Difference between revisions of "Literary Devices – Shemot 14/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 44: Line 44:
 
For more information about the nature of Biblical parallelism, see Dr. Mayer I. Gruber’s article&#160;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20689374?read-now=1&amp;seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents">The Meaning of Biblical Parallelism: A Biblical Perspective</a> and Dr. Adele Berlin’s <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23503350?searchText=&amp;searchUri=&amp;ab_segments=&amp;searchKey=&amp;refreqid=fastly-default%3A597a674cac61fd731f453302a133d0b9">Grammatical Aspects of Biblical Parallelism</a>.<fn>See also Dr. Robert Alter’s <i>The Art of Biblical Poetry</i> pp. 3-61, Dr. Adele Berlin’s <i>The Dynamics of Biblical Parallelism</i>, and Dr. James Kugel’s <i>The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History</i>.</fn>
 
For more information about the nature of Biblical parallelism, see Dr. Mayer I. Gruber’s article&#160;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20689374?read-now=1&amp;seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents">The Meaning of Biblical Parallelism: A Biblical Perspective</a> and Dr. Adele Berlin’s <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23503350?searchText=&amp;searchUri=&amp;ab_segments=&amp;searchKey=&amp;refreqid=fastly-default%3A597a674cac61fd731f453302a133d0b9">Grammatical Aspects of Biblical Parallelism</a>.<fn>See also Dr. Robert Alter’s <i>The Art of Biblical Poetry</i> pp. 3-61, Dr. Adele Berlin’s <i>The Dynamics of Biblical Parallelism</i>, and Dr. James Kugel’s <i>The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History</i>.</fn>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 +
</category>
 +
<category>Envelope Structure:&#160;
 
</category>
 
</category>
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 03:41, 11 December 2023

Literary Devices – Shemot 14

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Key Words

מצרים

  • As seen in the Tanakh Lab,1 the word מצרים appears 26 times in this chapter, more than any other. The repetition highlights the might of Egypt and terror they instill, even as they are about to be defeated. In the panicked words of the Israelites to Moshe in verses 12-13 the word appears a full five times, illustrating the psychological hold that Egypt continues to exert over Israel and the fear that they feel as a result.

חזק וכבד

  • Tanakh Lab – The two related roots of “כבד” and “חזק”, which have appeared many times throughout the exodus narrative in the context of hardening Paroh's heart, appear three times each in Shemot 14 as the story culminates.  Here, though, the root "כבד"  describe how Hashem will be honored through the miracle.  The repetition and wordplay highlight how Paroh’s obduracy led to the crowning miracle of the splitting of the sea.
  • Articles – See Prof. Yonatan Grossman's Leitwort who discusses the phenomenon of keywords as a whole,2 bringing "כבד" as one example, and R. Nathaniel Helfgot שתי מילים מנחות בסיפור יציאת מצרים, who explores the usages of the two roots כבד and חזק. Both authors note how the repetition of the roots demonstrates Hashem's measure for measure actions during the Exodus.3 

Wordplay

Examples Amos Hakham4 points out a play on words between the Egyptians’ exclamation of “What is this that we have done that we have sent Israel out from serving us?" and the Israelites’ cry of “What is this that you have done to us, to bring us out from Egypt?!” Both express regret at the exodus. Moreover, both exclamations contrast with the question that the Torah states will be asked by Jewish children about the Passover service in the future: “What is this?” (13:14). The despairing “What is this?” of the Egyptians and the Israelites at the time of the exodus will be replaced by the curious “What is this?” of generations of Jews as they commemorate the event.

Articles The following articles contain general discussion of wordplay in Tanakh:


Parallelism

Examples

  • The words attributed to Pharaoh in verse 3 are stated in parallelistic form:  נְבֻכִ֥ים הֵ֖ם בָּאָ֑רֶץ / סָגַ֥ר עֲלֵיהֶ֖ם הַמִּדְבָּֽר.  In his commentary on the Torah, Robert Alter suggests that this highlights Paroh’s “regal confidence” in his ability to capture the escaped Israelites.
  • Verse 9, which describes Mitzrayim’s apparently successful pursuit of the Israelites, is also formulated with parallel structure, also conveying a sense of confidence and majesty, which will shortly be upended:
    • וַיִּרְדְּפ֨וּ מִצְרַ֜יִם אַחֲרֵיהֶ֗ם / וַיַּשִּׂ֤יגוּ אוֹתָם֙ חֹנִ֣ים עַל־הַיָּ֔ם
    • כׇּל־סוּס֙ רֶ֣כֶב פַּרְעֹ֔ה / וּפָרָשָׁ֖יו וְחֵיל֑וֹ
    • עַל־פִּי֙ הַֽחִירֹ֔ת / לִפְנֵ֖י בַּ֥עַל צְפֹֽן

Articles For more information about the nature of Biblical parallelism, see Dr. Mayer I. Gruber’s article The Meaning of Biblical Parallelism: A Biblical Perspective and Dr. Adele Berlin’s Grammatical Aspects of Biblical Parallelism.6

Envelope Structure: