Difference between revisions of "Mordechai's Religious Identity/2"
m |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<point><b>"וַיִּזְעַק זְעָקָה גְדוֹלָה וּמָרָה"</b> – The Septuagint, Second Targum, Esther Rabbah, and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer all presumably draw on this verse when they interpolate into the story of the Megillah a prayer of Mordechai for salvation.  They assume that the anguished cry of Mordechai was a cry and plea to Hashem.</point> | <point><b>"וַיִּזְעַק זְעָקָה גְדוֹלָה וּמָרָה"</b> – The Septuagint, Second Targum, Esther Rabbah, and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer all presumably draw on this verse when they interpolate into the story of the Megillah a prayer of Mordechai for salvation.  They assume that the anguished cry of Mordechai was a cry and plea to Hashem.</point> | ||
<point><b>Mordechai's name</b> – Mordechai's name seems to be related to that of the foreign god, Marduk, a strange choice for an observant Jew.  Bavli Chulin 139b distances itself from this possibility by suggesting that his name is a play on the words "מר דרור".</point> | <point><b>Mordechai's name</b> – Mordechai's name seems to be related to that of the foreign god, Marduk, a strange choice for an observant Jew.  Bavli Chulin 139b distances itself from this possibility by suggesting that his name is a play on the words "מר דרור".</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Why was Mordechai in exile?</b> According to <multilink><a href="BavliMenachot65a" data-aht="source">Bavli Menachot</a><a href="BavliMenachot65a" data-aht="source">Menachot 65a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, Mordechai is identical to Mordechai | + | <point><b>Why was Mordechai in exile?</b> According to <multilink><a href="BavliMenachot65a" data-aht="source">Bavli Menachot</a><a href="BavliMenachot65a" data-aht="source">Menachot 65a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, Mordechai is identical to Mordechai Bilshan, one of the early returnees to Israel with Zerubavel after the declaration of Cyrus (<a href="Ezra2-2" data-aht="source">Ezra 2:2</a>).  If so, he only subsequently returned to Persia, perhaps as an emissary to help and persuade the remaining Jews to make aliyah.</point> |
− | <point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – | + | <point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – Bavli Megillah and others following it assert that the nation sinned in participating in Achashverosh's party.  R. Saba even suggests that Esther's fast was intended to atone for the nation's eating at the party. He further asserts that all except Mordechai bowed down to Haman, and that Mordechai's refusal was a corrective act.</point> |
− | <point><b>Absence of Hashem in the Megillah</b> – According to <a href="RSaadiaGaonIntroductiontoEsther" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a>, the absence of Hashem's name does not connote a lack of religiosity, but might rather be an attempt to prevent desecration of Hashem's name.<fn>In his introduction to the Megillah, R. Saadia asserts that Esther and Mordechai knew that the scroll was going to be stored in the royal archives and if Hashem's name were to be mentioned, the Persians would have replaced it with the names of their gods. Esther and Mordechai, thus, decided to omit Hashem's name entirely.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>Absence of Hashem in the Megillah</b> – According to <a href="RSaadiaGaonIntroductiontoEsther" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a>, the absence of Hashem's name does not connote a lack of religiosity, but might rather be an attempt to prevent the desecration of Hashem's name, as the Megillah's story was to be recorded in the Persian royal annals.<fn>In his introduction to the Megillah, R. Saadia asserts that Esther and Mordechai knew that the scroll was going to be stored in the royal archives and if Hashem's name were to be mentioned, the Persians would have replaced it with the names of their gods. Esther and Mordechai, thus, decided to omit Hashem's name entirely.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Followed by Rashi.</fn> explains that Mordechai | + | <li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Followed by Rashi.</fn> explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah.  R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.<fn>See <a href="Mordechai's Refusal to Bow" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Refusal to Bow</a> for a discussion of whether Mordechai's decision was justified, according to R. Yosef' Kara's understanding of his motives.</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Neutral Statement </b>– | + | <li><b>Neutral Statement </b>– Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 21:11, 17 March 2016
Mordechai's Religious Identity
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
The vast majority of commentators assume that Mordechai was not only an observant Jew, but the spiritual leader of Persian Jewry. According to them, Mordechai maintained his piety while serving in a position of political power and also tried to ensure that Esther and the entire nation acted similarly. As such, the Megillah is the story of a righteous hero who helps to save his nation from both physical and spiritual destruction.
A small group of commentators, though, portray Mordechai in a less favorable light. R. Reggio depicts him as a layman who was not a particularly knowledgeable Jew and was willing to compromise his observance for personal gain. Accordingly, it was Esther, rather than Mordechai, who saved the nation, and Megillat Esther tells the tale of life in exile without proper leadership and of how Hashem never abandons His nation. R. Medan goes a step further in presenting Mordechai as a completely assimilated Jew who cared more for his personal honor than his nation. For him, the Megillah records the story of how Mordechai ultimately reconnected with his Jewish roots and conveys the enduring lesson that assimilation does not protect from anti-semitism.
Spiritual Leader (גדול הדור)
Mordechai was a pious leader of the Jewish community of Persia, who was not only punctilious in his own religious observance but also attempted to aid his brethren in maintaining their faith.
- Rashi asserts that Mordechai thought that hiding Esther's identity would reduce her chances of becoming queen11 and help her avoid the difficulties that palace life would place on maintaining a Jewish lifestyle.
- According to Ibn Ezra, Mordechai felt that if Esther's religious affiliation was not publicly known, she would be better able to keep Hashem's commandments in the palace.12
- Critique of Mordechai – Bavli Megillah 16b19 explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah. R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.20
- Neutral Statement – Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone.
Simple Jew (עם הארץ)
Mordechai was a layman. Though he was not assimilated, he was not particularly knowledgeable in matters of Jewish law.
Assimilated Persian
Mordechai was a secular Jew who was fully assimilated into Persian society and, at first, cared little for his nation.