh, grandchildren and great-grandchildren are referred to as "שלש" and "רבע" (the third and fourth generations).&#8206; See <a href="Bereshit50-23" data-aht="source">Bereshit 50:23</a>, <a href="Shemot20-4" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:4</a>, <a href="Shemot34-7" data-aht="source">Shemot 34:7</a>, and <a href="Devarim5-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:8</a></fn></li>
Line 193: Line 195:
 
<li>The&#160;התפעל form of "נצל" appears only once, in&#160;<a href="Shemot33-5-6" data-aht="source">Shemot 33:6</a> where it appears to mean remove from one's self.<fn>Cf. "הוֹרֵד עֶדְיְךָ" in the previous verse</fn> Today, in contrast, the word means to apologize.&#160; Y. Etsion<fn>See his article, &#8207;"<a href="http://www.daat.ac.il/daat/ktav_et/maamar.asp?ktavet=1&amp;id=859.">ארבע לשונות סליחה</a>", מעמקים 31, תש"ע.</fn> notes that the connotation of the verb has changed over the years. In medieval times it was used in the context of defending one's self against others' arguments (rather than acknowledging guilt),<fn>See <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Ramban Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 44:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> or&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">44:1</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 44:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> where he uses the term in this manner.</fn> and it meant to save one's self or cast off blame (thus, somewhat in keeping with the Biblical usage of the term). Only in modern times does it refer to the taking responsibility for one's actions and expressing regret for them.</li>
 
<li>The&#160;התפעל form of "נצל" appears only once, in&#160;<a href="Shemot33-5-6" data-aht="source">Shemot 33:6</a> where it appears to mean remove from one's self.<fn>Cf. "הוֹרֵד עֶדְיְךָ" in the previous verse</fn> Today, in contrast, the word means to apologize.&#160; Y. Etsion<fn>See his article, &#8207;"<a href="http://www.daat.ac.il/daat/ktav_et/maamar.asp?ktavet=1&amp;id=859.">ארבע לשונות סליחה</a>", מעמקים 31, תש"ע.</fn> notes that the connotation of the verb has changed over the years. In medieval times it was used in the context of defending one's self against others' arguments (rather than acknowledging guilt),<fn>See <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Ramban Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 44:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> or&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">44:1</a><a href="RambanBereshit20-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 20:12</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-35" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:35</a><a href="RambanBereshit44-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 44:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> where he uses the term in this manner.</fn> and it meant to save one's self or cast off blame (thus, somewhat in keeping with the Biblical usage of the term). Only in modern times does it refer to the taking responsibility for one's actions and expressing regret for them.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
<li><b>עָיֵף&#160;</b>– Today this word refers to being tired, while in Tanakh<fn>See discussion in Y. Etsion, "<a href="https://www.safa-ivrit.org/writers/etsion/tired.php">עייף ולא רוצה לישון</a>".&#160; He notes that in Rabbinic Hebrew, though more rare, evidence of this usage can be found as well. See, for instance, Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:2.</fn> it has a broader meaning, also referring to one who is thirsty (or hungry).<fn>See Ibn Janakh and Radak who both note this and point to several examples where the word "עיף" is parallel to words meaning dry or thirsty. See Yeshayahu 29:8, 32:2, Tehillim 63:2 or Mishlei 25:23.</fn> [The two meanings might be connected as thirst/ hunger is often connected to weariness.] The less well known usage might shed light on certain verses:</li>
+
<li><b>עָיֵף&#160;</b>– Today this word refers to being tired, while in Tanakh<fn>See discussion in Y. Etsion, "<a href="https://www.safa-ivrit.org/writers/etsion/tired.php">עייף ולא רוצה לישון</a>".&#160; He notes that in Rabbinic Hebrew, though more rare, evidence of this usage can be found as well. See, for instance, Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:2.</fn> it has a broader meaning, also referring to one who is thirsty (or hungry).<fn>See Ibn Janakh and Radak who both note this and point to several examples where the word "עיף" is parallel to words meaning dry or thirsty. See Yeshayahu 29:8, 32:2, Tehillim 63:2 or Mishlei 25:23.</fn> [The two meanings might be connected as thirst/ hunger is often connected to weariness.] The less well known usage might present a different take on verses which can sustain both meanings:</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>"וְאַתָּה עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ" – Though many assume that "עָיֵף" in this verse is parallel to "יָגֵעַ", Rashi and Ibn Ezra suggest that the verse refers to Israel's thirst, noting that Amalek attacked when he nation was in Refidim, without water.</li>
+
<li>"וְאַתָּה עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ" (Devarim 25)– Though many assume that "עָיֵף" in this verse is parallel to "יָגֵעַ", Rashi and Ibn Ezra suggest that the verse refers to Israel's thirst, noting that Amalek attacked when he nation was in Refidim, without water. see <a href="Annihilating Amalek" data-aht="page">Annihilating Amalek</a> for how this reading might impact one's understanding of the immorality of Amalek's actions.</li>
<li>"הַלְעִיטֵנִי נָא מִן הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה כִּי עָיֵף אָנֹכִי" – Ibn Ezra and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that here, too, the verse refers not weariness but thirst and hunger.</li>
+
<li>"הַלְעִיטֵנִי נָא מִן הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה כִּי עָיֵף אָנֹכִי" – Ibn Ezra and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that here, too, the verse refers not to weariness but to thirst and hunger, with R"Y Bekhor Shor suggesting that Ibn Ezra was literally starving and would soon die if he did not eat. This reading has important ramifications for how one evaluates Yaakov's actions in the episode. See <a href="Sale of the Birthright – A Fair Deal" data-aht="page">Sale of the Birthright – A Fair Deal</a>.</li>
<li>"תְּנוּ נָא כִּכְּרוֹת לֶחֶם לָעָם אֲשֶׁר בְּרַגְלָי כִּי עֲיֵפִים הֵם" – Similarly, Gidon requests that the people of Sukkot feed his army, not because they are tired, but because they are hungry.</li>
 
