Difference between revisions of "MiMachorat HaShabbat/2"
m |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<point><b>How would one know that the Shabbat is within Chag HaMatzot?</b> One of the main questions that is raised by the opponents of this position is how one is supposed to know from the verses which Shabbat is referred to;<fn>See, for example, the question of  R. Yose in <a href="SifraEmor10-12-1-5" data-aht="source">Sifra Emor 10:12:1-5</a> and <a href="BavliMenachot65b-66a" data-aht="source">Bavli Menachot 65b-66a</a> and the discussion of R. Saadia as quoted in the commentary of Yefet the Karaite. See also Rashi and Ramban who point to this question as being the strongest of those raised in the gemara. The very fact that so many sects accepted the idea that the word Shabbat referred to a day of the week but nonetheless disagree regarding when that Shabbat fell, highlights the problem.</fn> it could be any Shabbat of the year!  Aharon b. Levi the Karaite replies that the placement of the verses connect it to Chag HaMatzot. This position assumes that there is an overlap in time between the unit of verses speaking of the holiday and those speaking of the Omer offering<fn>Though the latter follows the former in the text, the two speak of the same time period.  Since the rituals are distinct, though, each is relayed separately, with its own passage and unique heading despite the chronological overlap.  The Rabbinates read the chronology of the verses in the same way, but the Qumarn sect do not.</fn>  and the latter's dating is thus naturally informed by the former.<fn>Though one might argue that this still leaves ambiguity if the Shabbat referred to falls in the middle of Chag HaMatzot or afterwards, Salmon b Yerucham the Kaarite argues that this is as much of a problem for the Rabbinates. According to them too it is unlcear if "the day following the Shabbat" refers to the first or second Yom Tov of the holiday.  See also Yefet who argues similarly.</fn></point> | <point><b>How would one know that the Shabbat is within Chag HaMatzot?</b> One of the main questions that is raised by the opponents of this position is how one is supposed to know from the verses which Shabbat is referred to;<fn>See, for example, the question of  R. Yose in <a href="SifraEmor10-12-1-5" data-aht="source">Sifra Emor 10:12:1-5</a> and <a href="BavliMenachot65b-66a" data-aht="source">Bavli Menachot 65b-66a</a> and the discussion of R. Saadia as quoted in the commentary of Yefet the Karaite. See also Rashi and Ramban who point to this question as being the strongest of those raised in the gemara. The very fact that so many sects accepted the idea that the word Shabbat referred to a day of the week but nonetheless disagree regarding when that Shabbat fell, highlights the problem.</fn> it could be any Shabbat of the year!  Aharon b. Levi the Karaite replies that the placement of the verses connect it to Chag HaMatzot. This position assumes that there is an overlap in time between the unit of verses speaking of the holiday and those speaking of the Omer offering<fn>Though the latter follows the former in the text, the two speak of the same time period.  Since the rituals are distinct, though, each is relayed separately, with its own passage and unique heading despite the chronological overlap.  The Rabbinates read the chronology of the verses in the same way, but the Qumarn sect do not.</fn>  and the latter's dating is thus naturally informed by the former.<fn>Though one might argue that this still leaves ambiguity if the Shabbat referred to falls in the middle of Chag HaMatzot or afterwards, Salmon b Yerucham the Kaarite argues that this is as much of a problem for the Rabbinates. According to them too it is unlcear if "the day following the Shabbat" refers to the first or second Yom Tov of the holiday.  See also Yefet who argues similarly.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Lack of date for Shavuot</b> – The Karaites<fn>See, for instance, Alkumisi, Salmon b. Yerucham and Levi b. Yefet.  See also those against whom R. Saadia Gaon is reacting in his ספר ההבחנה.</fn> point to another advantage of this approach; it easily explains why Shavuot, unlike other holidays, is not dated in the Torah. According to them, Shavuot actually has no fixed date, only a set day of the week and in any given year it might fall out anywhere between 5-11 Sivan.<fn>According to the Samaritans the date is also variable but ranges between 6-12 Sivan instead.  [See above that the Karaites and Samaritans disagreed about whether one began counting on the first Sunday of Chag HaMatzot if that fell out on the 15th of Nissan.]  Such flexible dating serves to sever the direct connection between Shavuot and the giving of the Torah.  As neither the Samaritans nor the  Karaites assume that the revelation at Sinai occurred on 6 Sivan, they had no incentive to set Shavuot on that date.  [The Karaite R. Aharon b. Yosef, in his comments to Shemot 18:29, asserts that the date of revelation is 3 Sivan, while the Samaritans commemorate it on the 46th day of the Omer.  However, since the Samaritans celebrate Shavuot for a full week, beginning on the Monday of the last week of the Omer, they too end up connecting revelation and the holiday.]</fn></point> | <point><b>Lack of date for Shavuot</b> – The Karaites<fn>See, for instance, Alkumisi, Salmon b. Yerucham and Levi b. Yefet.  See also those against whom R. Saadia Gaon is reacting in his ספר ההבחנה.</fn> point to another advantage of this approach; it easily explains why Shavuot, unlike other holidays, is not dated in the Torah. According to them, Shavuot actually has no fixed date, only a set day of the week and in any given year it might fall out anywhere between 5-11 Sivan.<fn>According to the Samaritans the date is also variable but ranges between 6-12 Sivan instead.  [See above that the Karaites and Samaritans disagreed about whether one began counting on the first Sunday of Chag HaMatzot if that fell out on the 15th of Nissan.]  Such flexible dating serves to sever the direct connection between Shavuot and the giving of the Torah.  As neither the Samaritans nor the  Karaites assume that the revelation at Sinai occurred on 6 Sivan, they had no incentive to set Shavuot on that date.  [The Karaite R. Aharon b. Yosef, in his comments to Shemot 18:29, asserts that the date of revelation is 3 Sivan, while the Samaritans commemorate it on the 46th day of the Omer.  However, since the Samaritans celebrate Shavuot for a full week, beginning on the Monday of the last week of the Omer, they too end up connecting revelation and the holiday.]</fn></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Significance of Sunday?</b> A disadvantage of this position is that the Torah's normal mode of marking time is to date events to their lunar calendrical date or by an agricultural season, not by the day of the week in which they fall. Moreover, this approach must further explain what is significant about a Sunday specifically that Hashem would decide that the counting (and thus Shavuot) need fall out on that day of the week.<br/> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><b> Two days of rest</b> – In the Scholion to Megillat Taanit, a Boethusian tells R. Yochanan b. Zakkai that Hashem wanted the nation to rest for two consecutive days on Shavuot, which otherwise would be a short one day holiday.<fn>It is not clear if this reflects a serious explanation or if it is  fabricated conversation used to mock the Boethusian position.</fn></li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Prevent Sabbath desecration</b> – Salmon b. Yerucham the Karaite suggests instead that Shavuot was set on Sunday to ensure that the holiday never fell on Shabbat which would be problematic for bringing a Shelamim offering.</li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"וַיֹּאכְלוּ מֵעֲבוּר הָאָרֶץ מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיֹּאכְלוּ מֵעֲבוּר הָאָרֶץ מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח"</b><ul> | ||
<li>The Karaites<fn>See Alkumisi and Salmon b. Yerucham.  Aharon b. Yosef further points out that according to the Rabbinate position, in contrast, the verse in Yehoshua suggests that the Israelites sinned in eating from the new harvest before the day of bringing the Omer!  See below how the sages understand the verse.</fn> assert that the year the Israelites entered the land, Chag HaPesach fell on a Shabbat, and the Omer offering was brought on the next day ‎‏(‎"‏‎‏מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח‎"),<fn>Pesach is understood to be the fourteenth of Nissan, the day the Pesach offering was brought.  This fits with the usage and dating of the term in <a href="Bemidbar33-3" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:3</a>.</fn>‎‏ Nissan 15, allowing the nation to eat of the new harvest on that very day. The passage in Yehoshua, thus, could support their understanding of "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת".</li> | <li>The Karaites<fn>See Alkumisi and Salmon b. Yerucham.  Aharon b. Yosef further points out that according to the Rabbinate position, in contrast, the verse in Yehoshua suggests that the Israelites sinned in eating from the new harvest before the day of bringing the Omer!  See below how the sages understand the verse.</fn> assert that the year the Israelites entered the land, Chag HaPesach fell on a Shabbat, and the Omer offering was brought on the next day ‎‏(‎"‏‎‏מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח‎"),<fn>Pesach is understood to be the fourteenth of Nissan, the day the Pesach offering was brought.  This fits with the usage and dating of the term in <a href="Bemidbar33-3" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 33:3</a>.</fn>‎‏ Nissan 15, allowing the nation to eat of the new harvest on that very day. The passage in Yehoshua, thus, could support their understanding of "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת".</li> | ||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"תִּסְפׇּר לָךְ מֵהָחֵל חֶרְמֵשׁ בַּקָּמָה"</b> – Aharon b. Yosef suggests that this time marker is equivalent to that of "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת", with both referring to the day the Omer is offered.  He compares the phrase to that in <a href="DivreiHaYamimII31-10" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim II 31:10</a>, "מֵהָחֵל הַתְּרוּמָה לָבִיא בֵית י"י" suggesting that both point to a day when a sacrifice is brought to the Mikdash.</point> | <point><b>"תִּסְפׇּר לָךְ מֵהָחֵל חֶרְמֵשׁ בַּקָּמָה"</b> – Aharon b. Yosef suggests that this time marker is equivalent to that of "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת", with both referring to the day the Omer is offered.  He compares the phrase to that in <a href="DivreiHaYamimII31-10" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim II 31:10</a>, "מֵהָחֵל הַתְּרוּמָה לָבִיא בֵית י"י" suggesting that both point to a day when a sacrifice is brought to the Mikdash.</point> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<point><b>Polemical Motivations</b> – This reading might in part be motivated by a desire to prevent the possibility of the day of the Omer sacrifice falling on a Shabbat, necessitating reaping on Shabbat.<fn>See Tosefta Meanchot 10:23 which suggests that the Boethusians opposed the date for this reason. See also Salmon b. Yerucham's similar argument above regarding the desire to eliminate any problems bringing the Shelamim offering if Shavuot were to fall on Shabbat.</fn>  By setting a fixed day of the week, they eliminated the need to ever have to transgress the regular laws of Shabbat.<fn>This discomfort was not shared by the Rabbinates who suggest in several cases that another law might supersede the laws of Shabbat.</fn></point> | <point><b>Polemical Motivations</b> – This reading might in part be motivated by a desire to prevent the possibility of the day of the Omer sacrifice falling on a Shabbat, necessitating reaping on Shabbat.<fn>See Tosefta Meanchot 10:23 which suggests that the Boethusians opposed the date for this reason. See also Salmon b. Yerucham's similar argument above regarding the desire to eliminate any problems bringing the Shelamim offering if Shavuot were to fall on Shabbat.</fn>  By setting a fixed day of the week, they eliminated the need to ever have to transgress the regular laws of Shabbat.<fn>This discomfort was not shared by the Rabbinates who suggest in several cases that another law might supersede the laws of Shabbat.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Who Counts</b></point> | <point><b>Who Counts</b></point> |
Version as of 23:35, 30 April 2015
MiMachorat HaShabbat
Exegetical Approaches
The Day After Shabbat Bereshit
The word Shabbat refers to the seventh day of the week and the Omer offering is always brought on the following day. This position subdivides regarding when in the calendar this Shabbat falls:
Within Chag HaMatzot
- ממחרת השבת – According to the Karaites, the "day following the Shabbat" (rather than Shabbat itself) must fall within the week of Chag Hamatzot. Thus, one could conceivably bring the Omer offering and start counting as early as the 15th of Nissan.2
- השבת – The Samaritans, in contrast, maintain that the Shabbat itself (not the "day following the Shabbat") must fall within the holiday. As such, one would never bring the Omer offering before the 16th, but depending on when Shabbat were to fall, one might bring it as late as the 22nd of Nissan, after the conclusion of the festival.
