Difference between revisions of "Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Spiritual status</b> – Uziyahu "did as was right in the eyes of Hashem," excepting the continued use of private altars. Divrei HaYamim also shares that at the end of his life, he became arrogant and thought to usurp the position of the high priest, attempting to bring an incense offering. Despite&#160; the problematic nature of this action,<fn>He was punished with tzara'at.</fn> it is important to note that it was not an idolatrous act.</li>
 
<li><b>Spiritual status</b> – Uziyahu "did as was right in the eyes of Hashem," excepting the continued use of private altars. Divrei HaYamim also shares that at the end of his life, he became arrogant and thought to usurp the position of the high priest, attempting to bring an incense offering. Despite&#160; the problematic nature of this action,<fn>He was punished with tzara'at.</fn> it is important to note that it was not an idolatrous act.</li>
<li><b>Political status</b> – Uziyahu's reign was marked by prosperity, military conquests, and expansion of the kingdom.&#160; He further engaged in agricultural and building projects, fortifying the country. The text shares that: "וַיֵּצֵא שְׁמוֹ עַד לְמֵרָחוֹק כִּי הִפְלִיא לְהֵעָזֵר עַד כִּי חָזָק".&#160; </li>
+
<li><b>Political status</b> – Uziyahu's reign was marked by prosperity, military conquests, and expansion of the kingdom.&#160; He further engaged in agricultural and building projects, fortifying the country. The text shares that: "וַיֵּצֵא שְׁמוֹ עַד לְמֵרָחוֹק כִּי הִפְלִיא לְהֵעָזֵר עַד כִּי חָזָק".&#160;</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
Given these facts, at first glance, Yeshayahu's descriptions of a sinning nation and destroyed country would seem not to match the era at all.&#160; [See how this approach deals with these issues in the following points.]</point>
 
Given these facts, at first glance, Yeshayahu's descriptions of a sinning nation and destroyed country would seem not to match the era at all.&#160; [See how this approach deals with these issues in the following points.]</point>
<point><b>Interpersonal sins&#160;</b> – Yeshayahu's description of a society which perverts justice, does not care for the unfortunate and whose leaders are corrupt and dishonest, finds echoes in the prophecies of Amos. As the book of Amos is explicitly dated to the reign of Uziyahu, this suggests that despite the silence on the issue in Melakhim, the period was indeed marked by a deterioration in the interpersonal sphere. It is possible that the prosperity of the period broadened the gaps between the rich and poor and led to the mistreatment of the latter.</point>
+
<point><b>Interpersonal sins</b> – Yeshayahu's description of a society which perverts justice, does not care for the unfortunate, and whose leaders are corrupt and dishonest, finds echoes in the prophecies of Amos. As the book of Amos is explicitly dated to the reign of Uziyahu, this suggests that despite the silence on the issue in Melakhim, the period was indeed marked by societal ills. It is possible that the prosperity of the period broadened the gaps between the rich and poor and led to the mistreatment of the latter.</point>
 
<point><b>Sins against God</b> – Given the description of Uziyahu as an upright king who worshiped Hashem, this position must explain the various verses in the chapter which suggest that the people of the era sinned against Hashem: <br/>
 
<point><b>Sins against God</b> – Given the description of Uziyahu as an upright king who worshiped Hashem, this position must explain the various verses in the chapter which suggest that the people of the era sinned against Hashem: <br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><b>"יָדַע שׁוֹר קֹנֵהוּ ... יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יָדַע... עָזְבוּ אֶת י"י"</b> – Though these verses refers to "not recognizing and leaving God", they need not connote that the nation worshiped idolatry<fn>See Shadal below who reads the verses in this manner.</fn> and might simply refer to their no longer obeying Hashem's laws in the interpersonal realm, as described above.<fn>R. Eliezer of Beaugency says that the verses mean that despite the fact that the nation should recognize Hashem as their creator and benefactor, and therefore obey him, they have turned against Him and no longer serve Him. He does not elaborate so it is not clear if R"E of Beaugency is referring to the nation's idolatrous worship, or to more general disobedience when he writes: "לא ידע טובתי לעבדני."&#160; As later in the commentary he is explicit that they people were worshiping idolatry, either reading would be consistent with his overall understanding of the chapter. [See the discussion in the main body regarding how idol worship fits with the portrait of the era in Melakhim and Divrei HaYamim.]</fn> </li>
+
<li><b>"יָדַע שׁוֹר קֹנֵהוּ ... יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יָדַע... עָזְבוּ אֶת י"י"</b> – Though these verses refers to "not recognizing and leaving God", they need not connote that the nation worshiped idolatry<fn>See Shadal below who reads the verses in this manner.</fn> and might simply refer to their no longer obeying Hashem's laws in the interpersonal realm, as described above.<fn>R. Eliezer of Beaugency says that the verses mean that despite the fact that the nation should recognize Hashem as their creator and benefactor, and therefore obey him, they have turned against Him and no longer serve Him. He does not elaborate so it is not clear if R"E of Beaugency is referring to the nation's idolatrous worship, or to more general disobedience when he writes: "לא ידע טובתי לעבדני."&#160; As later in the commentary he is explicit that they people were worshiping idolatry, either reading would be consistent with his overall understanding of the chapter. [See the discussion in the main body regarding how idol worship fits with the portrait of the era in Melakhim and Divrei HaYamim.]</fn></li>
 
