Difference between revisions of "Epilogue to the Manna Story/1/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<page type="Introduction">
 
<page type="Introduction">
 
<h1>Epilogue to the Manna Story</h1>
 
<h1>Epilogue to the Manna Story</h1>
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div>
+
<figure class="thumb"><a href="The Manna in Art" data-aht="page"><img src="/Media/2Shemot/16/The Manna in Art/deRoberti.jpg"/></a><figcaption>(<a href="The Manna in Art" data-aht="page">Click for this topic in art</a>)</figcaption></figure>
<h2></h2>
+
<h2>Expanding the Time Frame</h2>
<p>The bulk of Shemot 16 recounts the first week of the miracle of the manna, detailing how it rained down on regular weekdays, the double portion which was collected on Fridays, and that it didn't come on Shabbat.&#160; Toward the conclusion of the chapter, however, several verses detail events which concern the future:</p>
+
<p>The bulk of&#160;<a href="Shemot16-31-36" data-aht="source">Shemot 16</a> provides a log of the amazing events of the first week of the miracle of the manna: its raining down from the heavens on regular weekdays, the double portion of manna collected on Fridays, and its complete absence on Shabbat.&#160; The conclusion of the chapter, though, moves on to discuss events relevant only for the more distant future:</p>
<multilang style="overflow: auto">
+
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">&#160;(לב) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה זֶה הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מִמֶּנּוּ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם לְמַעַן יִרְאוּ אֶת הַלֶּחֶם אֲשֶׁר הֶאֱכַלְתִּי אֶתְכֶם בַּמִּדְבָּר בְּהוֹצִיאִי אֶתְכֶם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם. (לג) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה אֶל אַהֲרֹן קַח צִנְצֶנֶת אַחַת וְתֶן שָׁמָּה מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מָן וְהַנַּח אֹתוֹ לִפְנֵי י"י לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם. (לד) כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י אֶל מֹשֶׁה וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת. (לה) וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אָכְלוּ אֶת הַמָּן אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה עַד בֹּאָם אֶל אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת אֶת הַמָּן אָכְלוּ עַד בֹּאָם אֶל קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן.</q>
+
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">(לב) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה זֶה הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מִמֶּנּוּ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם לְמַעַן יִרְאוּ אֶת הַלֶּחֶם אֲשֶׁר הֶאֱכַלְתִּי אֶתְכֶם בַּמִּדְבָּר בְּהוֹצִיאִי אֶתְכֶם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם. (לג) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה אֶל אַהֲרֹן קַח צִנְצֶנֶת אַחַת וְתֶן שָׁמָּה מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מָן וְהַנַּח אֹתוֹ לִפְנֵי י"י לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם. (לד) כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י אֶל מֹשֶׁה וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת. (לה) וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אָכְלוּ אֶת הַמָּן אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה עַד בֹּאָם אֶל אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת אֶת הַמָּן אָכְלוּ עַד בֹּאָם אֶל קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן.</q>
<q xml:lang="en"></q>
+
<q xml:lang="en">(32) And Moses said: 'This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded: Let an omerful of it be kept throughout your generations; that they may see the bread wherewith I fed you in the wilderness, when I brought you forth from the land of Egypt.' (33) And Moses said unto Aaron: 'Take a jar, and put an omerful of manna therein, and lay it up before the Lord, to be kept throughout your generations.' (34) As the Lord commanded Moses, so Aaron laid it up before the Testimony, to be kept. (35) And the children of Israel did eat the manna forty years, until they came to a land inhabited; they did eat the manna, until they came unto the borders of the land of Canaan.</q>
 
</multilang>
 
</multilang>
<p>&#160;</p>
+
<p>When did these events take place, and at what point were these verses recorded?</p>
<ul>
 
<li><b>"מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מִמֶּנּוּ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת"</b> – In verses 32-34, Moshe speaks of Hashem's command to preserve a portion of manna for posterity, by storing it "לִפְנֵי ה'".&#160; Did this occur only on the eve of the nation's entry into the land, when it became necessary to commemorate the soon to be lost miracle, or did it happen where written, right when the phenomenon began?</li>
 