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<li><b>רגז</b> – Today, perhaps under the influence of Aramaic, this root relates to anger. See, though,&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit45-24" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit45-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 45:24</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> who notes that in the Hebrew sections of Tanakh<fn>It is only n the Aramaic sections of Ezra (5:12) and Daniel (3:13), that the root relates to anger or fury.</fn> it takes the meaning of "tremble" or "agitate",<fn>See, for example, <a href="Yoel2-10" data-aht="source">Yoel 2:10</a>, <a href="Tehillim18-8" data-aht="source">Tehillim 18:8</a>, <a href="Tehillim77-19" data-aht="source">Tehillim 77:19</a>, and <a href="Iyyov9-6" data-aht="source">Iyyov 9:6</a>.</fn> and is often paired with fear,<fn>See, for example, <a href="Shemot15-14" data-aht="source">Shemot 15:14</a>, <a href="Devarim2-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 2:25</a>, <a href="ShemuelI14-15" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 14:15</a>, and <a href="Yirmeyahu33-9" data-aht="source">Yirmeyahu 33:9</a>.</fn> not anger.<fn>In Biblical Hebrew anger is expressed via the terms: חרון אף, קצף, or חמה.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>רגז</b> – Today, perhaps under the influence of Aramaic, this root relates to anger. See, though,&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit45-24" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit45-24" data-aht="source">Bereshit 45:24</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> who notes that in the Hebrew sections of Tanakh<fn>It is only n the Aramaic sections of Ezra (5:12) and Daniel (3:13), that the root relates to anger or fury.</fn> it takes the meaning of "tremble" or "agitate",<fn>See, for example, <a href="Yoel2-10" data-aht="source">Yoel 2:10</a>, <a href="Tehillim18-8" data-aht="source">Tehillim 18:8</a>, <a href="Tehillim77-19" data-aht="source">Tehillim 77:19</a>, and <a href="Iyyov9-6" data-aht="source">Iyyov 9:6</a>.</fn> and is often paired with fear,<fn>See, for example, <a href="Shemot15-14" data-aht="source">Shemot 15:14</a>, <a href="Devarim2-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 2:25</a>, <a href="ShemuelI14-15" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 14:15</a>, and <a href="Yirmeyahu33-9" data-aht="source">Yirmeyahu 33:9</a>.</fn> not anger.<fn>In Biblical Hebrew anger is expressed via the terms: חרון אף, קצף, or חמה.</fn></li>

