Difference between revisions of "Literary Devices – Bereshit 2-3/0"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Relative Prevalence | <subcategory>Relative Prevalence | ||
− | <p>When looking at the relative frequency of the words in the unit, another keyword takes on significance.</p><ul> | + | <p>When looking at the relative frequency of the words in the unit, another keyword takes on significance.</p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
<li><span style="color: #ff6600;"><b>עֵירֹם</b></span> – See <a href="https://mg.alhatorah.org/TanakhLab/Bereshit/2/4/3/24">Tanakh Lab</a> that though the word only appears three times in the unit, it is 143 times more prevalent here than elsewhere in Tanakh.  This might suggest that one of the keys to understanding the story of the Tree of Knowledge lies in exploring this theme. See <a href="The Tree of Knowledge" data-aht="page">The Tree of Knowledge</a> and the opinion of Ibn Ezra, Radak and Abarbanel <a href="../The_Tree_of_Knowledge/2/en#SexualDesire">there</a>, who all suggest that the knowledge granted by the tree was sexual desire, which imparted new significance to the notion of nakedness.</li> | <li><span style="color: #ff6600;"><b>עֵירֹם</b></span> – See <a href="https://mg.alhatorah.org/TanakhLab/Bereshit/2/4/3/24">Tanakh Lab</a> that though the word only appears three times in the unit, it is 143 times more prevalent here than elsewhere in Tanakh.  This might suggest that one of the keys to understanding the story of the Tree of Knowledge lies in exploring this theme. See <a href="The Tree of Knowledge" data-aht="page">The Tree of Knowledge</a> and the opinion of Ibn Ezra, Radak and Abarbanel <a href="../The_Tree_of_Knowledge/2/en#SexualDesire">there</a>, who all suggest that the knowledge granted by the tree was sexual desire, which imparted new significance to the notion of nakedness.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
<p>Throughout this unit, Hashem is consistently referred to as "י״י אֱלֹהִים". This stands in contrast to Chapter 1, where He is referred to only as "אֱלֹהִים" and to Chapter 4 where the name "י״י" appears alone for the first time. For discussion of the different usages, see <a href="Two Accounts of Creation: Bereshit 1–2" data-aht="page"> Bereshit 1–2</a>.</p> | <p>Throughout this unit, Hashem is consistently referred to as "י״י אֱלֹהִים". This stands in contrast to Chapter 1, where He is referred to only as "אֱלֹהִים" and to Chapter 4 where the name "י״י" appears alone for the first time. For discussion of the different usages, see <a href="Two Accounts of Creation: Bereshit 1–2" data-aht="page"> Bereshit 1–2</a>.</p> | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
+ | </category> | ||
+ | <category>Relationship Epithets | ||
+ | <p>Tanakh is artful in the way it refers to people in relation to each other. </p> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>In the opening of the story of the sin of the Tree of Knowledgein Chapter 3, Adam is identified as Chavvah’s husband (3:6) and Chavvah as Adam’s wife (3:8). </li> | ||
+ | <li>When they are confronted by Hashem, by contrast, Adam refers to Chavvah simply as “ha-ishah.” </li> | ||
+ | <li>Hashem again refers to Adam as Chavvah’s husband (3:15) and Chava as Adam’s wife (3:17) in the context of the curses.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | This mechanism perhaps reflects the psychological reality that people often turn against each other in blame during a time of crisis, even if they were partners until that point.  Hashem’s language reminds Adam and Chava of their relationship despite their attempts to cast blame on each other.   | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Version as of 12:35, 22 June 2023
Literary Devices – Bereshit 2-3
Chiastic Structure
The story of Gan Eden can be construed as a chiasm,1 in which the turning point is the sin of eating from the Tree of Knowledge:
- a) The placement of man in Gan Eden: וַיַּנִּחֵהוּ בְגַן עֵדֶן (2:15)
- b) The naming of animals: וַיִּקְרָא הָאָדָם שֵׁמוֹת לְכׇל הַבְּהֵמָה (2:19-20)
- c) The creation of Chavvah and her relationship with Adam: וְדָבַק בְּאִשְׁתּוֹ וְהָיוּ לְבָשָׂר אֶחָד (2:22-24)
- d) The dialogue between the snake and Chavvah: וַיֹּאמֶר הַנָּחָשׁ אֶל הָאִשָּׁה (3:2-5)
- e) The sin of eating from the tree: וַתִּקַּח מִפִּרְיוֹ וַתֹּאכַל (3:6)
- d') The curse on the relationship between the snake and Chavvah and offspring: וְאֵיבָה אָשִׁית בֵּינְךָ וּבֵין הָאִשָּׁה (3:14-15)
- c') The curse on the relationship between Adam and Chavvah: וְאֶל אִישֵׁךְ תְּשׁוּקָתֵךְ וְהוּא יִמְשׇׁל בָּךְ (3:16)
- b') The naming of Chavvah: וַיִּקְרָא הָאָדָם שֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ חַוָּה (3:20)
- a') The banishment from Gan Eden: וַיְשַׁלְּחֵהוּ י״י אֱלֹהִים מִגַּן עֵדֶן (3:22-23)
The structure highlights how in the aftermath of sin, the status quo changes, and earlier relationships are reversed.
Key Words
Prevalent Words
- Tanakh Lab highlights that the words which occur most frequently in the unit are the names of the main characters: אלהים, אדם, אשה,2 the verb "אכל" (eat),3 and the nouns "עץ" (tree) and "גן" (garden).4 This is somewhat expected as these form the basis of the plot. One figure, though, is missing from the list, being mentioned only 5 times in the unit -- the snake. This might suggest that, despite his pivotal role, he is really just a secondary character in the story.5
Relative Prevalence
When looking at the relative frequency of the words in the unit, another keyword takes on significance.
- עֵירֹם – See Tanakh Lab that though the word only appears three times in the unit, it is 143 times more prevalent here than elsewhere in Tanakh. This might suggest that one of the keys to understanding the story of the Tree of Knowledge lies in exploring this theme. See The Tree of Knowledge and the opinion of Ibn Ezra, Radak and Abarbanel there, who all suggest that the knowledge granted by the tree was sexual desire, which imparted new significance to the notion of nakedness.
Character Titles
י״י אֱלֹהִים (Hashem Elokim)
Throughout this unit, Hashem is consistently referred to as "י״י אֱלֹהִים". This stands in contrast to Chapter 1, where He is referred to only as "אֱלֹהִים" and to Chapter 4 where the name "י״י" appears alone for the first time. For discussion of the different usages, see Bereshit 1–2.
Relationship Epithets This mechanism perhaps reflects the psychological reality that people often turn against each other in blame during a time of crisis, even if they were partners until that point. Hashem’s language reminds Adam and Chava of their relationship despite their attempts to cast blame on each other.
Tanakh is artful in the way it refers to people in relation to each other.
- In the opening of the story of the sin of the Tree of Knowledgein Chapter 3, Adam is identified as Chavvah’s husband (3:6) and Chavvah as Adam’s wife (3:8).
- When they are confronted by Hashem, by contrast, Adam refers to Chavvah simply as “ha-ishah.”
- Hashem again refers to Adam as Chavvah’s husband (3:15) and Chava as Adam’s wife (3:17) in the context of the curses.