Difference between revisions of "Haggadah:Avadim Hayyinu in Art/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<page type="Basic">
 
<page type="Basic">
 
<h1>Avadim Hayyinu in Art</h1>
 
<h1>Avadim Hayyinu in Art</h1>
 
<!--
 
<p style="text-align:center"><a class="pdfright" href="/Media/Haggadah/Avadim Hayyinu/{%}/Topic.pdf">PDF Version</a></p>
 
-->
 
 
 
<div class="overview">
 
<div class="overview">
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>At the beginning of the Maggid section of the Haggadah, we read the passage, "We were slaves to Paroh in Egypt" ("עֲבָדִים הָיִינוּ לְפַרְעֹה בְּמִצְרָיִם"). The two miniatures shown here, one from the Munich Haggadah<fn>The illustrated Haggadah was produced in South Germany in the late fifteenth century and was once part of the library of the Monastery at Tegernsee.  It contains a prologue written by a contemporaneous Dominican friar, Erhard Von Pappenheim, and was apparently used as a study book by the monks to learn about Jewish rituals.  The Haggadah is owned by The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich and is cataloged as BSB-Hss Cod.hebr. 200.</fn> and one from the Barcelona Haggadah,<fn>This illuminated Haggadah was made in Catalonia during the second half of the 14th century. It is richly decorated with over ornamentation on over a 100 of its 322 pages. It is currently housed in the British Library.</fn> both depict this passage, while the "The Egyptians Afflicted the Israelites" image<fn>The picture is from <i>Bible Pictures and What They Teach Us</i> (1897), ed. Charles Foster, which contains 400 illustrations from a variety of artists. Each is accompanied by a short description written by Foster.</fn> draws off the original description of slavery in Sefer Shemot. The artists' different portrayals of the bondage and the slaves' dress, gender, and age suggest different possibilities as to the nature of the Israelite oppression as a whole.</p>
+
<p>At the beginning of the Maggid section of the Haggadah, we read the passage, "We were slaves to Paroh in Egypt" ("עֲבָדִים הָיִינוּ לְפַרְעֹה בְּמִצְרָיִם"). The two miniatures from the Munich Haggadah<fn>The illustrated Haggadah was produced in South Germany in the late fifteenth century and was once part of the library of the Monastery at Tegernsee.  It contains a prologue written by a contemporaneous Dominican friar, Erhard Von Pappenheim, and was apparently used as a study book by the monks to learn about Jewish rituals.  The Haggadah is owned by The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich and is cataloged as BSB-Hss Cod.hebr. 200.</fn> and from the Barcelona Haggadah,<fn>This illuminated Haggadah was made in Catalonia during the second half of the 14th century. It is richly decorated with ornamentation on over a 100 of its 322 pages. It is currently housed in the British Library.</fn> both depict this passage, while the image from the Rylands Leipnik Haggadah<fn>The Rylands Leipnik Haggadah was copied and partially decorated by Joseph ben David of Leipnik in the first half of the 18th century. Its iconography is based on the 1695 Amsterdam printed Haggadah. The Haggadah is housed in the University of Manchester.</fn> illustrates a later passage from the "Arami Oved Avi" section of the Haggadah which similarly references the slave experience. The artists' different portrayals of the bondage and the slaves' dress, gender, and age suggest different possibilities as to the nature of the Israelite oppression as a whole.</p></div>
</div>
 
 
 
