View source for Hagar – How Many Pregnancies/2

<aht-xml>

<page type="Approaches">
<h1>Hagar – How Many Pregnancies?</h1>
<!--
<div class="overview">
<h2>Overview</h2>
<p></p>
<continue>
<p></p>
</continue>
</div>
-->
<p>Commentators present two basic approaches to understanding the words "הִנָּךְ הָרָה" and Hagar's state:</p>
<approaches>
<category name="">Hagar had Miscarried
<p>Sarai had cast an evil eye upon Hagar causing her to miscarry. The angel, thus, informs her that if she returns to Avram she will conceive once again and bear a child.</p>
<mekorot>
	<multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah45-5" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah45-5" data-aht="source">45:5</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, 
	<multilink><a href="RashiBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit16-5" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:5</a><a href="RashiBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="RashiYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>
</mekorot>
	<point><b>Omnisignificance</b> – This approach is motivated by the seeming superfluity in the angel's comments. The Midrash views all words of the Biblical text as pregnant with meaning, leaving no room for redundancies.</point>
	<point><b>Tense of "הִנָּךְ הָרָה"</b> – This position assumes that the phrase is referring to a future event, and the angel is telling Hagar that she will become pregnant after returning home. As הנה clauses always take present tense verbs even when they refer to the immediate future, the fact that "הָרָה" is the present form of the participle does not preclude this read.<fn> See <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. S.D. Luzzatto</a></multilink> who points out that within two verses in Shofetim 13:3-5, the word "הנה" refers once to the immediate future ("הִנָּךְ הָרָה") and once to the present ("הִנֵּה נָא אַתְּ עֲקָרָה"). For other cases where a הנה clause is followed by the present form of the verb even though it clearly refers to a future action, see <a href="Bereshit6-17" data-aht="source">Bereshit 6:17</a>, <a href="Devarim31-16" data-aht="source">Devarim 31:16</a> and <a href="MelakhimI22-25" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 22:25</a>.
	<p>It should be noted that in our verse it is not clear whether the word "הָרָה" is a stative participle (a verb which describes a state rather than an action) or is simply an adjective whose helping verb is assumed rather than stated. (The two forms are indistinguishable in this case.) Either way, the tense remains ambiguous.</p></fn>
	<!--
As the word "הָרָה" is an adjective<!- -<fn>The present tense of the verb הרה would be vocalized "הוֹרָה". See, though, <multilink><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink> on the similar verse in Yeshayahu, who appears to read the word "הָרָה" as a verb.</fn>- -> whose helping verb is assumed rather than stated, there is no way of knowing with certainty the tense of the clause.<fn>Moreover, even if there were an explicit verb, the tense would still be ambiguous, as "הנה" clauses take present tense verbs even when they refer to the immediate future. See <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. S.D. Luzzatto</a></multilink> who points out that within two verses in Shofetim 13:3-5, the word "הנה" refers once to the immediate future and once to the present.</fn>--> </point>
	<!--<point><b>Tense of "הִנָּךְ הָרָה"</b> – As the word "הָרָה" is an adjective<!- -<fn>The present tense of the verb הרה would be vocalized "הוֹרָה". See, though, <multilink><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink> on the similar verse in Yeshayahu, who appears to read the word "הָרָה" as a verb.</fn>- -> whose helping verb is assumed rather than stated, there is no way of knowing with certainty the tense of the clause.<fn>Moreover, even if there were an explicit verb, the tense would still be ambiguous, as "הנה" clauses take present tense verbs even when they refer to the immediate future. See <multilink><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. S.D. Luzzatto</a></multilink> who points out that within two verses in Shofetim 13:3-5, the word "הנה" refers once to the immediate future and once to the present.</fn> This position assumes that the phrase is referring to a future event, and the angel is telling Hagar that she will become pregnant after returning home.</point>-->
