Difference between revisions of "Esther's Relations with Achashverosh/1"
m |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
</multilang> | </multilang> | ||
<p>However, these verses speak only about marrying people from the Canaanite nations, and do not speak explicitly about Gentiles as a whole.<fn>Perhaps surprisingly, nowhere else in Torah either is the nation warned explicitly against marrying an idolater. R. Yishmael in Bavli Megillah and others do relate the verse "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ לֹא תִתֵּן לְהַעֲבִיר לַמֹּלֶךְ" to sexual misdemeanors, but limit it to a man having relations with a female idolater, irrelevant for the case at hand.</fn>  As such, it is unclear how to view Esther's marriage to Achashverosh.  Was it prohibited by the Torah or only by the later Rabbinic expansions of the law?<fn>Considering that the reasoning given for the prohibition of Devarim relates to the spouse's ability to sway one towards idolatry, it might be logical to conclude that marriage to other idolaters must also be prohibited. However, it might also be possible that not all intermarriages are viewed equally negatively.</fn>  If by the latter, was this enactment already in place at the time of Mordechai and Esther?</p> | <p>However, these verses speak only about marrying people from the Canaanite nations, and do not speak explicitly about Gentiles as a whole.<fn>Perhaps surprisingly, nowhere else in Torah either is the nation warned explicitly against marrying an idolater. R. Yishmael in Bavli Megillah and others do relate the verse "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ לֹא תִתֵּן לְהַעֲבִיר לַמֹּלֶךְ" to sexual misdemeanors, but limit it to a man having relations with a female idolater, irrelevant for the case at hand.</fn>  As such, it is unclear how to view Esther's marriage to Achashverosh.  Was it prohibited by the Torah or only by the later Rabbinic expansions of the law?<fn>Considering that the reasoning given for the prohibition of Devarim relates to the spouse's ability to sway one towards idolatry, it might be logical to conclude that marriage to other idolaters must also be prohibited. However, it might also be possible that not all intermarriages are viewed equally negatively.</fn>  If by the latter, was this enactment already in place at the time of Mordechai and Esther?</p> | ||
| − | <p>Furthermore, even if one posits that it is a Torah level prohibition, it is not certain whether relations with an idolater<fn>According to <multilink><a href="BavliMegillah13a" data-aht="source">Bavli Megillah</a><a href="BavliMegillah13a" data-aht="source">Megillah 13a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, Esther was married to Mordechai.  [On the verse, "לְקָחָהּ מׇרְדֳּכַי לוֹ לְבַת", R. Meir remarks: "אל תקרי לבת אלא לבית" (do not read 'as a daughter' but as a 'house').]  If so, sleeping with Achashverosh would constitute adultery, which according to everyone falls into the category of illicit relations for which one is obligated to forfeit one's life rather than transgress.</fn>‏ are included among the illicit relations for which one must forfeit one's life.<fn>See, for example, Ramban who explains that relations with an idolater is not considered "גילוי עריות" for which one would have to forfeit one's life.  He learns this from the fact that during the Bavli's discussion regarding forfeiting one's life rather than transgressing the three cardinal sins, it does not question Esther's relations on that basis, but only from the fact that the act was public.</fn>  On the other hand, according to the <multilink><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Bavli Sanhedrin</a><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 74a-b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, a public transgression can turn even a minor crime into a desecration of God's name.<fn>See Rav's statement in <multilink><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Bavli Sanhedrin</a><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 74a-b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> that a publicly made demand of even a change in custom regarding one's shoelaces ("אפילו לשנויי ערקתא דמסאנא" – medieval commentators provide various explanations of this term) would require one to forfeit one's life.</fn>   | + | <p>Furthermore, even if one posits that it is a Torah level prohibition, it is not certain whether relations with an idolater<fn>According to <multilink><a href="BavliMegillah13a" data-aht="source">Bavli Megillah</a><a href="BavliMegillah13a" data-aht="source">Megillah 13a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, Esther was married to Mordechai.  [On the verse, "לְקָחָהּ מׇרְדֳּכַי לוֹ לְבַת", R. Meir remarks: "אל תקרי לבת אלא לבית" (do not read 'as a daughter' but as a 'house').]  If so, sleeping with Achashverosh would constitute adultery, which according to everyone falls into the category of illicit relations for which one is obligated to forfeit one's life rather than transgress.</fn>‏ are included among the illicit relations for which one must forfeit one's life.<fn>See, for example, Ramban who explains that relations with an idolater is not considered "גילוי עריות" for which one would have to forfeit one's life.  He learns this from the fact that during the Bavli's discussion regarding forfeiting one's life rather than transgressing the three cardinal sins, it does not question Esther's relations on that basis, but only from the fact that the act was public.</fn>  On the other hand, according to the <multilink><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Bavli Sanhedrin</a><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 74a-b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, a public transgression can turn even a minor crime into a desecration of God's name.<fn>See Rav's statement in <multilink><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Bavli Sanhedrin</a><a href="BavliSanhedrin74a-b" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 74a-b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> that a publicly made demand of even a change in custom regarding one's shoelaces ("אפילו לשנויי ערקתא דמסאנא" – medieval commentators provide various explanations of this term) would require one to forfeit one's life.</fn>   Thus, Esther's very public marriage to Achashverosh, regardless of its severity under other circumstances, might have required her to forfeit her life rather than acquiesce.</p> |
<h2>Esther and Mordechai's Religiosity</h2> | <h2>Esther and Mordechai's Religiosity</h2> | ||
| − | How committed to Jewish law were Mordechai and Esther?  Though it is natural to assume that the two were not only observant Jews, but even leaders of the nation, a simple reading of the chapter may suggest that they were not particularly troubled by the king's decree.  There is no sign of resistance or struggle, and no mention of attempts to hide from or disobey the royal edict. Does this indicate that a "secular" Esther actually went to the king willingly, or are arguments from silence invalid? | + | How committed to Jewish law were Mordechai and Esther?  Though it is natural to assume that the two were not only observant Jews, but even leaders of the nation, a simple reading of the chapter may suggest that they were not particularly troubled by the king's decree.  There is no sign of resistance or struggle, and no mention of attempts to hide from or disobey the royal edict.  Does this indicate that a "secular" Esther actually went to the king willingly, or are arguments from silence invalid?  Were Esther and Mordechai happy or horrified when she was selected?  For a full discussion of the religiosity of each protagonist, see <a href="Mordechai's Religious Identity" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Religious Identity</a> and <a href="Esther's Religious Identity" data-aht="page">Esther's Religious Identity</a>. |
<notes> | <notes> | ||
Version as of 21:53, 21 March 2016
Esther's Relations with Achashverosh
Introduction
How Could She?