Version as of 22:33, 29 October 2020

Lexical: Changing Meanings

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

All languages evolve, and semantic shift can sometimes result in a word's modern meaning being radically different than its original usage.  Hebrew is no exception, as Ri writes, ""לשון התורה לחוד ולשון נביאים לחוד ולשון חכמים לחוד" (Tosafot Kiddushin 37bKiddushin 37bAbout Ba'alei HaTosafot). Words might take on one meaning in Torah, another in the Prophets and yet another in Rabbinic or modern Hebrew.  Often, one's familiarity with the contemporary usage of a word influences the way one interprets Tanakh, as one might not recognize that a word's definition might have evolved, becoming more narrow, more expansive, or changing totally.  Below is a listing of many terms whose meaning has shifted, with examples of how the changing definitions might have influenced different understandings of the Biblical text.

Changes Within the Biblical Period

There are several words whose meaning might have changed from one period within Tanakh to another:

  • אֲבָל – The meaning of this word has shifted over time, from meaning "indeed" or "verily" in the earlier book of Tanakh1 to meaning "but" in later books such as Daniel, Ezra and Divrei HaYamim.2
  • בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל – The connotation of this word has changed slightly over time, becoming more expansive in meaning. In Sefer Bereshit3 and the opening verses of Sefer Shemot4 the term  refers to the literal sons of Yaakov, whereas afterwards it refers to the nation of Israel.  The turning point might be Shemot 1:9, which uniquely states "עַם בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל",‎5 perhaps to clarify that the people have become a nation.6  There are a couple of cases in which the meaning of the term is ambiguous:
    • "לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת גִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה" (Bereshit 32:33) – See the debate in Bavli Chulin 100bChulin 100bAbout the Bavli whether this refers to a prohibition Yaakov's sons accepted upon themselves or whether this was first commanded to the nation at Sinai and placed in Sefer Bereshit only to provide the reasoning behind the command.7
    • "וַיַּשְׁבַּע יוֹסֵף אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל... וְהַעֲלִתֶם אֶת עַצְמֹתַי" (Bereshit 50:25) – It is ambiguous from this verse whether Yosef is speaking to his brothers or all their descendants (the nation). The difference relates to a larger question: Did Yosef assume that after his death, the family would immediately return to Canaan and take his bones with them, or was Yosef aware the nation was to remain in Egypt for centuries and was requesting that the nation remember him when redeemed?8
  • דָּת – ShadalDevarim 33:2About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto points out that the word "דָּת" is a Persian loan word, first appearing as an independent word in the Book of Esther, where it means law or decree. The term appears only once earlier in Tanakh, in Devarim 33:2, but only as part of a larger term "אשדת". The word is written as just one word "אשדת" but read as if written "אֵשׁ דָּת". This has led commentators to debate the term's meaning:
  • חֹדֶשׁ – It is possible that in Torah, "חֹדֶשׁ" refers to the full month,9 while in Prophets it also takes on the more specific meaning of "Rosh Chodesh", the first of the month.10 See, though, R. Moshe ibn ChiquitillaShemot Second Commentary 12:2About R. Moshe ibn Chiquitilla who claims that the primary meaning of "חֹדֶשׁ" in Torah is "Rosh Chodesh".11  The different possibilities might affect one's reading of several verses:
  • שַׁבַּת – It is possible that it is first in Prophets that the word "שַׁבַּת" refers to the seventh day of the week,15 while in Torah it refers to either a state of cessation,16 or the full week.17 When Torah speaks of the seventh day, it instead uses the terms "יּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי"‎18 or "יוֹם הַשַּׁבָּת".‎19
    • The meaning of the word has important implications for the debate regarding the meaning of the phrase "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת" in Vayikra 23:15, and hence the dating of both the bringing of the Omer offering and Shavuot. See MiMachorat HaShabbat for discussion.
  • שָׂטָן– In earlier books of Tanakh this word refers to any adversary or enemy, and not to a demonic being.20  In the later books of Zekharyah and Iyyov, in contrast, the word is used as a proper noun (prefaced by a definite article) and appears to refer to an independent  supernatural figure, Satan.21 In several instances, commentators debate whether the term takes on the earlier or later meaning:22
  • רֹאֶה, נָבִיא, חֹזֵה – Tanakh itself attests to the changing terms used to describe a prophet.  See Shemuel I 9:9, " כִּי לַנָּבִיא הַיּוֹם יִקָּרֵא לְפָנִים הָרֹאֶה". The different terms might reflect varying conceptions of the prophet's main role.  Was he primarily a "seer", foreteller of the future, or  a spokesman,24 someone whose job it was to relay the word of Hashem or rebuke the people?

