Difference between revisions of "Literary Devices – Bereshit 13/0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<h1>Literary Devices – Bereshit 13</h1> | <h1>Literary Devices – Bereshit 13</h1> | ||
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | <div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<category>Character Titles | <category>Character Titles | ||
<subcategory>Lot | <subcategory>Lot | ||
| Line 18: | Line 11: | ||
<p>See R. Joseph Soloveitchik, Abraham’s Journey (New York, 2008):117-119, who discusses how Lot's being attracted to Egyptian materialistic culture contributed to the rift between him and Avraham.<fn>He writes, “Something happened in Egypt . . . . Lot also traveled with him, but no longer as a member of Abraham’s family. . . Egypt was the world’s most advanced country, and Abraham was a shepherd. Lot was completely overpowered and overwhelmed by the stupendous Egyptian culture, civilization, and technology. He could not resist the influence of the environment. Abraham could, Sarah could, but Lot couldn’t. Here is the acid test of a Jew: can he resist environmental pressures, can he withstand the impact of a culture that is materially great but morally and ethically very primitive?” </fn></p> | <p>See R. Joseph Soloveitchik, Abraham’s Journey (New York, 2008):117-119, who discusses how Lot's being attracted to Egyptian materialistic culture contributed to the rift between him and Avraham.<fn>He writes, “Something happened in Egypt . . . . Lot also traveled with him, but no longer as a member of Abraham’s family. . . Egypt was the world’s most advanced country, and Abraham was a shepherd. Lot was completely overpowered and overwhelmed by the stupendous Egyptian culture, civilization, and technology. He could not resist the influence of the environment. Abraham could, Sarah could, but Lot couldn’t. Here is the acid test of a Jew: can he resist environmental pressures, can he withstand the impact of a culture that is materially great but morally and ethically very primitive?” </fn></p> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
| + | </category> | ||
| + | <category>Parenthetical Statements | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>Bereshit 13:7 states parenthetically that the Canaanite and the Perizzites lived in the land. Seforno and Abarbanel suggest that the purpose of this background information is to explain Avraham’s motivation for suggesting a separation from Lot: he was concerned that tension between the two of them might invite the animosity or aggression of their neighbors.</li> | ||
| + | <li>Another parenthetical statement appears in 13:13, where we are told that the people of Sedom were exceedingly wicked. This provides background that shines a negative light on Lot’s choice to live there, and that prepares the reader for the story to come in Bereshit 19.</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> | ||
Version as of 21:26, 28 June 2023
Literary Devices – Bereshit 13
Character Titles
Lot
When Avraham begins the journey to Egypt in Bereshit 12:5, Sarai is identified as his wife and Lot as his brother’s son. By contrast, when the family leaves Egypt in 13:1, Sarai is still identified as his wife but Lot is not given a relational epithet. This implies that Lot’s relationship with Avraham frayed during the time in Egypt, leading to their separation in Chapter 13.
Articles
See R. Joseph Soloveitchik, Abraham’s Journey (New York, 2008):117-119, who discusses how Lot's being attracted to Egyptian materialistic culture contributed to the rift between him and Avraham.1
Parenthetical Statements
- Bereshit 13:7 states parenthetically that the Canaanite and the Perizzites lived in the land. Seforno and Abarbanel suggest that the purpose of this background information is to explain Avraham’s motivation for suggesting a separation from Lot: he was concerned that tension between the two of them might invite the animosity or aggression of their neighbors.
- Another parenthetical statement appears in 13:13, where we are told that the people of Sedom were exceedingly wicked. This provides background that shines a negative light on Lot’s choice to live there, and that prepares the reader for the story to come in Bereshit 19.