<li><b>"לָמָּה לִּי רֹב זִבְחֵיכֶם"</b> – R"E of Beaugency suggests that the people's sacrifices no longer found favor in God's eyes for two reasons: Throughout most of the year, they were offered on prohibited private altars (במות), rather than in the Mikdash.<fn>This is testified to in <a href="MelakhimII15-1-5" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 15:4</a>, "רַק הַבָּמוֹת לֹא סָרוּ עוֹד הָעָם מְזַבְּחִים וּמְקַטְּרִים בַּבָּמוֹת"</fn> Moreover, even when people brought sacrifices to the Mikdash<fn>R"E of Beaugency reads "כִּי תָבֹאוּ לֵרָאוֹת פָּנָי" as "[even] when you come to see my face [in the Mikdash]."</fn> (on Shabbat, new moons, or holidays), they did so with the wrong motives, assuming that they the offerings would atone for all their crimes, despite the fact that they continued to sin.</li>
 
<li><b>"לָמָּה לִּי רֹב זִבְחֵיכֶם"</b> – R"E of Beaugency suggests that the people's sacrifices no longer found favor in God's eyes for two reasons: Throughout most of the year, they were offered on prohibited private altars (במות), rather than in the Mikdash.<fn>This is testified to in <a href="MelakhimII15-1-5" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 15:4</a>, "רַק הַבָּמוֹת לֹא סָרוּ עוֹד הָעָם מְזַבְּחִים וּמְקַטְּרִים בַּבָּמוֹת"</fn> Moreover, even when people brought sacrifices to the Mikdash<fn>R"E of Beaugency reads "כִּי תָבֹאוּ לֵרָאוֹת פָּנָי" as "[even] when you come to see my face [in the Mikdash]."</fn> (on Shabbat, new moons, or holidays), they did so with the wrong motives, assuming that they the offerings would atone for all their crimes, despite the fact that they continued to sin.</li>
<li><b>"</b>כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" – R"E of Beaugency maintains that this refers to the trees under which the people set up altars and Asheirot for idolatry. He might assume that despite Uziyahu's worship of Hashem, the nation continued to worship other gods alongside Him.&#160; [It is also possible that the nation turned to idolatry only after Uziyhau's sin and punishment; without the guidance of an upright leader, it was easy to revert to idolatrous ways.]</li>
+
<li>"כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" – R"E of Beaugency maintains that this refers to the trees under which the people set up altars and Asheirot for idolatry. He might assume that despite Uziyahu's worship of Hashem, the nation continued to worship other gods alongside Him.&#160; [It is also possible that the nation turned to idolatry only after Uziyhau's sin and punishment; without the guidance of an upright leader, it was easy to revert to idolatrous ways.]</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Description of destruction</b> – R. Eliezer of Beaugency reads the descriptions of punishment / destruction to refer either to the past or future, but not to Uziyahu's reign itself:<br/>
 
<point><b>Description of destruction</b> – R. Eliezer of Beaugency reads the descriptions of punishment / destruction to refer either to the past or future, but not to Uziyahu's reign itself:<br/>
Line 29: Line 29:
 
<li><b>Other descriptions of destruction</b> – According to R"E of Beaugency, the rest of the descriptions of destruction and punishment, such as: &#8206;כׇּל רֹאשׁ לׇחֳלִי ,אַרְצְכֶם שְׁמָמָה, &#8206; and וְנוֹתְרָה בַת צִיּוֹן כְּסֻכָּה בְכָרֶם, refer to the future, when Assyria was to exile the ten tribes, leaving their land barren, and when Sancheriv was to capture all the fortified cities of Yehuda, leaving Yerushalayim alone unscathed. Yeshayahu is warning the people of what will come if they do not change their ways.</li>
 
<li><b>Other descriptions of destruction</b> – According to R"E of Beaugency, the rest of the descriptions of destruction and punishment, such as: &#8206;כׇּל רֹאשׁ לׇחֳלִי ,אַרְצְכֶם שְׁמָמָה, &#8206; and וְנוֹתְרָה בַת צִיּוֹן כְּסֻכָּה בְכָרֶם, refer to the future, when Assyria was to exile the ten tribes, leaving their land barren, and when Sancheriv was to capture all the fortified cities of Yehuda, leaving Yerushalayim alone unscathed. Yeshayahu is warning the people of what will come if they do not change their ways.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
One might question this reading from the wording of many verses which suggest that the prophet is speaking of the present. For example, the phrase "אַדְמַתְכֶם לְנֶגְדְּכֶם זָרִים אֹכְלִים אֹתָהּ" implies that those listening to he prophecy itself see the land being ravaged by foreigners. Similarly, the cry "לוּלֵי יְהֹוָה צְבָאוֹת הוֹתִיר לָנוּ שָׂרִיד" suggests that destruction has already been wrought. R"E of Beaugency might reply that Yeshayahu is speaking from the perspective of those living in the time of the punishment.</point>
+
One might question this reading from several verses which suggest that the prophet is speaking of the present. For example, the phrase "אַדְמַתְכֶם <b>לְנֶגְדְּכֶם</b> זָרִים אֹכְלִים אֹתָהּ" implies that those listening to he prophecy itself see the land being ravaged by foreigners. Similarly, the cry "לוּלֵי יְהֹוָה צְבָאוֹת <b>הוֹתִיר</b> לָנוּ שָׂרִיד" suggests that destruction has already been wrought. R"E of Beaugency might reply that Yeshayahu is speaking from the perspective of those living in the time of the punishment.</point>
 
<point><b>Ramifications: new portrait of an era</b></point>
 
<point><b>Ramifications: new portrait of an era</b></point>
 
<point><b>Description of consolation</b> – R. Eliezer of Beaugency seems to read the verses of נחמה to be during the time of "אַחֲרִית הַיָּמִים" mentioned in the next chapter (2:2), which he does not explicate when it is.<fn>Radak and others there explain it about the time of the Mashiach, while Ibn Kaspi proposes it to be in the time of Chizkiyahu.</fn>&#160; "אֲשֶׁר חָזָה" in 2:1 regards the prophecy told right beforehand.</point>
 
<point><b>Description of consolation</b> – R. Eliezer of Beaugency seems to read the verses of נחמה to be during the time of "אַחֲרִית הַיָּמִים" mentioned in the next chapter (2:2), which he does not explicate when it is.<fn>Radak and others there explain it about the time of the Mashiach, while Ibn Kaspi proposes it to be in the time of Chizkiyahu.</fn>&#160; "אֲשֶׁר חָזָה" in 2:1 regards the prophecy told right beforehand.</point>
Line 36: Line 36:
 
<p>Yeshayahu's words were directed at Achaz and his generation.&#160; He decried their sins, and highlighted the resulting destruction that had been wrought on the land in the hopes of encouraging the people to change their ways</p>
 
<p>Yeshayahu's words were directed at Achaz and his generation.&#160; He decried their sins, and highlighted the resulting destruction that had been wrought on the land in the hopes of encouraging the people to change their ways</p>
 
<mekorot>Gesenius cited in <multilink><a href="ShadalYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<mekorot>Gesenius cited in <multilink><a href="ShadalYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot>
<point><b>Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu</b> – Not in chronological order</point>
+
<point><b>Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu</b> – This approach maintains that the prophecies of Yeshayahu were not written in chronological order.&#160; The book opens with the reign of Achaz, only to move back in time to the era of Uziyahu, and then return once again to Achaz.&#160;</point>
<point><b>Relationship to time period</b></point>
+
<point><b>Relationship to time period</b> – Achaz</point>
 
<point><b>Description of sin</b> – The description of the sin of idolatry matches Achaz's time period.&#160; Shadal questions this approach, however, because the focus of the verses seems to be more on the interpersonal sins, as the verses do describe that sacrifices were brought to Hashem just for the wrong purpose.&#160; The only explicit hint that they worshiped idols which certainly was the central sin in the time of Achaz, are the words "כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" (in verse 29).</point>
 
<point><b>Description of sin</b> – The description of the sin of idolatry matches Achaz's time period.&#160; Shadal questions this approach, however, because the focus of the verses seems to be more on the interpersonal sins, as the verses do describe that sacrifices were brought to Hashem just for the wrong purpose.&#160; The only explicit hint that they worshiped idols which certainly was the central sin in the time of Achaz, are the words "כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" (in verse 29).</point>
 
<point><b>Description of destruction</b> – These verses can be read about the present, the desolation that resulted from the battles Achaz fought and lost against Aram, Pekach, Pelishtim, and Ashur.</point>
 
<point><b>Description of destruction</b> – These verses can be read about the present, the desolation that resulted from the battles Achaz fought and lost against Aram, Pekach, Pelishtim, and Ashur.</point>

Version as of 11:50, 16 May 2018

Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

During Uziyahu's Reign

The prophecy was relayed during the reign of Uziyahu and relates to the sins of his era. Yeshayahu warned the people of the future devastation slated to befall their land if they did not change their ways.

Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu – R. Eliezer of Beaugency maintains that the Book of Yeshayahu is written in chronological order.1 Since the heading of Chapter 6 reads, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", he assumes that all the previous chapters (including the first) refer to Uziyahu's reign. 2
Relationship to time period – In Melakhim and Divrei haYamaim,3 Uziyahu is described as both a righteous and powerful king. 
  • Spiritual status – Uziyahu "did as was right in the eyes of Hashem," excepting the continued use of private altars. Divrei HaYamim also shares that at the end of his life, he became arrogant and thought to usurp the position of the high priest, attempting to bring an incense offering. Despite  the problematic nature of this action,4 it is important to note that it was not an idolatrous act.
  • Political status – Uziyahu's reign was marked by prosperity, military conquests, and expansion of the kingdom.  He further engaged in agricultural and building projects, fortifying the country. The text shares that: "וַיֵּצֵא שְׁמוֹ עַד לְמֵרָחוֹק כִּי הִפְלִיא לְהֵעָזֵר עַד כִּי חָזָק". 
Given these facts, at first glance, Yeshayahu's descriptions of a sinning nation and destroyed country would seem not to match the era at all.  [See how this approach deals with these issues in the following points.]
Interpersonal sins – Yeshayahu's description of a society which perverts justice, does not care for the unfortunate, and whose leaders are corrupt and dishonest, finds echoes in the prophecies of Amos. As the book of Amos is explicitly dated to the reign of Uziyahu, this suggests that despite the silence on the issue in Melakhim, the period was indeed marked by societal ills. It is possible that the prosperity of the period broadened the gaps between the rich and poor and led to the mistreatment of the latter.
Sins against God – Given the description of Uziyahu as an upright king who worshiped Hashem, this position must explain the various verses in the chapter which suggest that the people of the era sinned against Hashem:
  • "יָדַע שׁוֹר קֹנֵהוּ ... יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יָדַע... עָזְבוּ אֶת י"י" – Though these verses refers to "not recognizing and leaving God", they need not connote that the nation worshiped idolatry5 and might simply refer to their no longer obeying Hashem's laws in the interpersonal realm, as described above.6
  • "לָמָּה לִּי רֹב זִבְחֵיכֶם" – R"E of Beaugency suggests that the people's sacrifices no longer found favor in God's eyes for two reasons: Throughout most of the year, they were offered on prohibited private altars (במות), rather than in the Mikdash.7 Moreover, even when people brought sacrifices to the Mikdash8 (on Shabbat, new moons, or holidays), they did so with the wrong motives, assuming that they the offerings would atone for all their crimes, despite the fact that they continued to sin.
  • "כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" – R"E of Beaugency maintains that this refers to the trees under which the people set up altars and Asheirot for idolatry. He might assume that despite Uziyahu's worship of Hashem, the nation continued to worship other gods alongside Him.  [It is also possible that the nation turned to idolatry only after Uziyhau's sin and punishment; without the guidance of an upright leader, it was easy to revert to idolatrous ways.]
Description of destruction – R. Eliezer of Beaugency reads the descriptions of punishment / destruction to refer either to the past or future, but not to Uziyahu's reign itself:
  • "עַל מֶה תֻכּוּ עוֹד תּוֹסִיפוּ סָרָה" – Yeshayahu tells the nation that there seems to be no point in continuing to punish them in their land,9 with the hopes of them repenting, since they have been punished in this manner from the time of the Judges, to no effect. Thus, "עַל מֶה תֻכּוּ עוֹד" does not refer to their being smitten in Uziyahu's era, but throughout the generations.
  • Other descriptions of destruction – According to R"E of Beaugency, the rest of the descriptions of destruction and punishment, such as: ‎כׇּל רֹאשׁ לׇחֳלִי ,אַרְצְכֶם שְׁמָמָה, ‎ and וְנוֹתְרָה בַת צִיּוֹן כְּסֻכָּה בְכָרֶם, refer to the future, when Assyria was to exile the ten tribes, leaving their land barren, and when Sancheriv was to capture all the fortified cities of Yehuda, leaving Yerushalayim alone unscathed. Yeshayahu is warning the people of what will come if they do not change their ways.
One might question this reading from several verses which suggest that the prophet is speaking of the present. For example, the phrase "אַדְמַתְכֶם לְנֶגְדְּכֶם זָרִים אֹכְלִים אֹתָהּ" implies that those listening to he prophecy itself see the land being ravaged by foreigners. Similarly, the cry "לוּלֵי יְהֹוָה צְבָאוֹת הוֹתִיר לָנוּ שָׂרִיד" suggests that destruction has already been wrought. R"E of Beaugency might reply that Yeshayahu is speaking from the perspective of those living in the time of the punishment.
Ramifications: new portrait of an era
Description of consolation – R. Eliezer of Beaugency seems to read the verses of נחמה to be during the time of "אַחֲרִית הַיָּמִים" mentioned in the next chapter (2:2), which he does not explicate when it is.10  "אֲשֶׁר חָזָה" in 2:1 regards the prophecy told right beforehand.

