Difference between revisions of "Lemekh and His Wives in Art/0/en"
m |
m |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<p>The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the Biblical text and different possible interpretive stances:</p> | <p>The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the Biblical text and different possible interpretive stances:</p> | ||
<subcategory>How many dead bodies? | <subcategory>How many dead bodies? | ||
− | <p>While the Alexander Master depicts two dead bodies, and Blake includes just one, Schnorr and the Speculum do not portray any at all.  Which is most supported by the text? </p> | + | <p>While the Alexander Master depicts two dead bodies, and Blake includes just one, Schnorr and the Speculum do not portray any at all.<fn>Schnorr, though, alludes to the murder through the sword in Lemekh's hand.</fn>  Which is most supported by the text?  Lemekh's words, "כִּי אִישׁ הָרַגְתִּי לְפִצְעִי וְיֶלֶד לְחַבֻּרָתִי" are ambiguous.  Taken literally, one might assume that both a child and older man were killed,<fn>See, for instance, Tanchuma who identifies these as Kayin and Tuval Kayin, or the Netziv who agrees that two people were killed but leaves them anonymous.</fn> but it is also possible that the two halves of the verse are simply poetically parallel and speak of but one victim.<fn>See Cassuto who reads the verse in this manner.</fn> Alternatively, Lemekh's words do not constitute a statement at all but rather a rhetorical question, "Have I killed a man...", in which case there are no deaths to view.<fn>For two variations of this approach see Bereshit Rabbah and R. Yosef Kara.  The former assumes that Noach's wives refused to have relation with him, knowing of the impending flood.  R. Yosef Kara, in contrast, has Lemekh responding to the noisy quarreling between his wives. Either way, Lemekh questions them why they are punishing him, if he has done no wrong and killed neither boy nor man.. </fn></p> |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
− | <subcategory>Boast | + | <subcategory>Boast or lament? |
+ | <p>Blake's Lemekh is dismayed at his actions, whereas Schnorr's figure seems proud and happy to share his feat.  What was the Biblical Lemekh feeling?  Again the text is ambiguous, and depends both on how one interprets the phrases "לְפִצְעִי" and "לְחַבֻּרָתִי" and what tone one ascribes to the words. Thus, for example, Seforno reads Lemekh as expressing sincere regret and explains that he is telling his wives, "I have killed a man and it will be a wound to me" (I will always hurt for my deed).  Ibn Kaspi, in contrast, asserts that Lemekh is boasting to his wives that to retaliate for a mere bruise, he has killed a man.</p> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Lemech's wives | <subcategory>Lemech's wives | ||
+ | <p>In Blakes image' Lemekh's wives appear almost as distraught as he, hugging each other in their pain.  In the Speculum, in contrast, the two wives appear to harass their husband.  Though Bereshit shares nothing of Adah and Zilah's reaction to Lemekh's monologue, both depictions fit various commentaries on the story.  The Tanchuma suggest that Lemekh hasd killed his own relatives, his ancestor Kayin, and son, Tuval KAyin.  As such, amournful reposnse b his wives is expected.</p> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Murder Weapon | <subcategory>Murder Weapon | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Schnorr depicts Lemech wielding a sword while the Alexander Master accouters him witha  bow and arrow.</p> |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 00:21, 28 June 2015
Lemekh in Art
Overview
The character of Lamekh appears in Tanakh only briefly, relaying an enigmatic speech to his wives which hints to a murder, but does not elaborate further. The four artworks displayed here, the painting by William Blake,1 the woodcut by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld, 2 the engraving by the Alexander Master,3 and the miniature from the Speculum humanæ salvationis all depict the event. The portrayals differ in almost every detail, from the choice of characters included, to the emotions they express and the actions they commit. The variety reflects the many different ways the story has been understood.Contrasting Images
Blake
Blake's image is full of pathos,with a grief-stricken Lemech taking center stage. Lemech pulls his hair in anguish as he looks at the dead body sprawled on the floor by his feet. His wives stand to the side, embracing each other in their shared sorrow as they look at both their husband and his victim.
Schnorr
Schnorr's Lamekh stands in stark contrast to that of Blake. He is not tormented and distraught, but rather proud and defiant. He runs home to his waiting wives and family, his sword raised in a sign of victory. They look up at him with admiration.
Alexander Master
The Alexander Master depicts Lemech as a hunter. He stands to the viewer's left, holding his bow and arrow, aiming to shoot. Near him a young boy lies face down on the ground, while a second man lies a bit further away with an arrow through his heart. This Lemekh's emotions are hard to read, and contain neither signs of despair nor of pride.
Speculum
This depiction differs from the others in that it contains no hints of violence on the part of Lemech at all, no sword and no dead bodies. Instead, a somewhat foolish-looking Lemech stands in between his two wives, who raise their fists at him and pull on his hair. Lemech lifts his hands as if to say, "enough, what do you want from me?"
Relationship to the Biblical Text
The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the Biblical text and different possible interpretive stances:
How many dead bodies?
While the Alexander Master depicts two dead bodies, and Blake includes just one, Schnorr and the Speculum do not portray any at all.4 Which is most supported by the text? Lemekh's words, "כִּי אִישׁ הָרַגְתִּי לְפִצְעִי וְיֶלֶד לְחַבֻּרָתִי" are ambiguous. Taken literally, one might assume that both a child and older man were killed,5 but it is also possible that the two halves of the verse are simply poetically parallel and speak of but one victim.6 Alternatively, Lemekh's words do not constitute a statement at all but rather a rhetorical question, "Have I killed a man...", in which case there are no deaths to view.7
Boast or lament?
Blake's Lemekh is dismayed at his actions, whereas Schnorr's figure seems proud and happy to share his feat. What was the Biblical Lemekh feeling? Again the text is ambiguous, and depends both on how one interprets the phrases "לְפִצְעִי" and "לְחַבֻּרָתִי" and what tone one ascribes to the words. Thus, for example, Seforno reads Lemekh as expressing sincere regret and explains that he is telling his wives, "I have killed a man and it will be a wound to me" (I will always hurt for my deed). Ibn Kaspi, in contrast, asserts that Lemekh is boasting to his wives that to retaliate for a mere bruise, he has killed a man.
Lemech's wives
In Blakes image' Lemekh's wives appear almost as distraught as he, hugging each other in their pain. In the Speculum, in contrast, the two wives appear to harass their husband. Though Bereshit shares nothing of Adah and Zilah's reaction to Lemekh's monologue, both depictions fit various commentaries on the story. The Tanchuma suggest that Lemekh hasd killed his own relatives, his ancestor Kayin, and son, Tuval KAyin. As such, amournful reposnse b his wives is expected.
Murder Weapon
Schnorr depicts Lemech wielding a sword while the Alexander Master accouters him witha bow and arrow.