 
<category>Contrasting Images
 
<category>Contrasting Images
<subcategory name="">Munich Haggadah
+
<subcategory>Munich Haggadah
<p>This miniature depicts several slaves working in various stages of building construction. Two adults mix raw materials, while three younger males form and carry the bricks. On the left side, another slave uses these bricks to build a tower. All are dressed in cloaks of various green or pink shades. In the middle, an Egyptian slave master looks surprisingly similar to the slaves over which he stands guard. He is distinguished only by his accusatory stance and the club he holds in his hand.</p>
+
<p>This miniature depicts several slaves working in various stages of building construction. Two adults mix raw materials, while three younger males form and carry the bricks. On the left side, another slave uses these bricks to build a tower. All are dressed in cloaks of various green or pink shades. In the middle, an Egyptian slave master looks surprisingly similar to the slaves over which he stands guard. He is distinguished only by his accusatory stance and the club he holds in his hand.</p>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
+
<subcategory>Rylands Leipnik Haggadah
<subcategory name="">Egyptians Afflicted the Israelites
+
<p>In this miniature, the slaves all appear to be children, though it is hard to tell if they are male or female. They are engaged in a variety of tasks, with one holding a pick, a second carrying buckets of water, a third loaded under a pile of hay, and yet others pulling a wheel barrow loaded with stones. In the foreground and background piles of bricks attest also to brick-building. On the left, three adult figures (including one female), all clad more richly than the slaves, stand next to a building, perhaps to oversee the work.</p>
<p>In contrast to the Munich Haggadah, this engraving portrays both male and female slaves, all dressed in tattered clothing.  In the foreground, a man bends under the weight of four heavy bricks, while an elderly slave slumps in exhaustion next to him.  One woman carries a jug on her head ,and another kneels on the floor, her hands held to her head in distress. To the left, a richly garbed Egyptian watches over the slaves with a raised staff in his hand.  In the background, another Egyptian lifts a child to throw him into the river, while the anguished mother protests behind him.</p>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
+
<subcategory>Barcelona Haggadah
<subcategory name="">Barcelona Haggadah
+
<p>The top half of the page displays several Israelites building a brick tower. They are clothed in dull grey tunics and white bonnets, and appear to be female.<fn>Their gender is difficult to ascertain as the faces are somewhat androgynous.</fn> On the right, a slave master beats one of the slaves, while two other Egyptians sit on horses and watch. The bottom of the image depicts the various stages of brick building, with one slave mixing the mortar, another forming the bricks, and a final slave carrying the finished product. The entire page is framed by fanciful creatures and foliage scrolls.<fn>A unique scene in the frame of this page is the dog serving the hare at the center top.  Some have suggested that this is a variation of the often depicted hunting scenes found in many Haggadot. The prevalence and role of such scenes in a Haggadah are themselves often questioned.  Some suggest that they are a play on the mnemonic "yaknehaz" ("hare hunt" in German is "jag den Has") which directs the Seder leader as to the order of the blessings in the combined Kiddush-Havdalah service.  Others instead suggest that the hunt scene is an allegory for persecution of the Jews, a major theme of Pesach.  If so, the image shown here may invert the allegory and hint to salvation and Messianic times.</fn></p>
<p>The top half of the page displays several Israelites building a brick tower. They are clothed in dull grey tunics and white bonnets, and appear to be female.<fn>Their gender is difficult to ascertain as the faces are somewhat androgynous.</fn> On the right, a slave master beats one of the slaves, while two other Egyptians sit on horses and watch. The bottom of the image depicts the various stages of brick building, with one slave mixing the mortar, another forming the bricks, and a final slave carrying the finished product. The entire page is framed by fanciful creatures and foliage scrolls.<fn>A unique scene in the frame of this page is the dog serving the hare at the center top.  Some have suggested that this is a variation of the often depicted hunting scenes found in many Haggadot. The prevalence and role of such scenes in a Haggadah are themselves often questioned.  Some suggest that they are a play on the mnemonic "yaknehaz" ("hare hunt" in German is "jag den Has") which directs the Seder leader as to the order of the blessings in the combined Kiddush-Havdalah service.  Others instead suggest that the hunt scene is an allegory for persecution of the Jews, a major theme of Pesach.  If so, the image shown here may invert the allegory and hint to salvation and Messianic times.</fn></p>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
+
<category>Relationship to the Text of the Haggadah
<category>Relationship to the Text of the Haggadah  
 
 
<p>The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the text of the Haggadah and different possible interpretive stances:</p>
 