Biblical vs. Rabbinic Hebrew

There are many words whose usage might have changed from the Biblical period to the Mishnaic period:25

  • אֶגְרֹף – This word appears in only two places in Tanakh (Shemot 21:18 and Yeshayahu 58:4 ), making it difficult to define. In his Sefer HaShorashim, Radak suggests that while the word means fist in Rabbinic Hebrew, in Tanakh it refers to a clump of earth,26 connecting it to the word "מֶגְרְפֹתֵיהֶם" in Yoel 1:17.27 RambanShemot 21:18About R. Moshe b. Nachman and R. D"Z HoffmannShemot 21:18About R. David Zvi Hoffmann, disagree, allowing for the possibility that the meaning of the word has not changed over time, and that in Tanakh, too, it means fist.28
    • "וְהִכָּה אִישׁ אֶת רֵעֵהוּ בְּאֶבֶן אוֹ בְאֶגְרֹף" (Shemot 21) – According to Radak's reading, "בְּאֶבֶן" and "בְאֶגְרֹף" are somewhat parallel terms, and the verse is simply giving two similar examples. According to Ramban, the verse is setting up a contrast, declaring that whether one smites with a tool that is likely to kill or one which is not, the same law applies.
  • אמה – In Tanakh, the word אמה means either maidservant (when spelled without a dagesh)29 or a unit of measure (when spelled with a dagesh).30 In Rabbinic Hebrew, it may be used to refer also to the forearm itself.
  • בֶּדֶק הַבַּיִת – As opposed to Rabbinic Hebrew, where "בדק הבית" refers to Temple maintenance or repairs, and "בדק" is understood in terms of inspection or fixing34 (as in the root's verbal form),35 in Tanakh "בֶּדֶק" means a crack or fissure,36 and "בֶּדֶק הַבַּיִת" refers to the breaches of the Mikdash.37 As such, when speaking of maintenance in Tanakh, the term is always accompanied by the verb "לחזק".
    • The change in meaning was a key factor in the debate over the authenticity of the so-called Yehoash Inscription. The relevant part of the inscription reads, "ואעש את בדק הבית", a usage which would have been anomalous in the time of Yehoash where בדק meant breaks rather than repairs.38
  • בָּיִת – In Tanakh, this root generally refers to either a physical house39 or receptacle,40 or a family or household.41 In Rabbinic Hebrew it is also understood more narrowly to refer specifically to a wife.42
  • גּוֹי – Though the Sages use this word to refer to a non-Jew,43 in Tanakh it simply means nation, and can even refer to the Nation of Israel.44 In his Sefer HaShorashim, RadakSefer HaShorashimAbout R. David Kimchi attempts to explain the change in usage, suggesting that when the Sages wanted to identify a person as a non-Israelite but did not know his nationality, they would refer to him as simply "גוי", so as to say that he was from a different nation.45 This later usage has influenced the midrashic interpretation of the following verse:
    •  "לָקַחַת לוֹ גוֹי מִקֶּרֶב גּוֹי" (Devarim 4:34) - Though the simple meaning of the verse is that Hashem took the nation of Israel out from Egypt, Pesikta Rabbati15About Pesikta Rabbati46 notes that Israel is referred to as a "גוי" because she behaved like a non-Jew (not being circumcised in Egypt).

Biblical vs. Modern Hebrew

Many modern Hebrew words might take on different meanings than their Biblical counterparts:

  • אָחֻז – The meaning of this word has become narrower with time (and has shifted from verbal to noun form). In Tanakh it refers to taking a part from a whole, but not necessarily one from one hundred.91 It is first in modern times that it comes to mean percent specifically.
  • אֶמֶת – In modern Hebrew אמת stands in contrast to שקר and means truth.  In Biblical Hebrew, however, the meaning of the word is broader and includes also the connotation of being steadfast or faithful,92 with "אֶמֶת" being synonymous with "נאמנות".‎93 RadakSefer HaShorashimAbout R. David Kimchi even suggests that the original root of the word is "אמן" where the nun was dropped.94
    • The two possible Biblical meanings of the word are highlighted when comparing two instances of the phrase "תּוֹרַת אֱמֶת".  In Malakhi 2:6, the context "תּוֹרַת אֱמֶת הָיְתָה בְּפִיהוּ וְעַוְלָה לֹא נִמְצָא בִשְׂפָתָיו בְּשָׁלוֹם וּבְמִישׁוֹר הָלַךְ אִתִּי" might suggest that the phrase refers to truth or honesty.95 In Tehillim 119:142, "צִדְקָתְךָ צֶדֶק לְעוֹלָם וְתוֹרָתְךָ אֱמֶת, the parallel to "לְעוֹלָם" might instead support the meaning "steadfast", that Hashem's laws are constant and unchanging.
  • אֶפֶס – It is relatively recent that the word "אֶפֶס" is used to express the number zero,96  but it is not difficult to see how the modern word might have stemmed from the Biblical "אֶפֶס".  In Tanakh the root relates to cessation.  As such, in noun form it often refers to the ends of the earth (as in the phrase "אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ")97 or more simply, it can mean nought (hence its choice as the number zero).98  In Tanakh the word is might also express "but",99 qualifying a previous statement.100
  • אֶקְדָּח – This word refers to a handgun in modern Hebrew, a usage obviously not found in the Biblical period.  The word appears only once in Tanakh, in Yeshayahu 54:12, "וְשַׂמְתִּי כַּדְכֹד שִׁמְשֹׁתַיִךְ וּשְׁעָרַיִךְ לְאַבְנֵי אֶקְדָּח". As the root "קדח" relates to burning or fire,101 the phrase "אַבְנֵי אֶקְדָּח" is understood by most commentators to refer to a fiery or sparkling stone such as a carbuncle.102  As such, it is understandable why Ben Yehuda suggested it when looking for a word to describe a pistol (something which "fires stones").103  Rashi Yeshayahu 54:12About R. Shelomo Yitzchakibrings an alternative understanding, that the verse speaks of a "מקדח",  a hollowed out stone.  This, though, is taking an anachronistic understanding of the root "קדח", as it is first in Rabbinic Hebrew that it takes on the meaning to bore a hole.104
  • בִּירָה – Though today, "בִּירָה" is used to refer to a capital city, in Biblical Hebrew the word generally means simply palace or fortress,105 related to the Akkadian "birtu".
  • בטח – Y. Etsion108 suggests that though today this root is associated with stability and means to trust and rely upon another, it is possible that originally in Tanakh, like in Arabic today, it meant to fall (and only from there also to lean upon or to trust).109  There are several verses in which the traditional understanding of "trust" is difficult, yet the definition of "fall" is appropriate:
  • דּוֹד‎111 – Though today "דּוֹד" can refer to an uncle on either the mother or father's side, see RashiYirmeyahu 32:12About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki112 who notes that in Tanakh, the term is reserved for a father's brother.113  [It also takes the meaning of beloved, as in Shir HaShirim]. 
    • See Yirmeyahu 32:12 where Rashi attempts to explain how Chanamel can be  referred to as both Yirmeyahu's cousin and uncle,114 rejecting the possibility raised by some that he was Yirmeyahu's cousin on his father side and his uncle on his mother's side, claiming, "לא מצינו בכל המקרא אח האם קרוי דוד".‎115  