Chapter 2 of the Megillah describes how Esther was chosen to replace Vashti as Achashverosh's wife:
(טז) וַתִּלָּקַח אֶסְתֵּר אֶל הַמֶּלֶךְ אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ אֶל בֵּית מַלְכוּתוֹ בַּחֹדֶשׁ הָעֲשִׂירִי הוּא חֹדֶשׁ טֵבֵת בִּשְׁנַת שֶׁבַע לְמַלְכוּתוֹ. (יז) וַיֶּאֱהַב הַמֶּלֶךְ אֶת אֶסְתֵּר מִכׇּל הַנָּשִׁים וַתִּשָּׂא חֵן וָחֶסֶד לְפָנָיו מִכׇּל הַבְּתוּלוֹת וַיָּשֶׂם כֶּתֶר מַלְכוּת בְּרֹאשָׁהּ וַיַּמְלִיכֶהָ תַּחַת וַשְׁתִּי.
(16) So Esther was taken unto king Ahasuerus into his house royal in the tenth month, which is the month Tebeth, in the seventh year of his reign. (17) And the king loved Esther above all the women, and she obtained grace and favour in his sight more than all the virgins; so that he set the royal crown upon her head, and made her queen instead of Vashti.
The marriage has bothered many readers of the Megillah. How could Esther marry an idolater? Why did neither she nor Mordechai protest her being taken? In the words of R. Saadia Gaon:
It is necessary for us to understand why Mordecai did not resist (the removal of) Esther to Achashverosh's palace, since it is clearly stipulated in the Torah, "Do not give your daughter to his son or take his daughter for your son" (Deut 7:3). Though we might aver that he was absolved from guilt because he was forced, according to our Oral Law the use of force does not in fact absolve one from guilt in connection with the three sins of idolatry, sexual immorality, and the shedding of innocent blood.
R. Saadia's question is based on two assumptions:
1) Marriage to an idolater is a cardinal sin for which one is obligated to sacrifice one's life.
2) Mordechai and Esther were observant Jews who would have been bothered by such a transgression. Both assumptions, however, require further exploration.
Gravity of the Sin
The degree of severity of the sin in marrying Achashverosh is unclear. The Torah's prohibition of intermarriage can be found in Devarim Chapter 7:
(א) כִּי יְבִיאֲךָ י"י אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֶל הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַתָּה בָא שָׁמָּה לְרִשְׁתָּהּ וְנָשַׁל גּוֹיִם רַבִּים מִפָּנֶיךָ הַחִתִּי וְהַגִּרְגָּשִׁי וְהָאֱמֹרִי וְהַכְּנַעֲנִי וְהַפְּרִזִּי וְהַחִוִּי וְהַיְבוּסִי שִׁבְעָה גוֹיִם רַבִּים וַעֲצוּמִים מִמֶּךָּ....
(ג) וְלֹא תִתְחַתֵּן בָּם בִּתְּךָ לֹא תִתֵּן לִבְנוֹ וּבִתּוֹ לֹא תִקַּח לִבְנֶךָ. (ד) כִּי יָסִיר אֶת בִּנְךָ מֵאַחֲרַי וְעָבְדוּ אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים וְחָרָה אַף י"י בָּכֶם וְהִשְׁמִידְךָ מַהֵר.
And you shall not marry into them, your daughter you shall not give to his son, and his daughter you shall not take for your son.
However, these verses speak only about marrying people from the Canaanite nations, and do not speak explicitly about Gentiles as a whole.1 As such, it is unclear how to view Esther's marriage to Achashverosh. Was it prohibited by the Torah or only by the later Rabbinic expansions of the law?2 If by the latter, was this enactment already in place at the time of Mordechai and Esther?
Furthermore, even if one posits that it is a Torah level prohibition, it is not certain whether relations with an idolater3 are included among the illicit relations for which one must forfeit one's life.4 On the other hand, according to the Bavli Sanhedrin, a public transgression can turn even a minor crime into a desecration of God's name.5 Thus, Esther's very public marriage to Achashverosh, regardless of its severity under other circumstances, might have required her to forfeit her life rather than acquiesce.
Esther and Mordechai's Religiosity
How committed to Jewish law were Mordechai and Esther? Though it is natural to assume that the two were not only observant Jews, but even leaders of the nation, a simple reading of the chapter may suggest that they were not particularly troubled by the king's decree. There is no sign of resistance or struggle, and no mention of attempts to hide from or disobey the royal edict. Does this indicate that a "secular" Esther actually went to the king willingly, or are arguments from silence invalid? Were Esther and Mordechai happy or horrified when she was selected? For a full discussion of the religiosity of each protagonist, see Mordechai's Religious Identity and Esther's Religious Identity.