<p>The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the text of the Haggadah and different possible interpretive stances:</p>
<subcategory name="">Who Was Enslaved?
+
<subcategory>Who Was Enslaved?
<p>While the illustrator of the engraving in Foster's <i>Bible Pictures</i> includes both male and female slaves in his image, the artist of the Munich Haggadah depicts only males, with children working alongside adults. The images in the Barcelona Haggadah are somewhat androgynous, but at first glance appear to be predominantly female. Who was included in the edict of bondage? Were only men expected to work, or also females?<fn>See the graphic description of the bondage in <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink> which describes a pregnant woman working alongside her husband.</fn> Did children work beside their parents, or were they exempt? What about the elderly? Finally, if women were enslaved, were they expected to do the heavy work of brick building, or were they assigned tasks generally performed by females?<fn> See, for instance the description in <multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze9" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze9" data-aht="source">Vayetze 9</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> which suggests that the Egyptians purposefully gave the women men's work while the men were assigned tasks traditionally done by women. Efficient labor was less important that causing humiliation to the slaves.</fn></p>
+
<p>The artist of the Munich Haggadah depicts only male slaves, with children working alongside adults. In contrast, the images in the Barcelona Haggadah appear to be predominantly female. Who was included in the edict of bondage? Were only men expected to work, or also females?<fn>See the graphic description of the bondage in <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink> which describes a pregnant woman working alongside her husband.</fn> Did children work beside their parents, or were they exempt? What about the elderly? Finally, if women were enslaved, were they expected to do the heavy work of brick building, or were they assigned tasks generally performed by females?<fn>See, for instance the description in <multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze9" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze9" data-aht="source">Vayetze 9</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> which suggests that the Egyptians purposefully gave the women men's work while the men were assigned tasks traditionally done by women. Efficient labor was less important that causing humiliation to the slaves.</fn>&#160; See <a href="Who was Enslaved in Egypt" data-aht="page">Who was Enslaved in Egypt?</a> for more.</p>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
+
<subcategory>Masters and Servants
<subcategory name="">Masters and Servants
+
<p>In the Barcelona and Rylands Leipnik Haggadot, there is a clear demarcation between masters and servants.<fn>The Barcelona Haggadah depicts the masters with headgear and richer attire than the slaves. The Rylands Leipnik Haggadah similarly differentiates by clothing the Egyptians in full rather than half length garments.</fn> In the Munich Haggadah, in contrast, master and slave look almost identical. The only indications that one is the Egyptian are the club in his hand and his accusing finger. How different were the Israelites from their neighboring Egyptians? Was their slave status evident to all? Did the Israelites maintain distinctive dress or habits that separated them from others, or had they assimilated to the extent that they appeared and acted just like the Egyptians amongst whom they lived? See <a href="Religious Identity in Egypt" data-aht="page">Israelites' Religious Identity</a> for elaboration.</p>
<p>In both Foster's <i>Bible Pictures</i> and the Barcelona Haggadah, there is a clear demarcation between masters and servants.<fn>In Foster's illustration, the slaves are dressed in rags, while the master is garbed in a full cloak.  Similarly, the Barcelona Haggadah depicts the masters with headgear and richer attire than the slaves.</fn> In the Munich Haggadah, in contrast, master and slave look almost identical. The only indications that one is the Egyptian are the club in his hand and his accusing finger. How different were the Israelites from their neighboring Egyptians? Was their slave status evident to all? Did the Israelites maintain distinctive dress or habits that separated them from others, or had they assimilated to the extent that they appeared and acted just like the Egyptians amongst whom they lived? See <a href="Religious Identity in Egypt" data-aht="page">Israelites' Religious Identity</a> for elaboration.</p>