- Two days of rest – In the Scholion to Megillat Taanit, a Boethusian tells R. Yochanan b. Zakkai that Hashem wanted the nation to rest for two consecutive days on Shavuot, which otherwise would be a short one day holiday.11
- Prevent Sabbath desecration – Salmon b. Yerucham the Karaite suggests instead that Shavuot was set on Sunday to ensure that the holiday never fell on Shabbat which would be problematic for bringing a Shelamim offering.
- The Karaites12 assert that the year the Israelites entered the land, Chag HaPesach fell on a Shabbat, and the Omer offering was brought on the next day ("מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח"),13 Nissan 15, allowing the nation to eat of the new harvest on that very day. The passage in Yehoshua, thus, could support their understanding of "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת".
- Since the Samaritans do not accept Sefer Yehoshua as part of their canon they are not bothered by any contradictions therefrom.14
After Chag HaMatzot
The Omer offering and counting of fifty days began on the day following the first Shabbat Bereshit after the festival of Chag HaMatzot.
After the First Harvest
The Omer is brought on the first Sunday following the initial harvest of the season.
The Day After Yom Shabbaton (Yom Tov)
Shabbat is another way of referring to Yom Tov. The Omer offering is brought on the day after the Yom Tov of Chag HaMatzot. The approach divides based on which Yom Tov is referred to:
The First Yom Tov
The Day of the Waving of the Omer follows the first Yom Tov of the festival, falling out on the 16th of Nissan.
- Fifteenth of Nissan – According to Ibn Ezra "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח" refers to the fifteenth of Nissan,43 when eating of the new wheat was still prohibited. To solve the problem, he suggests44 that the verse speaks of eating from the old grain.45 An opinion in Yerushalmi Challah 2:1 alternatively asserts that the prohibition of "new wheat" only took effect after the conquest.46
- Sixteenth of Nissan – Other exegetes47 maintain that "מִמׇּחֳרַת הַפֶּסַח" is the 16th of Nissan. Since the Pesach sacrifice is eaten on the evening of the fifteenth, the next new day is the 16th. This is equivalent to ""מִמׇּחֳרַת הַשַּׁבָּת48 when the Omer is brought and the new grain is permitted.49
- Transgressing of Shabbat – As opposed to the Sectarians, the Sages were not bothered by the potential trangressing of Shabbat were the Day of the Waving of the Omer to fall on it. As such, they were more concerned with setting a monthly date rather than a day of the week for the offering.
- Shavuot and Matan Torah – It is possible that part of the Rabbinate disagreement with the Karaites related to their desire to connect Shavuot with the revelation at Sinai. Since this was associated with the sixth of Sivan, they had an incentive to date Shavuot then.
The Second Yom Tov
The Omer is sacrificed on the morrow of the second Yom Tov of Chag HaMatzot, which dates to the 22nd of Nissan.
The Day After the Cessation
The word Shabbat refers to something that has ceased. The Omer offering is dated to the day following such an event.
- Leavened bread – According to HaKetav VeHaKabbalah53 the 15th of Nissan is referred to as a Shabbat since it is a day in which one is obligated to desist from leavened bread.
- The manna – Lichtenschtadt and I. Kislev asserts that the Torah is referring to the future54 cessation of the manna,55 which historically took place on the 15th of Nissan.56
- Essence of day – According to HaKetav VeHaKabbalah, the entire essence of the first day of Yom Tov is the cessation from leavened bread. This was especially true during the year of the Exodus when leavened bread was only prohibited for that one day. HaKetav VeHaKabbalah does not explain, though, why it is only here that the first Yom Tov is so called.
- Recall the manna –According to I. Kislev the Torah purposefully wants to connect the bringing of the Omer and the cessation of the manna. In fact, the entire ritual comes, in part, to commemorate the miracle and the subsequent transition from supernatural providence to natural living. Giving a calendrical date would have obscured the connection. In addition, at this point it was not yet known what specific date the people were to enter the land and stop eating manna.
- By dating one event to the other, the Torah connects them.
- The specific measure of an omer's worth of the harvest recalls the omer's worth of manna that was allotted to each Israelite each day.
- While the harvest focuses on man's natural food supply, the manna represents Hashem's supernatural source of sustenance. The cessation of the latter is what led to man's harvesting.