Difference between revisions of "Giving One's Seed to Molekh/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Merge last two approaches)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<point><b>"מֹּלֶךְ"</b> – According to most of the commentators taking this approach, "מֹּלֶךְ" is the name of specific idol.<fn>The verse in <a href="MelakhimI11-7" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 11:7</a> calls the god of Amon "מֹלֶךְ", so Ibn Ezra suggests that perhaps this is the same god.</fn> However, Targum Neofiti translates "מֹּלֶךְ" as a name for idolatry in general.<fn>See also the discussions in the <multilink><a href="ToseftaSanhedrin10-4-5" data-aht="source">Tosefta</a><a href="ToseftaSanhedrin10-4-5" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 10:4-5</a><a href="Tosefta Sanhedrin" data-aht="parshan">About Tosefta Sanhedrin</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="YerushalmiSanhedrin7-10" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Sanhedrin</a><a href="YerushalmiSanhedrin7-10" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 7:10</a><a href="Talmud Yerushalmi" data-aht="parshan">About the Yerushalmi</a></multilink>, regarding whether the prohibition is limited to giving one's children to Molekh or also includes giving them to other gods.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>"מֹּלֶךְ"</b> – According to most of the commentators taking this approach, "מֹּלֶךְ" is the name of specific idol.<fn>The verse in <a href="MelakhimI11-7" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 11:7</a> calls the god of Amon "מֹלֶךְ", so Ibn Ezra suggests that perhaps this is the same god.</fn> However, Targum Neofiti translates "מֹּלֶךְ" as a name for idolatry in general.<fn>See also the discussions in the <multilink><a href="ToseftaSanhedrin10-4-5" data-aht="source">Tosefta</a><a href="ToseftaSanhedrin10-4-5" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 10:4-5</a><a href="Tosefta Sanhedrin" data-aht="parshan">About Tosefta Sanhedrin</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="YerushalmiSanhedrin7-10" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Sanhedrin</a><a href="YerushalmiSanhedrin7-10" data-aht="source">Sanhedrin 7:10</a><a href="Talmud Yerushalmi" data-aht="parshan">About the Yerushalmi</a></multilink>, regarding whether the prohibition is limited to giving one's children to Molekh or also includes giving them to other gods.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Context</b> – According to this approach, the prohibition against the Molekh is found in Vayikra 18 as one of the immoral actions done by the Egyptians and Canaanites.</point>
 
<point><b>Context</b> – According to this approach, the prohibition against the Molekh is found in Vayikra 18 as one of the immoral actions done by the Egyptians and Canaanites.</point>
<point><b>Parallel Verses</b> – According to this approach, Vayikra 18:21 is dealing with the same prohibition as&#160;<a href="Devarim12-31" data-aht="source">Devarim 12:31</a> and <a href="Devarim18-10" data-aht="source">18:10</a>. This could be proven from <a href="MelakhimII23-10" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 23:10</a>, "לְהַעֲבִיר אִישׁ אֶת בְּנוֹ וְאֶת בִּתּוֹ בָּאֵשׁ לַמֹּלֶךְ", which refers to both passing in fire and the Molekh as the same action.</point>
+
<point><b>Parallel Verses</b> – According to this approach, Vayikra 18:21 is dealing with the same prohibition as&#160;<a href="Devarim12-31" data-aht="source">Devarim 12:31</a> and <a href="Devarim18-10-11" data-aht="source">18:10</a>.<fn>Note that the prohibition of Molekh in Vayikra 20 is immediately followed (<a href="Vayikra20-1-6" data-aht="source">verse 6</a>) by the prohibition of אוב and ידעוני, just like in <a href="Devarim18-10-11" data-aht="source">Devarim 18:10-11</a>.</fn> This could be proven from <a href="MelakhimII23-10" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 23:10</a>, "לְהַעֲבִיר אִישׁ אֶת בְּנוֹ וְאֶת בִּתּוֹ בָּאֵשׁ לַמֹּלֶךְ", which refers to both passing in fire and the Molekh as the same action.</point>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category name="">General Idolatry
 
<category name="">General Idolatry
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<mekorot>Second version of <multilink><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Targum Neofiti</a><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 18:21</a><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra20-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:2</a><a href="Targum Neofiti" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Neofiti</a></multilink>, R. Yehuda in <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim171" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim</a><a href="SifreDevarim171" data-aht="source">171</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="MidrashTannaimDevarim18-9" data-aht="source">Midrash Tannaim</a><a href="MidrashTannaimDevarim18-9" data-aht="source">Devarim 18:9</a><a href="Midrash Tannaim" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Tannaim</a></multilink>, others in <multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 18:21</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<mekorot>Second version of <multilink><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Targum Neofiti</a><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 18:21</a><a href="TargumNeofitiVayikra20-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:2</a><a href="Targum Neofiti" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Neofiti</a></multilink>, R. Yehuda in <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim171" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim</a><a href="SifreDevarim171" data-aht="source">171</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="MidrashTannaimDevarim18-9" data-aht="source">Midrash Tannaim</a><a href="MidrashTannaimDevarim18-9" data-aht="source">Devarim 18:9</a><a href="Midrash Tannaim" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Tannaim</a></multilink>, others in <multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra18-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 18:21</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<point><b>"וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ"</b> – This opinion understands "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" to be referring to one's children.</point>
 
