Mordechai's Refusal to Bow/1

Mordechai's Refusal to Bow

Introduction

Why Refuse?

The entire story of Purim transpired because of one crucial decision of Mordechai:

EN/HEע/E

(ב) וְכׇל עַבְדֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁעַר הַמֶּלֶךְ כֹּרְעִים וּמִשְׁתַּחֲוִים לְהָמָן כִּי כֵן צִוָּה לוֹ הַמֶּלֶךְ וּמׇרְדֳּכַי לֹא יִכְרַע וְלֹא יִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה.... (ה) וַיַּרְא הָמָן כִּי אֵין מׇרְדֳּכַי כֹּרֵעַ וּמִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה לוֹ וַיִּמָּלֵא הָמָן חֵמָה. (ו) וַיִּבֶז בְּעֵינָיו לִשְׁלֹחַ יָד בְּמׇרְדֳּכַי לְבַדּוֹ כִּי הִגִּידוּ לוֹ אֶת עַם מׇרְדֳּכָי וַיְבַקֵּשׁ הָמָן לְהַשְׁמִיד אֶת כׇּל הַיְּהוּדִים אֲשֶׁר בְּכׇל מַלְכוּת אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ עַם מׇרְדֳּכָי. 

(2)

Mordechai's defiance of the king's directive leads Haman to attempt to annihilate the Jewish nation.  Surprisingly, though, the Megillah explains neither Mordechai's motives¹ nor the backdrop for the Achashverosh's original order.  Why did Haman desire that the king's servants bow to him?²  What were the factors which caused Mordechai not to comply?³ 

A Bad Choice?

As Mordechai's actions led to the near annihilation of his people, it begs the question of whether his action was justified.  There appears to be no prohibition against bowing to people, as evidenced by the many Biblical characters (including Moshe) who do so.⁴  What, then, could have been so vital to Mordechai to prompt him to endanger his entire nation?  As Ibn Ezra writes:

EN/HEע/E

והנה יש לשאול למה הכניס מרדכי עצמו בסכנה גם הכניס כל ישראל היה ראוי שידבר לאסתר ותסירנו משער המלך ולא יכעיס את המן אחר שראה שהשעה משחקת לו!

And

Other Questions

• "כִּי הִגִּיד לָהֶם אֲשֶׁר הוּא יְהוּדִי" – Do these words provide the reason for Mordechai's refusal to bow, or do they point only to the antisemitism of the servants who informed on him to Haman?
• "לֹא יִכְרַע וְלֹא יִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה" – Is there a difference between kneeling and bowing?  Is each used as a means to honor another person, or is kneeling specifically an act of worshiping a deity?  Are they equally permitted or prohibited?
• Haman's edict – Did Mordechai anticipate the consequences of his actions?⁵  Was he cognizant, even after the fact, that it was his refusal that led Haman to his decision of destruction, or did he never connect between the two?
• "כׇל עַבְדֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁעַר הַמֶּלֶךְ" – Who was included in the command to prostrate themselves – only members of the king's court or the entire populace?  What might this teach regarding either Haman or Mordechai's motives?

¹ See below that although the verse states, "כִּי הִגִּיד לָהֶם אֲשֶׁר הוּא יְהוּדִי", it is unclear whether or not this is an explanation of what motivated Mordechai's original refusal.

² It is also possible that this was not Haman's initiative at all, but only that of Achashverosh (as the verse states "כִּי כֵן צִוָּה לוֹ הַמֶּלֶךְ").  However, Haman's internal thoughts and recommendation to the king in Esther 6:6-9 make it probable that he was the impetus behind the king's instructions.

³ The motives of the two need not be identical. It is possible that Mordechai's motives were religious in nature while Haman's were political or vice versa.

⁴ See R. Saadia Gaon, who questions, "Why did Mordecai refrain from bowing down before Haman? Was he better than the patriarchs, some of whom bowed down to others?"

⁵ Did he think that he was only endangering himself or had he reason to believe that Haman might seek vengeance on the whole nation?  Or, did he think that his stance should not have put anyone's life in danger?