+
</subcategory>
 +
<subcategory>Type of Work
 +
<p>All three images mark the brick building of the Israelites, but the Leipnik Haggadah also depicts people working in the field and carrying water. Was the work of the Israelites limited to construction of storehouses or did they work in other areas as well? Were they slaves to the state or also to individuals? The majority of verses would suggest the former, though one might suggest that "בְכָל עֲבֹדָה בַּשָּׂדֶה" refers to fields of individual Egyptians. <multilink><a href="RambanShemot1-11" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot1-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 1:11</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Nachmanides</a></multilink> further suggests that the word "מִצְרַיִם" in the phrase "וַיַּעֲבִדוּ מִצְרַיִם אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּפָרֶךְ" refers, not to the government of Egypt, but to Egyptian laypeople.<fn>He suggests that there were two stages of oppression. The first constituted a labor tax in which Israelites worked for Paroh on a rotational basis. Afterwards, though, the decree of bondage expanded, and even individual Egyptians were welcome to enslave any Israelite they wished.</fn></p>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
+
<subcategory>Penniless and Ragged?
<subcategory name="">Type of Work
+
<p>Perhaps surprisingly, the slaves of all three Haggadot appear to be decently attired rather than dressed in rags as might be supposed. Was poverty part and parcel of the Egyptian slavery experience? Did the Israelites have any possessions they could call their own? Though one tends to think of slaves as people who get no wages and therefore own nothing, the verses attest to the Israelites having their own homes and cattle. At the same time, before leaving they are told to ask for gold and silver vessels and dresses, suggesting that these might have been lacking.&#160; See <a href="Nature of the Bondage" data-aht="page">Nature of the Bondage</a> for elaboration.</p>
<p>All three images highlight the brick building of the Israelites, but the illustrator of <i>Bible Pictures</i> also adds an image of a woman carrying a water jug. Was the work of the Israelites limited to construction of storehouses or did they work in other areas as well?  Were they slaves to the state or also to individuals?  The majority of verses would suggest the former, though one might suggest that "בְכָל עֲבֹדָה בַּשָּׂדֶה" refers to fields of individual Egyptians. <multilink><a href="RambanShemot1-11" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot1-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 1:11</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe Nachmanides</a></multilink> further suggests that the word "מִצְרַיִם" in the phrase "וַיַּעֲבִדוּ מִצְרַיִם אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּפָרֶךְ" refers, not to the government of Egypt, but to Egyptian laypeople.<fn>He suggests that there were two stages of oppression.  The first constituted a labor tax in which Israelites worked for Paroh on a rotational basis. Afterwards, though, the decree of bondage expanded, and even individual Egyptians were welcome to enslave any Israelite they wished.</fn></p>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
+
<subcategory>עָרֵי מִסְכְּנוֹת
<subcategory name="">Penniless and ragged?
+
<p>In both the Munich and Barcelona Haggadot, the Israelites work to build a tower. This is lacking in the Rylands Leipnik Haggadah, which instead highlights the Israelites bringing wheat, water and stones into a walled area. The different depictions might relate to a debate regarding the meaning of "עָרֵי מִסְכְּנוֹת".&#160; While a majority of commentators assume the term refers to cities for food storage, the Septuagint translates the phrase as "fortified cities" built for defense.</p>
<p>While the Israelites in Foster's <i>Bible Pictures</i> are dressed in rags, the slaves of both Haggadot appear to be decently attired. Was poverty part and parcel of the Egyptian slavery experience?  Did the Israelites have any possessions they could call their own?  Though one tends to think of slaves as people who get no wages and therefore own nothing, the verses attest to the Israelites having their own homes and cattle. At the same time, before leaving they are told to ask for gold and silver vessels and dresses, suggesting that these might have been lacking.</p>
 