    • See also RadakAmos 6:10About R. David Kimchi116 on Amos 6:10, who raises the possibility that the hapax legomenon "מסרף" in the phrase "דּוֹדוֹ וּמְסָרְפוֹ" might refer to an uncle on the mother's side (suggesting that the words  דוד and מסרף are a pair).117
  • "דָּת" – The word "דָּת" is a Persian loan word,118 which appears predominantly in Sefer Esther, and consistently means "law" or "decree".119 This stands in contrast to the word's prevalent usage today where it means "religion".120
  • חֹזֶה – While today this word refers to a contract, in Tanakh it refers to a prophet, or more literally a "seer".
    • The modern usage might stem from Yeshayahu 28:15, "כָּרַתְנוּ בְרִית אֶת מָוֶת וְעִם שְׁאוֹל עָשִׂינוּ חֹזֶה" where the definition "prophet" is somewhat difficult and the parallel to "בְרִית" implies that "חֹזֶה" might mean an agreement. See Shadal121 who notes the parallel, but attempts to maintain the regular meaning of the root "חזה", suggesting that "חֹזֶה" refers to an open, viewable (rather than sealed) document.122 He compares it to the term "הַגָּלוּי" (an open contract) in Yirmeyahu 32:11.123 Contrast Rashi who suggests that "חֹזֶה" of Yeshayahu stems from a totally different root, the word "מָחוֹז",‎124 meaning place or edge.125
  • להתחתן (חתן)‎126‎‎ – In Tanakh, in contrast to modern Hebrew, the parties who are "מתחתן" are the חֹתֵן (father127 of the bride) and the חָתָן (son-in-law)128 or the חֹתֵן (father of the bride) and the father of the groom,129 not the husband and wife. The verb "להתחתן" is not used to describe the forming of the marital relationship between the bride and groom130 as it was the father of the bride and not the bride herself who was the active party in the marital contract. This betrays the nature of marriage in Tanakh as the formation of an alliance131 rather than a bonding of love.
  • יָרֵא אֱ-לֹהִים  – Today, this phrase is used to refer to a person who is a believing, God-fearing Jew, and focuses on the person's relationship to Hashem.  In Tanakh, though, it might also be used in the context of interpersonal relations, referring to someone's moral or ethical conduct.132 ShadalShemot 1:15About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto suggests that the term might refer to anyone who fears even a false god, for someone who fears such a higher authority will have some sense of morality.  The difference in meaning might affect how one reads several stories:
    • The Midwives – As the midwives are said to have "feared God" (Shemot 1:17), whether one understand the phrase to refer to having belief in Hashem or having a sense of morality will influence whether one suggests that they were Egyptian or Hebrew. See Who are the Midwives.
    • Amalek - In speaking of Amalek's attack, Devarim 25:18 states, "וְאַתָּה עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ וְלֹא יָרֵא אֱלֹהִים".  Commentators debate whether the description "יָרֵא אֱלֹהִים" refers to Amalek or Israel, and, if the former, whether it describes the Amalekites' lack of ethics or disregard for God. See Annihilating Amalek.
  • לָחֶם  – The meaning of this word has become narrower over time. Whereas today it refers specifically to bread, in Tanakh it can also refer to any food or meal.133 As bread was the staple of the diet, all foodstuffs could be spoken of in terms of "לָחֶם".  This general understanding exists in English as well, in the term, "breaking bread,"   which refers to sharing a meal.
  • מִדְבָּר – In modern Hebrew a "מדבר" is defined as an area with a hot, dry climate and less than 250 mm of precipitation a year. RadakYehoshua 8:15Yirmeyahu 12:12About R. David Kimchi134 points out that in Tanakh, in contrast, the term refers to grazing land, unfit for agriculture but well suited for shepherding.  He suggests that the word "מִדְבָּר" might relate to the root "דבר" meaning to lead (or shepherd).