<li><b>"וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת"</b> – Verse 34 details Aharon's fulfillment of the command, and his placing of the manna "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת", the Torah's common designation for the Ark of Testimony.&#160; At this point of the story, however, the Tabernacle and Ark have not yet been built, so this event could not have occurred before the second year in the Wilderness.&#160; It is not clear, though, if it took place right after the building, or at some later point.&#160; In addition, what is the relationship between the terms "לִפְנֵי ה'" found in the directive and "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת" found here?&#160; Was the manna placed in two different places at different times, or are the terms identical and the verses speak of only one event?</li>
 
<li><b>"וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אָכְלוּ אֶת הַמָּן אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה"</b> – Verse 35 discusses the duration of the miracle, bringing the reader all the way to the fortieth year.&#160; Since <a href="Yehoshua5-10-12" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 5:10-12</a> teaches that the manna ceased falling only after crossing the Jordan, the verse might even be detailing events that took place after Moshe's death!&#160; Is that possible?</li>
 
</ul>
 
How much of verses 32-35 is an epilogue and how much of it occurred where written?&#160; To what time period is each verse really referring?
 
  
<h2></h2>
+
<h2>Cessation of the Manna</h2>
<p>Verse 35 and its description of the forty year duration of the miracle of the manna is the classic example used to prove that sometimes the Torah inserts achronological information so as to complete a story.<fn>See, for instance, Ibn Ezra on Shemot 12:50 and Ramban on Bemidbar 21:1 who both reference it as evidence when trying to suggest that other verses too come just "to finish the story".</fn>&#160; It is often overlooked, however, that the verse might not be limited to events of the fortieth year.&#160; The verse speaks of eating the manna until the nation's arrival at both "אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת" and to "קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן". &#160;What is the relationship between these two terms; do both refer to the settled land of Arvot Moav,&#160; both to Israel, or one and one?&#160; Is Moshe speaking only of events in his own lifetime, or also to those that happened after his death on the other side of the Jordan?&#160; On a textual level, if the terms are identical, what is the need the repetition?&#160; If not, what is the verse trying to say about the cessation of the manna?&#160;</p>
+
<p><a href="Shemot16-31-36" data-aht="source">Verse 35</a>&#160;and its description of the forty year duration of the miracle of the manna is the classic example used to prove that the Torah sometimes appends information which happened only significantly later so as to complete a story.<fn>See, for instance, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotLongCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra Shemot 12:50 </a><a href="IbnEzraShemotLongCommentary12-50" data-aht="source">Shemot Long Commentary 12:50</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>and&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Ramban Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="RambanBemidbar21-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 21:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> who both use it as a prototype for their suggestions that concluding verses in other stories also appear out of order for the purpose of "finishing the story" (להשלים הענין).&#160; See <a href="Chronological and Thematic Order" data-aht="page">Chronological and Thematic Order</a> for elaboration and other examples.</fn>&#160; Interestingly, this verse might even refer to events which go beyond the fortieth year, as it speaks of eating the manna until the nation's arrival at both "אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת" ("inhabited land") and "קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן" ("the border of the land of Canaan"). &#160;What is the relationship between these two terms; do they both refer to the land of Arvot Moav (east of the Jordan), both to Israel proper, or do they split between the two? &#160;If the terms mean the same thing, why the doubling?&#160; If not, when exactly did the manna cease?&#160; Is the Torah speaking here only about events which took place in Moshe's lifetime, or also about those which happened after Moshe's death and the crossing of the Jordan?</p>
  
