Difference between revisions of "Mordechai's Religious Identity/2"
m |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Rashi adopts this interpretation.</fn> explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah.  R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.<fn>See <a href="Mordechai's Refusal to Bow" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Refusal to Bow</a> for a discussion of R. Yosef' Kara's position on whether Mordechai's decision was justified.</fn></li> | <li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Rashi adopts this interpretation.</fn> explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah.  R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.<fn>See <a href="Mordechai's Refusal to Bow" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Refusal to Bow</a> for a discussion of R. Yosef' Kara's position on whether Mordechai's decision was justified.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li><b>Neutral statement </b>– Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone.</li> | + | <li><b>Neutral statement </b>– Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone. See <a href="Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו</a> for elaboration.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<point><b>Biblical parallels</b> – R. Medan suggests that there are similarities between Mordechai and Moshe.  During the earlier stages of their lives, each was detached from his brethren and had ties to the king's palace.  Moshe may have even been swayed by Yitro's religious beliefs.<fn>R. Medan points to the opinion brought by R. Elazar HaModai in Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael that suggests that Moshe made a pact with Yitro that one of his sons would not be circumcised and raised as a polytheist.  For a full discussion of this episode, see <a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a>.</fn> Nonetheless at the crucial moment, each one assumes the leadership mantle and dedicates the rest of his life to saving and helping his nation.</point> | <point><b>Biblical parallels</b> – R. Medan suggests that there are similarities between Mordechai and Moshe.  During the earlier stages of their lives, each was detached from his brethren and had ties to the king's palace.  Moshe may have even been swayed by Yitro's religious beliefs.<fn>R. Medan points to the opinion brought by R. Elazar HaModai in Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael that suggests that Moshe made a pact with Yitro that one of his sons would not be circumcised and raised as a polytheist.  For a full discussion of this episode, see <a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a>.</fn> Nonetheless at the crucial moment, each one assumes the leadership mantle and dedicates the rest of his life to saving and helping his nation.</point> | ||
<point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – It is possible that many of the Jews of Shushan were similarly assimilated.  Like Mordechai, they had opted to remain in exile, and were perhaps quite comfortable in Persian society.</point> | <point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – It is possible that many of the Jews of Shushan were similarly assimilated.  Like Mordechai, they had opted to remain in exile, and were perhaps quite comfortable in Persian society.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b> – M. Eisenberg<fn>Michael Eisenberg, ככה יעשה ליהודי, (Ashkelon, 2016): 175-179.</fn> suggests that while the acculterated nation in Shushan were pleased with Mordechai, the religiously observant in Israel were not.  They viewed his rise to the heights of secular power as a tragedy as it all but ensured the further assimilation of the rest of Persian Jewry and left little hope that many would opt to return to Israel.<fn>For elaboration, see <a href="Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו</a></fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Message of the Megillah</b> – According to this approach, the Megillah is as much a story about a return to Hashem and one's roots as it is about salvation from physical destruction.</point> | <point><b>Message of the Megillah</b> – According to this approach, the Megillah is as much a story about a return to Hashem and one's roots as it is about salvation from physical destruction.</point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 04:08, 10 March 2017
Mordechai's Religious Identity
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
The vast majority of commentators assume that Mordechai was not only an observant Jew, but the spiritual leader of Persian Jewry. According to them, Mordechai maintained his piety while serving in a position of political power and also tried to ensure that Esther and the entire nation acted similarly. As such, the Megillah is the story of a righteous hero who helps to save his nation from both physical and spiritual destruction.
A small group of commentators, though, portray Mordechai in a less favorable light. R. Reggio depicts him as a layman who was not a particularly knowledgeable Jew and was willing to compromise his observance for personal gain. Accordingly, it was Esther, rather than Mordechai, who saved the nation, and Megillat Esther tells the tale of life in exile without proper leadership and of how Hashem never abandons His nation. R. Medan goes a step further in presenting Mordechai as a completely assimilated Jew who cared more for his personal honor than his nation. For him, the Megillah records the story of how Mordechai ultimately reconnected with his Jewish roots and conveys the enduring lesson that assimilation does not protect from anti-semitism.
Gadol HaDor (Spiritual Leader of the Generation)
Mordechai was a pious leader of the Jewish community of Persia, who was not only punctilious in his own religious observance but also attempted to aid his brethren in maintaining their faith.
- Rashi asserts that Mordechai thought that hiding Esther's identity would reduce her chances of becoming queen11 and help her avoid the difficulties that palace life would place on maintaining a Jewish lifestyle.
- According to Ibn Ezra, Mordechai felt that if Esther's religious affiliation was not publicly known, she would be better able to keep Hashem's commandments in the palace.12
- Critique of Mordechai – Bavli Megillah 16b19 explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah. R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.20
- Neutral statement – Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone. See Mordechai's Legacy – ורצוי לרב אחיו for elaboration.
Simple Jew
Mordechai was a layman. Though he was not assimilated, he was not particularly knowledgeable in matters of Jewish law.
Assimilated Persian
Mordechai was a secular Jew who was completely assimilated into Persian society and initially cared little about his nation.