    • The difference in meaning affects how one thinks about the forty years in the wilderness.  Did the nation trek through barren, arid land, with intense heat and almost no water,135 or were the conditions considerably better, with pasture for their livestock?136  See Life in the Wilderness.
  • מַחֲמָאָה – This word appears only once in Tanakh, in Tehillim 55:22.  It is likely the source of the modern "מחמאה", meaning compliment, though the Biblical usage of the word might be somewhat different.  In the verse, the phrase "חָלְקוּ מַחְמָאֹת פִּיו" is parallel to "רַכּוּ דְבָרָיו מִשֶּׁמֶן", leading RadakSefer HaShorashim, אמןSefer HaShorashim, גויSefer HaShorashim, חמהBereshit 32:33Yehoshua 8:15Tehillim 55:22About R. David Kimchi and the commentary attributed to RashbamTehillim 55:22About Attributed to Rashbam to suggest that "מַחְמָאֹת" relates to חמאה, meaning butter or cream. The verse is saying that the person's speech was "smoother than cream".‎137  It speaks of false flattery rather than sincere compliments.
  • משק‎138– Today this word refers to running a farm, household or even to the economy as a whole, which leads many to naturally assume that the phrase "וּבֶן מֶשֶׁק בֵּיתִי הוּא דַּמֶּשֶׂק אֱלִיעֶזֶר" in Bereshit 15:2 refers to one who was in charge of administering Avraham's household. The word "מֶשֶׁק", though, is a hapax legomenon and its original meaning is unclear.
    • The modern understanding stems from Onkelos and Rashi's explanation of the verse which connects "משק" with the root "נשק", as in Bereshit 41:40's: "אַתָּה תִּהְיֶה עַל בֵּיתִי וְעַל פִּיךָ יִשַּׁק כׇּל עַמִּי".‎139 R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, suggests that "משק" is related to "משך" and refers to one who acquires, referring to an inheritor.140 He compares the verse to Zephanyah 2:9, "מִמְשַׁ֥ק חָר֛וּל", which he understands to mean the acquisition of the "חרול". A third possibility is raised (and rejected) by Shadal in the name of the scholar Quatremère  who associates the word with "משקה", suggesting that Eliezer was a "שר המשקים", or butler.
  • נִין וָנֶכֶד‎‎141‎‎‎‎‎ – This pair of words appears three times in Tanakh,142 always in this order.  As such, in context, the terms would appear to mean child and grandchild respectively,143 or perhaps refer more generally to descendants (with no differentiation between the terms).144 In modern Hebrew, in contrast, נין and נכד no longer take on the general connotation of "descendant", and the chronological order is reversed and moved down a generation, with נכד referring to a grandson and נין referring to a great-grandson.145
  • נַעַר – Though in modern Hebrew this word refers to a youth rather than an infant or adult, in Tanakh, it might refer to any of the three.146
  • נצל - The הפעיל form of this verb (הציל) has maintained the meaning of to save or deliver until today, but the meaning of the פיעל and התפעל forms might have changed over time:
    • The פיעל form appears in four places in Tanakh, but its meaning is ambiguous.  Based on the context, in three cases (Shemot 3:22, Shemot 12:35-36, and Divrei HaYamim II 20:25) the word appears to mean to strip or despoil,148 while in a fourth case it appears to mean to "save".  Both possibilities stand in contrast to the modern usage of "to exploit". See Reparations and Despoiling Egypt for how the different understandings might affect how one reads the command to borrow / ask for vessels from the Egyptians.