	<point><b>Shofetim 13</b> - Rashi compares our verse to the similar ones in <a href="Shofetim13-2" data-aht="source">Shofetim 13</a>,<fn>The Leipzig 1 manuscript of Rashi copies a gloss of R. Shemayah which notes that Rashi interpreted similarly also regarding Yeshayahu 7:14.</fn> where the angel uses the same language to refer to a future conception.<fn>In Shofetim 13, both the context and the earlier words of the angel, "הִנֵּה נָא אַתְּ עֲקָרָה וְלֹא יָלַדְתְּ וְהָרִית וְיָלַדְתְּ בֵּן" suggest that the future tense is implied. Cf. <multilink><a href="BemidbarRabbah10-5" data-aht="source">Bemidbar Rabbah</a><a href="BemidbarRabbah10-5" data-aht="source">10:5</a><a href="Bemidbar Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bemidbar Rabbah</a></multilink>, though, who attempts nonetheless to read the phrase "הִנָּךְ הָרָה" there as referring to the present.</fn></point>
	<point><b>"וַתְּעַנֶּהָ שָׂרי"</b> – There is no attempt here to defend or mitigate Sarai's harsh treatment of Hagar. In fact, the suggestion of Sarai causing the miscarriage exacerbates it.</point>
	<point><b>The evil eye</b> – The Midrash derives the concept of the use of the evil eye from an extra yud in the word "בֵינֶיך" (normally spelled defectively.) It is possible, though, that the idea is also a play on Avraham's words, "עֲשִׂי לָהּ הַטּוֹב בְּעֵינָיִךְ"&#8206;.<fn>Interestingly the noun עין comes up five times in the story, three times meaning eye and twice referring to the spring. In addition, the similar-sounding verb ענה comes up three times. The midrash might be making a word play, noting that Sari was looked down upon ("וָאֵקַל בְּעֵינֶיהָ") and thus, she decided to oppress her servant ("וַתְּעַנֶּהָ") with an evil eye (עין הרע).</fn></point>
	</category>
<category name="">Entering into Conversation
<p>Hagar is currently pregnant, and the angel is simply stating an already known fact in order to lead up to the next part of the conversation.</p>
<mekorot>
	<multilink><a href="IbnEzraShitahAcheretHaDikduk" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShitahAcheretHaDikduk" data-aht="source">Shitah Acheret HaDikduk Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, 
	<multilink><a href="RadakBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="RadakShofetim13-5" data-aht="source">Shofetim 13:5</a><a href="RadakYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, 
	<multilink><a href="RalbagBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBereshit16-11" data-aht="source">Bereshit 16:11</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>
</mekorot>
	<point><b>Redundancy</b> – Radak suggests that the angel's repetition is a natural part of everyday speech. At times, one states what is already apparent simply as a way of making conversation, or of steering it in a particular direction.<fn>As Hagar and the angel are in mid-conversation, one cannot say that these words serve as an opening in this particular case, but they can be seen as directing it to a new point, the birth and naming of the soon to be born child.</fn> This reading fits with Radak's general approach which allows for repetition in the Biblical text, explaining such cases as either being literary techniques or reflecting the mannerisms of people.</point>
	<point><b>Tense of "הִנָּךְ הָרָה"</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, Radak, and Ralbag, the phrase is making a statement about Hagar's present condition; the angel reminds her that she is presently expecting a child.<fn>See above for the grammatical issues involved in reading the clause in one tense or the other.</fn></point>
	<point><b>Sarai's behavior</b> – This position does not make any evaluation of Sarai's actions.</point>
	<point><b>Yeshayahu 7:14 and polemics</b> The decision to read the clause in the present tense might be related to the similar ambiguity regarding the almost identical clause in Yeshayahu 7:14: "לָכֵן יִתֵּן אֲדֹנָי הוּא לָכֶם אוֹת הִנֵּה הָעַלְמָה הָרָה וְיֹלֶדֶת בֵּן". As this verse is understood by Christians to be a prophecy later fulfilled by the virgin birth of Jesus,<fn>The phrase הִנֵּה הָעַלְמָה הָרָה would be understood as, "Behold the virgin shall conceive."</fn> Radak and others prefer to distance themselves from that possibility by positing that the prophet is not talking about a future conception, but a present pregnancy (of a married woman).<fn>See <multilink><a href="RYosefKaraYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYosefKaraYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency,</a><a href="REBeaugency" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RadakYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakYeshayahu7-14" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 7:14</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink> who all understand the phrase as saying, "Behold the young woman is with child." Each, then, must explain what is so wondrous about this that it constitutes a sign. Though one might have expected Radak to be consistent and read the phrase in the present tense in Shofetim 13 as well, the context there clearly points to a future conception making any other read difficult.</fn></point>
</category>
</approaches>
</page>
</aht-xml>