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
</category>
 
</category>
  
 
+
</page>
</page>
 
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Latest revision as of 12:13, 26 April 2023

Avadim Hayyinu in Art

Introduction

At the beginning of the Maggid section of the Haggadah, we read the passage, "We were slaves to Paroh in Egypt" ("עֲבָדִים הָיִינוּ לְפַרְעֹה בְּמִצְרָיִם"). The two miniatures from the Munich Haggadah1 and from the Barcelona Haggadah,2 both depict this passage, while the image from the Rylands Leipnik Haggadah3 illustrates a later passage from the "Arami Oved Avi" section of the Haggadah which similarly references the slave experience. The artists' different portrayals of the bondage and the slaves' dress, gender, and age suggest different possibilities as to the nature of the Israelite oppression as a whole.

Contrasting Images

Munich Haggadah

This miniature depicts several slaves working in various stages of building construction. Two adults mix raw materials, while three younger males form and carry the bricks. On the left side, another slave uses these bricks to build a tower. All are dressed in cloaks of various green or pink shades. In the middle, an Egyptian slave master looks surprisingly similar to the slaves over which he stands guard. He is distinguished only by his accusatory stance and the club he holds in his hand.

Rylands Leipnik Haggadah

In this miniature, the slaves all appear to be children, though it is hard to tell if they are male or female. They are engaged in a variety of tasks, with one holding a pick, a second carrying buckets of water, a third loaded under a pile of hay, and yet others pulling a wheel barrow loaded with stones. In the foreground and background piles of bricks attest also to brick-building. On the left, three adult figures (including one female), all clad more richly than the slaves, stand next to a building, perhaps to oversee the work.

Barcelona Haggadah

The top half of the page displays several Israelites building a brick tower. They are clothed in dull grey tunics and white bonnets, and appear to be female.4 On the right, a slave master beats one of the slaves, while two other Egyptians sit on horses and watch. The bottom of the image depicts the various stages of brick building, with one slave mixing the mortar, another forming the bricks, and a final slave carrying the finished product. The entire page is framed by fanciful creatures and foliage scrolls.5

Relationship to the Text of the Haggadah

The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the text of the Haggadah and different possible interpretive stances:

Who Was Enslaved?

The artist of the Munich Haggadah depicts only male slaves, with children working alongside adults. In contrast, the images in the Barcelona Haggadah appear to be predominantly female. Who was included in the edict of bondage? Were only men expected to work, or also females?6 Did children work beside their parents, or were they exempt? What about the elderly? Finally, if women were enslaved, were they expected to do the heavy work of brick building, or were they assigned tasks generally performed by females?7  See Who was Enslaved in Egypt? for more.

Masters and Servants

In the Barcelona and Rylands Leipnik Haggadot, there is a clear demarcation between masters and servants.8 In the Munich Haggadah, in contrast, master and slave look almost identical. The only indications that one is the Egyptian are the club in his hand and his accusing finger. How different were the Israelites from their neighboring Egyptians? Was their slave status evident to all? Did the Israelites maintain distinctive dress or habits that separated them from others, or had they assimilated to the extent that they appeared and acted just like the Egyptians amongst whom they lived? See Israelites' Religious Identity for elaboration.

Type of Work

All three images mark the brick building of the Israelites, but the Leipnik Haggadah also depicts people working in the field and carrying water. Was the work of the Israelites limited to construction of storehouses or did they work in other areas as well? Were they slaves to the state or also to individuals? The majority of verses would suggest the former, though one might suggest that "בְכָל עֲבֹדָה בַּשָּׂדֶה" refers to fields of individual Egyptians. RambanShemot 1:11About R. Moshe Nachmanides further suggests that the word "מִצְרַיִם" in the phrase "וַיַּעֲבִדוּ מִצְרַיִם אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּפָרֶךְ" refers, not to the government of Egypt, but to Egyptian laypeople.9

Penniless and Ragged?

Perhaps surprisingly, the slaves of all three Haggadot appear to be decently attired rather than dressed in rags as might be supposed. Was poverty part and parcel of the Egyptian slavery experience? Did the Israelites have any possessions they could call their own? Though one tends to think of slaves as people who get no wages and therefore own nothing, the verses attest to the Israelites having their own homes and cattle. At the same time, before leaving they are told to ask for gold and silver vessels and dresses, suggesting that these might have been lacking.  See Nature of the Bondage for elaboration.

עָרֵי מִסְכְּנוֹת

In both the Munich and Barcelona Haggadot, the Israelites work to build a tower. This is lacking in the Rylands Leipnik Haggadah, which instead highlights the Israelites bringing wheat, water and stones into a walled area. The different depictions might relate to a debate regarding the meaning of "עָרֵי מִסְכְּנוֹת".  While a majority of commentators assume the term refers to cities for food storage, the Septuagint translates the phrase as "fortified cities" built for defense.