 
<h2>Preserving the Manna</h2>
 
<h2>Preserving the Manna</h2>
<p>The achronology is not limited to the chapter's conclusion.&#160; Verse 34 speaks of Aharon's preserving of the manna by storing it "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת", the Torah's common designation for the Ark of Testimony.&#160; At this point of the story, however, the Tabernacle and Ark have not yet been built, placing this event no earlier than the second year. Here, too, though, the extent of the achronology is unclear.&#160; Did the event take place right after the building, or at some later point?&#160; Moreover, in Moshe's directive he speaks of placing the manna "לִפְנֵי ה'".&#160; Is that term identical to "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת" and speaks of the same event, or are they distinct and the manna might have been placed in two different places at two different times, perhaps even before the Tabernacle's construction?&#160;&#160; Finally, when would have been the most logical time to have set aside the manna&#160;– when the phenomenon first began, when there was a proper place for safe-keeping, or perhaps only at the eve of the nation's entry into the land, when it became necessary to commemorate the soon to be lost miracle?</p>
+
<p>It appears that at least part of&#160;<a href="Shemot16-31-36" data-aht="source">verses 32-34</a> is also out of chronological order.&#160; Verse 34 speaks of Aharon's preserving of an omer of manna by storing a jar of it "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת", a term used in the Torah<fn>See&#160;<a href="Shemot30-36" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:36</a> and <a href="Bemidbar17-19-25" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 17:19,25</a>.</fn> to describe the place of the Ark of Testimony ("אֲרוֹן הָעֵדֻת") and the Tablets of Testimony ("לֻחֹת הָעֵדֻת") contained therein.&#160; At this point, however, the Tabernacle and Ark had not yet been built, seemingly placing this event no earlier than the second year.<fn>This event could also have happened no later than the first of the fifth month of the fortieth year, since that is the date of Aharon's death.</fn>&#160; Here, too, though, the extent of the achronology is unclear:</p>
 
 
<h2>When was the Epilogue Written</h2>
 
When the Torah concludes a story by including a future event, when is that event recorded?&#160; Does Moshe receive all the information where it was supposed to be written and prophetically write it even before the event transpired, or does he add it in only after the fact?&#160; Did he do so immediately, or only at the end of the forty years?&#160; What about events that first happen after his death?
 
 
 
<h2>Textual and Philosophical Issues</h2>
 
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Why Aharon? – Why is Aharon specifically chosen to store the manna?&#160; Is this related to his role as priest or assistant to Moshe?</li>
+
<li>Did this occur immediately after the construction of the Mishkan, or only at some later point?&#160; When would have been the most logical time to have set aside the manna – when the phenomenon first began, when there was a proper place for safe-keeping, or perhaps only on the eve of the nation's entry into the land, when it became necessary to commemorate the soon to be ending miracle?</li>
<li>"קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן" versus "אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת" –&#160; What is the relationship between these two terms;&#160; do both refer to the settled land of Arvot Moav, both to Israel, or one and one?&#160; If the terms are identical, why the repetition?&#160; If not, what is the verse trying to say about the cessation of the manna?</li>
+
<li>Are Moshe's instructions in verses 32-33 communicated at the same time as their fulfillment in verse 34?</li>
 +
<li>Moshe's directive speaks of placing the manna "לִפְנֵי ה'&#8207;".&#160; Does that term have an identical meaning to "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת" and speak of the same event?&#160; Or is it possible that the terms have distinct meanings and that the manna was placed in different places at different times (one of which might even have perhaps preceded the Tabernacle's construction)?</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 +
 +
<h2>When was the Epilogue Written?</h2>
 +
In addition to the questions regarding when the events occurred, we must also consider the question of when the verses of the epilogue were recorded.&#160; Did Moshe, in the first year, prophetically write the entire chapter including its appendix even before some of these events transpired, or did he write about these events only after the fact?<fn>This question also depends on the Talmudic debate (<multilink><a href="BavliGittin60a" data-aht="source">Bavli Gittin</a><a href="BavliGittin60a" data-aht="source">Bavli Gittin 60a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>) over whether Moshe wrote the Torah piecemeal or all at once.</fn>&#160; Was Moshe, already in the first year, privy to the information that the Children of Israel would spend forty years wandering in the wilderness because of the Sin of the Spies?&#160; If verse 35 describes events that took place after the crossing of the Jordan, does that suggest that Moshe wrote also about events that took place after his death?
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Latest revision as of 10:29, 11 January 2020

Epilogue to the Manna Story

Introduction

(Click for this topic in art)

Expanding the Time Frame

The bulk of Shemot 16 provides a log of the amazing events of the first week of the miracle of the manna: its raining down from the heavens on regular weekdays, the double portion of manna collected on Fridays, and its complete absence on Shabbat.  The conclusion of the chapter, though, moves on to discuss events relevant only for the more distant future:

EN/HEע/E

(לב) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה זֶה הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מִמֶּנּוּ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם לְמַעַן יִרְאוּ אֶת הַלֶּחֶם אֲשֶׁר הֶאֱכַלְתִּי אֶתְכֶם בַּמִּדְבָּר בְּהוֹצִיאִי אֶתְכֶם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם. (לג) וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה אֶל אַהֲרֹן קַח צִנְצֶנֶת אַחַת וְתֶן שָׁמָּה מְלֹא הָעֹמֶר מָן וְהַנַּח אֹתוֹ לִפְנֵי י"י לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם. (לד) כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה י"י אֶל מֹשֶׁה וַיַּנִּיחֵהוּ אַהֲרֹן לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת לְמִשְׁמָרֶת. (לה) וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אָכְלוּ אֶת הַמָּן אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה עַד בֹּאָם אֶל אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת אֶת הַמָּן אָכְלוּ עַד בֹּאָם אֶל קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן.

(32) And Moses said: 'This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded: Let an omerful of it be kept throughout your generations; that they may see the bread wherewith I fed you in the wilderness, when I brought you forth from the land of Egypt.' (33) And Moses said unto Aaron: 'Take a jar, and put an omerful of manna therein, and lay it up before the Lord, to be kept throughout your generations.' (34) As the Lord commanded Moses, so Aaron laid it up before the Testimony, to be kept. (35) And the children of Israel did eat the manna forty years, until they came to a land inhabited; they did eat the manna, until they came unto the borders of the land of Canaan.

When did these events take place, and at what point were these verses recorded?

Cessation of the Manna

Verse 35 and its description of the forty year duration of the miracle of the manna is the classic example used to prove that the Torah sometimes appends information which happened only significantly later so as to complete a story.1  Interestingly, this verse might even refer to events which go beyond the fortieth year, as it speaks of eating the manna until the nation's arrival at both "אֶרֶץ נוֹשָׁבֶת" ("inhabited land") and "קְצֵה אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן" ("the border of the land of Canaan").  What is the relationship between these two terms; do they both refer to the land of Arvot Moav (east of the Jordan), both to Israel proper, or do they split between the two?  If the terms mean the same thing, why the doubling?  If not, when exactly did the manna cease?  Is the Torah speaking here only about events which took place in Moshe's lifetime, or also about those which happened after Moshe's death and the crossing of the Jordan?

Preserving the Manna

It appears that at least part of verses 32-34 is also out of chronological order.  Verse 34 speaks of Aharon's preserving of an omer of manna by storing a jar of it "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת", a term used in the Torah2 to describe the place of the Ark of Testimony ("אֲרוֹן הָעֵדֻת") and the Tablets of Testimony ("לֻחֹת הָעֵדֻת") contained therein.  At this point, however, the Tabernacle and Ark had not yet been built, seemingly placing this event no earlier than the second year.3  Here, too, though, the extent of the achronology is unclear:

  • Did this occur immediately after the construction of the Mishkan, or only at some later point?  When would have been the most logical time to have set aside the manna – when the phenomenon first began, when there was a proper place for safe-keeping, or perhaps only on the eve of the nation's entry into the land, when it became necessary to commemorate the soon to be ending miracle?
  • Are Moshe's instructions in verses 32-33 communicated at the same time as their fulfillment in verse 34?
  • Moshe's directive speaks of placing the manna "לִפְנֵי ה'‏".  Does that term have an identical meaning to "לִפְנֵי הָעֵדֻת" and speak of the same event?  Or is it possible that the terms have distinct meanings and that the manna was placed in different places at different times (one of which might even have perhaps preceded the Tabernacle's construction)?

When was the Epilogue Written?

In addition to the questions regarding when the events occurred, we must also consider the question of when the verses of the epilogue were recorded.  Did Moshe, in the first year, prophetically write the entire chapter including its appendix even before some of these events transpired, or did he write about these events only after the fact?4  Was Moshe, already in the first year, privy to the information that the Children of Israel would spend forty years wandering in the wilderness because of the Sin of the Spies?  If verse 35 describes events that took place after the crossing of the Jordan, does that suggest that Moshe wrote also about events that took place after his death?