    • The התפעל form of "נצל" appears only once, in Shemot 33:6 where it appears to mean remove from one's self.149 Today, in contrast, the word means to apologize.  Y. Etsion150 notes that the connotation of the verb has changed over the years. In medieval times it was used in the context of defending one's self against others' arguments (rather than acknowledging guilt),151 and it meant to save one's self or cast off blame (thus, somewhat in keeping with the Biblical usage of the term). Only in modern times does it refer to the taking responsibility for one's actions and expressing regret for them.
  • עָיֵף – Today this word refers to being tired, while in Tanakh152 it has a broader meaning, also referring to one who is thirsty (or hungry).153 [The two meanings might be connected as thirst/ hunger is often connected to weariness.] The less well known usage might present a different take on verses which can sustain both meanings:
    • "וְאַתָּה עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ" (Devarim 25)– Though many assume that "עָיֵף" in this verse is parallel to "יָגֵעַ", Rashi and Ibn Ezra suggest that the verse refers to Israel's thirst, noting that Amalek attacked when he nation was in Refidim, without water. see Annihilating Amalek for how this reading might impact one's understanding of the immorality of Amalek's actions.
    • "הַלְעִיטֵנִי נָא מִן הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה כִּי עָיֵף אָנֹכִי" – Ibn Ezra and R"Y Bekhor Shor suggest that here, too, the verse refers not to weariness but to thirst and hunger, with R"Y Bekhor Shor suggesting that Ibn Ezra was literally starving and would soon die if he did not eat. This reading has important ramifications for how one evaluates Yaakov's actions in the episode. See Sale of the Birthright – A Fair Deal.
  • רגז – Today, perhaps under the influence of Aramaic, this root relates to anger. See, though, RashbamBereshit 45:24About R. Shemuel b. Meir who notes that in the Hebrew sections of Tanakh154 it takes the meaning of "tremble" or "agitate",155 and is often paired with fear,156 not anger.157
  • שופט – In modern Hebrew, a "שופט" serves solely in a judicial capacity.  In Biblical Hebrew, however, the verb "לשפט" might also refer to the execution of judgement, and the noun form has the broader connotation of "governor" or "savior" as well.158
    • The difference in meaning might influence how one perceives the various "שופטים" of Sefer Shofetim. Were they religious leaders, judges, or simply warriors who took vengeance on Israel's enemies?  See Hoil Moshe on Shofetim 10:4
  • שזף - Though today this root relates to suntanning, in Tanakh it means to see or look upon.159 The modern usage most likely stems from the verse, "אַל תִּרְאוּנִי שֶׁאֲנִי שְׁחַרְחֹרֶת שֶׁשְּׁזָפַתְנִי הַשָּׁמֶשׁ" (Shir HaShirim 1:6), which literally means "for the sun has looked down upon me"160 but nonetheless results in the beloved's becoming tanned.
  • שמלה – This word has narrowed in meaning over the years, from referring to a garment appropriate for either a man or woman,161 to one worn only by women.162
  • Body parts as metaphors – Though both Biblical and modern Hebrew have various body parts act as metaphors, they disagree regarding what is expressed by each part:
    • לב – In Tanakh the heart, rather than the brain, is home to thought and the intellect.163
    • כליות, כבד and מעיים – In Tanakh, it is the kidneys, intestines, and liver, which are home to emotions and affections.164
  • Directions and orientation – In modern times, people tend to orient themselves to the north, and so one's left would be to the west and one's right would be to the east.  In the Ancient Near East, in contrast, people oriented themselves towards the sun, and hence to the east.  Thus, in Tanakh, "קֶדֶם" (literally: forward) is not north, but east, "אָחוֹר" (literally: backward) is west, "יָמִין" is south, and "שְׂמֹאל" is north.