<point><b>"וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ"</b> – This opinion understands "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" to be referring to one's children.</point>
<point><b>"לְהַעֲבִיר"</b></point>
+
<point><b>"לְהַעֲבִיר"</b> – R. Yehuda understands "לְהַעֲבִיר" as an action which symbolizes a covenant (in this case with idolatry), as in Yirmeyahu 34:18. In contrast, the others in Ibn Ezra understand "לְהַעֲבִיר" to mean "transfer" (from Judaism to the Molekh religion).</point>
<point><b>"מֹּלֶךְ"</b></point>
+
<point><b>"מֹּלֶךְ"</b> – Targum Neofiti and R. Yehuda understand "מֹּלֶךְ" to be a general term, referring to all idolatry. In contrast, the others in Ibn Ezra understand "מֹּלֶךְ" to be a specific religion that one is converting one's children to.</point>
 
<point><b>Context</b></point>
 
<point><b>Context</b></point>
 
</category>
 
</category>

Version as of 23:23, 20 April 2015

Molekh

Exegetical Approaches

This topic is currently in progress

Child Sacrifice

The verse forbids burning one's children (or passing them through flames) for the Molekh.

"וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" – This opinion understands "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" to be referring to one's children.
"לְהַעֲבִיר" – According to this approach, "לְהַעֲבִיר" means passing through fire, although it is unclear whether the child is being passed between two bonfires (Rashi), passed through the flames (possibility in Ramban), or actual burning (Ramban).1 Conversely, "להעביר" may be a metathesis with "להבעיר", in which case the children were presumably actually burnt.2
"מֹּלֶךְ" – According to most of the commentators taking this approach, "מֹּלֶךְ" is the name of specific idol.3 However, Targum Neofiti translates "מֹּלֶךְ" as a name for idolatry in general.4
Context – According to this approach, the prohibition against the Molekh is found in Vayikra 18 as one of the immoral actions done by the Egyptians and Canaanites.
Parallel Verses – According to this approach, Vayikra 18:21 is dealing with the same prohibition as Devarim 12:31 and 18:10.5 This could be proven from Melakhim II 23:10, "לְהַעֲבִיר אִישׁ אֶת בְּנוֹ וְאֶת בִּתּוֹ בָּאֵשׁ לַמֹּלֶךְ", which refers to both passing in fire and the Molekh as the same action.

General Idolatry

The verse forbids giving one's children to become priests for idolatry.

"וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" – This opinion understands "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" to be referring to one's children.
"לְהַעֲבִיר" – R. Yehuda understands "לְהַעֲבִיר" as an action which symbolizes a covenant (in this case with idolatry), as in Yirmeyahu 34:18. In contrast, the others in Ibn Ezra understand "לְהַעֲבִיר" to mean "transfer" (from Judaism to the Molekh religion).
"מֹּלֶךְ" – Targum Neofiti and R. Yehuda understand "מֹּלֶךְ" to be a general term, referring to all idolatry. In contrast, the others in Ibn Ezra understand "מֹּלֶךְ" to be a specific religion that one is converting one's children to.
Context

Intermarriage

The verse forbids either sexual relations with a non-Jewish woman, or marrying one's daughters (or sisters) to non-Jewish men.

Who is intermarrying? Jubilees prohibits the father or brother of a girl from marrying her to a non-Jew.7 In contrast, the other commentators understand the prohibition to be referring to the man himself, prohibiting him from having sexual relations with a non-Jewish woman.
Why is there a prohibition? Jubilees understands the reasoning behind the prohibition to be an issue of intermarriage. However, Sifre Devarim and R. Yishmael emphasize the children that are born from a union between a Jew and non-Jew, and how they will become "אויבים למקום" (enemies of God).
"וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" – According to Jubilees, Sifre Devarim, and R. Yishmael, "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" refers to one's children, either those one marries to non-Jewish woman, or those born of the non-Jewish woman. However, it is possible that the other commentators understand "וּמִזַּרְעֲךָ" to be referring to one's semen.8
"לְהַעֲבִיר" – The Peshitta translates "לְהַעֲבִיר" as "למבטנו" (‎"לעבר", to impregnate).9
"מֹּלֶךְ" – Targum Pseudo-Jonathan seems to understand "מֹּלֶךְ" to be a general term, referring to all idolatry.10
Context – According to this approach, it is clear why this verse is found in the middle of the list of sexual offenses in Vayikra 18.
Parallel Verses – The Sifre Devarim and R. Yishmael in Midrash Tannaim seem to understand "מַעֲבִיר בְּנוֹ וּבִתּוֹ בָּאֵשׁ" in Devarim 18:10 to also refer to intermarriage, although it is unclear what "בָּאֵשׁ" would mean.