During Achaz's Reign

Yeshayahu's words were directed at Achaz and his generation.  He decried their sins, and highlighted the resulting destruction that had been wrought on the land in the hopes of encouraging the people to change their ways

Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu – This approach maintains that the prophecies of Yeshayahu were not written in chronological order.  The book opens with the reign of Achaz, only to move back in time to the era of Uziyahu, and then return once again to Achaz. 
Relationship to time period – Achaz
Description of sin – The description of the sin of idolatry matches Achaz's time period.  Shadal questions this approach, however, because the focus of the verses seems to be more on the interpersonal sins, as the verses do describe that sacrifices were brought to Hashem just for the wrong purpose.  The only explicit hint that they worshiped idols which certainly was the central sin in the time of Achaz, are the words "כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם" (in verse 29).
Description of destruction – These verses can be read about the present, the desolation that resulted from the battles Achaz fought and lost against Aram, Pekach, Pelishtim, and Ashur.
Description of consolation

During Chizkiyahu's Reign

Yeshayahu delivered this prophecy during the reign of Chizkiyahu.  This approach divides regarding both the specific period referred to and the sins being rebuked:

After Chizkiyahu's Religious Reform

After Chizkiyahu brought the nation back to Hashem, they continued to sin in the interpersonal sphere and it is about this which Yeshayahu prophesied.

Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu – Shadal explains this prophecy is first even though chronologically it belongs later, because of the importance of the rebuke which includes major ethics and believing in Hashem.  He adds that chapter 1 is the first prophecy Yeshayahu received, but not the first to be relayed to the nation (it was only relayed during Chizkiyahu's reign).
Relationship to time period
Description of sin – This approach reads the verses describing the sin of idolatry, as focusing on the interpersonal issues during Chizkiyahu's time.  Chizkiyahu worked to restore the worship of Hashem, but not the justice.
Verses that argue for a sin of idolatry: – This approach must reread verses which rebuke of the sin of idolatry which was not the main sin during Chizkiyahu's time:
  • "וְהֵם פָּשְׁעוּ בִי"‎ (2-4) – The nation did not follow Hashem's path of doing justice and righteousness, and acted unjustly.
  • "כִּי יֵבֹשׁוּ מֵאֵילִים אֲשֶׁר חֲמַדְתֶּם"‎ (29-31) – According to Shadal, these words of "מֵאֵילִים" and "מֵהַגַּנּוֹת" refer to trees parallel to ministers and kings, who the rogue judges relied on.  The judges will be ashamed of the tall trees that appointed them and whom they trusted and sat in their shade to allow them to do injustice and violence.  On the other hand, Hoil Moshe explains more literally, of the sexual crimes done under trees.
Description of destruction – Shadal also reads it in the present, but describing the destruction left from the time of Achaz from the battles he fought and lost against Aram, Pekach, Edom, and Pelishtim.  Shadal notes a parallel description to Divrei HaYamim II 29:9 where Chizkiyahu says, "וְהִנֵּה נָפְלוּ אֲבוֹתֵינוּ בֶּחָרֶב וּבָנֵינוּ וּבְנוֹתֵינוּ וְנָשֵׁינוּ בַּשְּׁבִי עַל זֹאת".
Description of consolation

After the exile of the ten tribes

Yeshayahu rebuked the people for both their sins of idolatry and their crimes against their fellow men, bemoaning that they learned nothing from the exile of the ten tribes.

Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu – Rashi says explicitly that chapter one is out of chronological order, as chapter six recounts Yeshayahu's call to prophecy and this chapter was said afterwords.  He proves from the language of "אֲשֶׁר חָזָה עַל יְהוּדָה וִירוּשָׁלָ‍ִם" which is not inclusive of all the visions regarding other nations, so it must be an introduction just for the chapter and not for the book.12  He does not explain why it is in non-chronological order.
Relationship to time period – Yeshayahu is talking to the tribe of Yehuda so they will learn from the overthrow of the kingdom of Yisrael, to do good virtues.
Description of sin – Rashi can posit like Shadal above, that the focus of the rebuke was on the sins between man and fellow man, specifically the injustice in the country, occurring during the time of Chizkiyahu.
Description of destruction – Rashi reads these verses to be talking of the present desolation, resulting from the exile of most of the population.  At the time Yeshayahu is talking, the land is desolated.  Shadal notes a difficulty that one would have assumes the prophecy would mention somewhere at least incidentally the fact that the ten tribes exiled to Ashur, as it is the grounds for the whole prophecy.13
Description of consolation – R. Yosef Kara suggests the consolation refers to the returning of the exiled from exile.
"עַל מֶה תֻכּוּ עוֹד תּוֹסִיפוּ סָרָה" – R. Yosef Kara reads this verse, that Hashem is saying He exiled the ten tribes to no avail, because the people left in the country didn't learn virtues rather just continued to transgress.

During All Four Kings

Yeshayahu relayed this prophecy multiple times, during the reigns of each of Uziyahu, Yotam, Achaz, and Chizkiyahu, as it pertained to all of them.

Chronology of Sefer Yeshayahu – Abarbanel suggests the reason this prophecy is first, is because it was repeated so many times during the reign of each of the four kings, or because it was the first prophecy Yeshayahu prophesied during Uziyahu's reign.
Relationship to time period – Abarbanel understands Yeshayahu is warning the tribe of Yehuda of the destruction to come on the rest of the tribes and is telling them to do better so it won't happen to them like will happen to the rest of the tribes.
Description of sin – Radak notes that the representation of the sins of the people matches all of the four kings.14  Shadal asks how can one say the same prophecy for a different situation, since the sin of the people is different in each time period.  Additionally, he questions that the main focus in the chapter is not about worshiping idols, and it even sounds like the people were bringing sacrifices to the temple.
Description of destruction – Radak says the verses are referring to the fortified cities the king of Ashur captured in the time of Chizkiyahu.  Abarbanel presents both options that these verses should be read as talking about the exile of the ten tribes, either in the present, or in the future.
Description of consolation – Radak seems to say the consolation will happen during the Messianic era, besides for verse 29 which talks about the elimination of idolatry which occurred in the destruction of the Temple.
"עַל מֶה תֻכּוּ עוֹד תּוֹסִיפוּ סָרָה"